Understanding the Forces Driving the U.S. Towards War with Iran
Overview
This summary explores the key forces pushing the United States towards a potential conflict with Iran, including the influence of the Israel Lobby, the role of Saudi Arabia, and the implications of U.S. military doctrine. It also discusses the historical context and game theory analysis of military strategies and outcomes.
Key Forces Influencing U.S. Policy
-
Israel Lobby:
- Composed of Jewish and Christian Zionist interests.
- AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) is a major player with significant financial power.
- Christian Zionist groups like Christians United for Israel also exert influence. For a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play, see our summary on Analyzing the Iran-Israel Conflict: Current Developments and Implications.
-
U.S. Military and Economic Interests:
- The U.S. is described as "addicted to Empire," seeking financial gain through military engagements.
- Wall Street's influence on politics is significant, pushing for military actions that promise economic returns.
-
Saudi Arabia's Role:
- The primary conflict in the Middle East is framed as between Saudi Arabia and Iran, with Iran seen as a direct threat to Saudi existence.
- Saudi Arabia's interests align with those of Israel, further pushing the U.S. towards conflict.
The Trump Administration's Influence
- Donald Trump: Seen as a champion of these interests, with Jared Kushner and Nikki Haley playing pivotal roles in shaping policy. For insights into Trump's broader political strategies, refer to our summary on Donald Trump on Politics, Leadership, and the Future of the U.S..
- Actions taken during Trump's first term, such as withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal and moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, indicate a pro-war stance.
- The potential for a second Trump term raises concerns about escalating tensions with Iran.
Military Doctrine and Limitations
- The U.S. military's shift from traditional warfare principles to a doctrine of "shock and awe" has created a sense of hubris, leading to overconfidence in military capabilities.
- Recent military engagements, such as the inability to effectively counter Houthi attacks in the Red Sea, highlight limitations in U.S. military strategy.
Speculative Future Scenarios
- A hypothetical scenario is presented where Trump announces a full-scale invasion of Iran, citing reasons such as the need for democracy, nuclear threats, and protecting allies.
- The discussion emphasizes the potential pitfalls of such an invasion, including logistical challenges and the historical precedent of military overreach.
Historical and Game Theory Analysis
- Historical examples, such as the Athenian invasion of Sicily and the Vietnam War, illustrate the dangers of military hubris and the consequences of failing to adapt to battlefield realities. For a more comprehensive look at the historical context, see Understanding the Israel-Iran Conflict: Perspectives from Experts.
- Game theory analysis suggests that various actors (U.S., Iran, Israel, Saudi Arabia) have different motivations, complicating the potential outcomes of a conflict.
Conclusion
The likelihood of a U.S.-Iran war in the coming years is framed as a complex interplay of political, military, and historical factors. The analysis underscores the importance of understanding these dynamics to anticipate future developments in U.S. foreign policy and military engagements.
okay let's start class so um let us summarize and review where we are so far in the story so um there are three major
interest forces that are pushing the United States towards war with Iran um the first is the Israel
Lobby remember that the Israel Lobby is composed of both Jew Jewish interest as well as Christian interests right
representing the Jewish interest is something called APAC uh and they have a membership of
about a 100,000 but they're very wealthy there are many billionaires in this group so
this group has Financial power in fact APAC is considered the second most powerful lobbying organization in in the
United States the first is um the pensioners okay there's about 30 million of them um and their lobbying
organization is the most powerful but APAC is second but also in the Israel Lobby are the Christian Zionist right so
for example the organization uh Christians United for Israel has 7 million
people um in its membership so together the Christian Zionist and APAC um are extremely powerful force in government
and they want a war in the middle ease in order to advance Israel's interest also remember that America is
now addicted to Empire because Empire represents easy money all money has to be uh channeled through the
US and so there are many people in the US who just make make basically make their money by speculating on money okay
so for example Wall Street and that has made Wall Street extremely powerful uh right now in US
politics and the third um force is Saudi Arabia um remember that in our discussion of Saudi Arabia we learned
that the major conflict in the Middle East is actually not between Israel and Iran but between Saudi Arabia
and Iran for Israel Iran is a security threat because it it supports hasah and
Hamas but for Saudi Arabia um Iran represents a threat to its very existance okay so Saudi Arabia
must resolve the Iran problem soon right now how these three forces manifest themselves is uh through
Trump okay so basically Trump is their champion and privately um there's a man named Jared
Kushner who is Trump's son-in-law he's married to um Trump's fa daughter um Ivanka Trump okay and Char Jerry
Kushner happens to be very good friends with both Benjamin nanyu who is of Israel as well as
Muhammad bin Salon who was the leader of Saudi Arabia now uh Jer kushner's father tus Kushner was a very prominent uh
sponsor of APAC in fact when Benjamin Nan yahu comes to State United States he lives with the kushna family so one
night uh Benjamin natany had to stay in Jer crusher's bedroom and Jer kusher had to sleep in the in the uh basement okay
that's how close they are and Jared Kushner is friendly with MBS the leader of Saudi Arabia so friendly that when
Jer Kushner started a private Equity Fund Saudi Arabia invested two billion dollars okay so through jar Kushner uh
these three forces are able to exert influence on Trump as we also discussed it's very likely that Trump will become
