The Medical Mafia: How Big Pharma Took Over Healthcare, Exposed

My name is Gee, G H I S. I used to call myself G lane long to I was uh a medical doctor for 25

years until uh I found out what the medical system was all about uh a and I wrote a book entitled The Medical Mafia.

The medical system is sick everywhere. It doesn't work. Everybody's unhappy with it. Uh the patients are unhappy,

the the government is unhappy. It's too expensive. Uh the doctors, physicians are unhappy, everybody's unhappy with

the system, but it still goes on. So why does it still go on? Somebody must be happy with it. And yes, big money, big

pharma is happy with the system. And should it be then that they control it? Yes, they control it from A to Z. You

have to know that medical schools, all the media, even the medical journals, the uh the newspapers, the television,

radio are totally controlled by big money. At the beginning of the previous century, the early 19s

um the alternative medicine, natural medicine was um the most important one. uh there was uh doctors were practicing

were touching the patients were questioning the patients were healing them with herbs with all sorts of

natural stuff. Um and all this disappeared when with the flexner report [Music]

In 1907, the AMA, American Medical Association, involved the Cariegi Foundation in elaborating a booklength

study of medical education in the United States and Canada, also known as the Cariegi Foundation, Bulletin number

four. [Music] The author Abraham Flexner was an

ambitious educator, neither a physician nor a medical scientist, but the brother of Simon Flexner, employed by the

Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. Later on, Abraham Flexner became the first director of the

Rockefeller Philanthropy Programs in Medical Education. Andrew Cariegi was regarded as the

second richest man in history after John D. Rockefeller. While Cariegi played a

leading role in the American steel industry and education, Rockefeller was interested in

oil industry and medical research. Abraham Flexner's report was published in 1910 and the purpose was to

improve the quality of medical service by establishing professional medical education based on mainstream scientific

principles. But what was accepted as science in the early 20th century? The theory of materialism rising in the 17th

century holds that the only existing thing is matter. Everything is composed of material and all phenomena including

consciousness, human soul and spirit are the results of material interactions. In other words, matter is the only

substance. Scientific materialism, physicalism, became the philosophical position of the early 20th century. The

main statement of physicalism is that there are no kinds of things other than physical things.

[Music] When a hypothesis is repeated long enough, it often becomes a fundamental

rule of life. It is assumed to be [Music] true. Before the Flexner report was

released, twice as many physicians practiced alternative medicine than conventional alopathic medicine, and

medical knowledge was taught in small private schools all over the USA. The report changed everything and backed by

the police power of each American state, medical schools were obliged to follow the trend set by the Cariegi

Foundation. The human body belongs to the animal world. It is put together of tissues and organs. It grows, reproduces

itself, decays according to general laws. It is liable to attack hostile physical and biological agencies. Herbs,

homeopathy, chiropractic and massage were demoted as crackery. Small medical schools were either closed or merged

into universities financially supported by industrial companies. In less than 10 years, the

number of medical schools dropped from 650 to 50. The number of medical students decreased from

7,500 to 2,500 as they were unable to afford the high education fees. The report included

a detailed regulation of medical education and pharmarmacology as the only solution against dreadful diseases.

According to the present-day consequences of the report, no medical school can be created without the

permission of government and medical research adheres fully to the protocols of scientific research. Of the 1910s,

materialism, medication, and vaccination. Supply of physicians were restricted. Incomes of the remaining

practitioners raised and conventional medical schools began to be centralized. In

1997, the WH obtained full control over medicine as the validity of the Flexner report was extended

worldwide. And what was the long-term result of reforming the medical education and

practice? Hardly any news in the [Music] media. According to the 2003 medical

report, Death by Medicine, 783, 936 people in the United States die every year from conventional medical

mistakes. This is 16,400% of the victims of September the 11th,

2001. Equivalent of six jumbo jet crashes a day for an entire year. [Music]

106,000 of the nearly 800,000 cases are from prescription drugs. The United States spends $282 billion annually on

deaths due to medical mistakes or iatrogenic deaths. According to a 1995 US iatrogenic report, the annual

automobile accident mortality rate is 45,000. On the other hand, annually over a million patients get injured in

hospitals and 280,000 of these cases result in death. In 2004, the USA spent $1.4 4

trillion 15.5% of the GDP on healthcare. More than onethird was paid to the pharmaceutical industry.

