Download Subtitles for 1 Gen-Z Liberal vs 20 Gen-Z Conservatives Video
1 Gen-Z Liberal vs 20 Gen-Z Conservatives (ft. Adam Mockler) | Surrounded
Jubilee
SRT - Most compatible format for video players (VLC, media players, video editors)
VTT - Web Video Text Tracks for HTML5 video and browsers
TXT - Plain text with timestamps for easy reading and editing
Scroll to view all subtitles
Now you're saying he's the most corrupt
president in US history. To me it sounds
like fascist, most corrupt in history,
who's escaped the law because of his
political influence or something. Why
don't you want Donald Trump dead? What
do you think is radicalizing more
people, Nick Fuentes or MSNBC?
>> Probably MSNBC.
>> Really? More so than Nick Fuentes. I
hear someone laughing behind me. That's
kind of when immigrants move into the
country, they are a net benefit. Can you
site a study of the opposite?
>> I can site theory. I can site.
>> You ask me for a study and you can't
site one because the barriers are
increased. What what are the barriers?
The only barrier we talked about is work
requirements, and that's working 20
hours a week.
>> You got me. That was a good one. That
was really good. Thank you.
>> You got me.
>> My name is Adam Mockler. I talk politics
on YouTube every single day, and I am a
liberal college dropout. Today, I'm
surrounded by 20 conservative college
[music] students.
My first claim is Trump is causing a
rise of fascism in our generation.
Hey, Adam. I'm Scotty. Nice to meet you.
>> Nice to meet you, Scotty.
>> Hey, would you mind unpacking a little
bit more what you mean by rise?
>> The rise of fascism. Yeah. Over the past
decade, we've seen a normalization of
more fascist anti-democratic ideologies.
Just to explain, Trump's claim to fame
entering US politics. He was famous
before this, but he entered US politics
by saying Obama wasn't born in America.
He convinced a large swath of the
country that Obama was not born in
America. Four years later, he was
chanting, "Lock her up," at a political
rally, and no presidential candidate had
done that before. Four years after that,
he had couped the government, or at
least attempted to coup the government.
And now, I I live in the city of
Chicago. He's posted AI memes of Chicago
being invaded. He sent the military into
Chicago. So, over the past, they could
say, decade, decade and a half, we've
seen a normalization of fascism in
America. And I think it's manifesting in
our generation in unique ways. We could
talk about the Politico story, but Yeah.
>> Yeah. No, I would say let's let's talk a
little bit more about what fascism
actually is because I think fascism is a
loaded term.
>> What's your definition?
>> Before I get there, what I would say
when you attach fascism to Trump's name,
that is a slap in the face to all the
Jews who were exterminated under fascist
law.
>> Fascism doesn't just have to do with
Jews. Donald Trump is out.
>> It was Hitler. When you think of
fascism, you think of two people. You
think of Hitler and you think of
Mousolini who killed millions and
millions of people. Trump is not that.
>> What's your definition of fascism?
>> I would say fascism is a one person or
one party who is silencing and who is
demeaning and who is I guess you would
say, you know, opposing and silencing
any other opposition.
>> It's it's kind of right. I
>> nuance to that. I'd say a a better
definition is a far-right authoritarian
ideology with one leader at the top with
a cult of personality who forcibly
suppresses opposition as you said, but
at the same time he erodess democratic
norms and there is hypermilitarization
involved military in the streets. Do you
agree disagree with any of that?
>> I agree with you that Trump
which one of those descriptions does not
describe Trump those terms. I would say
that Trump
>> I guess you say what are his motives
behind doing this you're asking me
you're saying these things no
>> you were pressing me on the definition
of fascism so I gave you a few qualities
which of those qualities does not
describe Trump
>> say those qualities one more time
>> it is a far-right authoritarian ideology
with one leader at the top who is a cult
of personality he forcibly suppresses
opposition they like hypermilitarization
>> I disagree with forcibly doing that tell
me give me an example right now about
forcibly
>> you know a really good example is lately
Jimmy Kimmel was taken off air by the
FCC because the FCC
>> I knew we were going to go here with
Jimmy Kim.
>> Wait, listen. No, no.
>> Did you hear you know who the FCC
commissioner is?
>> Yes. Okay. Who is it?
>> No, I actually don't know exactly who
this is, but I know what
>> it is. Brendan Carr. So, if you don't
know who it is, then you might not know
that Brendan Carr said in an interview,
we can do this the easy way or we can do
this the hard way. It was essentially a
mobster threat. Other than that, Donald
Trump has attacked law firms. He has
attacked universities. Jimmy Kimmel
might not be the best example because
he's a late night show host, but it is a
glaring example. So, right, I would
disagree with you. And what do you mean
by like forcibly? Right? Because you're
attaching fascism to Trump. Right? We
attach fascism. We attach that to Hitler
and Mousolini. Jimmy Kimmel, him taking
Jimmy Kim, he didn't have anything
direct to do with taking Jimmy Kimmel
off of air. The reason why Jimmy Kimmel
got taken off of air is because nobody
liked Jimmy Kimmel. I've
>> Let's talk about the word said Jimmy
Kimmel. He's not that funny.
>> Let's talk about the word forcibly then.
Forcibly doesn't mean through violence.
It could be using the states, using the
government, or your position of power to
try to suppress the opposition. Donald
Trump has spent his entire political
career acting like the Democratic Party
shouldn't exist. You know, Act Blue, the
fun and Obama have done the same things.
What are you talking about? It's not
about forcibly what has Trump done
forcibly remove the opposition. He's
spoken against the press yet. Every
president has done that of all time.
They've spoken against the opposition
press. But that doesn't mean he's
forcibly removed somebody from that
position.
>> Last month, Donald Trump sent out a
truth social post towards Pam Bondi. Do
you know what I'm talking about? He
said, "Pam, I want you to indict these
three people and move fast." What
happened is Eric Sebert, the federal
prosecutor from the Eastern District of
Virginia, then was forced to resign,
forcibly resign, not through violence,
but through pressure. Then you see two
of the three people that Donald Trump
named indicted for random stuff. You
have Leticia James, and then you have
James Comey who got indicted. We also
just saw John Bolton indicted. I ask you
is indicting your political opponents
for speaking up against you.
>> They did the exact same things to Trump.
The left party, the Democratic party has
done the same jury in New York. They
tried to No. No. A grand jury in New
York. Who's that?
>> See, now we're getting into, you know,
those jury things. They used political
power to go after Trump. They were
afraid of him. They were afraid of what
he was going to do to America.
>> Did Biden ever tweet at his attorney
general and say, "Hey, Merrick Garland,
can you invade?"
>> No, because Biden wasn't even in charge
of the presidency. He was not even
making those things.
>> Pause. Pause. Sorry. You've been
eliminated by the majority. That was so
much fun.
>> That was great. I love that. It was
great to meet you, Scotty.
>> Hi, Satie.
>> Satie. Nice to meet you. I'm Adam.
>> You. So, I want to touch on your
forceful suppression of the opposition
as defining fascism. So, in my
understanding, I think that the leftist
party is assassinating conservatives.
So, we're talking about Charlie Kirk's
assassination. We're writing engraving
on the bullets catch fascist. I think
that shows fascism over here.
>> Can you define what you mean by leftist
party? Because I I think that
conservatives are very good at
individual responsibility. And when
you're placing the blame on an entire
party because one 22-year-old dude
killed somebody, which is obviously
tragic, then what do you mean by leftist
party?
>> Yeah. So, we have Kla Harris calling
Trump supporters fascist, Biden calling
Trump supporters fascist. When you have
these big leaders calling individuals
fascist, and then that is getting tagged
on to conservatives as a whole. So I
think that the leftist party is actually
very good about saying one thing about
one person and then this is getting
spread to everyone. So back to what I'm
saying about Charlie Kirk. So when
Charlie Kirk got assassinated saying
catch fascist I think that's a very good
good example of fascism. And then you
want to talk about the
>> Can I ask you is your position that
people in power should not be calling
the opposition party fascists or Gustapo
or Hitler? Donald Trump Donald Trump
called Kla Harris and Joe Biden a
fascist a dozen times throughout the
campaign trail. He called them Gustapo.
And only one politician has called
Donald Trump Hitler and it's JD Vance,
his vice president.
>> And which party has that stuck to?
That's stuck to conservatives. Fascism
has stuck to conservatives consistently.
You have all this violence on college
campuses saying that we're going to
they're calling turning point target
practice USA posting photos of us with
red X's on our face with dots on our
neck. So how are you to say
>> who's they though? Like random unhinged
people. Do you think unhinged?
>> Random unhinged leftist random unhinged.
Do you think unhinged right-wing
supporters exist or no?
>> Absolutely. I think there's some on both
sides. But that's why I'm saying you
can't say forcible suppression of the
opposition is tagged only onto Trump
because that's coming from the left side
as well.
>> Okay. Let me ask you then. I'm going to
ask you the same question that I asked
Scotty. When Donald Trump sent a true
social post with three names in the post
and two of those names have been
indicted over the past month. Is there
any analog to the Biden administration
sending out open posts to the attorney
general Meritt Garland and asking people
to be indicted? I'm I honestly am not
completely knowledgeable on what
exactly.
>> Okay, so Donald Trump has spent the past
nine months in office trying to
consolidate power among every single
institution, not just by appointing
loyalists, but by trying to target law
firms that are democratic universities.
Act blue, which is the main fundraising
pack for the Democratic Party has
recently been uh invest like they're
investigating trying to sue them because
they want to take down any mechanism
that helps the Democratic party.
>> Let's talk about universities.
>> Is that force? Wait, is that forcibly
suppressing the opposition party when
you're trying to
>> I don't know if I'd exactly say forceful
suppression. It depends on exactly how
you're saying it because like we were
saying when you're attaching the term
fascists, you're talking about Nazis.
You're talking about specifically Nazis.
And when they say oppression,
>> not just Nazis.
>> I'm saying specifically for what I'm
saying. The suppression of the
opposition. When they're calling Trump
Hitler, they're calling conser.
>> Who's they? JD Vance.
>> I'm sorry. Leftist. When the leftist
>> Which leftist politician? Can you name
one?
>> I think you're moving the gold post
here.
>> Wait, no, no. Can you name one leftist
politician who has called Trump Hiller?
>> I It's every single It's like
>> So you shouldn't be throwing this out
when no leftist politicians have
actually called Trump
>> throwing out the term fascism.
>> Um is saying that election was stolen
when it wasn't fascism. Wait, do you
think the 2020 election was stolen?
>> I don't I don't know.
>> You don't know?
>> I don't know because I'm not I'm not
honest.
>> This proves my point. Trump is causing a
rise of fascism in our generation. I
would never say that you're a fascist,
but I think there is a normalization of
an ideology where people are denying
elections. You don't even know if the
2020 election was stolen. This isn't
America. The 2020 election was not
stolen.
>> You've been eliminated by the majority.
Could Could you please return?
>> Thank you. That was great.
[snorts]
>> Nice to meet you.
>> Nice to meet you as well.
>> So, um, you keep saying Trump is a
fascist and just keep throwing that term
around.
>> I didn't say that. I said he's causing a
rise of fascism in our generation. I
would consider him a fascist though.
Yeah,
>> he's not a fascist because a fascist is
one party rule. Is there there's two
parties in the United States. is not one
party and he's not using violence to
control power. It's not like after 2028
you're never going to see Trump again.
His two-term limit is over. That's not
fascism. If you want to see fascism, go
to the Middle East. I'm Egyptian. If you
want to see fascism is when when the
president
>> Okay, you said fascism is one party
control. Donald Trump has spent the past
decade acting like the opposition
[clears throat] party shouldn't exist.
Caroline Levit just the other day said
the entire Democratic voter base is
Hamas terrorists, criminals, and illegal
immigrants. Stephen Miller says, "The
Democratic Party is not a party. It is a
domestic extremist organization." Donald
Trump, wait, listen. Donald Trump has
called my side nats, the enemy within,
and people who need to be taken care of.
He's tried to get the military to boo
Obama and liberals. So Donald Trump over
the past decade does not want the
Democratic party to exist. That's why
they're targeting Act Blue. That's why
they're targeting our fun.
>> You're telling me that he doesn't have
the right to criticize their Democratic
party at all?
>> That's not criticizing the party. That's
using your power to take down their
>> funding. But doesn't the Democratic
party they try to impeach him twice?
Also, is that fascism? Why? Why? Why you
trying to
>> wait the wait? Hold up. You think it's
fascism to go through the proper
processes to impeach somebody? Wait a
minute. When one party controls the
narrative when you had Twitter, you got
all the
>> Just go back one second. Impeaching
somebody is not fascism. Impeaching
somebody is going through making a false
narrative around him. That's what they
did.
>> If you want to talk about false
narrative, let's talk about the 2020
election because listen, you came in
here. Listen, calm down. Like, take a
deep breath.
Okay? Let me tell you, okay, when you
have one party,
>> I just get mad at terrible talking
points. I'm so sorry.
>> Listen, listen, listen, listen. You
know, take a deep breath. So, when you
have a party, one party controlling the
narrative on social media and they were
telling when there was um pre-COVID
>> Wait, who owns Twitter right now? Elon
Musk. Elon Mus Tik Tok, right-wingers.
Who owns Facebook? Mark Zuckerberg. But
they switch narrative. They switched
narrative based on who's in who's in um
>> who's who's in power. So, right now you
got Trump, right? You're saying he's a
fascist. Is that your claim? What's your
claim? that people that America is going
to be a fascist nation. That is that
your claim?
>> No. My claim is that Trump is causing a
rise of fascism in our generation. And
you know what? Sitting in this room
proves it because you guys are all blind
to the fact to the fact that the Middle
East I'm Syrian, but I haven't been to
the Middle East. No.
>> Okay. Have you been to Middle Have you
seen fascism in in Syrian when they're
killing Christians just because of their
faith? That's that's fascism. Someone
just people is he Trump killing
>> someone just claimed that fascism can
only mean Hitler or Mussolini. So now
there's a broader definition. Now you
guys understand this. Okay. Thank you.
Thank God you guys understand it.
>> It means fascism is attributed to those
people because they killed people. They
killed people. Trump is not
>> fascism doesn't just mean you killed
people.
>> It's one party sign everyone off and
they're trying to control.
>> Do you think Donald Trump had it? Do you
think if Donald Trump and Steven Miller
had it their way? They would let the
Democratic party exist or do you think
they would go after opponents,
fundraising mechanisms, etc., etc.?
Which one?
>> No. What Trump is doing is you've been
eliminated by the group. You may return
to the seat.
>> Thanks, AB.
Damn.
>> Nice to meet you.
>> Nice to meet you, Adam. Uh, Ethan.
>> Ethan.
>> So, I want to get started with talking
about how you're saying, sitting in this
room with all of us who are blind to the
truth or whatever is proving your point
about the rise of fascism. It seems that
you are doing exactly what people have
been saying and applying this label
needlessly to so many conservatives like
painting with a broad brush. And it
makes me wonder if you really use
fascism in the way in like how the word
means or if you're using it as like a
manipulation technique to silence
opposition.
>> My intention is never ever to paint an
entire party as fascist or anyone in
this room as fascist. I don't think
anyone is. But I think that there is a
blindness and there is a normalization
of fascism. Can I ask you a question?
>> Sure. Was the 2020 election stolen or
was it not? Was it legit?
>> I'm not sure. But can I ask you a
question? No. No. That scares me.
Listen,
>> you think elections can be stolen? Let
me finish.
>> You think it's impossible for elections
to be stolen?
>> Of course. But in the United States,
Donald Trump then took 60 court cases,
60 cases of election fraud. He lost
every single legally after he went
through the courts legally. What he did
is that didn't work. So then he called
election officials. You know, Brad
Raffensburgger from Georgia. Have you
heard this phone call?
>> I have. Yeah. He said, "Can you find me
11,000 votes?" After that didn't work,
he tried a fake speculating a lot on
what he meant on that phone.
>> Okay. But then after that, he tried a
fake elector scheme. You've heard of
this, right? He tried to gather fake
electors in seven states to override the
real electors. After that didn't work.
January 6 happened. I know everyone's
going to sigh at this, but do you know
what was happening inside the capital on
January 6?
>> What was happening?
>> Well, do you know what was happening
inside the capital?
>> They were like um ratifying or affirming
like the election. Mike Pence was
certifying the results of the election.
And what were the people chanting
outside? There was a group of people
chanting, "Hang Mike Pence." So wait,
when Trump Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
Let me finish. When Trump said the
election was stolen before it even
happened and then he stood on stage when
50% of the votes were counted and said,
"I won this election." And then he calls
election officials and then on January
6th, the day they're certifying the
vote, people getting the point. Okay.
So, do you get what I'm saying now?
>> I I think I get what you now. I'm
sitting in a room of people who don't
even know if I speak for a second.
>> Okay. So, how do you feel about that
report that came out showing that there
was like 274 FBI informants in the crowd
on January 6th?
>> I think that it's hilarious that Trump
sent out a tweet saying Biden's FBI did
that when it was Trump's FBI.
>> Wait, who FBI?
>> Trump's FBI. The same FBI that literally
like colluded against him with Russia.
>> No, no. Whose FBI was this in 2020?
>> I mean, it was the FBI under Trump.
>> So, how do you feel about Trump's FBI
doing that though? How do you feel about
the whole Russia gate thing that the FBI
pedled to like try and frame a sitting
president for treason? Dude,
>> what's your source for this,
>> dude? The Tulsi Tulsi Gabbard. Yeah, the
director.
>> Donald Trump doesn't even trust Tulsi
Gabbard to be inside on some of these
like Iran conversations.
>> The director of national intelligence
who's over the C CIA and FBI did a press
conference and released a bunch of
documents and she said, "Hey,
>> they read the documents. They don't say
what she says." They said Donald Trump
had four years during his first term.
No, they did not. There was no Russia
collusion. Donald Trump or
>> they found no credible evidence that the
Trump campaign colluded with Russia to
influence the 2016 election. Literally
his campaign years and years to try to
frame him for treason. Dude,
>> his campaign manager was literally
arrested for colluding with the Russians
at one point in 2016. I wouldn't say
Trump did, but the Tulsi Gabbard report
that you're citing is not saying what
you think it says.
>> I mean, it's in the documents that she
released. People can read it for
themselves. And furthermore, it's not
just that, but you had like the deputy
director of the FBI.
>> Wait, so who who tried to pin Trump for
treason? Like, who exactly was this?
What? You got to be specific with your
claim.
>> It was the FBI and the CIA and former
Obama administration officials that were
investigating the Trump campaign leading
up to the election.
>> You've been eliminated by the majority.
>> Nice to meet you.
>> That was a great conversation.
>> Thanks. [applause]
>> Hey there, Adam.
>> How you doing?
>> Great to meet you. Great to meet you.
Nice to meet you, Muel.
>> All right. Well, I guess I I have a few
questions. Uh I want to start with you
seem to be kind of in news and I I kind
of want to come back down to reality.
So, I'm a college student at UC
Berkeley. I've had a student, it's
documented online on Instagram, come up
to me after class, vaguely threaten me
and say a bunch of stuff. Yeah.
University does absolutely nothing. I
filed a report. I did everything. Wasn't
even removed from my classes. And this
is all documented and up online. So, I
as a student don't have the freedom to
go share my opinions. Charlie Kirk, the
day Charlie Kirk died, we requested
security. The university turned down our
request for security. These these are
the real examples of fascism every
single day. Are you trying to equate one
random No, wait. No, hold on. Are you
trying to equate one random college
student who I condemn? No. Who I think
is with Donald Trump using his power to
try to consolidate as much of No, you're
not. Okay. So, what are you trying to
say?
>> So, I'm trying to say that there's a
system of the university here that's set
up against
>> system. Do you mean one student?
>> Uh, no. I mean that there's a system
that I reported this person to and
nothing happened. This is part and
parcel. Well, it's stifling conservative
speech on campuses. And my my point here
is and we saw back in the 2020 election
the suppression of the Hunter Biden
story. I don't think the election was
actually,
>> you know, ballots were thrown in and it
was rigged. I I don't
>> Wait. So, you think it So, wait. You do
or you don't? Sorry. I
>> I do not believe that.
>> You don't think the election was stolen?
There's probably a few people here who
disagree with you. Does that worry you
at all?
>> Uh, I think it's it's slightly worrying,
but
>> it's slightly worrying that people think
the election was stolen because they
were convinced by the president.
concerning that when I table on my
campus, I have students telling me that
Charlie Kirk deserved to die, throwing
up L's in my face, laughing at me.
>> That's terrible. But you can't equate
one or a few random students for the
president of the United States convinced
a large portion of the country the
election was stolen when it wasn't. I
condemn these random Okay, I just want
to ask you a question.
>> You're saying that this is fascism. Can
you provide your definition of mine as
normal?
>> This is a small scale. So, I would say
there there's a few definitions and I
think all of them are like mine.
>> Uh can can you repeat your character?
Actually, I want to pause because you
you wanted to talk about the rise of
fascism. And that that's what I have the
generation cuz your your claim isn't
that Trump is a fascist. Your claim is
that Trump has contributed to the rise
of fascism. Why do all the fascist
people in American politics hate Donald
Trump? Why did Fuentes not vote for
Donald Trump? Why did why did all the
people who are openly claiming, you
know, Medi Hassan, you saw that Jubilee
surrounded?
>> I was going to say, wait a minute.
>> Why do all these people who who are
openly admitting that they're fascist?
Why do why does not a single one of them
support Donald Trump?
>> They are openly admitting that they're
fascists and a lot of them do support
Donald Trump. Number one, the people in
that episode conservatives. Number one,
but number two,
>> conservative, not Republican. They don't
vote Republican.
>> But also, what about the Politico story
that really changed
the point? That's
>> I'm not changing the point. You No, no,
no. You asked me. Unless you want to
contain it to one Jubilee episode.
>> Go to the Go.
>> Let me finish. Unless you want to
contain the people we're talking about
to one Jubilee episode. Young people,
not only young Republicans, but young
conservatives. Sure. They are turning to
fascism at a high rate. Do you condemn
what was in that group chat?
>> What group chat? Oh, the political group
chat. Uh, I I would personally condemn
what was said in that group chat.
>> And what was said in that group?
>> Wait, wait. Can you tell me what was
said in that group chat?