president of the United States again um um in November and he will pick Nikki Haley as his
VP and that means that Nikki Hy will be the one in the Trump White House pushing for war against um Iran as we discussed
uh niiki heli makes most of her money from the um Israel Lobby okay the anti-iran
lobby we know from the first Trump Administration that these forces are able to exert tremendous influence on
Trump okay and the evidence is one Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal that would have secured peace between United
States and Iran okay Trump moved the United States Embassy from T aiv to Jerusalem in Israel which um was a
major um which caused major friction in the Middle East okay we also know that um Trump ignore the fact that NBS
killed a journalist okay so we also know that Trump um has been very friendly with
Saudi Arabia we also know that Trump sponsored the Abraham Accords which is trying to bring peace between Israel and
other Arab countries and unite them against Iran okay the last thing that Trump did which is the most important is
that in January 2020 Trump ordered the assassination of General Kasam salamani who who is the leader of the
Revolutionary sorry who is the leader of the Iranian Refuge guards okay so from all this we can
suspect that a second in a second Trump term uh war with Iran will be a major priority
so is this clear so far all right now we also discussed that okay even though there are there are these forces that
want war with Iran ultimately it is the US military that must implement this war and if the
US military refuses to go to war then the war can't happen so we discussed that unfortunately the US military is
very different from what it was 30 years ago okay 30 years ago the US military maintain very standard
military Doctrine okay they maintain three very important principles that all militaries must maintain in a time of
war the first is mass forces uh B is um avoid encirclement right and the third is protect supply
lines now the the important idea is that when you fight a war like this okay which is
traditional Warfare you must have the consent of the public okay because it is the public that sends soldiers that
provides money that gives you political support but in 2003 the US military changed its mil Doctrine to one of shock
and all okay and what shock and all means is that you don't have to follow these three
principles anymore you can use ear Supremacy um you you also have technological
omniscience and you also have special forces and this allows you to fight Wars cheaply quickly and decisively so that
you no longer need public political support for fighting Wars and as we also discussed this created the idea of
hubris in the American Military so the American Military because of the 2003 uh war in
Iraq are clothin that can win any War any place against any enemy we know that this Doctrine is
actually not true and we know because of something called operation Prosperity Guardian okay so um a few months ago The
Who which are a rebel group in in Yemen they started to attack ships in the Red Sea
okay um and a lot of trade goes through the Red Sea so the American Military dispatched a massive Naval Force against
the houthis were the Americans able to defeat the
houthis no they were not and so what the what what what are the Americans going to do about it
what can they do about the houthis what's what's the solution to this problem you have these Pirates
houthis going around and attacking these uh ships which is affecting um International Commerce and that's why
inflation is such a huge problem right now in the world so what are the what's American Military going to do about
this what can they do about this the answer is nothing okay the American Military has no solution why
because they don't have the forces necessary in order to undertake an operation against the houthis they have
special forces they have Air Supremacy they have technological omnicient satellites but they don't have infantry
they don't have lots and lots of ships therefore they cannot stop the houthis okay and what's willing point is that
Joe Biden has come out and said that yes we know we are losing the war in the Red Sea and yes we know that we cannot stop
the houthis but we are going to continue on this path okay does that make sense this is
the idea of hubris not knowing your limitations and when when you are faced with your
limitations you refuse to accept your limitations okay and that's why when the US military is given the order to invade
Iran they'll probably go along with it because they cannot imagine the possibility that they could be defeated
in Iran okay and then you have the Iran
revolutionary uh core okay the re rol guard and as we discussed last class they want war with the United States
because um they're very angry about us interference in Iran right so during the
Sha regime which was a brutal police state from 1953 and 19779 the Americans were the ones who
were backing this police state so there are many who are who are angry about this they're also um angry
about the fact that the US continues to protect protect Israel and Saudi Arabia okay and they're also angry about the
fact that that Trump killed J general salamini okay um and as we discussed it's possible that uh the rary guard
Corps killed last week the president of Iran Ibraham Ry in or because um he was preventing War okay so they want war
with the United States so you see the map right you you see the logic of this where there are power forces United
States pushing the United States towards War you have Trump who has basically agreed in its first term to raise or
increase escalation with Iran within the Trump White House there be Jared Kushner and Niki heli to push this war both
privately and publicly the US military um has so much huis that they
think they can win this war and Iran wants to provoke the United States into invading it okay United St Iran can have
many and for so Iran has many many um strategies in order to provoke the United States into war okay basically
United States is looking for a reason and Iran wants to give them a reason and that's why I think war between United
States and Iran is very likely in the next two to four years okay any questions so far are we
clear about where we are so far be before I I move on any questions okay so now let's talk