[Music] After 100 years, we must raise the question, what went wrong? Despite the

huge amount of money accumulated in the pharmaceutical industry, there are more dreadful diseases and sick people today

than ever. You will find the answers in the Flexner report, a documentation that created and

enabled the terms of a centralized medical system and farmer industry to take over

[Music] control. I will tell you about my experience, my

my personal experience as a doctor. When I was in medical school, I didn't know all of this I'm telling you today. Um,

and I thought that medicine was the state of the art. I was so convinced and I I was in medical school

in the 60 1965 from 60 to 65 66 um I was convinced that by the end of

the century there would be no more disease. So I really believed in

medicine when I came out. I practiced medicine. I was in specialty but I practiced medicine but

slowly I started seeing things that did not make sense. So I questioned. You see we have

to question what we see. If it does not make sense, stop doing it. Stop

believing it. You see people, they get chemotherapy, there's they get so sick with the

treatment. I mean, question it. Go and see what's beyond it. What's beyond chemotherapy?

Poisons. How can you help people with poisons? When you give chemotherapy drugs to a

healthy person, what's going to happen to them? It's going to make them sick. It's

a very toxic poison. It destroys and damages a lot of cells in your body. So, how do we think then that we can give

those same toxic poisonous drugs that would make a healthy person sick, give them to a sick person and make them

healthy? That doesn't make any sense at all. 400 years ago, doctors attempted to

treat cancer with heavy metals. Those experiments were unsuccessful and finally ended up in the toxication of

the patients. Today, there are three common ways to treat cancer symptoms. Surgery, radiation, and

chemotherapy. Chemotherapy refers to cytotoxic agents applied as cancer treatment. Many drugs are found

accidentally, and it is said it was the same with cytotoxic agents. In World War I, nitrogen mustard was

used as a biochemical weapon and it was observed that soldiers being exposed to the gas developed lucopenia and lymphoid

suppression. According to documents of the University of Iowa, nitrogen mustard is a chemotherapeutic agent still in use

even though there is absolutely no scientific evidence for its ability to extend in any appreciable way the lives

of patients suffering from cancer. The theory behind applying cytotoxic agents, toxic materials that interfere

with the life cycle of cells to fight cancer, is that chemo indiscriminately kills rapidly dividing cells, both

cancerous and normal. Beside cancer cells, the most rapidly dividing cells are stem cells, gameamt, bone marrow,

hair follicles, mucosa of the mouth, and gastrointestinal tract. This explains the reason why many people undertaking

chemotherapy lose their hair, become infertile, or get mouth and throat sores. The mortality rate of patients

treated with chemo is 96%. Conventional medicine has many hypotheses about the causes of cancer.

None of them have been proved and all of them are limited to the mainstream trend of science

materialism excluding the human soul. Chemotherapy is a treatment of symptoms and patients are dying of it or

suffering from its severe side effects. Chemotherrapeutic agents applied to treat cancer are declared as hazardous

material, handled with extreme precaution, yet become the only cure for cancer when given to people as

[Music] medicine. It's the same thing with vaccines. You make healthy people, you

make them sick. How can how can you believe such a thing? In the 1800s, society sanctioned both approaches to

healing. Patients had a choice of using either doctors called alopaths or natural healers called empirics or

homeopaths. The two groups waged a bitter philosophical debate. The alopathic doctors called

their approach heroic medicine. They believed the physician must aggressively drive disease from the body. They based

their practice on what they considered scientific theory. The alopaths used three main techniques.

They bled the body to drain out the bad humors. They gave huge doses of toxic minerals like mercury and lead to

displace the original disease. They also used surgery. But it was a brutal procedure before anesthesia and

infection control. Few patients were willing to have surgery. Most patients feared alopathic methods altogether.

Satist of the day remarked that with alopathic treatment, the patient died of the

cure. Competing with the doctors were the empiric healers. Contrary to the doctors, they believed in stimulating

the body's own defenses to heal itself. Instead of poisonous minerals, they used vegetable products and non-toxic

substances in small quantities. They especially favored herbs learned from Native American and old European

traditions. The empiric said they based their remedies not on theory but on

observation and experience. Satists of the day added that with empiric treatment the patient died of the

disease not the cure. In the 1800s doctors tried to stop the popular empirics from collecting their fees by

denouncing them as quacks. Economic competition from the empiric healers caused the doctors to found the American

Medical Association. But the AMA was a small trade association without political clout and

the balance of medical power remained equal until the turn of the century. Then new medical treatments emerged that

were potentially very profitable. Promoting these methods, the AMA joined with strong financial forces

to transform medicine into an industry. The fortunes of Carnegie, Morgan, and Rockefeller financed surgery, radiation,

and synthetic drugs. They were to become the economic foundations of the new medical economy. Ironically, John D.