>> Yeah. So, they they described black
people as watermelon people. They said
they love Hitler. They they they said a
lot of
>> Wait, wait. What do they say about gas
chambers?
>> Uh, they said if you don't vote for me,
you're getting sent to the gas.
>> Okay. Wait a minute. And these weren't
just young Republicans. These were like
20, 30, 40 year olds, correct? No. No.
These were 20, 30, 40 year olds. And
some of them were state senators. So,
younger people seem to be inclined
towards fascism. You can respond. I'm
sorry.
>> Okay. Younger people seem to be inclined
towards fascism. Yes. And all these
people don't like Donald Trump. It's
those were young.
>> Let me finish speaking. Okay. You keep
Okay. So, it was a reaction.
>> You've been animated by the
>> All right. Thank you.
>> That's great.
>> Hello.
>> Hi. Nice to meet you.
>> Hi, I'm Sarah. So, I'm a lot more
concerned about the rise of violent
left-wing rhetoric among Gen Z than
so-called fascism because I'm sorry if
you think like that chat was any sort
like that meant that fascism is on the
rise. It's like you've never been a Call
of Duty lobby. Like it's called making
edgy jokes. Okay.
>> Wait a minute. You make those types of
jokes?
>> I don't personally, but like that's like
every young man ever has like made a
joke.
>> Raise your hand if you make those types
of jokes.
>> For real. Like
>> Okay. So, no one will actually admit it
because it's kind of weird to make those
types of jokes. Everyone makes those
types and that YouTube like no male
friends if you've like never been in a
room where people say the n word as a
joke like it's like everyone does that
and you know it's true and it's like if
not you're probably like homosexuals
>> okay my male friends and I tell each
other to like kill themselves we do
funny stuff
>> okay oh that's so shocking oh my gosh we
don't say we don't say off to the gas
chamber the difference is that young
leftists genuinely worshiped the murder
of Charlie Kirk and Luigi Manion who are
people committing genuine acts of
violence and They genuinely condone
that. So that's the big difference
because I mean I saw literally graffiti
on college campuses saying kill all
Charlie Kirks. They are inciting
violence and that is a totally like
normalized thing to say to like
celebrate the fact and that's serious
and the political group chat was a joke
and you know that.
>> Okay. So your concession is that you
know people talk like fascists in
private sometimes but you're worried
that leftists are using increasingly
violent rhetoric like the people you
were talking about. Luigi
>> one thing is serious and one thing is a
joke.
>> Okay. I want to ask you one thing. is
did one Democratic politician support
what Luigi did? Can you name any actual
Democratic politician?
>> Uh, no. But it doesn't matter because on
the other side, you were talking about
the rise in the generation. You're not
talking about politicians.
>> I am talking about politicians as well.
So, on the other side,
>> now you're No, no, no. Let me let me
clarify.
>> What about young leftists? What about
What about the violence that young
leftists?
>> Let me clarify very very quickly. So
you're trying to point to young leftists
on the left, but on the right there are
politicians in power. People like Steven
Miller who says the Democratic Party is
a domestic extremist organization.
Caroline Levit just the other day, as I
said, said that the entire base is Hamas
terrorists and criminals. So when you
have people in power on the right, wait,
wait, wait. They're using this rhetoric
and normalizing it that goes downstream.
So
>> and you have leftwing media like MSNBC
cheering backstage when Charlie Kirk was
murdered.
>> Wait, you think people are being
murdered because of MSNBC? You think
MSNBC is radical? Yes, I do.
>> You think MSNBC is radical?
>> Oh, absolutely.
>> What do you think is radicalizing more
people, Nick Fentes or MSNBC?
>> Probably MSNBC.
>> Really? More so than Nick Fuentes. I
hear someone laughing behind me. That's
kind of But also, there is a fundamental
difference between people in power using
rhetoric in random leftists. Listen, I'm
a young liberal.
>> You know, Don Lemon just told people to
shoot ICE agents. They told They told
Don Lemon just told illegal brown people
to grab guns so they can shoot ICE
agents when they show up at their door.
Is Don Lemon not someone in a position
of power?
>> As a young liberal, can I
>> do? Wait, do you condone that?
>> What do you condone shooting? Yeah. Do
you condone that?
>> No, you should not shoot ICE agents. He
said that you should have a weapon in
your house. Don't you support the Second
Amendment?
>> Not for illegal immigrants. They're not
allowed to legally own firearms.
>> Can I Can I clarify something?
[applause]
>> Can I clarify? He was talking about
citizens because he said they're
arresting and detaining citizens. So, if
you watch that if you watch that clip,
he was saying citizens. I hope there's
one of those fact checks on screen
because he was saying they're detaining
citizens. So, really quickly,
>> citizens wouldn't need to be like
shooting ICE agents either.
>> I don't think anyone should shoot ICE
agents, but he was number one, I'm not
Don Lemon, I'm not Don Lemon. That's a
ton. No, we're saying we're seeing
leftwing people openly insight.
I'm a young liberal and I completely
wholeheartedly condemn anyone on my side
who is number one talking poorly about
Charlie Kirk. Number two saying insane
half your party. Do it.
>> Oh, you think? Okay. Can you name one
Democratic person in position of power
who said something about Charlie Kirk
that was
>> Yeah, I just said like half of the
people on MSNBC we saw the video he
died. I don't know cuz they're off
camera but we heard the cheers the
second he died.
>> On your side I can name Mike Lee who
made fun of Melissa Hortman after she
died. I can name Donald Trump and Don
Jr. who made fun of Nancy Pelosi. So
just to back up, there is a
normalization of this type of ideology
happening in our politics and it's due
to people like Donald Trump. Okay,
>> we saw Luji Manion as a sex symbol.
>> Pause. Time out. We're done with this
claim. So we need to move on to the next
claim. [applause]
>> My next claim is despite Trump's claims,
the economy is not in a golden age.
>> Got it. Nice to meet you. I'm Riley.
>> Nice to meet you, Riley.
>> So, why don't you think why do you think
um Trump's economy isn't golden?
>> I don't think it's in a golden age. I
think that he claims almost on a weekly
basis that the economy is in a golden
age and that we are bringing in
trillions of dollars in tariffs, but
that's not manifesting in any of the
indicators. We can look at three in
particular. Unemployment is up since
Trump took office. Prices are rising and
manufacturing is down. Manufacturing was
one of his big claims, but we can dig
into any of those.
>> Um, yeah. So I would just like to talk
about the tariffs first in general. Um
so actually when we increase tariffs
it's um kind of proven that always at
the beginning um inflation rise there's
always a little spike and then it
eventually decreases. Um we can also see
that Trump would do this to eventually
in hopes to improve domestic
manufacturing and self-reliance because
for example we get about 60% of
semiconductors and um 90% of microchips
from Taiwan. they're the leading
manufacturer of those in the whole world
and currently they're at war with China
and if China takes over Taiwan then
we're in big trouble right so um I would
just kind of like like to add that it's
really important that tar and not only
do tariffs help us get that
self-reliance and create more jobs um we
also can use tariffs to make more money
and bring more money for our country
because to fix the national debt issue
that Biden's team caused so
>> yeah let's start off with the first
claim about tariffs reshoring
manufacturing They absolutely can be
used to reshore certain industries into
the United States and that's a good
point, but that's not how Trump's using
them. He placed blanket tariffs on every
single country except for Russia and
North Korea for some odd effing reason.
But then he has been kind of weird about
these tariffs. Like there's no actual
concessions that he's trying to get. He
placed tariffs on countries that we had
free trade with. And then secondly, when
you do tariffs, wait really quickly.
When you do tariffs all via executive
order, all of his tariffs were via
executive order. None of them actually
went through Congress or were long-term
and binding. There's no actual
incentivization for countries to reshore
manufacturing because there's no really
quickly there's no continuity into the
next administration, right? Can you
agree that when you do it all via
executive order, the next administration
could just, you know, run it all back.
So, we've seen actually a decrease in
manufacturing investments.
>> I would I would like to add that when we
see that um employment rates will rise
and costs will go down. We've already um
as he's it's only it's bar we're not
even in his first full.
>> He said he's the one that's claiming
we're in a golden age and said 90 deals
in 90 days. Also, can I add that when
tariffs are added about like you said
about multiple across all nations in the
world that is like a I believe I'm
saying the right name neoexceptionalism
um trade policy so we can have more
communication with other countries and
also um to just generate more wealth
also as well and um
>> that's not manifesting in any of our
manufacturing investment that wealth is
not manifesting for the US people in
fact this type of tax is regressive you
can you agree that uh tariffs are paid
by the US consumer consumer like can you
split with Trump there?
>> Yes, of course tariffs are um paid by
the US consumer but as we can see that
when we make when we I mean use tariffs
to have domestic manufacturing and um to
just generate more wealth. We can rely
on ourselves and not look to these other
countries like we have been for so long.
And
>> that's right, but it's not what Trump's
doing. Actually, real private fixed
investment into manufacturing structures
in the United States went down. Biden
actually had a few acts that
incentivized like the chips act
incentivized the building of chips and
semiconductors in the United States. But
Trump is tearing up these trade deals
and then piecing them back together with
tape and signing his name on it as if
it's as if he did something when he
didn't.
>> But as we can see with Biden's um era of
presidency, inflation actually
increased. And um with Trump's current
president second term, it hasn't
decreased. And we actually see um as of
August, I believe, uh that median
household income has increased $1,000
already. And in his first term, we've
seen
>> You've been animated by.
>> It was a pleasure.
>> That was great. I really enjoyed that.
Thank you.
>> Got you. What's up?
>> Hi. Nice to meet you, Isaiah.
>> Isaiah,
>> I want to give you 30 seconds and I want
to give myself 30 seconds just to
understand where you're coming from.
>> Yeah. So again, there are a few
indicators that you can look at, but if
Donald Trump is going to claim that we
are in a golden age, then we necessarily
had to have been in a golden age under
the end of Biden's term. Because so far,
youth unemployment is up 16% since he
took office. That's people in this room.
Youth unemployment is up. That's not a
golden age. Unemployment for black
Americans is up 20% since he took
office. That is not a golden age. We can
look at inflation over the past, you
know, since Liberation Day in April. You
can look at inflation and it has gone
up. We were actually trending down at
the end of Biden's term and as Trump
took office, but now it is trending back
up. And all of this is for what? No
actual reshoring of manufacturing quite
yet.
>> All right, perfect.
>> So to go based on you want to talk about
unemployment?
>> Any of it. Yeah.
>> So to go based on unemployment, the
reason why it's actually higher is
because under Biden's inflation
reduction act that actually increased
the inflation margin significantly only
because it actually did in fact increase
taxes. It did say it was going to put $
1.5 trillion dollars back into the
economy for roads, infrastructure, all
that. It didn't actually increase
anything necessarily. Actually, that was
more so actually given to the states
actually to do away with the money as
they choose. As far as tariffs go,
>> yes, obviously inflation does increase
as well as well as also a slow slow
growth maintenance. But as far as that
goes, actually for a long-term
development,
>> how long you have to
>> Well, it could take as much as 5 years.
>> But that's also an investment to the
American mercy. Is that what the people
voted for? I thought they voted for
immediate relief.
>> As far as As
Yeah, don't get me wrong, egg prices did
drop. So did gasoline prices. The only
reason why California isn't as high is
just because of California's
regulations. But either way, while he
does actually influence the economy
through his executive orders, he can't
control every single
>> Can I ask you, do you think we're in a
golden age right now as Trump claims?
>> Do I think that we're in a golden age? I
think we're actually pro progressing
there.
>> Okay. Do you think that Trump has
brought in the amount of money he
claims? He claims it's $18 trillion. He
says 17 to$18 trillion based on tariffs.
>> I do believe so because as the tariffs
have actually have actually done
companies have actually met actually
started to set up their businesses here
in the United States. Yes.
>> The problem is okay a few things. Number
one, there was a CNBC article that came
out just yesterday where they
interviewed 12 business owners and all
of them said that the tariffs have
impacted them so negatively that they've
had to reduce the amount of people that
employ them. They've had to slow down
their growth. And when it comes to the
$18 trillion that Trump is claiming,
they're just inflated numbers that Trump
seems to be lying about. And my entire
point is when unemployment for young
Americans, for black Americans up, yeah,
it's high,
>> especially because we actually outsource
our employment from other countries as
well, which actually will be get will be
[clears throat] brought back to the
United States when they actually
>> when
>> when five years,
>> like I said, it's an investment. You
have to also give it time for the
economy to actually heal. This is
actually we were already healing. We
were at a pretty good pace. The stock
market was hitting all-time highs. Then
when Trump announced the Liberation Day
tariffs, it dropped and it took months
for it to return to those all-time
highs. It took months.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you.
>> I appreciate that. Have a good day.
>> That was great.
>> Matt, nice meeting you.
>> I'm Adam. Nice to meet you.
>> First of all, when Trump says golden
age, he means golden age, which is a set
of time period. It doesn't happen. It's
not golden day, golden year, golden 3
months. There's no time uh stamp or time
limit on the golden age. So, it's an
idea that America is going to be entered
in to a time period, a time age, and
hopefully sooner than later.
>> It's not the age part I have a problem
with. It's the golden part I have a
problem with.
>> So, why don't you think we're heading
into a golden age?
>> I don't think we're in a golden age as
Trump claims for the few reasons that
I've stated. I mean, the economy is just
not bearing that. People in our
generation are going into a golden age.
>> Wait, what? Why?
>> So, not why you don't think we're in a
golden age. Why do you think we're not
going into a golden age?
>> Well, because the indicators are slowing
down since Trump took office. If you
want to say that we're in a golden age
now, then we were in a golden age under
Biden. As Biden left office, the economy
was recovering. And I know that he had a
rocky four years. I know there were a
lot of extrinsic factors such as COVID,
the Ukraine war, and some policies that
Biden passed. I can easily concede that.
But by the end of Biden's term, the
economy was starting to stick the
landing. And Trump immediately screwed
it up by doing these liberation day
tariffs combined with the big ugly
beautiful bill or whatever which will
not only you know strip Medicaid and
social security nets away from the
lowest income earners or people that
need it the most but it also provides
permanent tax cuts to the richest of the
rich.
>> So in terms of the economy because the
Medicaid is a whole different argument.
So let's not talk about Medicaid. Let's
talk into So let's talk about the
economy. So in terms of the economy
>> medicaid feeds into the economy. in
terms of the Sure. But we're talking
about specifically the economy and I
think we brought up tariffs and I think
we bought so let's stick to that for the
for
>> really quickly when people don't have
social safety nets they have to start
digging into their savings and taking
out credit
>> I think he's I think he made it a little
bit of a harder made fraud a little bit
less prevalent to happen in let's talk
about tariffs real quick because there's
two arguments to the tariffs there's the
national security part of tariffs and
then there's the wealth of America
tariffs
>> which one you want to go for
>> so let's go for national security so
it's in the best interest that our
number one adversary is responsible
for the majority of vital
things that we need. So for example,
vitamin C is produced almost I think 90
plus% in China which China would be an
adversary. Um steel is produced in large
quantities in China. Uh drone parts
which the military heavily relies on for
military and private people as well rely
on drone parts for industry or whatever
that's also made in China. Do you think
it's a good idea that Do you think it's
going towards a golden age to get
America less dependent on our
adversaries who in theory hate us and
are have been uh pulling military
advances to threaten our
>> No, what you're saying is true. What
you're saying is true.
>> But it's not going into the golden age.
>> That is not what Trump is doing. So just
to say
>> that exactly is what Trump is doing.
>> No, it is not at all. Really quickly,
wait really quickly. Really quickly, you
just said a lot of things. Really
quickly, you're pointing out a good
thing. Uh during COVID, a lot of our
supply chain flaws were exposed heavily.
We relied on other countries for certain
technologies and certain masks and I
think everyone realized oh [ __ ] wait a
minute our supply chains are really just
in other countries we need to reshore
some stuff but when it comes to Trump's
tariffs on China can you name me any
indicators at bear that we have reshored
what is it you were saying steel
reshored any sort of this technology
>> well the idea that we have 7 trill I
think it's almost at 7 trillion I just
debunked that number of
>> yeah okay um
>> so it's not trillion so there's almost 7
7 trillion come from a few countries.
>> So I haven't even listed what the 7
trillion is about. So the Yeah. So the 6
trillion maybe almost
>> 6 trillion. It's around 6 trillion and
it's about 5 trillion.
>> So it's well depending on
67 whatever.
>> So my point is if you let me finish is
that
>> you want it. You just won right there.
Sorry.
>> There you go. My entire point is that
you talk about manufacturing going down
>> and it takes about cuz I work in
government. It takes about um you know
like two years at least in California to
even go from groundbreaking to flat to
ribbon cutting. So I mean in terms of
manufacturing going down the way you
look at manufacturing what's promised
what's what's get what's what's been
promised to be reinvested into America.
So that's the my first entire
>> do you think companies have any
incentive to reshore manufacturing long
term when these are all done by
executive order and not actual binding
trade deals gone through court
Trump's tariff policy is to impact the
future economic
investment into the future whether they
see the promise or not they've promised
six almost 7 trillion6 trillion 67
trillion into the economy so
>> do one more time
>> in terms of national in terms of that I
think it's a good idea that China is no
longer holding us hostage economically.
My second point to the second to the
national intelligence is that the fact
that we are in a almost trillion dollar
trade deficit which deficits when you
export when you uh import more than you
export which is not a good thing.
>> Would you say that
>> you've been animated by the majority
>> that was great that was fun. [applause]
>> So, hi. It's good to meet you.
>> Great to meet you.
>> Martin, nice to meet you. Martin, I'm
Adam.
>> Perfect. So, what I want to talk about
is because we already established kind
of the golden age is is a wide range of
time. Sure. More so talking about the
time
>> golden part.
>> Well, yeah. I was saying for the age,
we're talking about the this entire
Trump presidency and really
>> You think we're in a golden age like he
claims?
>> I think we're entering one. And I think
that, you know, so what indicators are
>> Yeah. So, what I want to talk about is
more so
talking about the biggest, you know,
aspect of the Trump's economic
presidency, which is the one big
beautiful bill.
>> Okay, that would be great.
>> Yeah. So, I assume you're against the
one big beautiful bill, correct?
>> Um, yeah, certain parts of it. Sure. For
sure.
>> Okay. For sure. So I think the biggest
part of it is the extension the 2017 tax
cuts and jobs act. Are you pro against
that?
>> Um I mean that's fine but it depends on
the context around it. So what Donald
Trump did is permanently extend the tax
cuts and jobs act tax cuts and that
disproportionately benefits the richest
of the rich but at the same time like I
said like I said at the same time he cut
social safety nets for people at the
very very bottom. And you know what the
tax cuts and jobs act says? By the way,
really quickly, if you look it up, the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act over the next few
years will lead to hundreds of thousands
of people, hundreds of thousands of
children losing free lunch at schools.
While it also allows billionaires, it
also allows billionaires to now write
off private jets. Now, none of us in
this room benefit from having a private
jet.
>> Let's touch on that. So, let's touch on
the first part. You said that most of
the tax cuts are are concentrated, you
know, within the top 20
>> disproportionately. I wouldn't say most.
Yeah.
>> Well, sure. So 60% of the tax so 60% of
income earners actually do get tax cuts
under the one big beautiful bill under
the extent of the tax cuts and jobs act.
Specifically the median American family
would have seen a tax hike of $1,800 a
year should the tax cuts and jobs.
>> And I'm glad they extended that.
>> Yeah, absolutely.
>> So like I said, the context matters when
you're extending that, but you're
removing social safety nets and allowing
billionaires to write off private jets.
Listen, we we people in this room will
benefit a lot more from like kids
getting free lunches than writing off
private jets. I don't see anyone in this
room social part though. So the bring
the best the best example the left
always brings up is cuts to Medicaid.
You the actual like pro most prominent
cut that that we made to Medicaid was
instituting work requirements work
requirements of 20 hours a week.
>> They tried this exact thing in Arkansas
and it kicked 18 the th,000 people off
of their Medicaid.
>> I would I would say that if someone
isn't working then they shouldn't be
getting healthare.
>> But these were 18,000 people who had
increased barriers to get Medicaid. And
what happens is these people who are
vulnerable already
>> the barriers are seeking a job. No, no.
It's not just it's not just that that it
kicks people off because the barriers
become so hard. People with jobs can
still get it. But the problem is listen,
>> what are the barriers though that are so
hard?
>> The problem is when it comes to this
with the tax cuts and jobs act, sorry,
with that the barriers for Medicaid,
sorry, one second.
>> No. Okay. So, like you said barriers,
what what are the barriers that are so
hard besides getting a job where you
have to go work 20 hours a week? There's
already there's already a qualification
in there that if you're disabled, then
that doesn't apply to you. I mean, what
what are these barriers? The left always
the left always speaks in these like
just you know ab abstracts like it's
actually like what are the barriers?
>> The increased barriers are when people
are vulnerable and already working
part-time and then you cut them off of
Medicaid. Yes, people can get Medicaid
with this. But the problem is when
18,000 people like in Arkansas are
kicked off of their Medicaid part.
>> No, they the 18,000 people were kicked
off of their Medicaid because they
couldn't get access to it. What happens
then is that they have to dig into their
social safety. They have to dig in to
their
>> So how do they how they not get access
then? But because the barriers are
increased.
>> What are the barriers? The only barrier
you've listed the only barrier we talked
about is work requirements and that's
working 20 hours a week.
>> Yeah. But it's the work requirements
increasing is just Yeah, it's not. So
wait, can you concede?
>> So So we agree work requirements are a
good thing. We we can find common
ground. Can you concede that what the
tax cuts and wait listen can you concede
that what the tax cuts and jobs act does
is it permanently in decreases taxes for
the richest of the rich but then it also
wait but it also temporarily gives no
tax on tips. Do you know that part?
>> Yeah the no tax on
>> but that's only temporary. So what it
does cut off on it cuz you always want
to like test out wait a minute which is
which reason why the original program
had an expiration date.
>> Wait wait wait let me bring this back.
So the permanent tax cuts for the
richest of the rich don't have an
expiration date. Wait for because we
ALREADY DID THAT. WE ALREADY HAD THE
TRIAL PROGRAM.
>> THEY don't have an expiration date, but
you have an expiration date for the
things that are going to help first time
trial.
