Overview of the Jammu and Kashmir MLA Nomination Debate
In Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), the nomination of five MLAs to the legislative assembly has sparked significant debate. The core issue revolves around whether the Lieutenant Governor (LG) should nominate these members independently or based on the aid and advice of the council of ministers.
Background: State Reorganization and Assembly Composition
- In 2019, the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act bifurcated the former state into two Union Territories (UTs): J&K with a legislative assembly and Ladakh without one.
- The J&K assembly consists of 90 elected members and 5 nominated members.
- The nominated members include two women, two Kashmir migrants, and one displaced person from Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
Legal and Constitutional Context
- The Union Home Ministry stated that the LG can nominate members unilaterally without consulting the council of ministers.
- Petitioners argue the LG must act on the council of ministers' advice, citing democratic principles.
- The Indian Constitution mandates that nominations to the Rajya Sabha and state legislative councils occur on the aid and advice of the council of ministers (Articles 74 and related provisions).
- Previously, Anglo-Indian nominations to Parliament and assemblies were discontinued by the 104th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019.
Comparison with Other Union Territories
- Delhi: Governed by the Government of NCT of Delhi Act, 1991, with 70 elected members and no nominated members.
- Puducherry: Governed by the UT Act, 1963, with 30 elected and 3 nominated members. The LG nominates members unilaterally here, a practice upheld by courts.
Judicial Precedents
- Puducherry Case (K Lakshmi Narayan vs Union, 2018): Both Madras High Court and Supreme Court upheld the LG's unilateral nomination power.
- Delhi Case (NCT of Delhi vs Union of India, 2023): Introduced the concept of "triple chain of command" emphasizing democratic accountability:
- Civil servants accountable to ministers
- Ministers accountable to legislature
- Legislature accountable to the electorate
Democratic Concerns and Implications
- Unilateral nominations by the LG risk undermining democratic accountability and transparency.
- Ignoring the council of ministers' advice weakens elected representatives and the electorate's supreme authority.
- Such practices are undesirable in a stable democracy.
Recommendations and Way Forward
- The LG should nominate members based on the aid and advice of the council of ministers to uphold democratic norms.
- Laws governing nominations in J&K need to be clarified to remove ambiguity.
- The central government should honor its promise to restore J&K's statehood with a clear timeline, after which the governor will act on the council of ministers' advice, aligning with other states.
Summary
The nomination process of MLAs in Jammu and Kashmir remains contentious due to ambiguous laws and the unique status of the UT. Judicial precedents and constitutional principles favor nominations based on elected representatives' advice to maintain democratic accountability. Clear legislation and restoration of statehood are essential for resolving this issue.
Practice Question: Consider the following statements:
- The provision for nominating Anglo-Indian members to Parliament and state assemblies was discontinued through the 104th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019.
- One-sixth of the members of a state legislative council are nominated by the governor on the advice of the state council of ministers.
- The Government of NCT of Delhi Act, 1991 provides for up to three nominated members in the Delhi Legislative Assembly.
Select the correct answer:
- 1 only
- 2 only
- 1, 2 and 3
- 1 and 2 only
Please share your answers in the comments section.
In India's legislatores, not all members are elected. Some are nominated for their special contributions and
expertise. But the manner of this nomination has often been a subject of debate. Hello and welcome to Dishias. My
name is Aloney Nanduler and in this video we will discuss the recent debate on the nomination of MLAs to Jammu and
Kashmir and how will the LG nominate them. So there were petitions that were filed in Jammu Kashmir High Court which
said that the LG should nominate members based on the aid and advice of the council of ministers. He should take
recommendations from the council of ministers. But union ministry union home ministry in a response has released an
effid which says that LG can nominate five members without council of ministers advice. So the union home
ministry has said that LG can function unilaterally. does not need to take any recommendations from the state council
of ministers but the petitioners feel otherwise. So this is what the entire debate is all about. It's on the
procedure of the nomination of these people to the legislative assembly of Jammu and Kashmir. Now if we trace back
the root of the issue we go back to 2019 when by the state reorganization act of Jammu and Kashmir the stateood of JNK
was taken and two separate UTS were created UT of GNK and UT of Ladak.
So JNK has an assembly and UT of Ladak is without an assembly. [Music]
And in this assembly we have 90 elected members and five nominated members. So these five nominated members is where
our issue lies at the moment that how is the nomination of these members going to happen and even out of these five if we
quickly look at the breakup we have two women two Kashmir migrants
and one person who displaced from P or Pakistan occupied Kashmir. So we need to nominate LG needs to nominate
five members to the legislative assembly of Jammu and Kashmir but we are not sure of the procedure. Very recently in a
judgment of Supreme Court the abrogation of article 370 was upheld but the union government has promised to restore
statethood for Jammu and Kashmir and no timeline has been given. It has only said that this will happen the
restoration will happen soon. So this is a challenge as we do not know when this restoration of statehood is going to
happen because no timeline has been defined. And JNK is a special case in itself because before 2019 this was a
state and after 2019 it was downgraded to a UT one with an assembly and one without an assembly. So whenever we are
in such a tussle where we do not know what to do the source of truth lies in the Indian constitution.
So what do our constitutional provisions say about the nominated members? Constitution talks about nomination of
members to the Rajya Sabha and state legislative councils. Earlier there were Anglo Indians who were being nominated
to Lok Sabha also and the legislative assemblies also but that has been scrapped by the
104th constitutional amendment act. Now we have 12 members who are nominated to the
Rajya Sabha and in the states where we have state legislative councils 16th members
can be nominated to the state legislative councils. Now for Rajya Sabha who is responsible for the
nomination it is the president and our constitution explicitly calls out under article 74 that the president