Rockefeller himself used only an empiric homeopath while investing in alpathic medicine. Surgery became viable with

anesthesia and infection control, and doctors advocated expensive radical operations. These in turn produced the

need for a large lucrative hospital system. The alopaths also discovered a new toxic mineral,

radium. Radium fever swept medicine. The price of radium rose 1,000% almost overnight. Another costly technological

industry entered the hospital system. A drug industry grew out of the booming patent medicine business.

Ironically, many of the new synthetic drugs came from plants and empiric remedies. Drug company ads boosted the

revenues of the AMA journal 500% in 10 years. The doctors changed educational standards and licensing regulations to

exclude the empirics. Soon only AMA approved doctors could legally practice medicine. In a

brief 20 years, the AMA came to dominate medical practice. Organized medicine launched a media campaign to associate

the empirics with quacks. The code word for competition was quackery. By the 1940s, its quack files had swelled to

include 300,000 names. The Fitzgerald report to Congress named at least a dozen other promising

cancer treatments seemingly blocked by organized medicine. Their proponents were mostly doctors and scientists of

high reputation. The treatments were immunological or nutritional. Dismissing them as quackery were panels of surgeons

and radiation therapists. The congressional report emphasized two outstanding cases of alleged

suppression. Harry Hawky and Dr. Andrew C. Ivy. If Hawky fit the image of a quack, Dr. Ivy certainly did not. The

similarity of Dr. Iivey's charges to those of Hawky was unmistakable. a failed attempt by an AMA official to buy

his formulas, followed by blackballing and a refusal to test the therapy. The Fitzgerald report to Congress described

a menacing pattern. Fitzgerald concluded in his report, quote, "Behind this is the

weirdest conglomeration of corrupt motives, intrigue, selfishness, jealousy, obstruction, and conspiracy

that I have ever seen." Despite its shocking conclusions, the Fitzgerald report slipped quietly into the appendix

of the congressional record. With Dr. Ivy's death, Kbiasin would vanish untested. At the height of the McCarthy

era, a dozen other promising treatments would be banned without investigation. Hello, my name is Bert Sealman. I'm 62

years old and I've been working for over 37 years in the natural health and human performance field. I've worked with many

different types of people, all types of diseases, from the least to the worst, and seen many miraculous things happen

according to what most people would actually say are not possible at all. I want to talk to you about our misguided

perceptions of the medical field and the truth behind what doctors are practicing and what they are not practicing.

They're not talking about the health that we think of today. They were at one time, but today this has been lost. I'm

talking about the health that comes from total restoration. Realizing that every four days, we have a new stomach lining.

Every 28 days, we build a new layer of skin. Every 16 to 18 months, our body is brand new to every cell. Think about how

what we put in our mouths can change who we become as this time period changes. If we're going to eat ho hos and

ding-dongs, we're obviously going to become ho hos and ding-dongs. What I'm talking about today is intent. What is

the truth behind what people really are doing and what they have sworn an oath to do and what they are not doing. What

I'm talking about today is not just the standard of care for doctors, but about the ignorance of people who think that

all of these practitioners are about this person's health who walks in the door. This is not true. What I'm going

to show you today, I have talked with many attorneys on. I'm about to show you that by law, most doctors and physicians

today are not practicing according to their oath and that they are doing things that are not only against their

oath, but are actually crimes against humanity. I'm talking heinous, cruel, and unusual things that should not be

done. Do not take me wrong. I'm saying that there are many doctors out there who wish to make things right for

people, who have the right intent, but there are also more professionals out there who are not doing what they

actually swore an oath to do. So, I want you to consider the things I'm about to show you. You all know that they took

what's called the hypocratic oath. Hypocrates said many years ago, "Let thy food be medicine, and thy medicine be

thy food." Yes, we can change who we are. No matter whether it's cancer or hepatitis C or HIV, these things can all

be arrested. They can all be stopped and they can all be reversed because our body is a renewable resource. Yes, a new

stomach lining every 4 days, a new layer of skin every 28, and that's right, a new body every 16 to 18 months. I've

seen it happen. I want you to know today what the truth says. I'm first going to talk to you and show you the original

hypocratic oath that was used up until 1964 and it was translated from the Greek. And for time's sake, I'm going to