>> Why is there an expiration date for the
people who are the most vulnerable?
>> It's a trial program and the tax cuts
for everyone were were made permanent.
Like I mean for everyone were made
permanent. Why would you not make the
tax cuts permanent? You know when they
end? They end right as Trump's leaving
office. So this is what it's like. It's
like it's like waving a $100 bill in
front of somebody's eyes while giving
thousands of dollars to the rich
>> early part. Can we can we can you
concede again that work requirements are
good medication? All right. Perfect.
Awesome. So you support Donald Trump on
that? No. Great to know.
>> I don't support No. No. Listen. When you
sat down, I said the context matters.
The context of permanent tax cuts. Wait.
Do you
>> Okay. Actually, so let me ask if you
could have it your way. If you could
have it your way, would the no tax on
tips be permanent or
>> um if it works out then I want to make
it.
>> If you if you had it your way, would the
no tax on tips be permanent now in the
big beautiful bill? Or do you think that
them expiring right as Trump leaves
office is a good thing?
>> I want to make sure that they work and
then make them permanent. I want to make
sure that we don't need to expand it. I
want to actually have a, you know, a
sound public policy.
>> Why do you think Trump made them not
permanent? I I've already said this
three times. Because when you ever have
a new program, you need to try it out.
You have a trial period, which is why
the 2017 TCJA had a cut off time. So,
and let's talk about, you know, you
bring up taxes on the richest Americans.
So, I I assume you're, like I said,
you're you're opposed to the Trump's
tariffs.
>> The Trump tariffs. Yeah.
>> Okay. Why the Trump tariffs for a few
reasons
>> or just just tariffs in general? Why are
you opposed to tariffs?
>> I'm not opposed to tariffs in general.
As I've said, there are ways to do
targeted tariffs, but when Donald Trump
got into office, he placed tariff on
every single country except for North
Korea and Russia. I find that pretty
weird. But listen, listen. I want to ask
you after 9 months
I want to make.
So, we're talking about, you know,
cutting taxes for the richest Americans
and all Americans. The reason why that's
actually a good thing is because you
want people investing more money,
especially right now when we're seeing
an AI revolution, which is about to make
our country exponentially. You
understand? Wait, let me let me make
this point why the House Republicans and
President Trump have actually not going
to grow.
>> I got to make this point. Tariffs are a
regressive tax on the people who earn
the lowest. Well, so right now,
>> all a tariff is a sales tax. That's
literally all it's a sales tax on
foreign goods.
>> Listen, lowincome earners necessarily
spend more of their income on
consumption, right? So when you're
spending more of your income on consumer
goods, you are going to be hit by these
taxes harder. Meanwhile, the richest of
the rich are getting tax cuts, are
getting all
>> paying tax.
>> The richest of the rich are
disproportionately benefiting from this.
So even even tax project that that the
2017 tax and jobs act being extended
will put more money
in will take out.
>> No, that is not true. Absolutely. Can
you concede that lower income earners
are disproportionately benefited by the
regressive tariffs?
>> One more time. So lower income earners
necessarily spend a lot
>> bring jobs back. They're going to be
disproportionate.
>> When are they going to bring jobs back?
Jobs have been
>> tariffs take a while to kick in effect.
You need to have trade deals. You need
to have the tariffs actually foreign
goods. We've we've done with the UK.
We've done some with the EU. We're
working on some with India.
>> Are these actually papered up?
>> I mean it takes more than 3 months to
negotiate a massive trade deal.
>> Donald Trump said 90 deals in 90 days.
What do you mean it takes more than 3
months? How many of you going to have it
like that? Time out.
>> You got me. That was a good one. That
was really good. Thank you.
>> YOU GOT ME. [applause]
MY next claim is children are safer with
the average illegal immigrant than with
Donald Trump.
>> Hi, I'm
>> Nice to meet you. I'm Adam.
>> I would actually like to hear what you
have to say about it.
>> That'd be great. So when you look at the
statistics, there's a study done by PNAS
in Texas that shows that undocumented
immigrants are two times less likely to
commit violent. Let me finish. Two times
less likely to commit crimes than
nativeorn citizens. 2.5 times less
likely to commit property or drug crimes
than nativeorn citizens. Four times less
likely to commit property crimes.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump has been held
liable for sexual assault. Donald Trump
has had 34 felonies. Donald Trump is
best friends with prolific trafficker
sex trafficker Jeffrey Epste. So
>> well um I just have a few questions for
you. So um I would really like to know
how come 60% of them that come in commit
a crime or they have the intention to
commit a crime and how that is not true.
>> That is true.
>> What's your What's your study?
>> Um I believe it was in two articles. I
learned it in my college class.
>> Do you think who do you think commits
more crimes? The average US citizen or
the average undocumented immigrant? I
mean violent crime
>> undocumented. So we wouldn't know.
>> Violent crimes. We actually wouldn't
know who they are and we don't we have
no idea who these people are coming into
our country.
>> Texas did a comprehensive study
>> but there's no background check on them.
They don't exist in this country. So we
have no idea who they are. We have
>> the burden of proof would be on
>> They're just allowed to come in here. Do
you understand what sanctuary cities
are? They're allowed to just come in
here and they get everything for free.
>> Okay. Can I ask you a question?
>> Sure.
>> So just imagine you had a daughter.
Let's run a thought experiment. You had
a daughter and you're about to bring her
over to your her friend's house. As
you're driving your daughter over to her
friend's house, you learn at the last
minute that her father had not only been
sexually assaulted or civily liable for
sexual abuse, his father her father also
at the same time, sorry, let me restart
that.
>> Um,
>> one second. Imagine you're taking your
daughter over to her friend's house and
as you're going over there, you learn
that her friend's father had been held
civily liable of sexual abuse. He was
best friends with prolific sex
trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and had said
that he could just walk in on girls in
dressing rooms like he did in the Howard
Stern show. Would you let your daughter
go over to that person's house?
>> The chances would be actually this
actually the same because I wouldn't
know who those people are, the
undocumented immigrants.
>> No. Would you would you bring your
daughter over to that person's house?
>> Um, I don't think so.
>> Okay. Because that describes Donald
Trump perfectly.
>> I would never bring my daughter to a
house that I don't even know who the
parents are. I don't know where they
come from. I don't know whether
>> average undocumented immigrant commits
lower crimes than Donald Trump. There's
no statistics on that because they're
undocumented. There are statistics on
this.
Where are they coming from? Where are
they coming from? Do you know do you
know their past life? Do you know?
>> Wait, so when a crime you know where
where in what country track of them? No,
you don't. Because they don't take any
of that data when they come here. You
slap a name on them and they allow them.
>> You realize when a violent crime when a
violent crime is committed, it's likely
time they're let go because they're
undocumented. So it doesn't go on any
criminal record. So those statistics are
actually very very smear.
>> You were trying to say that most people
are let go for violent crimes. That's
not true. Let me finish. When a violent
crime occurs, somebody necessarily
likely reported, right? So when it's
reported, that goes into the overall
stats. When they do the arrests, when
they do the arrests, it shows that
undocumented immigrants are way less
likely to be arrested
>> because they are not being caught. They
are not being documented. They are
undocumented immigrants. They are
illegal. They're committing a crime by
being here. The burden of proof would be
on you to prove that undocumented
immigrants commit crimes at two times
higher
>> rates and they went through the legal
process of becoming a US citizen. Then
they would be able to prove if they're a
criminal or not because they would have
a background check. But these people are
coming in here undocumented with no way
to prove that.
>> Can I have can I ask you a question?
>> Absolutely.
>> If somebody were held civily liable of
sexual abuse, would you let them
immigrate into the country legally?
>> Uh no. But we don't know that because
>> Donald Trump was held civily liable of
sexual abuse and you're okay with him
being the president held accountable for
that or not BECAUSE THERE'S NO RECORD of
a major problem here that you're denying
all of Trump's all of Trump's Jeffrey
you've been eliminated by the group.
>> That was good. Thank you.
>> Awesome.
>> That was really good.
>> Sprinted there.
>> Nice to meet you.
>> Nice to meet you as well. Appreciate you
being out here going against all of us.
Of course. So explain to me more of what
you're trying to say. Are you trying to
say that Trump's like an evil man or
>> No, no, no. So there's a massive problem
with Donald Trump when it relates to
power dynamics. Throughout his entire
career, this is a man who has abused
power dynamics every step of the way. On
the Howard Stern show, he one time said
that he walks into dressing rooms of
people changing because he owns the
beauty pageant and they they no one says
anything. You think that's bad, right?
>> Donald Trump als Yeah. Donald Trump also
said he grabs women by the [ __ ] because
they let them do it. You can that
happened, right? Yes.
>> So then he was also asked in a
deposition a few years later, do you
consider yourself a star? And he said,
I'll consider myself a star. So he's
basically conceding right there that
he's a star who can do it. So my point
is Donald Trump throughout the years has
abused his power dynamics by not only
walking into girls in dressing rooms,
but also being best friends with Jeffrey
Epstein, sending Jeffrey Epstein letters
while Jeffrey Epste is at the peak of
his sex trafficking. Meanwhile, the
average undocumented immigrant doesn't
have any power to abuse. Yes, there are
crimes committed by undocumented
immigrants. coming to the country
illegally is a crime, but when we're
talking about sexual crimes on the outer
edges and by the statistics, Donald
Trump is way more likely to commit one.
>> So [clears throat] that's your claim. So
>> first and foremost,
we got to talk about So you're for
immigration,
>> illegal immigration.
>> I I am all on the same page with you.
>> Hell yeah.
>> Of course. So I'm I'm glad that we do
agree on this other aspect that we don't
like men in dressing rooms, right? I'm
glad we do agree on that, but
>> No, of course I don't. Wait, why would
I? Right. That's a whole different thing
with the trans woman
>> climb. Can you claim it's kind Can you
just say it's kind of weird that the
president of United States has bragged
repeatedly about grabbing women because
they let you do it or
>> Okay. Another important thing to keep in
mind is that when did Trump do all these
things that he's being accused of? Was
he a Republican or was he a known
Democrat?
>> Does his ideology matter?
>> I think it does because it shows you who
you're surrounded around around can
affect your decision. Now I'm not saying
you I'm saying like Trump at the time he
was 68 years a Democrat. You want to
talk about who we're surrounded by? The
Republican party is literally covering
up Jeffrey Epstein. The Republican party
is covering up Matt G. Do you remember
when Matt Gates was being investigated
because he had Venmoed 17-year-old
girls? Do you remember this? And then
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson
refused to allow information to come
out. And then the Epstein case, Speaker
of the House Mike Johnson refuses to
allow stuff to come out. So, it's kind
of weird to me that you guys want to
sometime, not you, but people try to
paint every undocumented immigrant as
some violent sex offender when the
president of the United States is.
>> That's the thing we don't know about
these undocumented immigrants. You see,
my stance is we need legal immigration.
I agree.
>> I I'm glad we agree on that.
>> Can I ask you, would you let your
daughter go over to her friend's house
if the scenario that I laid out earlier
existed?
>> I wouldn't want her around. But here's
the thing. Trump, if he was truly what
they're claiming he is to be, why does
his granddaughters love him? Why do his
children love him? Right? You would
assume if he has those tendencies, he
would like hopefully not, but sad
situation is pedophiles do that. He's
said a lot of weird things about his own
daughter, but even if I were to concede
that he treats his own children well,
what about Virginia, who was groomed out
of his Mara Lago spa? I'm sure no one in
this room would want their daughter to
be in the Mara Lago spa in the early
2000s where Jeffrey Epste was grooming
women out. So, when you look at
statistics and you look at the
proportions, you are much much safer
with the average undocumented immigrant
than with Donald Trump, Mr. Mara Lago,
sex trafficker. So, you've been
eliminated by the
>> I appreciate you.
Hey, nice to meet you.
>> Nice to meet you as well.
>> Okay, so the first thing I want to say
is you mentioned Howard Stern. Um, I
think there's some really important
context to note when we talk about
Howard Stern, which is that show was in
the early 2000s. They always tried to
egg their guests on to be extremely edgy
and say things that would basically stir
things up. And so with that context in
mind, that is not an actual admission
that he did it. Well, what about the
fact that four or 15year-old girls said
that Donald Trump walked in in their
dressing room when they were part of his
beauty pageant?
>> I mean, whether or not that's true, I
want to get to one point here. Okay? So,
if that is true,
>> and you condemn it.
>> If if that is true, then
>> Donald Trump said it himself.
>> He said it
>> and then four women corroborated it
>> and we have to understand even more. I
don't know the context of that. So, if
that is true any
>> No context.
Okay. Yeah. Yeah. I I haven't looked at
evidence, so I need the evidence. But I
want to ask because I think this
question really is about a larger
immigration policy. What immigration
policy are you supporting with this?
>> I support on the highest level an
immigration policy where people come
into the country legally where we know
every single person who is in the
country at all times because we don't
want undocumented people going around
and a way that we can have people be
competitive in the labor market uh for
immigrants to just integrate into
society in a solid way. So, I think
there's a way better way to do that than
number one, what Trump is doing. Number
two, the deportations that he's enacting
are crazy.
>> So, now I want to also ask, do you
support welfare?
>> Do I support welfare?
>> That would be like social security,
Medicare, Medicaid. Sure. To a certain
extent, not for illegal.
>> Here's what I want to get to.
>> Illegal immigration um or in this case,
you'd want it to be legal ideally.
>> They would all collect on welfare and if
you look at it overall, it would be a
net drain on the economy. Yes, that is
true. And studies that have estimated
against it do stuff like estimating that
every one out of nine has a graduate or
PhD which is just blatantly false.
>> That is not true. A few things. Every
single study on this topic shows that
when immigrants move to the country
especially when they're higher when
they're PhDs as well uh they increase
more in or sorry they give more in taxes
they give more in building. Then what
about Giovanni Perry's 2016 study saying
that when immigrants move into the
country that they are a net benefit. Can
you site a study of the opposite?
>> I can site theory. I can site
>> you asked me for a study and you can't
site one.
>> No, I I there is a study by the Heritage
Foundation, but again, so are you saying
that illegal immigrants cuz most of
these studies are talking Are you saying
that legal or ille talking about the
policy that you're trying to back is
going to cause a net harm on the
economic
>> future? What's your prescription? You
want no legal immigration to the
country?
>> No. No, no, no. Absolutely not.
>> So, what's your prescription then?
>> You have mass migration and welfare at
the same time. You have to choose
between the two. Otherwise, there will
be a net drain on the economy. This has
been well noted through economists like
Milton Freriedman. And
>> it's not true.
>> Yes, it is.
>> You've been animated by this.
>> That was good. Thanks, man.
>> What's up?
>> Good to meet you, man.
>> Great to meet you as well.
>> I'm Kai. Adam, I think um I I like what
you're doing rhetorically. It's a very
interesting strategy.
>> Where do you disagree?
>> Um well, I disagree in large degree with
the framing. Would you agree with the
framing that a child is probably uh
safer off with the average illegal
immigrant than with Joseph Biden? I
think that's what a Republican would
claim. Perfect. Now that we've agreed
kind of that the framing is safer, can
you point to Joe Biden being friends
with prolific sex trafficker Jeffrey
Epste?
>> Absolutely.
>> I mean, there's a web of connection.
>> Wait, wait, wait, wait. Did Joe Biden
have girls groomed out of his Mara Lago
spa? Did Joe Biden have 26 different
credible sexual assault allegations? Or
did Joe Biden say that he grabs women
because they let him do it? Any of those
things? Well, it's interesting because
>> I'm not here to say that Joe Biden's
perfect, but I just think this
equivalency is crazy. I wouldn't want my
daughter.
>> I agree. I I think the equivalency of
the average illegal immigrant Donald
Trump is crazy. The way that we assemble
those statistics is absolutely
ridiculous. If you were if you were to
take, let's say, what's the sample size
in your study? How many illegal
immigrants were included as a part of
the study?
>> It was in Texas from 2012 to 2019. I
don't know the exact sample size.
>> Let's let's assume it's over a thousand.
It's statistically significant. There
there is a there is a power there in the
the value that the study has concluded
with. If we have a thousand Donald
Trumps, which of the two will have been
more guilty of violent crimes?
>> Wait a minute. Wait a minute. You want
to do this? If you have a thousand
Donald Trumps versus a thousand
undocumented immigrants,
>> one group will have committed violent
crimes. The other will not have
statistics show No, that is the
statistics show.
>> Which violent crime has he been has he
actually been convicted of?
>> He was held civily liable of sexual
abuse, sexual assault. Number one. But
number two, what if you take a thousand
people, you take a thousand undocumented
immigrants, thousand Donald Trumps, the
statistics show that those thousand
Donald Trumps will abuse way more women.
26 versus the average undocumented
immigrant commits violent crimes at a
two times lower rate than the native
born citizen. Trump commits crimes at a
higher rate than the native citiz
I do see what you're doing. And what
you're doing is trying to remove the
hole in it. What you're doing is trying
to remove the effect of the crime from
the actual people who are affected by
it. Which is why you're saying, well, if
Donald Trump was in a room with you, the
issue is when you analyze the the
difficult or rather the amount of crime
that these illegal immigrants are
actually perpetrating. And when you
compare it and say that blanket
statement, right, that they are less
violent than the nativeorn American.
You're not comparing it individually to
each group. The levels of crime, the
rates of crime among groups in this
country differ significantly based on
where you are and based on what the
group is. Would you say that's why I
said average? That's why I said average.
I mean, you can point to a specific
area, but that's why it's average.
>> Would you let someone who was held
civily liable sexual abuse immigrated
into the country legally?
>> You you understand? Well, no, I don't
think so. No, but you have to be the
president.
>> You're not engaging with the with the
statistic that you brought up at the
beginning. And again,
>> the framing that you the framing that
you were providing, if we were to be
statistically um consistent, would say
that with the average illegal immigrant,
you are safer than with the average
black American. Would you agree with
that framing? with the average illegal
immigrant, you're safer with the average
black. Yeah. Yeah. Because black
Americans commit crimes
>> at a disproportionate rate.
>> No. Yeah. Yeah. Sure.
>> Okay. So, you understand how framing can
significantly shape the way that we
engage in these conversations. I don't
think every black person is going to
kill me, but there is a
disproportionality around it.
>> But the thing is, not every immigrants,
listen, not every immigrant's going to
abuse you. Every one of those thousand
Donald Trumps will abuse their power
dynamics. Absolutely. Donald Trump
throughout throughout his entire life is
>> none of them will commit violent crime
throughout his entire life as somebody
who has abused every power dynamic
available to him to prey on girls. Would
you let your daughter in the Mara Lago
spa if it were 2001?
>> No, I I Trump is supposed to be safe.
Trump's Mara Lago spa isn't safe.
>> You're drawing these equivalencies
between a property that an individual
owns, what occurs on that property, and
a condoning of it by that.
>> He knew about it. He said he likes him
young. He was talking about Jeffrey.
>> That is an absolute false. Okay, show me
what how how do those two comments
relate to each other?
>> When Donald Trump said in 2003 Jeffrey
Epstein likes some young
>> I'm looking for for a clear consistency.
>> Okay, let me finish. Donald Trump says
in 2003 Jeffrey Epstein likes some
young. That happened, right?
>> Okay. What is that?
>> That Let me finish. Did that happen?
Sure.
>> Okay. Three years earlier, Virginia Grey
was groomed out of his spa by Jeffrey
Epstein. Donald Trump held private
Donald Trump held private parties in the
'9s where him and Jeffrey Epste just
those two had 20 calendar girls. You can
look this up. I hope there's one on
screen. with their girls. Okay. What
about the 15-year-old girls that Donald
Trump walked in on in his dressing
rooms? I mean, no one here. I've had
three people say they wouldn't let their
daughter around Trump. Three people say
they wouldn't let their daughter
>> I wouldn't let my daughter around Joseph
Biden. I'm not defending Biden. I don't
care.
>> Well, you don't have to defend a thing.
You haven't staked out a position.
You've easily admitted that once we
change the framing to talk, for example,
about things that are more relevant to
the average American. For instance, the
average person who is living in Texas,
right? The way that these people are
going to feel the effects of migration
are not as an average. There is no
cookie cutter average American was done
in Texas.
>> Hold on. I understand that. That's why
I'm citing the study. That's why I
immigration state. Yeah. Yeah.
>> Here's the point.
>> Pause. You've been animation.
>> That was really good, man.
>> Appreciate it, man. Likewise. It's good
to meet you.
>> Yeah. Great to meet you.
>> Quick.
>> Hey, nice to meet you.
>> Great to meet you as well.
>> Thank you very much for having this
conversation.
>> Okay. So, I want to start with by saying
I think your claim is actually quite
absurd because it's really a nothing
burger. If Donald Trump is, you know,
worse for my to be a babysitter for my
child than an average illegal immigrant,
that doesn't really mean anything. True
though. I what what I I wouldn't let my
kid with anyone. I wouldn't let my kid
with Harris, with Biden, with Destiny.
There's so many like like are you ser
Okay.
>> Wait. So you can concede that your kid's
probably not safe with Donald Trump with
the average undocumented.
>> I think this is a red herring. What I
really want to talk about and what I
really care about is are our kids safer
under Donald Trump or under a potential
Kla Harris administration. Because if
you really think [cheering] about it,
[applause]
if you really think about it, when we're
analyzing the safety of our children,
Kla Harris is proabortion, Kla Harris
liked transgender surgeries for our
minors and hormone therapies. But if
we're talking about specifically
elimination, her open border policies
was absolutely drastic right now.
>> Okay, wait. I want to talk about which
administration kids are better off
under. The big beautiful bill that we
were just all talking about in the last
segments will remove over the next
decade hundreds of thousands of people
from having school lunch. Free school
lunch. Are you supporting free school
lunch? Do you support free school lunch?
>> What what I want to talk to you about.
>> Do you support free school lunch or no?
>> You're we're talking about immigration,
which is the topic.
>> Wait, no, no. You were just talking
about children's safety in America.
>> I'll tell you I I'm going to I need to
propose to you why I think we are going
to be safer under Donald Trump than
under transgender people or what?
because of illegal immigration. Under
Kla Harris's open border policy, we had
we under her policy, we had an influx of
illegal immigration, many of which
caused children to go missing. But but
furthermore, Donald Trump is really good
at promoting national sovereignty and
national identity. And I think that's
really the core issue at hand here when
we talk about uh immigration. And we see
Donald Trump promoting deportations,
promoting enforcement on the border is
going to unify the nation and bring us
back to our national identity. What
about the citizen children of people who
are here illegally who are now terrified
that they're going to be deported along
with their parents as two people were?