will act on the aid and advice of the council of ministers. So this nomination will also happen on the aid and advice
of the council of ministers. For Raja Sabha it is the president and for the state legislative councils it is the
governor who again acts on the aid and advice of the state's council of ministers. So
president is acting on the aid and advice of the union council of ministers. Governor is acting on the aid
and advice of the state council of ministers. This is what our constitution talks about. But because Jammu Kashmir
is a special case. It was a state before. Right now it is a union territory and statehood is expected to
be restored soon. Anything that will happen in Jammu Kashmir's case will now set a precedent. So we do not know as to
what is going to happen right now because the laws are ambiguous. They are not clear. So in order to understand
what can happen with JNK, we can look at cases of UTS with a legislative assembly which are Delhi and Puducherry. So Delhi
is governed by the government of NCT of Delhi act 1991 and Puducherry is governed by the UT's act of 1963.
So these acts they define the elected members and nominated members for the legislative assembly of these UTS. So
for Delhi we have 70 elected members but no nominated members. So this act
does not have any provisions for the nomination of members to the legislative assembly of Delhi. So this right now is
not a relevant comparison for us. Versus Puducherry, it has a 30 plus three setup. 30 elected members, three
nominated members and these members will be nominated by the LG unilaterally which means that LG does not need to
take any advice from the state's council of ministers pardon me the UT's council of ministers. So LG is functioning
unilaterally and here Delhi we do not have any nominated members. So whatever happens in the case of Jammu Kashmir,
whatever judgment comes, it is going to set a precedent because this is a unique case as I already mentioned. So we are
in a hassle right now. We do not know what is going to happen. So whenever there is a situation where the
constitutional provisions say something and uh there is something else going on in the other UTS with assemblies, who do
we resort to? We go to the judiciary. So there are some key court judgments both in the case of Puducherry and Delhi. So
in Puducherry we have a case that's called K Lakshmi Narayan versus Union 2018 case it had it had gone to the high
court also in Supreme Court also and both the times it was said that LG can function unilaterally. As we already saw
that in Puduchari's case LG was functioning unilaterally and that was upheld by both Madras High Court as well
as the Supreme Court. There was only one thing that the Madras High Court additionally said that it suggested the
parliament to clarify the law because the law is ambiguous. So it suggested that the parliament clarifies the law
but Supreme Court scrapped this. It did away with the recommendation. It simply said that LG can function unilaterally.
Now in the case of NCT of Delhi versus Union of India 2023, this case originally came up because of
civil services bureaucracy issues. But an interesting concept came up which was the
triple command. Triple chain of command. Triple chain of command where we are
setting up democratic accountability across different levels like the civil servants.
Civil servants will be accountable to ministers. Ministers will be accountable to
legislature. And who will the legislature be accountable to? The electorate or the
people who have elected it. So this is the triple chain of command. This is the triple chain of command to
set up democratic accountability so that towards the end everybody is accountable to the people who have elected these
representatives. Civil services civil servants are accountable to ministers. Ministers are accountable to legislature
and legislature is accountable to the electorate. This is what we are supposed to follow. That is why there's this
contention that LG should function on the aid and advice of the council of ministers because these council of
ministers are elected representatives who have been chosen by the electorate who is the supreme power who this most
supreme power in the entire democracy. That is why we do not want the LG to function unilaterally and we do not want
it to do away with the recommendations of state council of ministers. Now what can be the issues
if LG nominates unilaterally? First our democratic accountability will be under threat.
Democratic accountability and transparency will be under threat and our elected authorities
will be weakened because now we are not listening to we are not taking into consideration the thoughts the opinion
of our elected authorities. which means we are undermining the value of the electorate the people which is the
supreme power of our democracy. So this is not something that a healthy democracy would want to do. A stable
democracy does not function like this. So this is not a desirable situation where the LG functions unilaterally and
the state's council of ministers are not taken into confidence or under consideration. So what should be our way
forward here? The way forward is that LG should function according to the aid and advice of the council of ministers.
There should be unambiguous laws. The laws must be defined. Right now there is a lot of ambiguity in the law. That is
why this matter is also subjudice. That is the reason that we do not know as to how JNK's function. The JNK's case is
going to function. So the laws they need to be unambiguous. There needs to be accountability and transparency in the
system and the center needs to honor its promise of statehood. Just like other states when uh JNK also becomes again a
fullyfledged state the governor will act on the aid and advice of the council of ministers. Right now because it is a UT
the entire dispute has come up. So the center must honor its obligation must honor its promise and the timeline of
soon should be defined. So that was all for today's video. I hope you enjoyed the discussion. Now let us practice a
question for prelims with reference to nominated members in Indian legislatores. Consider the
following statements. One, the provision for nominating Anglo-Indian members to parliament and state assemblies was
discontinued through the 104th constitutional amendment act 2019. Two, one sixth of the members of a state
legislative council are nominated by the governor on the advice of the state council of ministers. Three. The
government of NCT of Delhi Act 1991 provides for up to three nominated members in the Delhi Legislative
Assembly. Select the correct answer. One only, two only, 1 2 and three, one and two only. Please provide your answers in
the comment section and we will meet tomorrow with a new video. For more informative content, like,
share and subscribe and do not forget to press the bell icon to get the notifications.
Heads up!
This summary and transcript were automatically generated using AI with the Free YouTube Transcript Summary Tool by LunaNotes.
Generate a summary for freeRelated Summaries