cut right to the chase. The old classical oath of the hippo hypocratic oath for doctors said in the third

paragraph, I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment. I

will keep them from harm and injustice. Please note, I will apply dietetic measures. Where does your doctor today

able to tell you or where has he practice with you finding out what you're eating, how to prevent the

diseases from happening? You go to this man for a cure, but yet he doesn't tell you anything on how to prevent it. Could

it be because it makes him money? Or more importantly, could it be because a big pharma taught him how to practice

medicine and maybe he was duped? I want you to look at the next paragraph. I will neither give a deadly drug to

anyone who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Notice that they have sworn an oath that they will

help you with dietetic measures and that they will help you to get well, that they will not even suggest a drug or

anything that can cause harm. Yet pharmaceuticals all have more side effects and the risk of greater problems

than the things that they actually work with. We all know that when it comes to pharmaceuticals, there is no such thing

as a cure. Your body has not been restored with what has broken down. The pharmaceutical products that you see

today only eliminate the symptom. They only eliminate the symptom and mask the severity of the problem that you have.

They do not do anything to restore. You will notice in every case when a person starts on a medication that as time

progresses they need more and more medications eventually the side effects are so great and the symptoms become so

numerous that you cannot determine which one has originated from the other. I want you to show yourself by going out

and finding this old original hypocratic oath what it says in the third and fourth paragraphs. Now I want you to

look at the new hypocratic oath. The new hypocratic oath has many changes. I want to bring up a point. It was changed in

1964 by a man named Luis Lasagna at Tus University. Mr. Lasagna also became one of the heads of the Food and Drug

Administration after being in the American Medical Association. Could this be due to their certain influences and

pressures for money or for position or for power? I want you to notice something that it says very carefully.

It says in the fourth paragraph, I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science. That warmth,

sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife and the chemist drug. You'll notice that the chemist

drug has now been put in. Where did this come from? And why could this have been something from big pharma? Look at the

next paragraph. I will not be ashamed to say I know not. Nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of

another are needed for a patient's recovery. Recovery or recovery for him to do another service that could cost

you something more. I want you to look farther into this. It says that I will respect my the privacy of my patients

for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. But please follow. Most especially must I tread

with care in matters of life and death. If it is given to me to save a life all thanks. Well, of course, we would all be

wonderful people, and we would want to help people and save a life. But notice what

continues. But it may also be within my power to take a life. Whoa. Within my power to take a life. You're going to a

man and you're going to sign a release and he has the power to take your life. I want you to think about this. This

awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. What? He's afraid that

someone come back and kill him or maybe take his life. But the next point is absolutely ludicrous. It is absolutely

insanity. Above all, I must not play it God. He can give a life or he can take it. And he's not playing God. This is

hypocrisy in itself. But go on. It goes down further to say I will prevent disease whenever I can for prevention is

preferable to cure. Now I want to ask you cancer cannot be cured until you go back and help the self-cleing mechanism

of the cell. We've done this with too many people. I've seen it done with many healthc care

practitioners. There is an actual restoration that can happen with your body because it is a renewable resource.

But where are they talking about prevention? There is no prevention. In fact, big pharma has gone on TV today to

actually sell you the drug so that you go to your doctor after hearing it on the TV and demand that you get it. But

do you know the long-term side effects? Remember, once you start on a pharmaceutical, it is only masking or

stopping the actual symptom. The disease itself is progressing. Shouldn't we go back and restore the body from whence it

came? Shouldn't we go back to nutrition and start to do what we need to do? If you always do what you've always done,

you always get what you've always gotten. I want you to notice they say, "I will prevent disease." This is an

oath, a solemn vow. By law, they are breaking their own oath. This is a crime against humanity. I say that such people

who commit these crimes should be charged with crimes against humanity. I believe that these people are nothing

more than modern paid terrorists who have licensed themselves and their organizations to put them above what we

know as common sense. I'm asking you to consider these things that these doctors do. By their own admission, they are not

doing what they have sworn to do. The old oath, as it says here, I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the

sick. I will neither give a deadly drug to anyone who asks for it, nor will I suggest this effect, make a suggestion

to this effect. Excuse me, please. Who is the hypocrite here? But more importantly, who's stupid? We see

healing done all the time through many health care practitioners. I say take your health into your own hands. That

going to a doctor is the big possibility for you actually signing your life away. Is it about your health or is it about

his money? I want you to stop and look at these things. Your health is important and so are your loved ones.

Thank you.