What about the kids not doing that many
deportations? So, he's not doing that
many deportations.
>> Look at it. If you I don't know the
exact number. So, how are you going to
claim that he's not doing that many? A
lot more. No, he's
>> How are you going to make a comparison
when you don't know the number? I got to
I got to mention this.
>> You don't know the number.
>> I got I got to mention this. Donald
Trump's promotion of national security
and national sovereignty in his strict
border enforcement policies is what's
going his talk about mass deportations.
It's really good for creating a
deterrence effect truthfully on illegal
immigration coming to the nation. But
what I really want to talk about is that
Democrats say all the time that
diversity is our strength and I
completely reject that notion. I think
unity is our strength. Yes. Let me ask
you a thought experiment. If I were to
take you and drop you off into South
Africa, you wouldn't know what's going
on. You don't understand the culture.
You don't understand the language. You
don't understand what the people around
you are doing. Now imagine notice that's
half that's half of it. Now imagine
every single person in the United States
felt that way. We would be in total
chaos. No one would understand anything
that's going on. You think everyone in
the United States feels that way
together as a unified nation.
>> Do you think people feel that way right
now?
>> I think I think under the left radical
administration they are promoting like
the
>> you said let me respond very quickly.
You said a lot. There was a moment where
you said something about rather than
diversity we need unity. Well both
coincide. When we have a diverse nation
a melting pot as we do all you can ask
for is unity. We have a president of the
United States right now who is trying to
get the military to boo my side. He
called my side gnats that need to be
taken care of. And he did this. There's
a clip of it online. In order to have
the two in order to have unity, you need
to assimilate to an idea which is the
idea of America, the American freedom.
>> So what's your broader point here? I
need to assimilate.
>> My broader point is that right now
children are safer with the average. It
sounds like you did when you sat down.
>> I got I got to Can you please let me
finish? Okay. So under the Trump
administration, children are safer than
under the Democrat open border policies
that we saw
>> by what statistic?
>> By what statistic? I by the border
enforcement statistics. How many people
across the border since Trump came into
office?
>> Since Trump came into office. You want
to know what other countries have zero
border?
>> You obviously don't want to talk about
the issue.
>> I will I will concede right away that
Donald Trump has decreased both
immigration and tourism into the United
States. You want to know what other
countries Harris is doing? You want to
know what other I've been wanting to get
this.
>> You want to know what other country has
zero immigration and zero tourism?
>> North Korea. Russia has no tourism.
>> Yeah, that's crazy. Uh, but okay. But
you need to have an American idea to
understand to and assimilate to. Thank
[applause] you.
>> That was good. That was really best
argument.
>> My last claim is Donald Trump is the
most corrupt president in American
history.
Hi, I'm Blake.
>> Nice to meet you, Blake.
>> Thanks for being here.
>> This is a great conversation.
>> I think that Donald Trump maybe is one
of the least corrupt presidents in
American history.
>> I think that Donald Trump came out of a
very corrupt system. Not himself, but
the America that elected Trump saw what
happened after years of Democrat
control, after years of Clintons and
Obama's and all the same. And Trump came
along and he said, "We have to change
this. We have to be unccorrupt. We have
to uh be done with these people that
coming in, they have these donors
controlling them." Think about that 2016
debate. Hillary Clinton came in and she
was controlled by the donors. Trump came
in and said, "I'm spending my own money.
I'm not controlled. I can't be corrupt."
So that's what we like about him.
>> What you're saying is true. A lot of
Americans have felt like the system is
rigged for years, and it has been. But
what Donald Trump did is not unrigged
the system. He rerigged it for himself.
When he got into office, his net worth
was $4.3 billion. Can you guess by how
much his net worth has increased over
the past 9 months?
>> Liberals always love to President
Trump's net worth.
>> Can you just guess very quickly?
>> We really don't care.
>> Okay, so Donald Trump, our net worth is
higher. Donald Trump made our net worth
higher.
>> Okay, how did he make your net worth
higher? By starting a Trump coin, the
name
increase business in America. He keeps
saying he has not America. I'm sorry,
but businesses are struggling under
terrorist wars.
>> Donald Trump's net worth in Okay, so Joe
Biden's net worth during his term went
from $8 million, let me finish, to $11
million. That is a $3 million increase
from real estate, from investments that
he had. Donald Trump over the past n
months has gained $3 billion in wealth
through a few things. Right before he
got into office, he started World
Liberty Financial, which is a way for
people to buy cryptocurrency named
Trumpcoin. You know about Trumpcoin,
right? Are you okay with Trumpcoin? Uh,
I mean, I'm not sure that's on him.
>> It's It's It is on him. He literally two
days before his inauguration leveraged
the hype of it to launch.
>> Think how much do you think Trump knows
about uh meme points?
>> Okay. The thing is it doesn't have to
know about it for him to know it's a
good channel of corruption. So, do you
know who Justin Sun is?
>> Tell me.
>> A Chinese-born entrepreneur who is being
investigated by the SEC for market
manipulation and fraud. Justin Sun
decided to buy 70 billion dollars worth
or 70 million or billion dollars worth
of cryptocurrency. It was billion
actually. And then he was allowed to
step foot back in the United States for
the first time in years because the SEC
dropped the investigation. Donald
Trump's wealth increase of $3 billion
has allowed people to literally get
favors. Corrupt people to get favors.
You can't point to anything like that
with Biden.
>> Really?
>> Yeah. Where did he increase his wealth
by like $3 billion?
>> Look at Hunter Biden. Look Ukraine.
>> Look at all that.
>> What's Hunter Biden's net worth?
>> Much larger than it was before his
father was in the Senate and the
presidency.
>> You think so?
>> Oh, absolutely. I mean, if your argument
is that Hunter Biden was corrupt and
that Trump is less corrupt. So, you're
saying Trump is the second corrupt
person?
>> I want I want to take it.
>> You've been eliminated by the group.
>> That was good. Thank you.
>> What's up,
>> Isaac? Good to meet you.
>> Nice to meet you, Isaac.
>> Awesome. So, your claim, just to make
sure, is that Trump is the most corrupt
president of all time. Um, so what due
diligence and evidence do you have to
compare him to every other president?
Cuz you said most. So what other
presidents have you done your due
diligence to see what their corruption
is and to make sure that he is the most
corrupt?
>> Yeah. So I think Watergate is a really
good analog. Nixon's Watergates was like
at that time the craziest thing to ever
happen in a presidential administration.
So Watergate was awful. But my argument
is there is a Watergate happening
basically every single day. What Donald
Trump has done is set up a few buckets
for people to funnel money into and then
he uses those buckets to give favors.
So, I've already talked about the Trump
coin and I talked about Justin Sun, but
there's other good examples like Melania
Trump, for example, met with Jeff Bezos
behind the scenes at the White House and
then got a $40 million movie deal right
away. It's interesting because I just
sorry, a quick tangent that I want to go
on. In the '9s, Hillary Clinton got in
this huge, huge scandal because she made
$100,000 a decade prior off of cattle
futures. Donald Trump and his family
make billions. Billions. And this is
like not even a blip in the news. So
that's what I'd compare it to. Hillary,
Watergate. Yeah.
>> So only Hillary and Nixon.
>> I mean, do you have any better analoges?
Who would you say is more corrupt?
>> What my argument isn't so much who's
more corrupt, it's that you're claiming
that he's the most corrupt, but you
haven't done your due diligence on every
other president.
>> There are big tentpole moments in
history like Watergates, LBJ had some
election corruption, but Donald Trump
between his fake elector scheme, between
his wealth enrichment, and between the
favors he's getting from Qatar. Do you
know about the $400 million Qatari jet?
>> Yeah. Do you think there's any analog in
American history to the $400 million
Guitar Jet?
>> Not off the top of my head, but I'm also
not making the claim that he's the most
corrupt.
>> No, no, that's fine. I'm I'm not trying
to like press you or anything, but
there's just no analog to this wealth
increase in the favors that Donald Trump
has given.
>> Okay. So, you would equate financial
gain to corruption and only financial
gain to corruption?
>> No, there's a few other ways. There's
like bribery, quid proquo, there's
pardons, there's certain things. Yeah.
What I'm trying to get at is I'm not
going to deny that everything that Trump
has done has not have some emphasis of
corruption. But what I am trying to
point out is the fact that you are
labeling him as the most but completely
disregarding every other presidency up
until that point because you're
>> not every single one. I gave a really
good example of 1992 when Hillary
Clinton got in a big scandal and then I
compared how Melania Trump made like
4,000 times that money, you know. So I
mean we can look at other analoges in
history. There's never been a fake
elector scheme. Do you remember Obama
coin or like Hillary coin? No, there was
no Obama coin. There was no Hillary coin
coins after them.
>> Trumpcoin is unique in many ways.
>> Okay, but what does Trumpcoin equate to
corruption? How is it corrupt?
>> It's an untraceable way for people to
funnel money into and gets No, because
Bitcoin isn't being held by the
president and used for favors. Donald
Trump. So, here's the thing with
Trumpcoin. It is not only untraceable,
but people can tell Trump, "Hey, I'll
donate to you." And then they not only
gain leverage over him, he wasn't
waiting.
>> Dang it.
>> Great.
Hey, great to see you again.
>> Yeah, nice to chat again.
>> So, I I just want to say uh and I'll
I'll address that. I do think there's a
lot of corruption with the Trump
administration, but I'm going to put
that aside. I don't think it's the most
uh corrupt administration, but that has
a lot to do with definitions. First, I
want to say you you call Trump a
fascist. You strongly strongly implied
he's a pedophile who's escaped the law.
>> Do you think he's not a ped Do you think
he was?
>> I don't I don't think I don't think that
he uh sexually assaulted any children
violently. Uh and now now you're saying
he's the most corrupt president in US
history. To me, it sounds like fascist,
most corrupt in history, pedophile who's
escaped the law because of his political
influence or something. Why don't you
want Donald Trump dead?
>> Because the American political system
should not have violence involved at it
in any step. I think part of the beauty
of America is that you and I are able to
sit down across from each other or
anybody in this room and we're able to
have a conversation. Even if it gets a
little bit feisty, even if people knock
over the clock accident, we're able to
go around and have a good conversation.
Nowhere in that process should violence
be involved. When Charlie Kirk was shot,
it shook me up. It's not good. That
should never happen. Nobody should enact
violence, and I tell my audience that
all the time. You can call somebody
corrupt. You can call somebody I mean,
dude, Donald Trump called Biden a
fascist. Donald Trump said Biden and
Kamala were to stop
>> like an example. Do you think someone
would have been justified in killing
Hitler?
>> Justified in killing Hitler at the end
of World War II.
>> Uh you could say in the the leadup
whenever he started putting Jews in gas
chambers, I think good cut off.
>> I think the man who was genociding
Jewish people could be justifiably
killed. But Donald Trump isn't
genociding any sort of group right now.
So that's a little bit different.
>> Well, I I I what what I hear is fascist.
And you say you attach all these things.
So I think that that there's a strong
implication there that some violence is
justified. But I think that has more to
do with your water down definition.
>> Wait, do you think that people in
positions of power shouldn't call the
other side fascist?
>> Uh yeah. Well, I I will say that the
Trump administration uses divisive
rhetoric and it's not
>> Do you think they shouldn't use the
word? So when Trump when Trump called
Kamla a fascist, was he calling for
Kamla to be killed?
>> Uh no.
>> Why not? Because there's not this
consistent this consistent force did it
over and over throughout the no there's
not a consistent force of claims and a
culture on the right that supports
>> Stephen Miller just said the Democratic
party isn't a he said it's not a
political party let me put it this way
it's a domestic extremist organization
>> yeah there there's differences with the
audience that you're speaking to so when
Democrats say someone's a fascist
someone's violent democrats actually go
out and commit these acts of violence is
what we see all the time so there's a
yes of course you see this
>> basically every single study I can point
to the one by the
>> CSI you can cite whatever study like you
cited the study on illegal immigrants
earlier There there there's no like
baseline no one had a counter study.
>> What's the methodology of that study?
Explain it to me.
>> Wait, the the political violence study
by the CSIS, let's talk about this one
very very quickly. They go through all
of the violent lethal crimes over the
past decade or it might be two decades
with the Minnesota in incident. And also
I want to say there's a difference
between the farright violence that's
fully fully denounced. There's fringes
of the Republican party that aren't
allowed anywhere near it. My problem is
that leftist ideology is an ideology of
violence. The difference the difference
that I see between Chuck Schumer is
causing violence in communist. Chuck
Schumer, let me finish speaking. Okay,
so the Chuck Schumer, let me
>> uh the difference that I see with uh
with Democrats and Republic See, now I
lost my train of thought. Oh, is uh the
Democrats do have a culture of supported
violence. The Republicans just don't.
>> Wait, are you sure Donald Trump pardons
1,600 people who beat the [ __ ] out of
cops? What's the analog to that with uh
Democrats?
>> Uh so he you're telling me that all of
those people were violent offenders?
>> No, I'm saying that
1600. How many of those people were
violent offenders?
>> I mean, the amount of people that beat
cops, how many of them were violent
offenders? Probably a few dozens. A lot
of them were arrested.
>> A few dozen?
>> Yeah.
>> A few dozen. So, so upwards of people
who are violent offenders.
>> Wait, you're okay with a few dozen
people? Violent people.
>> No. Trump went out of his way to not
pardon violent offenders.
>> He pardoned everybody. It was a blanket
pardon. You're just
>> a blank pardon for the trespassing that
happened on the capital.
>> Are you going to concede that Trump is
the most corrupt president in American
history? No, I'm not. Okay, then let's
go back.
>> So, my definition of corruption would be
for personal gain doing things. And I
would say uh going up for a bid for
re-election would also be corruption if
you do things you know are bad for the
country in order to get reelected. So
that for that reason and I I'll grant
you it's an unconventional definition. I
would say probably FDR or LBJ most
corrupt in American history.
>> Your definition wasn't even that far off
mine. It's using it's using public
office for private gain which is fine. I
don't know about your election analogy
but the thing is
>> LBJ I'll have those nwords voting
Democrat for the next 200 years.
>> That's not corruption. That's racism.
>> No, that is corruption. It's him saying
I'm going to give things to this section
of the population. All right. Now I let
you finish. There you go.
>> Speedy.
>> Hey. Nice to see you again. Long time no
see.
>> Good to be back. [laughter]
>> Um, I want to circle back to a point
that you brought up which was the Trump
coin. Yeah.
>> And can you explain why that's such a
good example of corruption in your view?
>> It is the perfect example of corruption
because Trump Donald Trump leveraged the
hype of his inauguration two days before
to release a Trump coin and then a
Melania coin. Not only is this
unprecedented, this has never happened
like this before, but it then led to an
unprecedented wealth increase over the
first nine months. This wealth increase
was through people funneling money into
his Trump coin and getting favors in
return.
>> Really quick, the reason it's probably
unprecedented is cuz crypto's not been
around for long enough for other
presidents to have done something like
that. And I will Jimmy Carter put his
farm in a blind trust that it was a
scummy thing to do, but I don't think
it's a clear sign of corruption. When I
see corrupt when I think corruption, I
think of things like not to circle back
to Russia gate, but like the Obama
administration literally spied on like
the leading Republican candidates
campaign and tried to frame him for
treason.
>> This is not true. But do you think
that's more corrupt than getting $3
billion in net worth increase and
>> from the from the like crypto poll? I
mean, yeah, because I don't see the
clear tie between like the Trump coin
and like political action.
>> Okay, Trumpcoin is owned 75% by Trump
and his family. It vests throughout the
term, meaning money gets released to
Trump and his family. What this allows
is for people in an untraceable manner
to donate to this and then get favors.
Like I said earlier,
>> you don't you don't know any of that's
happening. Wait, Justin's son was
allowed to step foot in the United
States and then went to a private dinner
with Trump for the executive branch. I
can listen.
>> You don't know that it's because of
Trumpcoin. You don't know that any of
this is happening with that. Trump has
sold a lot of things. Trump has sold a
lot of cheap products. He sells Trump
watches. He sells Trump commemorative
coins and he sell Trump cryptocurrency.
To me, it seems like he's like a
businessman who's been doing business
for his entire life and he's just doing
another business. I want to draw is a
scummy thing to do. I think like selling
cheap commemorative coins is a scummy I
think it's really important to draw a
distinction between monetizing your
name, monetizing the presidency by
selling things and actual corruption. So
what Donald Trump is doing
>> corruption? I think it was same example.
>> Okay. So when Donald Trump gets a $400
million jet from Qar and then Qar builds
a $5.5 billion golf course in their
country and now Trump is doing joint
training exercises with them in the
United States. Is that quidd proquo
corruption?
>> I don't know all the details for that.
So
>> do you know about the $400 million jet?
>> I do know about
>> Is that personal gain?
>> I don't.
>> Is that for the American people? It
wasn't given to Trump. It was given to
like the governments.
>> It was given to Trump. So after Trump's
term, where does it go?
>> I believe into like the government's
property.
>> The Trump presidential library. It is
only for Trump to use.
>> Is that is the presidential library
owned by Trump?
>> It is only for Trump to use.
>> This is owned by Trump. Okay. So they
gave it to the government and after
Trump's term, it's going to the
government.
>> No, it's going to his presidential
library. It was
>> If the government owns it, they can like
take it from the presidential library
and put it somewhere else. They can put
other
>> use. just conceding that it's fine to
take $400 million gifts even though it
violates the imalments clause which says
you can't take gifts from other
countries that is just
>> defin
far greater issue like uh issues of
corruption in our country's history and
I think singling out this one where
Trump not even Trump like the government
was given a jet by one of our allies is
not all that
>> if you can handwave Trump coin and the
wealth increase and you can handwave
other countries giving him gifts then I
guess
>> I'm not necessarily handwaving it I'm
just saying your claim is he's the most
corrupt president
where you are speculating that
you are speculating. You're speculating
that there was a quid proquo going on
with Trump and Qatar. You're speculating
that funneled money into Trump to
Trump's uh campaign or whatever a few
days ago the leader literal like clear
examples that we've seen that there are
released documents.
>> So that's clear. Wait, that's clear. But
Donald Trump documents Russia Gate and
it being a hoax. They all knew it was
like
>> Did you read the documents? The
documents didn't say what you think they
said. They did say
>> okay. Thank you.
>> That was a tense.
>> Welcome back.
>> Hello.
>> Um, okay. So, um, the prompt is that
Trump is the most corrupt president,
right? Yeah. Yeah. So, I would like to
make a reference to um something I spoke
about previously. Um the Biden
administration and the millions of
immigrants, illegal undocumented
immigrants that they were letting in
that were disservicing the like the the
poverty population in the lowest margin
below, legal immigrants that were coming
in and working hard to get those
opportunities and they were rigging the
system for illegal undocumented
immigrants to receive all the benefits
that all these people worked for
citizenship to get.
>> First of all, these were asylum seekers.
The border wasn't just open. There was
an abuse of the asylum system, but it
was open. But people were just coming
through. How come in August there was
265,000 undocumented immigrants that
came in with no papers and no
>> no no just process no just process?
>> No,
>> last August.
>> Hold on. Let me
>> You're good.
>> Sorry, I I missed my medication.
>> No, you're good. You're good. So like
like I
>> Trust me, you're good.
>> Sorry, guys. Um um anyway, so um what I
see as corruption is I see my
grandparents with tears in their eyes
because they don't qualify for medical
because our tax dollars are going
towards people we don't even know are
here and that are being brought here and
throwing
>> I don't think people should come here
illegally. We agree on that. I think
that Biden's border policy was rather
indefensible. I don't agree with the
fact that it was an open border, but I
would never defend Biden's border
policy. I think that it was sloppy and
he should have been stronger on it.
>> It was corrupt.
>> Well, not corrupt. What's your
definition of corruption? Corruption, I
believe, is when things are happening
that are an injustice to the people. And
I believe that the disproportionate
illegal immigration where thousands and
thousands and thousands and thousands of
people are just coming in, first of all,
taking entry-level jobs from legal
immigrants that are saving up the money
to keep their permanent citizenship and
keep them here.
>> That's a different topic. Do you know
what the fake elector scheme is?
>> Um, I do.
>> Back when Trump lost the election, he
did the fake elector scheme. How would
you describe it to me?
>> Um,
>> here I'll I'll just
>> Didn't Didn't there was some sort of
phone call, right? Yeah, it the phone
call has something to do with it, but
essentially electors in each state
certified
>> illegal immigrants were allowed to vote
for Biden and they were being told if
they voted for Biden that they would be
able to come here and receive all these
benefits. That's is right.
>> Who told them that?
>> The Biden administration never
they were being brought in here to vote
for him.
>> Let me just finish being given a free
pass to be in here. You've been
eliminated by
Sorry. I get
>> No, just trust me. You're fine.
Hi, I'm Nick.
>> Nice to meet you, Nick. Nice to meet
you. So, at the end of the day, do you
think Trump has been a net positive to
this country? You call him a fascist.
You're calling him all these terrible
terms. Do you think Trump has done good
things? Has Trump done good things?
Sure. I think Operation Warp Speed was
good. Do I think he's a net benefit to
this country? No. I think the erosion of
democratic norms that we've seen
throughout Trump's term is absolutely
absurd. I want to repivot to the fake
elector scheme because I think that
one's really really important.
Essentially what Donald Trump did was as
he after he lost the election, he
understood that he lost the election.
There were electors in seven swing
states. He had people forge their
signature and act like they were the
dyeleed electors when they worked.
>> Who was the president the past four
years?
>> Biden.
>> Biden, right?
>> But at the time this was Trump. This was
when Trump this was when the transition
of power was happening.
>> He he still worked within the confines
of democracy.
>> He did not. The fake elector scheme was
necessarily illegal. That's why people
were arrested and indicted. That's why
all of the fake electors in the state of
Georgia were arrested on a RICO charge.
A RICO charge. And Donald Trump's
corrupt ass then said, "Let's pause this
investigation."
>> But you call you call him a fascist. He
works within the confines of democracy.