about the actual War so here most of this is speculation okay but um I'm using speculation in order to help us
better understand what a war would look like okay so let's pretend that it's March
2027 okay and Trump go on TV he announces operation Iranian Freedom a fullscale US invasion of Iran along with
Israel Saudi Arabia as its main Partners but United Kingdom UK will be involved Australia will be involved UAE will be
involved Poland will be involved okay so you have many countries attacking um Iran together and Trump
goes on TV and explains to the American public why the United States is fighting this war okay and this is what Trump
says first he says that for the past year there have been violent protests in Iran you have religious protests you
have political protests you have ethnic protests the Iranian people are sick of the Ayatollah they are sick of the
dictatorship they want democracy they want want freedom and response the reg guard are killing thousands of
protesters Iran is on the brink of Civil War therefore the United States has an obligation to
protect the people of Iran okay the people of Iran are praying for freedom and democracy in the United States the
world's greatest democracy must give them democracy okay so the first reason is free freedom and
democracy second us intelligence along with Israeli intelligence have discovered
that for the past two years Iran has been working very very hard on developing a nuclear bomb in fact Iran
is only one month away from having three nuclear bombs so that New York City San
Francisco and Los Angeles at Los Angeles could all be destroyed okay so to prevent this we
must strike first to stop Iran's nuclear program okay
third Iranian proxies the houthis hollah many groups have been disrupting shipping
in the Middle East in both the Red Sea and the sh of hus 40% of the world's oil passes
through that region mainly to East Asia China Japan South Korea our Global Prosperity is at stake
we must go to war to protect these shipping lanes and ensure that the oil goes to China Japan and South Korea so
that they can continue their economic Prosperity so the United States as the world hedgemon
has a responsibility to protect Global Prosperity okay
four Iran has been launching attacks against our allies Saudi Arabia and Israel hesah has been violent attacking
Israel killing dozens of Israelis in a and Israelis the huies have been attacking
Saudi Arabia oil fields damaging the economy we have an obligation to protect our allies our friends in the Middle
East okay and the last reason is we know for a fact that the Iranian ref guard Corp
is a sponsor of terrorism last week in a mall
there were gunmen who went and killed 107 people our intelligence says that it was most definitely an Iranian
operation okay so for these five reasons we have decided to invade Iran but don't
worry this Invasion will be successful because we have a lot of allies the
UK Israel Saudi Arabia our friends we part of this operation our special forces are already
in the country looking for their air bases and their missiles we can knock them out at
the beginning of the war also we have been in contact with Iranian opposition groups they want to overthrow the regime
and when we help them they will install democracy in the country our American Military is the greatest in the
world in 1991 our military defeated Saddam Hussein in 100 100 hours in 2003 our military defeated s
Hussein in only in less than three weeks to prove that we are the greatest in the world we will defeat Iran in only
two weeks so do not worry we will be strong in protecting
democracy freedom and Global Prosperity okay so that's what that's what Donald Trump will say to the people
of the United States okay and of course you're going to have large scale protests throughout the country opposing
this war but most people in the country will support this war okay all right so after this
speech the operation is launched and on TV we'll watch this on TV and the internet together on YouTube
together okay and we'll be so impressed by the power of the US military um this is
Iran this is the straight of humus Saudi Arabia um Israel is
here Red Sea is here Iraq is here okay so in the hus comes the USS Gerald art Ford it is a$1 13 billion super carrier
okay this thing is designed to destroy countries it is now Pro prowling the shus to ensure that
shipping is safe America establishes ear Supremacy very quickly okay meaning that it has
complete control over the skies nothing can move in the skies without America uh detection okay and then a massive
Invasion force is sent to Iran in the South 100,000 US troops land maybe 200,000
Saudi Arabia troops land okay maybe you have 300,000 to half a million troops in Iran and they are about to strike
Tan in the north okay so in the South the United States and its allies have established a foothold they have a huge
presence in the country and they're about to attack Tran okay all right do you understand what what has
happened okay now I want to ask you this question at this point I think the war has been
decided who has won the war America has established Air Supremacy it controls the
skies US Navy controls the Seas you have 100,000 US troops in country ready to stri
Tran the war has been decided who has won the war okay okay obviously this is a trick
question obviously Iran has won the war why why what's the problem with this plan
okay this is typical American Doctrine shocking all this is how they fight Wars but there's a problem with this plan
what is it why would the Iranians want this okay let's go back to traditional
military Doctrine okay in traditional military Doctrine you have three principles right Mass forces avoid
encirclement protect supply lines okay these are three three things you must absolutely obey if you are win to war
okay so using traditional mil military Doctrine explain to me why United States has lost the war right
now exactly first of all they're in circle okay do you know why because Iran are all mountains it's a
fortress okay meaning that to get these troops into the country you have to eardrop
them right but guys once they're in the country you can't get them out of the country you
understand okay so that's a first problem they've been in circle right what's the second
problem why not that's right and why else yeah that that that that's right