Understanding Recent Constitutional Amendments in India
This video provides a comprehensive overview of recent constitutional amendments in India, focusing on key amendments such as the 101st, 103rd, 104th, 102nd, and 105th. It covers important aspects of the Indian Constitution, including the significance of the Preamble, the GST implementation, and the reservation for economically weaker sections.

Complete Guide to the Indian Constitution: Key Points and Insights
This comprehensive video covers the Indian Constitution in detail, including its formation, key articles, and significant amendments. Perfect for students preparing for exams, this guide emphasizes the importance of thorough knowledge and understanding of the Constitution.

UPSC 2013: Previous Year Questions and Explanations
This video discusses the previous year UPSC questions from 2013, focusing on various topics including Indian history, culture, and significant events. The session provides detailed explanations and answers to each question, helping aspirants understand the concepts better.

Comprehensive Summary of Current Affairs for Civil Services Exam Preparation
This video provides a detailed overview of essential current affairs for civil services exams, covering national and international topics, one-liners, expected questions, and significant events. It includes sections on appointments, awards, sports, and government schemes, making it a vital resource for aspirants preparing for various state PCS and UPSC exams.

Understanding Rent Revision Provisions under the Rajasthan Rent Control Act 2001
This video explains the provisions related to the revision of rent for existing and new tenancies under the Rajasthan Rent Control Act 2001. It covers how rent increases are determined and the implications for landlords and tenants.
Most Viewed Summaries

A Comprehensive Guide to Using Stable Diffusion Forge UI
Explore the Stable Diffusion Forge UI, customizable settings, models, and more to enhance your image generation experience.

Mastering Inpainting with Stable Diffusion: Fix Mistakes and Enhance Your Images
Learn to fix mistakes and enhance images with Stable Diffusion's inpainting features effectively.

How to Use ChatGPT to Summarize YouTube Videos Efficiently
Learn how to summarize YouTube videos with ChatGPT in just a few simple steps.

Pag-unawa sa Denotasyon at Konotasyon sa Filipino 4
Alamin ang kahulugan ng denotasyon at konotasyon sa Filipino 4 kasama ang mga halimbawa at pagsasanay.

Ultimate Guide to Installing Forge UI and Flowing with Flux Models
Learn how to install Forge UI and explore various Flux models efficiently in this detailed guide.