He's he's a
>> It's not. Do you think the 2020 election
was stolen?
>> I don't think it was.
>> Okay. So, do you think that Donald Trump
claims it was stolen?
>> He was not the president.
>> Does Donald Trump claim it was stolen?
He he he says there's uh serious
arguments against why he should
>> not just serious arguments. He said they
stole it from me. He said this is awful.
He said they we need to take our country
back. So you guys keep taking problem
with me calling him a fascist. But then
most of you guys conceded that the 2020
>> That's dangerous rhetoric.
>> Wait a minute. It's dangerous rhetoric
to convince half the country that the
election was stolen. Do you think it's
fascistic to try to thwart the peaceful
transfer of power and get your vice
president hung while he's certifying the
election results?
>> He he did.
>> Did people chant hang Mike Pence? Does
Mike Pence support Trump today? Wait,
what happened? Why isn't Mike Pence his
VP right now?
>> Trump was not in office. He He conceded.
He He didn't He never conceded. He call
He didn't call in, please. He's never He
has never conceded till this day. Can
this pop up somewhere? He was not He was
in office in action. He He didn't He
didn't call the National Guard and come
in and say
>> he conceded in action by storming having
his base storm the capital
>> in 2028. He's gonna, you know, he's
done, right?
>> I mean, he does a lot of 2028 hats. Is
it okay to say that's a little bit weird
and fascist? He he's been he's doing
incredible things for like what?
>> He's making this country great in a lot
of ways. He's he's bringing back a lot
of jobs. He's making this country great
if you were a billionaire. If you were
potentially on Epstein's Island and
don't want to get caught, he's making
this country great for all of the wrong
people. Meanwhile, in our generation,
unemployment is up. Prices have gone up.
It's a mess.
>> I just I really do think that um this
this this rhetoric of hate needs really
does need to stop on from the left.
you're comparing someone uh to Mussolini
Hitler, Franco, all these guys. It's
it's evil and we we just can't have this
in in this in this democracy.
>> I'm not saying he's genociding people
like Hitler, but I'm saying the election
denial, the erosion of democratic norms
and everything that Trump has done to my
city of Chicago is absolutely insane.
It's definitely fascistic and there's
just no doubt about it.
>> All right, time is out. See you later.
[applause]
I would like to choose the blue shirt
guy. [applause]
The reason why I chose you is because
you very clearly challenged me and
knocked me off for a second on the
Medicaid thing and I actually that was
good. It was a good debate and I want to
continue a discussion on your claim.
Let's hear it.
>> Perfect. I appreciate it.
My claim we'll be kind of going back to
that first claim that we talked about
earlier is that the left in the United
States is far more fascist than the
right in the United States.
>> Really, how do you define fascist?
>> Yes. So, let's start off with that. So,
I define it as one that wants
totalitarian rule and it aims to
establish that by dissenting forcibly
opposing views.
>> How do you define totalitarian?
>> Um, I' I'd say authoritarian
totalitarian just like like one party
rule.
>> Okay. So, how does this describe Joe
Biden or any Democrat more so than the
person who denied elections, more so
than the person who is literally
indicting his political opponents? We
can talk about the indictments. Do you
think that uh I should say? Yeah, let's
talk about the indictment.
>> I would love to talk about that.
>> So, you brought three indictment the
three sets of diamonds earlier with
Leticia James, James Comey, and the
third one was
>> Well, it was more that Donald Trump sent
out a post naming three people.
>> Let's just dive into the details of
those cuz cuz you you said that that's
an example of fascism on the part of the
president. Absolutely. So, let's dive
into each of those. So Leticia James was
indicted for mortgage fraud and there
was there's actually if you read the
indictment there's a pretty good
evidence that Leticia is actually guilty
of mortgage fraud. James Comey, I don't
think they've unsealed that indictment
yet, so we don't know exactly what he's
being charged for. But Michael Cohen,
who is obviously a super anti-Trump guy,
even went on MSDNC, MSNBC, same thing,
and said that James Comey is probably
guilty of those charges, and John Bolton
has been denied. Listen,
>> listen, my problem is not with Leticia
James. I actually think it's fine for
this investigation to go on into Leticia
James, and I think she should be tried
by a jury of her peers. The problem is
Eric Sebert, who is a federal prosecutor
for the Eastern District of Virginia, a
very wellrespected guy, he was told to
indict those three people and he
refused.
>> Wait, wait, let me finish. He refused to
bring those indictments. Do you know
what happened to him?
>> Yeah, he resigned.
>> Trump forced him to resign and
threatened him. And then that week,
Donald Trump,
>> if a prosecutor isn't going to do their
job, they should 100% resign. Prosecutor
is the one who resigns, then absolutely.
You don't deserve that job.
>> Do you think it's the job of the
president of the United States to number
one, force them out of their job, and
number two, direct people? Okay. Okay.
So, can you name Joe Biden doing that to
anybody?
>> Uh, yeah. Him directing Merrick Garland
to open investigation of president.
>> How so? When did he direct Merrick
Garland?
>> That was what that was one of the things
that Joe Biden said in the leadup to the
lead inauguration. Yes, he did. Him and
other prominent Democrats called for
President Trump to be held accountable
for January 6th, which is what Merrick
Garland was doing.
>> No, no, no. So, wait. You think that
Trump directly, Do you know the Pam
Bondi tweet I'm talking about? When
Trump tells Pam Bondi, he says, "Pam, I
need you to indict these people."
>> Yes. That is in the purview of the
president United States. Yeah.
Absolutely. To make sure United States
not supposed to direct his attorney
general. I want to ask you one more
time. One more time.
If the left when did Joe Biden direct
Merrick Garland and can you quote it
because what you just said was a lie.
Joe Biden never direct obvious that that
Joe Biden directed Merrick Garland. Did
you say he hired American that was what
Demarland did on day is that it's quote
obvious that Biden did it but you have
no evidence. But this obvious tweet from
directing Pam Bondi is not enough in
your eyes.
>> It doesn't matter if it's public or
private. The the fact of the matter is
that on the right we actually prosecute
people for real crimes they committed.
Whereas on the left they make up crimes.
For for example the one crime that
Donald Trump got committed on the state
of New York by lead falsifying business
record. They had they had to combine two
separate two separate crimes. They got
to combine them into one. Extend a
statute of limitations just to charge
President Trump on. Do you even know the
mechanism for for how they found him
guilty?
>> Like like what like what did they find
him guilty of?
>> Falsifying business records 34 times.
>> Like Yeah. Do you know what the actual
what the actual crime was that they were
alleging?
>> Yeah. He was trying to pay Stormmy
Daniels and they lied about the
payments.
>> Yeah. They they said that he should have
classified the I believe as a as a
campaign expense. I personally don't
think that that should be
>> classif but the jury did the jury
thought it was so you disagree with the
jury of Trump's peers that were picked
through the process of vadier by Trump's
own lawyers.
>> Yeah that yeah that was absolutely yeah
it was a obviously politicized trial in
>> the trial isn't politicized.
>> Um no because there's actual evidence of
mortgage fraud there crime. Should he be
charged?
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Yeah, he he didn't crime up.
>> Wait, according to who?
>> What do you mean according to if you if
you read the do if you read the actual
>> I've read the indictment and it went
through not only a grand jury, the
indictment, but then an actual jury that
Donald Trump and his lawyers
>> a grand jury that that's not evidence of
anything.
>> Of course. Yeah, that I can use the same
thing with Leticia James. Literally,
they say that a grand jury can indict a
ham sandwich.
>> So, before you call it in fascistic act,
why don't you actually see the evidence
and let trial play out?
>> You're not you're not engaging with what
I'm saying.
>> For sure. So, but let's move to the
other reasons why the left is more
fascistic. So the main reason why I
would say that is the rise of political
violence that we have seen on the left,
especially in the recent years with with
Donald Trump attempting to be
assassinated twice and Charlie Kirk's
actual assassination. That is the
textbook definition of fascism. You
don't see that on the right.
>> Do you think both you don't see that on
the rights?
>> No. When was when was the last time that
Joe Biden had an assassination attempt
or Barack Obama or Bill Clinton or any
prominent Democrat politician?
>> Melissa Hortman and her husband and her
dog were shot in their home. They were
shot in their home by Vance Bolter.
You're talking about the Minnesota
lawmaker case. Yeah. What what is your
evidence that that's rightwing? That he
was rightwing. He was appointed by Tim
Walls.
>> The guy had a list of Republicans that
he was going to their houses or sorry,
the guy had a list of Democrats. He was
going to their houses. I misspoke. And
he was trying to take them out. He
killed Melissa Hortman and her daughter
by by Democrat lawmaker.
>> This is not true. This dude was a
Republican. He was a Republican. Are you
claiming that this was Democrat-on
Democrat violence? What is your claim
here?
>> There's no evidence that it was
Republican on Democrat violence. Listen,
there's also no evidence he was not
appointed by Tim Walls. He was a part of
some board that Tim Walls was also a
part of. This is like so what's what's
your evidence that he was motivated by
by by right-wing politicians?
>> A few things. He left or in jail. He
said that he did this because he doesn't
like Democrats. I promise you he told
someone this in jail. He also literally
went to I think it was five different
Democrats house, but only two families
were home. And he killed Melissa Hortman
and then he shot the the man, but he
survived.
>> Sure. And so here's the big difference
between here's a big difference. Here's
the difference between that and what
happened with Charlie Kirk and President
Trump. On the right, you really don't
see anyone celebrating that. On the
left, you absolutely see people
celebrating Charlie Kirk's
assassination. You saw people on TikTok
and Instagram saying that they hope that
the shooter who shot a President Trump
missed. They're like, "How how can you
miss?" That would never hight. We don't
celebrate assassinations. You guys do.
>> Can you name one Democrat in power who
celebrated?
>> One Democrat in power who celebrated?
No. My point is that my point is that
one point is that this is that this is a
cultural problem with the left. The left
as a whole, their culture is fascistic
that you guys can't name one Democrat in
power who celebrated. But when Nancy
Pelosy's husband Paul Pelosi had his
head bashed in with the skull, somebody
sorry had his skull bashed in with a
hammer from somebody who supports Donald
Trump. Trump and Don Jr. posted memes
about that. They posted memes about it
the next day. Do you think there is a
difference between somebody in power
making fun of a violent crime versus
random people online? I I think I think
that it's indicative when you have the
entire left as a whole.
>> No, answer my question. Is there a
difference between there is there is a
difference because when you see an
entire political ideology the whole like
pretty much the entire grassroots
leftist operations.
>> So now you're categorizing my entire
party as like what a violation
>> I think on college campuses as a
president of the college Republicans of
America when when chapters across
country tell me that they're tableabling
on campus you have people coming up
celebrating that Charlie's death that
that is indicative of a cultural problem
with the left that is that you just
don't see on the right. You don't see
>> I absolutely do.
>> Well, when when was the when was the
last time you've ever seen you've ever
been on a college campus and see someone
on the right, you know, trying to
celebrate political?
>> I don't even have to look at college
students. I can look at the actual
leaders of the party who are making fun
of Paul Pelosi. What about Mike Lee?
Senator Mike Lee or Representative Mike
Lee made fun of Melissa Hortman and made
jokes about it. Do you condemn that?
>> I I don't know what what jokes did he
make?
>> He was saying that it was something
about the shooter being I don't even
know. He was making a bunch of jokes
about the shooter doing this for some
crazy reason and then he got confronted
in Congress. He made a series of jokes
online that he had to delete. Do you
condemn that?
>> Are you saying that he was making fun of
people on the left saying that that it
was politically motivated? Then no, I
don't.
>> No, he was making fun of Melissa Hortman
days after she died. Okay. Do you think
it's okay for Trump to post like AI
videos of Paul Pelosi or whatever? He
posted an AI video of Nancy Pelosi
laughing about Paul Pelosi. I
>> I didn't see the video, so I I can't
say. But what I can say again,
>> I didn't see people on college campuses
doing this, so I can't say. I don't
know. I I mean you can you can pretty
easily look at social media and find
people celebrating it. I mean like like
people said earlier you have you have
people posting
>> but no Democrats in power.
>> What do you mean no Democrats in power?
If you want to talk about Democrats who
are trying to get in power, we could
talk about the Virginia AG candidate Jay
Jones who said that he hopes that
>> people on the right kids die. [cheering]
I condemn that.
>> You condemn that? Perfect. So then he
should drop out of the race.
>> Sure. Can you name a single Democrat in
power who didn't condemn that?
>> Um yeah the the v the guy the person
who's running for Virginia govern in a
debate last week she said of course I
condemn it. Even Jay Jones enough to
tell him to tell him to drop out of the
race.
>> She should tell him to drop out. But
here's the here's the here's the
fundamental difference right now. You
are pointing to people on my side and
you can't name a single Democrat in
power who made fun of Charlie Kirk. You
can't name a single Democrat in power
who said that Jay Jones what he said was
good. I can point to multiple people and
AOC who come out after the fact of
Charlie's assassination said he was a
racist and and were against
memorializing an American hero in
Congress.
>> So they weren't celebrating any of it.
Okay. There is a fundamental difference
between the way the two parties
function. And it's because Steven Miller
the other day said the Democratic Party
is not a political party. It's a
domestic extremist organization.
>> When you have one of the people of that
of that of that political party going
out and celebrating the death of the
other side, then absolutely categorize
the entire party 100% needs to be
deratized. The entire party
>> the Democrat party.
>> Okay. But you can't name a single
Democrat.
>> It is a problem when it is a problem
when the base of your of your party is
celebrating other people's death. It is
a problem when people of your party are
openly calling for death for death of
people like Charlie Ker. It is a problem
when the when the motives of the shooter
are very clear that it was emboldened by
Democrat politicians when they have
catched this fascist. So that it is it
is clear that Democrat politicians l you
know rhetoric around Donald Trump being
a fascist name that we have seen
assassinations. That's the reason that
that Donald Trump was tried to be
assassinated. That's the same reason
that Charlie Kirk was assassin.
>> Is there any proof that Thomas Matthew
Krooks was even a liberal? What's your
proof?
>> That Thomas Matthew he he donated to Act
Blue.
>> That's not true.
>> He What do you mean it's not true? Yes,
it is. He registered as a Republican
solely for the purpose of coming after
Donald Trump and and voting in Nikki
Haley in the primary.
>> So this is your proof. He was like 20
when this happened.
>> When mean he was 20. What does that
mean?
>> He didn't even donate in the last
election cycle.
>> It it was obvious that he was a
Democrat, like I said, because he
donated to Act Blue before.
>> Wait, so it's obvious he's a Democrat,
but Melissa Hortman Shooter, who had a
list of six different Democrats, isn't a
Republican. Do you see the double
standards here? And the No, you don't.
>> Not Not at all. It's that throughout
this entire debate, you guys are able to
draw connections. Even with Pam Bondi,
you said that Biden, there's no actual
proof of Biden asking Merrick Garland to
do this, but the proof of Trump asking
Pam Bondi to do this isn't enough.
>> Again, the proof is that Merrick Garland
on day one did it after being appointed
from Biden.
>> He didn't. He slowwalked it. He did not
do it on day one and Biden never asked
him to do that because there was a clear
Merrick Garland was a [ __ ] He was
somebody who slowed every single case.
He was absolutely a [ __ ] I mean, if he
was actually as strong as you guys
thought he was, then Trump would
probably be in jail for trying to
overthrow the 2020 election right now.
There was no crime there, but
>> time times out.
>> Thanks so much. [applause]
>> Good work, man.
>> A lot of people in this room probably
thought I was going to be way more mean
or aggressive or insufferable, but there
was this vibe where afterwards everyone
was like, "Hey, that was a great
conversation, and we need more of those.
In fact, I might have more
conversations." So, I think there's a
dynamic where this proves that America
still can be based on conversation and
not online divisiveness. I think Adam
was such a nice young man, too. And
especially, he's someone I feel like,
dude, we could totally hang out with,
right? That's something I really
respect. I could tell he was prepared
and he had brought notes and he was
ready, right? And I think sometimes you
get into conversations with people and
[music] you just can tell very quickly
they don't know what they're talking
about.
>> I do um appreciate that he did
acknowledge he agreed with some of my
points. He didn't just veto it because
we're on different sides. You know, I I
very much appreciated the fact that he
was extending his arm to compromise.
>> The the thing that Adam said that I
agreed with the most is is that of the
the kind of moral issues in Donald
Trump. That is an Achilles heel that the
Republican party has right now. Just
that impropriy that um honestly Adam is
correct to point out that exists in my
opinion in both parties. Adam was very
nice. There was a moment where Marty
cooked him. he uh really really showed
him that he was wrong. And he admitted,
you know, he said, "You got me." And I
think it takes a really big person to
just say, "Yeah, I'm wrong."
>> Because at the end of the day, if you
have a, you know, real ideological, you
know, opposition to someone else, try to
convince them otherwise. Don't don't try
to cancel them or stop talking to them
or or hope that someone kills them.