okay um so they failed to mass forces okay Iran is a population of 90 million people you will need at least 3 to four
million soldiers to even think about conquering the country they've got 100,000 in this country okay and as Jack
says you can't move tanks through Mountains they're not designed for Mountain Warfare what are you going to
do okay so they can't mask forces and they can't and they've been en circled and and what else is a
problem and this is the biggest problem exactly they cannot be resupplied okay they have no supply
lines for them to be resupplied airplanes have to drop ammunition food into the country but again Iran is all
mountains so it's very easy for Iranians to shoot down the airplanes does that make sense when you pass through
mountains you can't see what's on the ground a guy a random guy with a rocket launcher can just shoot down the
helicopter okay which is what the what the Afghans did against the Soviets in the Afghanistan war and that's why the
Soviets lost the war War a drone can take down any airplanes okay so in other
words these guys are trapped that you think they're soldiers but they're not what they really are
hostages okay does that make sense you have too many people in the country so you can't
get them out of the country but you don't have enough people to actually launch a strike against tan you can't
resupply them and they've been encircled by Iranian forces all right does that make
sense okay okay now the logic of having 100,000 US troops in the country is that once in the country all the resistance
to the regime will rise up and strike against tan the Iranian Army will mut will Mutiny against the country okay
that's the hope why do we think this won't happen why won't the Iranians revolt
against their government why don't they want to revolt that's right okay so Iranians
hate Americans okay remember that Iranians remember the Sha from 1953 until 1979 the shaw the American
supported Shaw was running a a brutal police state so brutal that everyone in Iran revolted against the regime okay
that's number one what what why else would the Iranians not support the Americans
why that's the first reason Iran has a bad history of America what else
guys which country's next door what happened in Iraq America destroyed Iraq right from
2003 in 2011 America was there destroying the country America said that it would bring freedom freedom democracy
it would bring Prosperity it would bring wealth but instead it just destroyed the country American soldiers were running
into houses every night pointing guns at children destroying homes and arresting men for no reason okay Iranians saw all
this on TV they heard about all this from Neighbors okay so they know that if America comes it's destroy the country
not to bring freedom democracy not to bring prosperity it's to destroy the country that's why they're going to
fight okay um and another reason is that
Iranians think that they belong to a great civilization so they value their freedom and Independence okay does that
make sense they're not going to submit to a foreign conqueror so
um why else would the Iranians resist okay also religion right the Iranians are Rel religious they believe
that um that s America is Satan and they have a duty a religious obligation to fight
Satan okay so for many reasons there's is no way that Iran people are going to stand with America you might have a
minority but most are are going to resist okay okay so does that make sense okay
any questions so far okay so uh that's a great question why would the Americans think that thean
people will rise up and the answer is that they need to justify The Invasion does that make sense they they
have to have a logical explanation for why this Invasion will succeed because one other the criticisms against them
will be like you need 4 million people to invade Iran they don't have 4 million soldiers they have at most one million
soldiers okay total throughout the world uh they have about 60,000 in the Middle East so they can't get a million
soldiers so their only explanation is okay well we're going to pretend that once we invade the people of Iran will
support us do you understand so it's not based on truth but but it's it's a explanation for why the The Invasion
will succeed does that make sense oh you know that's a great question okay
so that's their propaganda but do they actually believe this and the answer is um hubris okay they do believe this
because they have hubris and and again um it's hard because we're not in your position but once you're in that
position where you have access to nuclear weapons when you can kill anyone in the world when you can see everything
in the world um it makes you think you're God okay and we we we remember like last
semester we were reading the Greeks the Greeks believe the worst thing is hubris because it makes you think you're
God but you're not God and you're gonna get into a lot of trouble if you think you're God okay does that make sense
okay all right any more questions Okay so um Trump says that Iran is one month
from developing a nuclear bomb right America's been seeing this for the past 10 years okay you just Google this and
America's like oh Iran is only one month away from a nuclear bomb they've been saying this for the past 10 years so do
you understand when Trump gives a speech there's absolutely no evidence that any of this is true okay but this is how
he'll explain the invasion okay all right and chances are that even if
tan uh possess a nuclear bomb they won't use it why not that's right um the reality is that
there's only one way that America can win this war against Iran okay they can just nuke the country and America will
do that I if it has enough if it has a pre-ex okay so nuclear weapons is something that Iran is very afraid of
okay so does it make sense all right so this becomes so American soldiers are trapped in this
country okay so now the question then is wait a minute here why would America do something so stupid as send 100,000
soldiers into the country for no reason and get them trapped okay so that's a question
and what I want to do now is make you the argument that um there are two ways that we
can prove or provide evidence that this is true okay the first is historical analysis historical analysis means that
are there historical examples like this okay are there historical analogues if there are then this could be true okay