>> I think conservatives and liberals can
come together by trying to shed the
online algorithms that divide us and
promote the most outrage and having more
in-person conversations about issues
that [music] matter. Once you strip the
online divisiveness, you find a human
being on the other side who's willing to
shake your hand
Full transcript without timestamps
Now you're saying he's the most corrupt president in US history. To me it sounds like fascist, most corrupt in history, who's escaped the law because of his political influence or something. Why don't you want Donald Trump dead? What do you think is radicalizing more people, Nick Fuentes or MSNBC? >> Probably MSNBC. >> Really? More so than Nick Fuentes. I hear someone laughing behind me. That's kind of when immigrants move into the country, they are a net benefit. Can you site a study of the opposite? >> I can site theory. I can site. >> You ask me for a study and you can't site one because the barriers are increased. What what are the barriers? The only barrier we talked about is work requirements, and that's working 20 hours a week. >> You got me. That was a good one. That was really good. Thank you. >> You got me. >> My name is Adam Mockler. I talk politics on YouTube every single day, and I am a liberal college dropout. Today, I'm surrounded by 20 conservative college [music] students. My first claim is Trump is causing a rise of fascism in our generation. Hey, Adam. I'm Scotty. Nice to meet you. >> Nice to meet you, Scotty. >> Hey, would you mind unpacking a little bit more what you mean by rise? >> The rise of fascism. Yeah. Over the past decade, we've seen a normalization of more fascist anti-democratic ideologies. Just to explain, Trump's claim to fame entering US politics. He was famous before this, but he entered US politics by saying Obama wasn't born in America. He convinced a large swath of the country that Obama was not born in America. Four years later, he was chanting, "Lock her up," at a political rally, and no presidential candidate had done that before. Four years after that, he had couped the government, or at least attempted to coup the government. And now, I I live in the city of Chicago. He's posted AI memes of Chicago being invaded. He sent the military into Chicago. So, over the past, they could say, decade, decade and a half, we've seen a normalization of fascism in America. And I think it's manifesting in our generation in unique ways. We could talk about the Politico story, but Yeah. >> Yeah. No, I would say let's let's talk a little bit more about what fascism actually is because I think fascism is a loaded term. >> What's your definition? >> Before I get there, what I would say when you attach fascism to Trump's name, that is a slap in the face to all the Jews who were exterminated under fascist law. >> Fascism doesn't just have to do with Jews. Donald Trump is out. >> It was Hitler. When you think of fascism, you think of two people. You think of Hitler and you think of Mousolini who killed millions and millions of people. Trump is not that. >> What's your definition of fascism? >> I would say fascism is a one person or one party who is silencing and who is demeaning and who is I guess you would say, you know, opposing and silencing any other opposition. >> It's it's kind of right. I >> nuance to that. I'd say a a better definition is a far-right authoritarian ideology with one leader at the top with a cult of personality who forcibly suppresses opposition as you said, but at the same time he erodess democratic norms and there is hypermilitarization involved military in the streets. Do you agree disagree with any of that? >> I agree with you that Trump which one of those descriptions does not describe Trump those terms. I would say that Trump >> I guess you say what are his motives behind doing this you're asking me you're saying these things no >> you were pressing me on the definition of fascism so I gave you a few qualities which of those qualities does not describe Trump >> say those qualities one more time >> it is a far-right authoritarian ideology with one leader at the top who is a cult of personality he forcibly suppresses opposition they like hypermilitarization >> I disagree with forcibly doing that tell me give me an example right now about forcibly >> you know a really good example is lately Jimmy Kimmel was taken off air by the FCC because the FCC >> I knew we were going to go here with Jimmy Kim. >> Wait, listen. No, no. >> Did you hear you know who the FCC commissioner is? >> Yes. Okay. Who is it? >> No, I actually don't know exactly who this is, but I know what >> it is. Brendan Carr. So, if you don't know who it is, then you might not know that Brendan Carr said in an interview, we can do this the easy way or we can do this the hard way. It was essentially a mobster threat. Other than that, Donald Trump has attacked law firms. He has attacked universities. Jimmy Kimmel might not be the best example because he's a late night show host, but it is a glaring example. So, right, I would disagree with you. And what do you mean by like forcibly? Right? Because you're attaching fascism to Trump. Right? We attach fascism. We attach that to Hitler and Mousolini. Jimmy Kimmel, him taking Jimmy Kim, he didn't have anything direct to do with taking Jimmy Kimmel off of air. The reason why Jimmy Kimmel got taken off of air is because nobody liked Jimmy Kimmel. I've >> Let's talk about the word said Jimmy Kimmel. He's not that funny. >> Let's talk about the word forcibly then. Forcibly doesn't mean through violence. It could be using the states, using the government, or your position of power to try to suppress the opposition. Donald Trump has spent his entire political career acting like the Democratic Party shouldn't exist. You know, Act Blue, the fun and Obama have done the same things. What are you talking about? It's not about forcibly what has Trump done forcibly remove the opposition. He's spoken against the press yet. Every president has done that of all time. They've spoken against the opposition press. But that doesn't mean he's forcibly removed somebody from that position. >> Last month, Donald Trump sent out a truth social post towards Pam Bondi. Do you know what I'm talking about? He said, "Pam, I want you to indict these three people and move fast." What happened is Eric Sebert, the federal prosecutor from the Eastern District of Virginia, then was forced to resign, forcibly resign, not through violence, but through pressure. Then you see two of the three people that Donald Trump named indicted for random stuff. You have Leticia James, and then you have James Comey who got indicted. We also just saw John Bolton indicted. I ask you is indicting your political opponents for speaking up against you. >> They did the exact same things to Trump. The left party, the Democratic party has done the same jury in New York. They tried to No. No. A grand jury in New York. Who's that? >> See, now we're getting into, you know, those jury things. They used political power to go after Trump. They were afraid of him. They were afraid of what he was going to do to America. >> Did Biden ever tweet at his attorney general and say, "Hey, Merrick Garland, can you invade?" >> No, because Biden wasn't even in charge of the presidency. He was not even making those things. >> Pause. Pause. Sorry. You've been eliminated by the majority. That was so much fun. >> That was great. I love that. It was great to meet you, Scotty. >> Hi, Satie. >> Satie. Nice to meet you. I'm Adam. >> You. So, I want to touch on your forceful suppression of the opposition as defining fascism. So, in my understanding, I think that the leftist party is assassinating conservatives. So, we're talking about Charlie Kirk's assassination. We're writing engraving on the bullets catch fascist. I think that shows fascism over here. >> Can you define what you mean by leftist party? Because I I think that conservatives are very good at individual responsibility. And when you're placing the blame on an entire party because one 22-year-old dude killed somebody, which is obviously tragic, then what do you mean by leftist party? >> Yeah. So, we have Kla Harris calling Trump supporters fascist, Biden calling Trump supporters fascist. When you have these big leaders calling individuals fascist, and then that is getting tagged on to conservatives as a whole. So I think that the leftist party is actually very good about saying one thing about one person and then this is getting spread to everyone. So back to what I'm saying about Charlie Kirk. So when Charlie Kirk got assassinated saying catch fascist I think that's a very good good example of fascism. And then you want to talk about the >> Can I ask you is your position that people in power should not be calling the opposition party fascists or Gustapo or Hitler? Donald Trump Donald Trump called Kla Harris and Joe Biden a fascist a dozen times throughout the campaign trail. He called them Gustapo. And only one politician has called Donald Trump Hitler and it's JD Vance, his vice president. >> And which party has that stuck to? That's stuck to conservatives. Fascism has stuck to conservatives consistently. You have all this violence on college campuses saying that we're going to they're calling turning point target practice USA posting photos of us with red X's on our face with dots on our neck. So how are you to say >> who's they though? Like random unhinged people. Do you think unhinged? >> Random unhinged leftist random unhinged. Do you think unhinged right-wing supporters exist or no? >> Absolutely. I think there's some on both sides. But that's why I'm saying you can't say forcible suppression of the opposition is tagged only onto Trump because that's coming from the left side as well. >> Okay. Let me ask you then. I'm going to ask you the same question that I asked Scotty. When Donald Trump sent a true social post with three names in the post and two of those names have been indicted over the past month. Is there any analog to the Biden administration sending out open posts to the attorney general Meritt Garland and asking people to be indicted? I'm I honestly am not completely knowledgeable on what exactly. >> Okay, so Donald Trump has spent the past nine months in office trying to consolidate power among every single institution, not just by appointing loyalists, but by trying to target law firms that are democratic universities. Act blue, which is the main fundraising pack for the Democratic Party has recently been uh invest like they're investigating trying to sue them because they want to take down any mechanism that helps the Democratic party. >> Let's talk about universities. >> Is that force? Wait, is that forcibly suppressing the opposition party when you're trying to >> I don't know if I'd exactly say forceful suppression. It depends on exactly how you're saying it because like we were saying when you're attaching the term fascists, you're talking about Nazis. You're talking about specifically Nazis. And when they say oppression, >> not just Nazis. >> I'm saying specifically for what I'm saying. The suppression of the opposition. When they're calling Trump Hitler, they're calling conser. >> Who's they? JD Vance. >> I'm sorry. Leftist. When the leftist >> Which leftist politician? Can you name one? >> I think you're moving the gold post here. >> Wait, no, no. Can you name one leftist politician who has called Trump Hiller? >> I It's every single It's like >> So you shouldn't be throwing this out when no leftist politicians have actually called Trump >> throwing out the term fascism. >> Um is saying that election was stolen when it wasn't fascism. Wait, do you think the 2020 election was stolen? >> I don't I don't know. >> You don't know? >> I don't know because I'm not I'm not honest. >> This proves my point. Trump is causing a rise of fascism in our generation. I would never say that you're a fascist, but I think there is a normalization of an ideology where people are denying elections. You don't even know if the 2020 election was stolen. This isn't America. The 2020 election was not stolen. >> You've been eliminated by the majority. Could Could you please return? >> Thank you. That was great. [snorts] >> Nice to meet you. >> Nice to meet you as well. >> So, um, you keep saying Trump is a fascist and just keep throwing that term around. >> I didn't say that. I said he's causing a rise of fascism in our generation. I would consider him a fascist though. Yeah, >> he's not a fascist because a fascist is one party rule. Is there there's two parties in the United States. is not one party and he's not using violence to control power. It's not like after 2028 you're never going to see Trump again. His two-term limit is over. That's not fascism. If you want to see fascism, go to the Middle East. I'm Egyptian. If you want to see fascism is when when the president >> Okay, you said fascism is one party control. Donald Trump has spent the past decade acting like the opposition [clears throat] party shouldn't exist. Caroline Levit just the other day said the entire Democratic voter base is Hamas terrorists, criminals, and illegal immigrants. Stephen Miller says, "The Democratic Party is not a party. It is a domestic extremist organization." Donald Trump, wait, listen. Donald Trump has called my side nats, the enemy within, and people who need to be taken care of. He's tried to get the military to boo Obama and liberals. So Donald Trump over the past decade does not want the Democratic party to exist. That's why they're targeting Act Blue. That's why they're targeting our fun. >> You're telling me that he doesn't have the right to criticize their Democratic party at all? >> That's not criticizing the party. That's using your power to take down their >> funding. But doesn't the Democratic party they try to impeach him twice? Also, is that fascism? Why? Why? Why you trying to >> wait the wait? Hold up. You think it's fascism to go through the proper processes to impeach somebody? Wait a minute. When one party controls the narrative when you had Twitter, you got all the >> Just go back one second. Impeaching somebody is not fascism. Impeaching somebody is going through making a false narrative around him. That's what they did. >> If you want to talk about false narrative, let's talk about the 2020 election because listen, you came in here. Listen, calm down. Like, take a deep breath. Okay? Let me tell you, okay, when you have one party, >> I just get mad at terrible talking points. I'm so sorry. >> Listen, listen, listen, listen. You know, take a deep breath. So, when you have a party, one party controlling the narrative on social media and they were telling when there was um pre-COVID >> Wait, who owns Twitter right now? Elon Musk. Elon Mus Tik Tok, right-wingers. Who owns Facebook? Mark Zuckerberg. But they switch narrative. They switched narrative based on who's in who's in um >> who's who's in power. So, right now you got Trump, right? You're saying he's a fascist. Is that your claim? What's your claim? that people that America is going to be a fascist nation. That is that your claim? >> No. My claim is that Trump is causing a rise of fascism in our generation. And you know what? Sitting in this room proves it because you guys are all blind to the fact to the fact that the Middle East I'm Syrian, but I haven't been to the Middle East. No. >> Okay. Have you been to Middle Have you seen fascism in in Syrian when they're killing Christians just because of their faith? That's that's fascism. Someone just people is he Trump killing >> someone just claimed that fascism can only mean Hitler or Mussolini. So now there's a broader definition. Now you guys understand this. Okay. Thank you. Thank God you guys understand it. >> It means fascism is attributed to those people because they killed people. They killed people. Trump is not >> fascism doesn't just mean you killed people. >> It's one party sign everyone off and they're trying to control. >> Do you think Donald Trump had it? Do you think if Donald Trump and Steven Miller had it their way? They would let the Democratic party exist or do you think they would go after opponents, fundraising mechanisms, etc., etc.? Which one? >> No. What Trump is doing is you've been eliminated by the group. You may return to the seat. >> Thanks, AB. Damn. >> Nice to meet you. >> Nice to meet you, Adam. Uh, Ethan. >> Ethan. >> So, I want to get started with talking about how you're saying, sitting in this room with all of us who are blind to the truth or whatever is proving your point about the rise of fascism. It seems that you are doing exactly what people have been saying and applying this label needlessly to so many conservatives like painting with a broad brush. And it makes me wonder if you really use fascism in the way in like how the word means or if you're using it as like a manipulation technique to silence opposition. >> My intention is never ever to paint an entire party as fascist or anyone in this room as fascist. I don't think anyone is. But I think that there is a blindness and there is a normalization of fascism. Can I ask you a question? >> Sure. Was the 2020 election stolen or was it not? Was it legit? >> I'm not sure. But can I ask you a question? No. No. That scares me. Listen, >> you think elections can be stolen? Let me finish. >> You think it's impossible for elections to be stolen? >> Of course. But in the United States, Donald Trump then took 60 court cases, 60 cases of election fraud. He lost every single legally after he went through the courts legally. What he did is that didn't work. So then he called election officials. You know, Brad Raffensburgger from Georgia. Have you heard this phone call? >> I have. Yeah. He said, "Can you find me 11,000 votes?" After that didn't work, he tried a fake speculating a lot on what he meant on that phone. >> Okay. But then after that, he tried a fake elector scheme. You've heard of this, right? He tried to gather fake electors in seven states to override the real electors. After that didn't work. January 6 happened. I know everyone's going to sigh at this, but do you know what was happening inside the capital on January 6? >> What was happening? >> Well, do you know what was happening inside the capital? >> They were like um ratifying or affirming like the election. Mike Pence was certifying the results of the election. And what were the people chanting outside? There was a group of people chanting, "Hang Mike Pence." So wait, when Trump Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Let me finish. When Trump said the election was stolen before it even happened and then he stood on stage when 50% of the votes were counted and said, "I won this election." And then he calls election officials and then on January 6th, the day they're certifying the vote, people getting the point. Okay. So, do you get what I'm saying now? >> I I think I get what you now. I'm sitting in a room of people who don't even know if I speak for a second. >> Okay. So, how do you feel about that report that came out showing that there was like 274 FBI informants in the crowd on January 6th? >> I think that it's hilarious that Trump sent out a tweet saying Biden's FBI did that when it was Trump's FBI. >> Wait, who FBI? >> Trump's FBI. The same FBI that literally like colluded against him with Russia. >> No, no. Whose FBI was this in 2020? >> I mean, it was the FBI under Trump. >> So, how do you feel about Trump's FBI doing that though? How do you feel about the whole Russia gate thing that the FBI pedled to like try and frame a sitting president for treason? Dude, >> what's your source for this, >> dude? The Tulsi Tulsi Gabbard. Yeah, the director. >> Donald Trump doesn't even trust Tulsi Gabbard to be inside on some of these like Iran conversations. >> The director of national intelligence who's over the C CIA and FBI did a press conference and released a bunch of documents and she said, "Hey, >> they read the documents. They don't say what she says." They said Donald Trump had four years during his first term. No, they did not. There was no Russia collusion. Donald Trump or >> they found no credible evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election. Literally his campaign years and years to try to frame him for treason. Dude, >> his campaign manager was literally arrested for colluding with the Russians at one point in 2016. I wouldn't say Trump did, but the Tulsi Gabbard report that you're citing is not saying what you think it says. >> I mean, it's in the documents that she released. People can read it for themselves. And furthermore, it's not just that, but you had like the deputy director of the FBI. >> Wait, so who who tried to pin Trump for treason? Like, who exactly was this? What? You got to be specific with your claim. >> It was the FBI and the CIA and former Obama administration officials that were investigating the Trump campaign leading up to the election. >> You've been eliminated by the majority. >> Nice to meet you. >> That was a great conversation. >> Thanks. [applause] >> Hey there, Adam. >> How you doing? >> Great to meet you. Great to meet you. Nice to meet you, Muel. >> All right. Well, I guess I I have a few questions. Uh I want to start with you seem to be kind of in news and I I kind of want to come back down to reality. So, I'm a college student at UC Berkeley. I've had a student, it's documented online on Instagram, come up to me after class, vaguely threaten me and say a bunch of stuff. Yeah. University does absolutely nothing. I filed a report. I did everything. Wasn't even removed from my classes. And this is all documented and up online. So, I as a student don't have the freedom to go share my opinions. Charlie Kirk, the day Charlie Kirk died, we requested security. The university turned down our request for security. These these are the real examples of fascism every single day. Are you trying to equate one random No, wait. No, hold on. Are you trying to equate one random college student who I condemn? No. Who I think is with Donald Trump using his power to try to consolidate as much of No, you're not. Okay. So, what are you trying to say? >> So, I'm trying to say that there's a system of the university here that's set up against >> system. Do you mean one student? >> Uh, no. I mean that there's a system that I reported this person to and nothing happened. This is part and parcel. Well, it's stifling conservative speech on campuses. And my my point here is and we saw back in the 2020 election the suppression of the Hunter Biden story. I don't think the election was actually, >> you know, ballots were thrown in and it was rigged. I I don't >> Wait. So, you think it So, wait. You do or you don't? Sorry. I >> I do not believe that. >> You don't think the election was stolen? There's probably a few people here who disagree with you. Does that worry you at all? >> Uh, I think it's it's slightly worrying, but >> it's slightly worrying that people think the election was stolen because they were convinced by the president. concerning that when I table on my campus, I have students telling me that Charlie Kirk deserved to die, throwing up L's in my face, laughing at me. >> That's terrible. But you can't equate one or a few random students for the president of the United States convinced a large portion of the country the election was stolen when it wasn't. I condemn these random Okay, I just want to ask you a question. >> You're saying that this is fascism. Can you provide your definition of mine as normal? >> This is a small scale. So, I would say there there's a few definitions and I think all of them are like mine. >> Uh can can you repeat your character? Actually, I want to pause because you you wanted to talk about the rise of fascism. And that that's what I have the generation cuz your your claim isn't that Trump is a fascist. Your claim is that Trump has contributed to the rise of fascism. Why do all the fascist people in American politics hate Donald Trump? Why did Fuentes not vote for Donald Trump? Why did why did all the people who are openly claiming, you know, Medi Hassan, you saw that Jubilee surrounded? >> I was going to say, wait a minute. >> Why do all these people who who are openly admitting that they're fascist? Why do why does not a single one of them support Donald Trump? >> They are openly admitting that they're fascists and a lot of them do support Donald Trump. Number one, the people in that episode conservatives. Number one, but number two, >> conservative, not Republican. They don't vote Republican. >> But also, what about the Politico story that really changed the point? That's >> I'm not changing the point. You No, no, no. You asked me. Unless you want to contain it to one Jubilee episode. >> Go to the Go. >> Let me finish. Unless you want to contain the people we're talking about to one Jubilee episode. Young people, not only young Republicans, but young conservatives. Sure. They are turning to fascism at a high rate. Do you condemn what was in that group chat? >> What group chat? Oh, the political group chat. Uh, I I would personally condemn what was said in that group chat. >> And what was said in that group? >> Wait, wait. Can you tell me what was said in that group chat? >> Yeah. So, they they described black people as watermelon people. They said they love Hitler. They they they said a lot of >> Wait, wait. What do they say about gas chambers? >> Uh, they said if you don't vote for me, you're getting sent to the gas. >> Okay. Wait a minute. And these weren't just young Republicans. These were like 20, 30, 40 year olds, correct? No. No. These were 20, 30, 40 year olds. And some of them were state senators. So, younger people seem to be inclined towards fascism. You can respond. I'm sorry. >> Okay. Younger people seem to be inclined towards fascism. Yes. And all these people don't like Donald Trump. It's those were young. >> Let me finish speaking. Okay. You keep Okay. So, it was a reaction. >> You've been animated by the >> All right. Thank you. >> That's great. >> Hello. >> Hi. Nice to meet you. >> Hi, I'm Sarah. So, I'm a lot more concerned about the rise of violent left-wing rhetoric among Gen Z than so-called fascism because I'm sorry if you think like that chat was any sort like that meant that fascism is on the rise. It's like you've never been a Call of Duty lobby. Like it's called making edgy jokes. Okay. >> Wait a minute. You make those types of jokes? >> I don't personally, but like that's like every young man ever has like made a joke. >> Raise your hand if you make those types of jokes. >> For real. Like >> Okay. So, no one will actually admit it because it's kind of weird to make those types of jokes. Everyone makes those types and that YouTube like no male friends if you've like never been in a room where people say the n word as a joke like it's like everyone does that and you know it's true and it's like if not you're probably like homosexuals >> okay my male friends and I tell each other to like kill themselves we do funny stuff >> okay oh that's so shocking oh my gosh we don't say we don't say off to the gas chamber the difference is that young leftists genuinely worshiped the murder of Charlie Kirk and Luigi Manion who are people committing genuine acts of violence and They genuinely condone that. So that's the big difference because I mean I saw literally graffiti on college campuses saying kill all Charlie Kirks. They are inciting violence and that is a totally like normalized thing to say to like celebrate the fact and that's serious and the political group chat was a joke and you know that. >> Okay. So your concession is that you know people talk like fascists in private sometimes but you're worried that leftists are using increasingly violent rhetoric like the people you were talking about. Luigi >> one thing is serious and one thing is a joke. >> Okay. I want to ask you one thing. is did one Democratic politician support what Luigi did? Can you name any actual Democratic politician? >> Uh, no. But it doesn't matter because on the other side, you were talking about the rise in the generation. You're not talking about politicians. >> I am talking about politicians as well. So, on the other side, >> now you're No, no, no. Let me let me clarify. >> What about young leftists? What about What about the violence that young leftists? >> Let me clarify very very quickly. So you're trying to point to young leftists on the left, but on the right there are politicians in power. People like Steven Miller who says the Democratic Party is a domestic extremist organization. Caroline Levit just the other day, as I said, said that the entire base is Hamas terrorists and criminals. So when you have people in power on the right, wait, wait, wait. They're using this rhetoric and normalizing it that goes downstream. So >> and you have leftwing media like MSNBC cheering backstage when Charlie Kirk was murdered. >> Wait, you think people are being murdered because of MSNBC? You think MSNBC is radical? Yes, I do. >> You think MSNBC is radical? >> Oh, absolutely. >> What do you think is radicalizing more people, Nick Fentes or MSNBC? >> Probably MSNBC. >> Really? More so than Nick Fuentes. I hear someone laughing behind me. That's kind of But also, there is a fundamental difference between people in power using rhetoric in random leftists. Listen, I'm a young liberal. >> You know, Don Lemon just told people to shoot ICE agents. They told They told Don Lemon just told illegal brown people to grab guns so they can shoot ICE agents when they show up at their door. Is Don Lemon not someone in a position of power? >> As a young liberal, can I >> do? Wait, do you condone that? >> What do you condone shooting? Yeah. Do you condone that? >> No, you should not shoot ICE agents. He said that you should have a weapon in your house. Don't you support the Second Amendment? >> Not for illegal immigrants. They're not allowed to legally own firearms. >> Can I Can I clarify something? [applause] >> Can I clarify? He was talking about citizens because he said they're arresting and detaining citizens. So, if you watch that if you watch that clip, he was saying citizens. I hope there's one of those fact checks on screen because he was saying they're detaining citizens. So, really quickly, >> citizens wouldn't need to be like shooting ICE agents either. >> I don't think anyone should shoot ICE agents, but he was number one, I'm not Don Lemon, I'm not Don Lemon. That's a ton. No, we're saying we're seeing leftwing