the second uh method is for Game Theory analysis why would the actors who are rational do something as stupid as trap
100,000 American soldiers in Iran all right so we'll first do historical analysis to find Historical analoges
examples s of similar similar to this and then we'll look at Game Theory to to try to reason out the motivation of the
actors okay so let's first look at Game Theory oh sorry sorry let's first look at historical analysis okay
so the year is 415 BC okay in Athens remember that we studied
faciiities the pelan war last semester okay so so we will now discuss the pelian war the war is four the year is
415 BC and for the past um 17 years Athens have been fighting a brutal war against Sparta okay it's a
stalemate and then for whatever reason um a man named alab alabes okay has a suggestion and his suggestion is
to win the war against Sparta let's go invade sisily and uh
Nas his opponent is like why the hell would we want to invade Sicily it's far way and
alabed by this is like well because it has a lot of money and if we invade the country we can take their money okay and
it turned out by making this argument the people of Athens really support this argument okay they because the reason
why is war was costing them a lot of money and they become addicted to the Easy Money of Empire okay so they wanted
to fight this war so nus has this great idea of how to convince people not to go to war
okay and what he says to the people is okay guys I know you want to fight this War I know I know you want to I know
that you think this war is a good idea but Sicily is a huge place it has a Navy therefore we need a massive
Expedition Force against Syracuse and Sicily okay we need at least 5,000 soldiers that's a lot okay because the
total Athan population is about 50,000 people okay 5,000 soldiers is a lot for Athens and we need about 100 ships and
the idea is nus is trying to scare people into not agreeing to not fight okay that's the idea the Athenians say
that's a great idea let's send a massive Force against Sicily and Syracuse so the war can be can be won just like that
okay shock and all so they so the problem though is that never before in his history has
Athens sent a large Expedition Force against another Power okay does that make sense when the Persians invaded
they were invading Athens Athens didn't go invade Persia so when you have S a massive
Expedition Force against another country what is your number one problem what is the thing that you must
resolve for the Athenians really think about it because he had actually no experience in fighting a foreign
war okay uh so yeah so the other the enemy knows the terrain better than you do okay but there's actually a much
bigger problem than that and it is what okay the biggest problem is resupply and this is something that the
aans didn't think about because they never thought they they never fought a war like this before okay so they sent
this huge Expedition against Sicily and Syracuse um which was a naval power were surprised because they were like why
would the Athenians want to invade us okay so for the first year the phans were
destroying uh the Syracuse Army and the Syracuse Army had to retreat back into their City okay and so the f is late
Siege to the city the Athenians Syracuse is here the Athenians are here and the Athenians
control the sea right okay so this situation is very similar to this situation okay do you
understand but then what happened was that the Athenians couldn't resupply themselves the reason why is Syracuse
had also had a navy and they could stop the aian Navy from resupplying the Athenian troops and
therefore the Athenian Army was wiped out in Sicily and this caus the Athenians to ultimately lose the war
against Sparta and it caused the Athenian Empire to collapse okay do you understand and
again historians have been trying to figure out for a long time why the Athenians would do such a stupid thing
as as as to send a huge Army against Syracuse because the risk of failure here was
catastrophic okay and the only answer is well the Athenians had hubis okay they never
really lost a war and they had become addicted to Empire which is the same situation
America finds itself in today okay does that make sense guys all right so this has happened before in
history when the Athenians invaded Sicily and lost to Syracuse their entire Army was wiped out in Syracuse okay
because they couldn't resupply their army does that make sense all right the second example we can look at is the
Vietnam War so in in the beginning of 1960 okay in the beginning of the decade most
Americans have never heard of a country called Vietnam okay most Americans didn't know
what it was didn't know where it was okay by the end of the decade in 1969 half a
million American soldiers were in the country destroying everything okay but also getting destroyed themselves
58,000 US soldiers died in Vietnam so the question then is how this happen why would this happen 1960
Vietnam was a distant country no one's ever heard of by by the end of the decade half a million US soldiers were
in country fighing this war against an enemy they really didn't know okay in 1971 um the Pentagon papers came
out and the Pentagon papers uh was a history of America's involvement in the Vietnam War dating back to 1950s okay
and it made three major points the first point is that American leadership military leadership
has been expanding the war in Vietnam without public knowledge okay this is what we call Mission
creep so maybe at first they sent some observers to the country then they sent some advisors then trainers then
soldiers okay so Mission creep slowly over time um things escalate and you don't
understand why things escalate but they do okay second point is that American
leadership from very early on knew the war was unwinable this was the greatest military
in the world they dropped more bombs in Vietnam in the 60s than all bombs were dropped in World
War II okay and they could not win the war the reason why is to win a war you have to
solve three problems okay okay the first problem is playar strategy
okay what are you trying to accomplish in this country what are your clear military
objectives okay second is you must adopt to the battlefield okay because all your best plans will
change over the course of battle okay so the the the adversary that is most willing to adapt to the battlefield will
win Okay the third thing is the will to fight so if you want to look at a war and who's most likely to win the war you
ask these three questions one does this guy have clear military objectives that everyone understands because that will
determine strategy okay second is is this guy a adapting to the battlefield the third is is this
guy um this does this guy still have the will to fight and if the answer is yes all three questions then the person will
most likely win the war okay and if you look at the Vietnam War even though America was killing a lot of
people it killed three million Vietnamese during the course of the war it was not destroying the enemy's will
to fight in fact it was making them angrier and therefore more people people willing to fight the
Americans okay so from a very so very early on the American political leadership knew the war could not be won
so then the question then is why did America stay in the war and the answer is
credibility okay credibility just means they didn't want to lose face they didn't want to be
laughed at by the Chinese and by the Soviets and by the Europeans okay but there's
actually another uh way to understand credibility and it's it's what we call the
sunk cost fallacy okay have you guys heard of the sunk cost
fallacy and the idea is never ever go into a casino the reason why is that when you go to the
casino you start losing money at some point you cannot leave the casino why not exactly you want to you want to
reclaim the money you've lost okay you've invested so much that you cannot leave you have to get that money back
and that's a problem with war eventually you've invested so much you cannot leave the war and that's what happened in
Vietnam America invested so much it can it didn't want to leave the war because it did not want to admit that all this
um has been lost okay it's what we call the sunk cause fallacy that's why even though America could not win
the war it still want to fight the war okay does that make sense okay so the Vietnam war is another
example okay that is similar to to this where America invests enough soldiers that it refuses to leave the
war and Aid defeat okay does that make sense guys all right now let's look at one more example and this is the uh most
recent example and it's the Russian Ukraine war now as you know in February 2022 Putin ordered uh a special military
operation against Ukraine okay and uh this is Ukraine and Russia attacked from three
axises okay the North to take K the capital you have the East to take dones and then you have the south from
from uh Crea to take the South okay and as we know uh the north fail okay the north attack failed and the Russians had
to turn back but the East and the South was successful okay now let's think about this you have an
extremely powerful military attacking your country the Ukraine if you were the Ukrainian president if
you were the Ukrainian military there's really only one way you can fight this war and when and what is it using
traditional military Doctrine what how much you fight this war you guys know let's go back to mass forces avoid
in circle men protect supply lines how much you fight this war there's only one way you you you can fight this war
excuse me how do you disrupt supply lines there's only one way you can fight
this war and win and what is it the the enemy is attacking you right so what what must you
do okay the answer is you must Retreat okay why the enem is attacking right so you
pull back your forces why would you do that what's the logic of
that exactly okay it's it's as simple okay you want to overextend your enemy Ukraine is a huge country right and and
Russia didn't send send that that that many soldiers maybe 160,000 that's not that many soldiers so if you just give
them space they're going to outrun the supply lines okay and then when they outrun their supply lines you can
encircle them and you can disrupt their supply and that's the only way you can win the war okay what did the ukrainians
do instead that's the only way to win this war but what did what did the ukrainians
do instead which made them lose the war yeah so the ukrainians refuse to give up give up space okay they refuse
to give up land they want to fight the Russians for every inch of territory and eventually because the
Russians had more forces Mass forces they were able to push push through okay so that's the first major mistake that
Ukraine made but then last summer Ukraine launched something called
a counter offensive right so once Russia was able to take space it it because and because Russia is a land Army it started
to De to develop um fortifications defenses okay mainly artillery that three lines of defenses and in the
summer offensive the Ukrainian military for whatever reason sent tens of thousands
hundreds of thousands of soldiers against the this artillery and the Russians blew every everyone up
okay now here's a question why are the ukrainians doing this they've lost the war now right they
have no more soldiers right now the average age of the Ukrainian Army is about it's over 40 years old they have
guys from their 60s and 70s fighting in the military they don't have enough manpower the war is
lost why would the ukrainians do do this first of all why would they fight for every inch of territory and why would
they launch a counter offensive against a superior enemy a superior enemy what's a
problem okay the first is the president zalinski the guy a TV actor okay which
means that he doesn't think strategy he just thinks what looks good on TV so for the first two years of the war
we're watching this on TV right it looked as though the ukrainians were going to win this
war right it I remember like two years ago people were saying that the ukrainians are going to march to Moscow
and overthrow Putin people are saying that okay and the reason why is that zilinski is is a master of Public Image
manipulation okay he was distorting reality for people through television the problem with that though
is it's not reality guys okay reality the reality on the ground is very different from TV okay so who else is
like zilinsky in this world Trump is exactly like uh zilinski okay do you understand Trump is also concerned about
what looks good on TV he's like I must look strong we must look as though we're
winning this war he doesn't really care about strategy okay so because of this it's very likely that he orders a land