people openly insight. I'm a young liberal and I completely wholeheartedly condemn anyone on my side who is number one talking poorly about Charlie Kirk. Number two saying insane half your party. Do it. >> Oh, you think? Okay. Can you name one Democratic person in position of power who said something about Charlie Kirk that was >> Yeah, I just said like half of the people on MSNBC we saw the video he died. I don't know cuz they're off camera but we heard the cheers the second he died. >> On your side I can name Mike Lee who made fun of Melissa Hortman after she died. I can name Donald Trump and Don Jr. who made fun of Nancy Pelosi. So just to back up, there is a normalization of this type of ideology happening in our politics and it's due to people like Donald Trump. Okay, >> we saw Luji Manion as a sex symbol. >> Pause. Time out. We're done with this claim. So we need to move on to the next claim. [applause] >> My next claim is despite Trump's claims, the economy is not in a golden age. >> Got it. Nice to meet you. I'm Riley. >> Nice to meet you, Riley. >> So, why don't you think why do you think um Trump's economy isn't golden? >> I don't think it's in a golden age. I think that he claims almost on a weekly basis that the economy is in a golden age and that we are bringing in trillions of dollars in tariffs, but that's not manifesting in any of the indicators. We can look at three in particular. Unemployment is up since Trump took office. Prices are rising and manufacturing is down. Manufacturing was one of his big claims, but we can dig into any of those. >> Um, yeah. So I would just like to talk about the tariffs first in general. Um so actually when we increase tariffs it's um kind of proven that always at the beginning um inflation rise there's always a little spike and then it eventually decreases. Um we can also see that Trump would do this to eventually in hopes to improve domestic manufacturing and self-reliance because for example we get about 60% of semiconductors and um 90% of microchips from Taiwan. they're the leading manufacturer of those in the whole world and currently they're at war with China and if China takes over Taiwan then we're in big trouble right so um I would just kind of like like to add that it's really important that tar and not only do tariffs help us get that self-reliance and create more jobs um we also can use tariffs to make more money and bring more money for our country because to fix the national debt issue that Biden's team caused so >> yeah let's start off with the first claim about tariffs reshoring manufacturing They absolutely can be used to reshore certain industries into the United States and that's a good point, but that's not how Trump's using them. He placed blanket tariffs on every single country except for Russia and North Korea for some odd effing reason. But then he has been kind of weird about these tariffs. Like there's no actual concessions that he's trying to get. He placed tariffs on countries that we had free trade with. And then secondly, when you do tariffs, wait really quickly. When you do tariffs all via executive order, all of his tariffs were via executive order. None of them actually went through Congress or were long-term and binding. There's no actual incentivization for countries to reshore manufacturing because there's no really quickly there's no continuity into the next administration, right? Can you agree that when you do it all via executive order, the next administration could just, you know, run it all back. So, we've seen actually a decrease in manufacturing investments. >> I would I would like to add that when we see that um employment rates will rise and costs will go down. We've already um as he's it's only it's bar we're not even in his first full. >> He said he's the one that's claiming we're in a golden age and said 90 deals in 90 days. Also, can I add that when tariffs are added about like you said about multiple across all nations in the world that is like a I believe I'm saying the right name neoexceptionalism um trade policy so we can have more communication with other countries and also um to just generate more wealth also as well and um >> that's not manifesting in any of our manufacturing investment that wealth is not manifesting for the US people in fact this type of tax is regressive you can you agree that uh tariffs are paid by the US consumer consumer like can you split with Trump there? >> Yes, of course tariffs are um paid by the US consumer but as we can see that when we make when we I mean use tariffs to have domestic manufacturing and um to just generate more wealth. We can rely on ourselves and not look to these other countries like we have been for so long. And >> that's right, but it's not what Trump's doing. Actually, real private fixed investment into manufacturing structures in the United States went down. Biden actually had a few acts that incentivized like the chips act incentivized the building of chips and semiconductors in the United States. But Trump is tearing up these trade deals and then piecing them back together with tape and signing his name on it as if it's as if he did something when he didn't. >> But as we can see with Biden's um era of presidency, inflation actually increased. And um with Trump's current president second term, it hasn't decreased. And we actually see um as of August, I believe, uh that median household income has increased $1,000 already. And in his first term, we've seen >> You've been animated by. >> It was a pleasure. >> That was great. I really enjoyed that. Thank you. >> Got you. What's up? >> Hi. Nice to meet you, Isaiah. >> Isaiah, >> I want to give you 30 seconds and I want to give myself 30 seconds just to understand where you're coming from. >> Yeah. So again, there are a few indicators that you can look at, but if Donald Trump is going to claim that we are in a golden age, then we necessarily had to have been in a golden age under the end of Biden's term. Because so far, youth unemployment is up 16% since he took office. That's people in this room. Youth unemployment is up. That's not a golden age. Unemployment for black Americans is up 20% since he took office. That is not a golden age. We can look at inflation over the past, you know, since Liberation Day in April. You can look at inflation and it has gone up. We were actually trending down at the end of Biden's term and as Trump took office, but now it is trending back up. And all of this is for what? No actual reshoring of manufacturing quite yet. >> All right, perfect. >> So to go based on you want to talk about unemployment? >> Any of it. Yeah. >> So to go based on unemployment, the reason why it's actually higher is because under Biden's inflation reduction act that actually increased the inflation margin significantly only because it actually did in fact increase taxes. It did say it was going to put $ 1.5 trillion dollars back into the economy for roads, infrastructure, all that. It didn't actually increase anything necessarily. Actually, that was more so actually given to the states actually to do away with the money as they choose. As far as tariffs go, >> yes, obviously inflation does increase as well as well as also a slow slow growth maintenance. But as far as that goes, actually for a long-term development, >> how long you have to >> Well, it could take as much as 5 years. >> But that's also an investment to the American mercy. Is that what the people voted for? I thought they voted for immediate relief. >> As far as As Yeah, don't get me wrong, egg prices did drop. So did gasoline prices. The only reason why California isn't as high is just because of California's regulations. But either way, while he does actually influence the economy through his executive orders, he can't control every single >> Can I ask you, do you think we're in a golden age right now as Trump claims? >> Do I think that we're in a golden age? I think we're actually pro progressing there. >> Okay. Do you think that Trump has brought in the amount of money he claims? He claims it's $18 trillion. He says 17 to$18 trillion based on tariffs. >> I do believe so because as the tariffs have actually have actually done companies have actually met actually started to set up their businesses here in the United States. Yes. >> The problem is okay a few things. Number one, there was a CNBC article that came out just yesterday where they interviewed 12 business owners and all of them said that the tariffs have impacted them so negatively that they've had to reduce the amount of people that employ them. They've had to slow down their growth. And when it comes to the $18 trillion that Trump is claiming, they're just inflated numbers that Trump seems to be lying about. And my entire point is when unemployment for young Americans, for black Americans up, yeah, it's high, >> especially because we actually outsource our employment from other countries as well, which actually will be get will be [clears throat] brought back to the United States when they actually >> when >> when five years, >> like I said, it's an investment. You have to also give it time for the economy to actually heal. This is actually we were already healing. We were at a pretty good pace. The stock market was hitting all-time highs. Then when Trump announced the Liberation Day tariffs, it dropped and it took months for it to return to those all-time highs. It took months. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> I appreciate that. Have a good day. >> That was great. >> Matt, nice meeting you. >> I'm Adam. Nice to meet you. >> First of all, when Trump says golden age, he means golden age, which is a set of time period. It doesn't happen. It's not golden day, golden year, golden 3 months. There's no time uh stamp or time limit on the golden age. So, it's an idea that America is going to be entered in to a time period, a time age, and hopefully sooner than later. >> It's not the age part I have a problem with. It's the golden part I have a problem with. >> So, why don't you think we're heading into a golden age? >> I don't think we're in a golden age as Trump claims for the few reasons that I've stated. I mean, the economy is just not bearing that. People in our generation are going into a golden age. >> Wait, what? Why? >> So, not why you don't think we're in a golden age. Why do you think we're not going into a golden age? >> Well, because the indicators are slowing down since Trump took office. If you want to say that we're in a golden age now, then we were in a golden age under Biden. As Biden left office, the economy was recovering. And I know that he had a rocky four years. I know there were a lot of extrinsic factors such as COVID, the Ukraine war, and some policies that Biden passed. I can easily concede that. But by the end of Biden's term, the economy was starting to stick the landing. And Trump immediately screwed it up by doing these liberation day tariffs combined with the big ugly beautiful bill or whatever which will not only you know strip Medicaid and social security nets away from the lowest income earners or people that need it the most but it also provides permanent tax cuts to the richest of the rich. >> So in terms of the economy because the Medicaid is a whole different argument. So let's not talk about Medicaid. Let's talk into So let's talk about the economy. So in terms of the economy >> medicaid feeds into the economy. in terms of the Sure. But we're talking about specifically the economy and I think we brought up tariffs and I think we bought so let's stick to that for the for >> really quickly when people don't have social safety nets they have to start digging into their savings and taking out credit >> I think he's I think he made it a little bit of a harder made fraud a little bit less prevalent to happen in let's talk about tariffs real quick because there's two arguments to the tariffs there's the national security part of tariffs and then there's the wealth of America tariffs >> which one you want to go for >> so let's go for national security so it's in the best interest that our number one adversary is responsible for the majority of vital things that we need. So for example, vitamin C is produced almost I think 90 plus% in China which China would be an adversary. Um steel is produced in large quantities in China. Uh drone parts which the military heavily relies on for military and private people as well rely on drone parts for industry or whatever that's also made in China. Do you think it's a good idea that Do you think it's going towards a golden age to get America less dependent on our adversaries who in theory hate us and are have been uh pulling military advances to threaten our >> No, what you're saying is true. What you're saying is true. >> But it's not going into the golden age. >> That is not what Trump is doing. So just to say >> that exactly is what Trump is doing. >> No, it is not at all. Really quickly, wait really quickly. Really quickly, you just said a lot of things. Really quickly, you're pointing out a good thing. Uh during COVID, a lot of our supply chain flaws were exposed heavily. We relied on other countries for certain technologies and certain masks and I think everyone realized oh [ __ ] wait a minute our supply chains are really just in other countries we need to reshore some stuff but when it comes to Trump's tariffs on China can you name me any indicators at bear that we have reshored what is it you were saying steel reshored any sort of this technology >> well the idea that we have 7 trill I think it's almost at 7 trillion I just debunked that number of >> yeah okay um >> so it's not trillion so there's almost 7 7 trillion come from a few countries. >> So I haven't even listed what the 7 trillion is about. So the Yeah. So the 6 trillion maybe almost >> 6 trillion. It's around 6 trillion and it's about 5 trillion. >> So it's well depending on 67 whatever. >> So my point is if you let me finish is that >> you want it. You just won right there. Sorry. >> There you go. My entire point is that you talk about manufacturing going down >> and it takes about cuz I work in government. It takes about um you know like two years at least in California to even go from groundbreaking to flat to ribbon cutting. So I mean in terms of manufacturing going down the way you look at manufacturing what's promised what's what's get what's what's been promised to be reinvested into America. So that's the my first entire >> do you think companies have any incentive to reshore manufacturing long term when these are all done by executive order and not actual binding trade deals gone through court Trump's tariff policy is to impact the future economic investment into the future whether they see the promise or not they've promised six almost 7 trillion6 trillion 67 trillion into the economy so >> do one more time >> in terms of national in terms of that I think it's a good idea that China is no longer holding us hostage economically. My second point to the second to the national intelligence is that the fact that we are in a almost trillion dollar trade deficit which deficits when you export when you uh import more than you export which is not a good thing. >> Would you say that >> you've been animated by the majority >> that was great that was fun. [applause] >> So, hi. It's good to meet you. >> Great to meet you. >> Martin, nice to meet you. Martin, I'm Adam. >> Perfect. So, what I want to talk about is because we already established kind of the golden age is is a wide range of time. Sure. More so talking about the time >> golden part. >> Well, yeah. I was saying for the age, we're talking about the this entire Trump presidency and really >> You think we're in a golden age like he claims? >> I think we're entering one. And I think that, you know, so what indicators are >> Yeah. So, what I want to talk about is more so talking about the biggest, you know, aspect of the Trump's economic presidency, which is the one big beautiful bill. >> Okay, that would be great. >> Yeah. So, I assume you're against the one big beautiful bill, correct? >> Um, yeah, certain parts of it. Sure. For sure. >> Okay. For sure. So I think the biggest part of it is the extension the 2017 tax cuts and jobs act. Are you pro against that? >> Um I mean that's fine but it depends on the context around it. So what Donald Trump did is permanently extend the tax cuts and jobs act tax cuts and that disproportionately benefits the richest of the rich but at the same time like I said like I said at the same time he cut social safety nets for people at the very very bottom. And you know what the tax cuts and jobs act says? By the way, really quickly, if you look it up, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act over the next few years will lead to hundreds of thousands of people, hundreds of thousands of children losing free lunch at schools. While it also allows billionaires, it also allows billionaires to now write off private jets. Now, none of us in this room benefit from having a private jet. >> Let's touch on that. So, let's touch on the first part. You said that most of the tax cuts are are concentrated, you know, within the top 20 >> disproportionately. I wouldn't say most. Yeah. >> Well, sure. So 60% of the tax so 60% of income earners actually do get tax cuts under the one big beautiful bill under the extent of the tax cuts and jobs act. Specifically the median American family would have seen a tax hike of $1,800 a year should the tax cuts and jobs. >> And I'm glad they extended that. >> Yeah, absolutely. >> So like I said, the context matters when you're extending that, but you're removing social safety nets and allowing billionaires to write off private jets. Listen, we we people in this room will benefit a lot more from like kids getting free lunches than writing off private jets. I don't see anyone in this room social part though. So the bring the best the best example the left always brings up is cuts to Medicaid. You the actual like pro most prominent cut that that we made to Medicaid was instituting work requirements work requirements of 20 hours a week. >> They tried this exact thing in Arkansas and it kicked 18 the th,000 people off of their Medicaid. >> I would I would say that if someone isn't working then they shouldn't be getting healthare. >> But these were 18,000 people who had increased barriers to get Medicaid. And what happens is these people who are vulnerable already >> the barriers are seeking a job. No, no. It's not just it's not just that that it kicks people off because the barriers become so hard. People with jobs can still get it. But the problem is listen, >> what are the barriers though that are so hard? >> The problem is when it comes to this with the tax cuts and jobs act, sorry, with that the barriers for Medicaid, sorry, one second. >> No. Okay. So, like you said barriers, what what are the barriers that are so hard besides getting a job where you have to go work 20 hours a week? There's already there's already a qualification in there that if you're disabled, then that doesn't apply to you. I mean, what what are these barriers? The left always the left always speaks in these like just you know ab abstracts like it's actually like what are the barriers? >> The increased barriers are when people are vulnerable and already working part-time and then you cut them off of Medicaid. Yes, people can get Medicaid with this. But the problem is when 18,000 people like in Arkansas are kicked off of their Medicaid part. >> No, they the 18,000 people were kicked off of their Medicaid because they couldn't get access to it. What happens then is that they have to dig into their social safety. They have to dig in to their >> So how do they how they not get access then? But because the barriers are increased. >> What are the barriers? The only barrier you've listed the only barrier we talked about is work requirements and that's working 20 hours a week. >> Yeah. But it's the work requirements increasing is just Yeah, it's not. So wait, can you concede? >> So So we agree work requirements are a good thing. We we can find common ground. Can you concede that what the tax cuts and wait listen can you concede that what the tax cuts and jobs act does is it permanently in decreases taxes for the richest of the rich but then it also wait but it also temporarily gives no tax on tips. Do you know that part? >> Yeah the no tax on >> but that's only temporary. So what it does cut off on it cuz you always want to like test out wait a minute which is which reason why the original program had an expiration date. >> Wait wait wait let me bring this back. So the permanent tax cuts for the richest of the rich don't have an expiration date. Wait for because we ALREADY DID THAT. WE ALREADY HAD THE TRIAL PROGRAM. >> THEY don't have an expiration date, but you have an expiration date for the things that are going to help first time trial. >> Why is there an expiration date for the people who are the most vulnerable? >> It's a trial program and the tax cuts for everyone were were made permanent. Like I mean for everyone were made permanent. Why would you not make the tax cuts permanent? You know when they end? They end right as Trump's leaving office. So this is what it's like. It's like it's like waving a $100 bill in front of somebody's eyes while giving thousands of dollars to the rich >> early part. Can we can we can you concede again that work requirements are good medication? All right. Perfect. Awesome. So you support Donald Trump on that? No. Great to know. >> I don't support No. No. Listen. When you sat down, I said the context matters. The context of permanent tax cuts. Wait. Do you >> Okay. Actually, so let me ask if you could have it your way. If you could have it your way, would the no tax on tips be permanent or >> um if it works out then I want to make it. >> If you if you had it your way, would the no tax on tips be permanent now in the big beautiful bill? Or do you think that them expiring right as Trump leaves office is a good thing? >> I want to make sure that they work and then make them permanent. I want to make sure that we don't need to expand it. I want to actually have a, you know, a sound public policy. >> Why do you think Trump made them not permanent? I I've already said this three times. Because when you ever have a new program, you need to try it out. You have a trial period, which is why the 2017 TCJA had a cut off time. So, and let's talk about, you know, you bring up taxes on the richest Americans. So, I I assume you're, like I said, you're you're opposed to the Trump's tariffs. >> The Trump tariffs. Yeah. >> Okay. Why the Trump tariffs for a few reasons >> or just just tariffs in general? Why are you opposed to tariffs? >> I'm not opposed to tariffs in general. As I've said, there are ways to do targeted tariffs, but when Donald Trump got into office, he placed tariff on every single country except for North Korea and Russia. I find that pretty weird. But listen, listen. I want to ask you after 9 months I want to make. So, we're talking about, you know, cutting taxes for the richest Americans and all Americans. The reason why that's actually a good thing is because you want people investing more money, especially right now when we're seeing an AI revolution, which is about to make our country exponentially. You understand? Wait, let me let me make this point why the House Republicans and President Trump have actually not going to grow. >> I got to make this point. Tariffs are a regressive tax on the people who earn the lowest. Well, so right now, >> all a tariff is a sales tax. That's literally all it's a sales tax on foreign goods. >> Listen, lowincome earners necessarily spend more of their income on consumption, right? So when you're spending more of your income on consumer goods, you are going to be hit by these taxes harder. Meanwhile, the richest of the rich are getting tax cuts, are getting all >> paying tax. >> The richest of the rich are disproportionately benefiting from this. So even even tax project that that the 2017 tax and jobs act being extended will put more money in will take out. >> No, that is not true. Absolutely. Can you concede that lower income earners are disproportionately benefited by the regressive tariffs? >> One more time. So lower income earners necessarily spend a lot >> bring jobs back. They're going to be disproportionate. >> When are they going to bring jobs back? Jobs have been >> tariffs take a while to kick in effect. You need to have trade deals. You need to have the tariffs actually foreign goods. We've we've done with the UK. We've done some with the EU. We're working on some with India. >> Are these actually papered up? >> I mean it takes more than 3 months to negotiate a massive trade deal. >> Donald Trump said 90 deals in 90 days. What do you mean it takes more than 3 months? How many of you going to have it like that? Time out. >> You got me. That was a good one. That was really good. Thank you. >> YOU GOT ME. [applause] MY next claim is children are safer with the average illegal immigrant than with Donald Trump. >> Hi, I'm >> Nice to meet you. I'm Adam. >> I would actually like to hear what you have to say about it. >> That'd be great. So when you look at the statistics, there's a study done by PNAS in Texas that shows that undocumented immigrants are two times less likely to commit violent. Let me finish. Two times less likely to commit crimes than nativeorn citizens. 2.5 times less likely to commit property or drug crimes than nativeorn citizens. Four times less likely to commit property crimes. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has been held liable for sexual assault. Donald Trump has had 34 felonies. Donald Trump is best friends with prolific trafficker sex trafficker Jeffrey Epste. So >> well um I just have a few questions for you. So um I would really like to know how come 60% of them that come in commit a crime or they have the intention to commit a crime and how that is not true. >> That is true. >> What's your What's your study? >> Um I believe it was in two articles. I learned it in my college class. >> Do you think who do you think commits more crimes? The average US citizen or the average undocumented immigrant? I mean violent crime >> undocumented. So we wouldn't know. >> Violent crimes. We actually wouldn't know who they are and we don't we have no idea who these people are coming into our country. >> Texas did a comprehensive study >> but there's no background check on them. They don't exist in this country. So we have no idea who they are. We have >> the burden of proof would be on >> They're just allowed to come in here. Do you understand what sanctuary cities are? They're allowed to just come in here and they get everything for free. >> Okay. Can I ask you a question? >> Sure. >> So just imagine you had a daughter. Let's run a thought experiment. You had a daughter and you're about to bring her over to your her friend's house. As you're driving your daughter over to her friend's house, you learn at the last minute that her father had not only been sexually assaulted or civily liable for sexual abuse, his father her father also at the same time, sorry, let me restart that. >> Um, >> one second. Imagine you're taking your daughter over to her friend's house and as you're going over there, you learn that her friend's father had been held civily liable of sexual abuse. He was best friends with prolific sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and had said that he could just walk in on girls in dressing rooms like he did in the Howard Stern show. Would you let your daughter go over to that person's house? >> The chances would be actually this actually the same because I wouldn't know who those people are, the undocumented immigrants. >> No. Would you would you bring your daughter over to that person's house? >> Um, I don't think so. >> Okay. Because that describes Donald Trump perfectly. >> I would never bring my daughter to a house that I don't even know who the parents are. I don't know where they come from. I don't know whether >> average undocumented immigrant commits lower crimes than Donald Trump. There's no statistics on that because they're undocumented. There are statistics on this. Where are they coming from? Where are they coming from? Do you know do you know their past life? Do you know? >> Wait, so when a crime you know where where in what country track of them? No, you don't. Because they don't take any of that data when they come here. You slap a name on them and they allow them. >> You realize when a violent crime when a violent crime is committed, it's likely time they're let go because they're undocumented. So it doesn't go on any criminal record. So those statistics are actually very very smear. >> You were trying to say that most people are let go for violent crimes. That's not true. Let me finish. When a violent crime occurs, somebody necessarily likely reported, right? So when it's reported, that goes into the overall stats. When they do the arrests, when they do the arrests, it shows that undocumented immigrants are way less likely to be arrested >> because they are not being caught. They are not being documented. They are undocumented immigrants. They are illegal. They're committing a crime by being here. The burden of proof would be on you to prove that undocumented immigrants commit crimes at two times higher >> rates and they went through the legal process of becoming a US citizen. Then they would be able to prove if they're a criminal or not because they would have a background check. But these people are coming in here undocumented with no way to prove that. >> Can I have can I ask you a question? >> Absolutely. >> If somebody were held civily liable of sexual abuse, would you let them immigrate into the country legally? >> Uh no. But we don't know that because >> Donald Trump was held civily liable of sexual abuse and you're okay with him being the president held accountable for that or not BECAUSE THERE'S NO RECORD of a major problem here that you're denying all of Trump's all of Trump's Jeffrey you've been eliminated by the group. >> That was good. Thank you. >> Awesome. >> That was really good. >> Sprinted there. >> Nice to meet you. >> Nice to meet you as well. Appreciate you being out here going against all of us. Of course. So explain to me more of what you're trying to say. Are you trying to say that Trump's like an evil man or >> No, no, no. So there's a massive problem with Donald Trump when