invasion of Iran because it would look good on TV okay so the problem with zinsky is he cared about what looked
good as opposed to actually what actually worked okay but you also have other problems like you have
extremists in the Ukrainian military okay and guys uh these extremists they're Nazis they're
neo-nazis and so um the traditional understanding of Neo of Nazis are people who kill Jews okay but the Russians
don't understand Nazis that way because because remember Germany and and the Soviet Union fought fought this
War so the Russians understood Nazis to be enemies of Russia who want to kill Russians and there were many neo-nazis
in Ukraine they hate Russia they wanted to kill as many Russians as possible okay and they're they're the
ones who are pushing for as much War as possible okay so you have these extremists in the Ukrainian
military the last reason is NATO so it's an Open Secret that NATO is helping the Ukraine Ukrainian military
against Russia you have NATO military advisors devising strategy against Russia okay so it's most likely that the
summer offensive last uh last summer was a NATO plan and not a Ukrainian plan it's possible we also know that NATO
special forces are in the country directing missile strikes against Russian forces
okay which means what if if this is true and if um Ukraine loses the war meaning that
it doesn't have enough soldiers to continue to fight this war what will NATO
do yeah yeah I mean according to what happened to Vietnam War and uh the Athenians uh Expedition against Sicily
it is most ly that the most likely outcome will be that NATO sends its own troops against
Russia okay so macron of France have said that we are we want to send French soldiers and the British um prime
minister has said that he is considering conscription for British people okay which means that young British uh
citizens will be drafted into the army to fight Russia all right so these are three historical
examples that are very similar to what could happen in Iran okay does that make sense
guys all right any questions before I continue all right is this clear so far all
right now let's use another mode of analysis called game analysis okay and this is what I've been teaching you uh
this uh semester and the idea is that Society what happens in the real world is a game among human
beings okay so so and each person is trying to play this game as to optimize the outcome for that
person okay so the question then is why would the United States send 100,000 troops into Iran so let's look
at the individual motivations of the individual players okay so you have the United
States what does the United States want to do what what what what does it want to
do by by doing one and accomplishing one it wants to top of the regime in in
tran right and you can only do that for a ground Invasion okay okay so the United States is trying to topple
Iran but then you also have other actors okay so um Iran what does Iran want to
do what what does Iran want to do or the basically the Revolutionary G Corp what do they want to
do ex me they want to kill as many Americans as possible okay you understand they want to force an
American Landing Invasion okay so Iran wants to force a US invasion knowing that if the US invades it has to lose
the war okay it will lose the war because the re guard can just send suicide bombers against the United
States okay now let's look at Israel okay we know that the United States wants to top of Iran we know that
Iran wants to force a US invasion to defeat the the the Americans to humiliate the Americans and and um exact
revenge for what happened in the past okay what does Israel want to do what is is Israel's optimal outcome you guys
know if you're Israel what do you want to happen Okay so you you you want Iran
defeated okay and then what do you want to happen you want Iran defeated you want the prox defeated and then what
what do you want to happen do you want the United States to stay in the Middle
East what happens if United States what happens if United States and Iran both lose the war mean Iran is destroyed as a
country the United States is destroyed as a military presence in the Middle East what would
happen Israel becomes the top dog in the Middle East do you understand okay Israel can now control the entire Middle
East so the timal outcome for Israel is Iran and United States are both destroyed okay you understand how about
how about Saudi Arabia what is their optimal optimal outcome exactly the same as isual exactly okay
do you understand okay which will leave the Middle East to Saudi Arabia and Israel
but Israel is a far superior military than Saudi Arabia okay remember like it's very easy to blow up Saudi Arabia
they have oil fields okay not that hard not that easy to blow um Israel so Israel becomes a top dog you understand
game theory in other words all the major participants want an invasion of
Iran okay but they want different outcomes and Saudi Arabia in Israel most benefit if this situation happens where
you have 100,000 US troops in the country and they can't get out okay because it becomes some cost fallacy
United States can only Point more soldiers does that make sense all right so is this clear to you guys okay
you can either use historical analysis to get to this outcome but you can also use Game Theory to get to this
outcome any questions so far okay great okay so Seline asked the most pival question
okay the United States has nuclear weapons which is its ultimate trump card right so what what Trump can say to Tran
is like I have 100,000 troops in country you have to let them go or I will nuke you okay you understand Trump trump can
say that listen I'm Trump I'm Donald Trump I need to look strong I have 100,000 troops in the country I can't
get them out of the country so he says to Teran you either let them go okay you either gu guarantee him self safe
passage out of the country or I will nuke you right so that's what that that's
what will happen that is what Donald Trump will do once the situation arises the only way for Donald Trump to
say face is to threaten tan and says you either let my my guys go or I will nuke the entire
country right so how does Tran get out of this situation how do the Iranians protect
themselves against this possibility because as because you're absolutely right this is exactly what will happen
if this situation will arise Trump will respond with nuclear weapons or a threat of nuclear weapons so what must the
Iranians do to protect to protect themselves against this possibility who who can help the the
Iranians now Russia okay do you understand so before this war happens Iran and Russia
must come to an agreement where Putin says from the out from from the onset no one is allowed to use nuclear
weapons okay if Iran US US nuclear weapons I will nuke Iran if the United States use use nuclear weapons I will
nuke the United States if Israel use nuclear weap I will nuke Israel okay Putin if Putin says
that how will the world react if Putin says this you are not allowed to use nuclear weapons how will
the world react he's a hero right he saved Humanity but because he says this the
United States is now trapped okay you understand and so this becomes a black hole for the United States where
they can only send in more troops they can't get any troops out they can only send in more
troops what's a problem with this what's the problem sending more troops no there's there's actually a
huge problem with this idea of sending more troops what what is it okay you can't like no one wants to
go fight you understand the military cannot recruit soldiers all right but even if you if
you did have enough troops as Jack says you can't resupply them
why why can't you actually resupply your army why not there but there's a bigger problem
than the supply lines what is it what do you need to create bullets and ammunition America has no manufacturing
capacity because America moved all its manufa capacity to China okay remember this so for every one ship that America
can build China can build 232 ships that's what the Pentagon says can do you
understand so if this were to were if this war were to happen there's absolutely no way America
can win this war it's just completely trapped inside Iran and once it becomes trapped some cost fallacy comes into
play and America just puts in all its resources into the country but it's a black hole okay they cannot use nuclear
weapons because Putin I said from the from the onset you are not allowed to use nuclear weapons
right but now the question then is why would Putin do that right why would Putin involve himself in this war and
that's what we'll discuss next class all right how Putin sees this war and how Putin will react in this war okay but um
before we end are there any questions about any of this does this make sense to you guys is this
clear any questions oh that's a great question yeah um so the the problem with Iraq is that Iraq
is an independent country you understand there are 10,000 American soldiers in Iraq
um so you would need you would need their their permission even if you had their permission there's a problem
problem here because there are lots of Shia militia men in Iraq who are loyal to Iraq okay and they would see the
American Invasion Force as something as opportunity to attack the Americans okay because they're still anger about the
Americans for what happened in Iraq but even if they could have a staging area in Iraq they still they still have to
deal with mountains okay do you understand all right I mean the problem is you have 100,000 troops in the
country you have to get out of the country okay and it's very hard to get get them out of the country if you go
through the mountains you're going to get this you're going to get ambush in the mountains if you go through the ear
th those drones are going to strike you down that's that's the issue okay right does that make sense okay any
more questions okay great so uh on Friday we'll talk about Putin okay
Heads up!
This summary and transcript were automatically generated using AI with the Free YouTube Transcript Summary Tool by LunaNotes.
Generate a summary for freeRelated Summaries

Analyzing the Iran-Israel Conflict: Current Developments and Implications
In this video, experts discuss the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel, focusing on Israel's military strategies, the potential for U.S. involvement, and the geopolitical implications of the situation. They analyze the effectiveness of Israeli operations, the response from Iran, and the role of major powers like Russia and China in the unfolding crisis.

Understanding the Israel-Iran Conflict: Perspectives from Experts
This video features a discussion between two prominent professors, John Mearsheimer and Yoram Hazani, who present contrasting views on the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict. Mearsheimer critiques Israel's military strategy and its implications for U.S. involvement, while Hazani defends Israel's actions as necessary for national security. The dialogue explores the complexities of international relations, national interests, and the potential consequences of military actions.

Understanding the US-China Relations: Insights from Nelson Wong
In this insightful discussion, political analyst Nelson Wong shares his perspectives on the evolving dynamics between the United States and China, particularly in light of recent tariff wars and geopolitical strategies. He emphasizes China's preparedness for economic competition and the implications of US policies on global trade.

Impact of Donald Trump's 2024 Presidential Win on Indian Economy, Jobs, and Trade
Explore how Trump's win in 2024 will shape India's economy, jobs, and trade relations.

Donald Trump on Politics, Leadership, and the Future of the U.S.
In this deep dive, Trump shares insights on politics, leadership, and the pressing issues facing America today.
Most Viewed Summaries

Mastering Inpainting with Stable Diffusion: Fix Mistakes and Enhance Your Images
Learn to fix mistakes and enhance images with Stable Diffusion's inpainting features effectively.

A Comprehensive Guide to Using Stable Diffusion Forge UI
Explore the Stable Diffusion Forge UI, customizable settings, models, and more to enhance your image generation experience.

How to Use ChatGPT to Summarize YouTube Videos Efficiently
Learn how to summarize YouTube videos with ChatGPT in just a few simple steps.

Ultimate Guide to Installing Forge UI and Flowing with Flux Models
Learn how to install Forge UI and explore various Flux models efficiently in this detailed guide.

How to Install and Configure Forge: A New Stable Diffusion Web UI
Learn to install and configure the new Forge web UI for Stable Diffusion, with tips on models and settings.