it relates to power dynamics. Throughout his entire career, this is a man who has abused power dynamics every step of the way. On the Howard Stern show, he one time said that he walks into dressing rooms of people changing because he owns the beauty pageant and they they no one says anything. You think that's bad, right? >> Donald Trump als Yeah. Donald Trump also said he grabs women by the [ __ ] because they let them do it. You can that happened, right? Yes. >> So then he was also asked in a deposition a few years later, do you consider yourself a star? And he said, I'll consider myself a star. So he's basically conceding right there that he's a star who can do it. So my point is Donald Trump throughout the years has abused his power dynamics by not only walking into girls in dressing rooms, but also being best friends with Jeffrey Epstein, sending Jeffrey Epstein letters while Jeffrey Epste is at the peak of his sex trafficking. Meanwhile, the average undocumented immigrant doesn't have any power to abuse. Yes, there are crimes committed by undocumented immigrants. coming to the country illegally is a crime, but when we're talking about sexual crimes on the outer edges and by the statistics, Donald Trump is way more likely to commit one. >> So [clears throat] that's your claim. So >> first and foremost, we got to talk about So you're for immigration, >> illegal immigration. >> I I am all on the same page with you. >> Hell yeah. >> Of course. So I'm I'm glad that we do agree on this other aspect that we don't like men in dressing rooms, right? I'm glad we do agree on that, but >> No, of course I don't. Wait, why would I? Right. That's a whole different thing with the trans woman >> climb. Can you claim it's kind Can you just say it's kind of weird that the president of United States has bragged repeatedly about grabbing women because they let you do it or >> Okay. Another important thing to keep in mind is that when did Trump do all these things that he's being accused of? Was he a Republican or was he a known Democrat? >> Does his ideology matter? >> I think it does because it shows you who you're surrounded around around can affect your decision. Now I'm not saying you I'm saying like Trump at the time he was 68 years a Democrat. You want to talk about who we're surrounded by? The Republican party is literally covering up Jeffrey Epstein. The Republican party is covering up Matt G. Do you remember when Matt Gates was being investigated because he had Venmoed 17-year-old girls? Do you remember this? And then Speaker of the House Mike Johnson refused to allow information to come out. And then the Epstein case, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson refuses to allow stuff to come out. So, it's kind of weird to me that you guys want to sometime, not you, but people try to paint every undocumented immigrant as some violent sex offender when the president of the United States is. >> That's the thing we don't know about these undocumented immigrants. You see, my stance is we need legal immigration. I agree. >> I I'm glad we agree on that. >> Can I ask you, would you let your daughter go over to her friend's house if the scenario that I laid out earlier existed? >> I wouldn't want her around. But here's the thing. Trump, if he was truly what they're claiming he is to be, why does his granddaughters love him? Why do his children love him? Right? You would assume if he has those tendencies, he would like hopefully not, but sad situation is pedophiles do that. He's said a lot of weird things about his own daughter, but even if I were to concede that he treats his own children well, what about Virginia, who was groomed out of his Mara Lago spa? I'm sure no one in this room would want their daughter to be in the Mara Lago spa in the early 2000s where Jeffrey Epste was grooming women out. So, when you look at statistics and you look at the proportions, you are much much safer with the average undocumented immigrant than with Donald Trump, Mr. Mara Lago, sex trafficker. So, you've been eliminated by the >> I appreciate you. Hey, nice to meet you. >> Nice to meet you as well. >> Okay, so the first thing I want to say is you mentioned Howard Stern. Um, I think there's some really important context to note when we talk about Howard Stern, which is that show was in the early 2000s. They always tried to egg their guests on to be extremely edgy and say things that would basically stir things up. And so with that context in mind, that is not an actual admission that he did it. Well, what about the fact that four or 15year-old girls said that Donald Trump walked in in their dressing room when they were part of his beauty pageant? >> I mean, whether or not that's true, I want to get to one point here. Okay? So, if that is true, >> and you condemn it. >> If if that is true, then >> Donald Trump said it himself. >> He said it >> and then four women corroborated it >> and we have to understand even more. I don't know the context of that. So, if that is true any >> No context. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. I I haven't looked at evidence, so I need the evidence. But I want to ask because I think this question really is about a larger immigration policy. What immigration policy are you supporting with this? >> I support on the highest level an immigration policy where people come into the country legally where we know every single person who is in the country at all times because we don't want undocumented people going around and a way that we can have people be competitive in the labor market uh for immigrants to just integrate into society in a solid way. So, I think there's a way better way to do that than number one, what Trump is doing. Number two, the deportations that he's enacting are crazy. >> So, now I want to also ask, do you support welfare? >> Do I support welfare? >> That would be like social security, Medicare, Medicaid. Sure. To a certain extent, not for illegal. >> Here's what I want to get to. >> Illegal immigration um or in this case, you'd want it to be legal ideally. >> They would all collect on welfare and if you look at it overall, it would be a net drain on the economy. Yes, that is true. And studies that have estimated against it do stuff like estimating that every one out of nine has a graduate or PhD which is just blatantly false. >> That is not true. A few things. Every single study on this topic shows that when immigrants move to the country especially when they're higher when they're PhDs as well uh they increase more in or sorry they give more in taxes they give more in building. Then what about Giovanni Perry's 2016 study saying that when immigrants move into the country that they are a net benefit. Can you site a study of the opposite? >> I can site theory. I can site >> you asked me for a study and you can't site one. >> No, I I there is a study by the Heritage Foundation, but again, so are you saying that illegal immigrants cuz most of these studies are talking Are you saying that legal or ille talking about the policy that you're trying to back is going to cause a net harm on the economic >> future? What's your prescription? You want no legal immigration to the country? >> No. No, no, no. Absolutely not. >> So, what's your prescription then? >> You have mass migration and welfare at the same time. You have to choose between the two. Otherwise, there will be a net drain on the economy. This has been well noted through economists like Milton Freriedman. And >> it's not true. >> Yes, it is. >> You've been animated by this. >> That was good. Thanks, man. >> What's up? >> Good to meet you, man. >> Great to meet you as well. >> I'm Kai. Adam, I think um I I like what you're doing rhetorically. It's a very interesting strategy. >> Where do you disagree? >> Um well, I disagree in large degree with the framing. Would you agree with the framing that a child is probably uh safer off with the average illegal immigrant than with Joseph Biden? I think that's what a Republican would claim. Perfect. Now that we've agreed kind of that the framing is safer, can you point to Joe Biden being friends with prolific sex trafficker Jeffrey Epste? >> Absolutely. >> I mean, there's a web of connection. >> Wait, wait, wait, wait. Did Joe Biden have girls groomed out of his Mara Lago spa? Did Joe Biden have 26 different credible sexual assault allegations? Or did Joe Biden say that he grabs women because they let him do it? Any of those things? Well, it's interesting because >> I'm not here to say that Joe Biden's perfect, but I just think this equivalency is crazy. I wouldn't want my daughter. >> I agree. I I think the equivalency of the average illegal immigrant Donald Trump is crazy. The way that we assemble those statistics is absolutely ridiculous. If you were if you were to take, let's say, what's the sample size in your study? How many illegal immigrants were included as a part of the study? >> It was in Texas from 2012 to 2019. I don't know the exact sample size. >> Let's let's assume it's over a thousand. It's statistically significant. There there is a there is a power there in the the value that the study has concluded with. If we have a thousand Donald Trumps, which of the two will have been more guilty of violent crimes? >> Wait a minute. Wait a minute. You want to do this? If you have a thousand Donald Trumps versus a thousand undocumented immigrants, >> one group will have committed violent crimes. The other will not have statistics show No, that is the statistics show. >> Which violent crime has he been has he actually been convicted of? >> He was held civily liable of sexual abuse, sexual assault. Number one. But number two, what if you take a thousand people, you take a thousand undocumented immigrants, thousand Donald Trumps, the statistics show that those thousand Donald Trumps will abuse way more women. 26 versus the average undocumented immigrant commits violent crimes at a two times lower rate than the native born citizen. Trump commits crimes at a higher rate than the native citiz I do see what you're doing. And what you're doing is trying to remove the hole in it. What you're doing is trying to remove the effect of the crime from the actual people who are affected by it. Which is why you're saying, well, if Donald Trump was in a room with you, the issue is when you analyze the the difficult or rather the amount of crime that these illegal immigrants are actually perpetrating. And when you compare it and say that blanket statement, right, that they are less violent than the nativeorn American. You're not comparing it individually to each group. The levels of crime, the rates of crime among groups in this country differ significantly based on where you are and based on what the group is. Would you say that's why I said average? That's why I said average. I mean, you can point to a specific area, but that's why it's average. >> Would you let someone who was held civily liable sexual abuse immigrated into the country legally? >> You you understand? Well, no, I don't think so. No, but you have to be the president. >> You're not engaging with the with the statistic that you brought up at the beginning. And again, >> the framing that you the framing that you were providing, if we were to be statistically um consistent, would say that with the average illegal immigrant, you are safer than with the average black American. Would you agree with that framing? with the average illegal immigrant, you're safer with the average black. Yeah. Yeah. Because black Americans commit crimes >> at a disproportionate rate. >> No. Yeah. Yeah. Sure. >> Okay. So, you understand how framing can significantly shape the way that we engage in these conversations. I don't think every black person is going to kill me, but there is a disproportionality around it. >> But the thing is, not every immigrants, listen, not every immigrant's going to abuse you. Every one of those thousand Donald Trumps will abuse their power dynamics. Absolutely. Donald Trump throughout throughout his entire life is >> none of them will commit violent crime throughout his entire life as somebody who has abused every power dynamic available to him to prey on girls. Would you let your daughter in the Mara Lago spa if it were 2001? >> No, I I Trump is supposed to be safe. Trump's Mara Lago spa isn't safe. >> You're drawing these equivalencies between a property that an individual owns, what occurs on that property, and a condoning of it by that. >> He knew about it. He said he likes him young. He was talking about Jeffrey. >> That is an absolute false. Okay, show me what how how do those two comments relate to each other? >> When Donald Trump said in 2003 Jeffrey Epstein likes some young >> I'm looking for for a clear consistency. >> Okay, let me finish. Donald Trump says in 2003 Jeffrey Epstein likes some young. That happened, right? >> Okay. What is that? >> That Let me finish. Did that happen? Sure. >> Okay. Three years earlier, Virginia Grey was groomed out of his spa by Jeffrey Epstein. Donald Trump held private Donald Trump held private parties in the '9s where him and Jeffrey Epste just those two had 20 calendar girls. You can look this up. I hope there's one on screen. with their girls. Okay. What about the 15-year-old girls that Donald Trump walked in on in his dressing rooms? I mean, no one here. I've had three people say they wouldn't let their daughter around Trump. Three people say they wouldn't let their daughter >> I wouldn't let my daughter around Joseph Biden. I'm not defending Biden. I don't care. >> Well, you don't have to defend a thing. You haven't staked out a position. You've easily admitted that once we change the framing to talk, for example, about things that are more relevant to the average American. For instance, the average person who is living in Texas, right? The way that these people are going to feel the effects of migration are not as an average. There is no cookie cutter average American was done in Texas. >> Hold on. I understand that. That's why I'm citing the study. That's why I immigration state. Yeah. Yeah. >> Here's the point. >> Pause. You've been animation. >> That was really good, man. >> Appreciate it, man. Likewise. It's good to meet you. >> Yeah. Great to meet you. >> Quick. >> Hey, nice to meet you. >> Great to meet you as well. >> Thank you very much for having this conversation. >> Okay. So, I want to start with by saying I think your claim is actually quite absurd because it's really a nothing burger. If Donald Trump is, you know, worse for my to be a babysitter for my child than an average illegal immigrant, that doesn't really mean anything. True though. I what what I I wouldn't let my kid with anyone. I wouldn't let my kid with Harris, with Biden, with Destiny. There's so many like like are you ser Okay. >> Wait. So you can concede that your kid's probably not safe with Donald Trump with the average undocumented. >> I think this is a red herring. What I really want to talk about and what I really care about is are our kids safer under Donald Trump or under a potential Kla Harris administration. Because if you really think [cheering] about it, [applause] if you really think about it, when we're analyzing the safety of our children, Kla Harris is proabortion, Kla Harris liked transgender surgeries for our minors and hormone therapies. But if we're talking about specifically elimination, her open border policies was absolutely drastic right now. >> Okay, wait. I want to talk about which administration kids are better off under. The big beautiful bill that we were just all talking about in the last segments will remove over the next decade hundreds of thousands of people from having school lunch. Free school lunch. Are you supporting free school lunch? Do you support free school lunch? >> What what I want to talk to you about. >> Do you support free school lunch or no? >> You're we're talking about immigration, which is the topic. >> Wait, no, no. You were just talking about children's safety in America. >> I'll tell you I I'm going to I need to propose to you why I think we are going to be safer under Donald Trump than under transgender people or what? because of illegal immigration. Under Kla Harris's open border policy, we had we under her policy, we had an influx of illegal immigration, many of which caused children to go missing. But but furthermore, Donald Trump is really good at promoting national sovereignty and national identity. And I think that's really the core issue at hand here when we talk about uh immigration. And we see Donald Trump promoting deportations, promoting enforcement on the border is going to unify the nation and bring us back to our national identity. What about the citizen children of people who are here illegally who are now terrified that they're going to be deported along with their parents as two people were? What about the kids not doing that many deportations? So, he's not doing that many deportations. >> Look at it. If you I don't know the exact number. So, how are you going to claim that he's not doing that many? A lot more. No, he's >> How are you going to make a comparison when you don't know the number? I got to I got to mention this. >> You don't know the number. >> I got I got to mention this. Donald Trump's promotion of national security and national sovereignty in his strict border enforcement policies is what's going his talk about mass deportations. It's really good for creating a deterrence effect truthfully on illegal immigration coming to the nation. But what I really want to talk about is that Democrats say all the time that diversity is our strength and I completely reject that notion. I think unity is our strength. Yes. Let me ask you a thought experiment. If I were to take you and drop you off into South Africa, you wouldn't know what's going on. You don't understand the culture. You don't understand the language. You don't understand what the people around you are doing. Now imagine notice that's half that's half of it. Now imagine every single person in the United States felt that way. We would be in total chaos. No one would understand anything that's going on. You think everyone in the United States feels that way together as a unified nation. >> Do you think people feel that way right now? >> I think I think under the left radical administration they are promoting like the >> you said let me respond very quickly. You said a lot. There was a moment where you said something about rather than diversity we need unity. Well both coincide. When we have a diverse nation a melting pot as we do all you can ask for is unity. We have a president of the United States right now who is trying to get the military to boo my side. He called my side gnats that need to be taken care of. And he did this. There's a clip of it online. In order to have the two in order to have unity, you need to assimilate to an idea which is the idea of America, the American freedom. >> So what's your broader point here? I need to assimilate. >> My broader point is that right now children are safer with the average. It sounds like you did when you sat down. >> I got I got to Can you please let me finish? Okay. So under the Trump administration, children are safer than under the Democrat open border policies that we saw >> by what statistic? >> By what statistic? I by the border enforcement statistics. How many people across the border since Trump came into office? >> Since Trump came into office. You want to know what other countries have zero border? >> You obviously don't want to talk about the issue. >> I will I will concede right away that Donald Trump has decreased both immigration and tourism into the United States. You want to know what other countries Harris is doing? You want to know what other I've been wanting to get this. >> You want to know what other country has zero immigration and zero tourism? >> North Korea. Russia has no tourism. >> Yeah, that's crazy. Uh, but okay. But you need to have an American idea to understand to and assimilate to. Thank [applause] you. >> That was good. That was really best argument. >> My last claim is Donald Trump is the most corrupt president in American history. Hi, I'm Blake. >> Nice to meet you, Blake. >> Thanks for being here. >> This is a great conversation. >> I think that Donald Trump maybe is one of the least corrupt presidents in American history. >> I think that Donald Trump came out of a very corrupt system. Not himself, but the America that elected Trump saw what happened after years of Democrat control, after years of Clintons and Obama's and all the same. And Trump came along and he said, "We have to change this. We have to be unccorrupt. We have to uh be done with these people that coming in, they have these donors controlling them." Think about that 2016 debate. Hillary Clinton came in and she was controlled by the donors. Trump came in and said, "I'm spending my own money. I'm not controlled. I can't be corrupt." So that's what we like about him. >> What you're saying is true. A lot of Americans have felt like the system is rigged for years, and it has been. But what Donald Trump did is not unrigged the system. He rerigged it for himself. When he got into office, his net worth was $4.3 billion. Can you guess by how much his net worth has increased over the past 9 months? >> Liberals always love to President Trump's net worth. >> Can you just guess very quickly? >> We really don't care. >> Okay, so Donald Trump, our net worth is higher. Donald Trump made our net worth higher. >> Okay, how did he make your net worth higher? By starting a Trump coin, the name increase business in America. He keeps saying he has not America. I'm sorry, but businesses are struggling under terrorist wars. >> Donald Trump's net worth in Okay, so Joe Biden's net worth during his term went from $8 million, let me finish, to $11 million. That is a $3 million increase from real estate, from investments that he had. Donald Trump over the past n months has gained $3 billion in wealth through a few things. Right before he got into office, he started World Liberty Financial, which is a way for people to buy cryptocurrency named Trumpcoin. You know about Trumpcoin, right? Are you okay with Trumpcoin? Uh, I mean, I'm not sure that's on him. >> It's It's It is on him. He literally two days before his inauguration leveraged the hype of it to launch. >> Think how much do you think Trump knows about uh meme points? >> Okay. The thing is it doesn't have to know about it for him to know it's a good channel of corruption. So, do you know who Justin Sun is? >> Tell me. >> A Chinese-born entrepreneur who is being investigated by the SEC for market manipulation and fraud. Justin Sun decided to buy 70 billion dollars worth or 70 million or billion dollars worth of cryptocurrency. It was billion actually. And then he was allowed to step foot back in the United States for the first time in years because the SEC dropped the investigation. Donald Trump's wealth increase of $3 billion has allowed people to literally get favors. Corrupt people to get favors. You can't point to anything like that with Biden. >> Really? >> Yeah. Where did he increase his wealth by like $3 billion? >> Look at Hunter Biden. Look Ukraine. >> Look at all that. >> What's Hunter Biden's net worth? >> Much larger than it was before his father was in the Senate and the presidency. >> You think so? >> Oh, absolutely. I mean, if your argument is that Hunter Biden was corrupt and that Trump is less corrupt. So, you're saying Trump is the second corrupt person? >> I want I want to take it. >> You've been eliminated by the group. >> That was good. Thank you. >> What's up, >> Isaac? Good to meet you. >> Nice to meet you, Isaac. >> Awesome. So, your claim, just to make sure, is that Trump is the most corrupt president of all time. Um, so what due diligence and evidence do you have to compare him to every other president? Cuz you said most. So what other presidents have you done your due diligence to see what their corruption is and to make sure that he is the most corrupt? >> Yeah. So I think Watergate is a really good analog. Nixon's Watergates was like at that time the craziest thing to ever happen in a presidential administration. So Watergate was awful. But my argument is there is a Watergate happening basically every single day. What Donald Trump has done is set up a few buckets for people to funnel money into and then he uses those buckets to give favors. So, I've already talked about the Trump coin and I talked about Justin Sun, but there's other good examples like Melania Trump, for example, met with Jeff Bezos behind the scenes at the White House and then got a $40 million movie deal right away. It's interesting because I just sorry, a quick tangent that I want to go on. In the '9s, Hillary Clinton got in this huge, huge scandal because she made $100,000 a decade prior off of cattle futures. Donald Trump and his family make billions. Billions. And this is like not even a blip in the news. So that's what I'd compare it to. Hillary, Watergate. Yeah. >> So only Hillary and Nixon. >> I mean, do you have any better analoges? Who would you say is more corrupt? >> What my argument isn't so much who's more corrupt, it's that you're claiming that he's the most corrupt, but you haven't done your due diligence on every other president. >> There are big tentpole moments in history like Watergates, LBJ had some election corruption, but Donald Trump between his fake elector scheme, between his wealth enrichment, and between the favors he's getting from Qatar. Do you know about the $400 million Qatari jet? >> Yeah. Do you think there's any analog in American history to the $400 million Guitar Jet? >> Not off the top of my head, but I'm also not making the claim that he's the most corrupt. >> No, no, that's fine. I'm I'm not trying to like press you or anything, but there's just no analog to this wealth increase in the favors that Donald Trump has given. >> Okay. So, you would equate financial gain to corruption and only financial gain to corruption? >> No, there's a few other ways. There's like bribery, quid proquo, there's pardons, there's certain things. Yeah. What I'm trying to get at is I'm not going to deny that everything that Trump has done has not have some emphasis of corruption. But what I am trying to point out is the fact that you are labeling him as the most but completely disregarding every other presidency up until that point because you're >> not every single one. I gave a really good example of 1992 when Hillary Clinton got in a big scandal and then I compared how Melania Trump made like 4,000 times that money, you know. So I mean we can look at other analoges in history. There's never been a fake elector scheme. Do you remember Obama coin or like Hillary coin? No, there was no Obama coin. There was no Hillary coin coins after them. >> Trumpcoin is unique in many ways. >> Okay, but what does Trumpcoin equate to corruption? How is it corrupt? >> It's an untraceable way for people to funnel money into and gets No, because Bitcoin isn't being held by the president and used for favors. Donald Trump. So, here's the thing with Trumpcoin. It is not only untraceable, but people can tell Trump, "Hey, I'll donate to you." And then they not only gain leverage over him, he wasn't waiting. >> Dang it. >> Great. Hey, great to see you again. >> Yeah, nice to chat again. >> So, I I just want to say uh and I'll I'll address that. I do think there's a lot of corruption with the Trump administration, but I'm going to put that aside. I don't think it's the most uh corrupt administration, but that has a lot to do with definitions. First, I want to say you you call Trump a fascist. You strongly strongly implied he's a pedophile who's escaped the law. >> Do you think he's not a ped Do you think he was? >> I don't I don't think I don't think that he uh sexually assaulted any children violently. Uh and now now you're saying he's the most corrupt president in US history. To me, it sounds like fascist, most corrupt in history, pedophile who's escaped the law because of his political influence or something. Why don't you want Donald Trump dead? >> Because the American political system should not have violence involved at it in any step. I think part of the beauty of America is that you and I are able to sit down across from each other or anybody in this room and we're able to have a conversation. Even if it gets a little bit feisty, even if people knock over the clock accident, we're able to go around and have a good conversation. Nowhere in that process should violence be involved. When Charlie Kirk was shot, it shook me up. It's not good. That should never happen. Nobody should enact violence, and I tell my audience that all the time. You can call somebody corrupt. You can call somebody I mean, dude, Donald Trump called Biden a fascist. Donald Trump said Biden and Kamala were to stop >> like an example. Do you think someone would have been justified in killing Hitler? >> Justified in killing Hitler at the end of World War II. >> Uh you could say in the the leadup whenever he started putting Jews in gas chambers, I think good cut off. >> I think the man who was genociding Jewish people could be justifiably killed. But Donald Trump isn't genociding any sort of group right now. So that's a little bit different. >> Well, I I I what what I hear is fascist. And you say you attach all these things. So I think that that there's a strong implication there that some violence is justified. But I think that has more to do with your water down definition. >> Wait, do you think that people in positions of power shouldn't call the other side fascist? >> Uh yeah. Well, I I will say that the Trump administration uses divisive rhetoric and it's not >> Do you think they shouldn't use the word? So when Trump when Trump called Kamla a fascist, was he calling for Kamla to be killed? >> Uh no. >> Why not? Because there's not this consistent this consistent force did it over and over throughout the no there's not a consistent force of claims and a culture on the right that supports >> Stephen Miller just said the Democratic party isn't a he said it's not a political party let me put it this way it's a domestic extremist organization >> yeah there there's differences with the audience that you're speaking to so when Democrats say someone's a fascist someone's violent democrats actually go out and commit these acts of violence is what we see all the time so there's a yes of course you see this >> basically every single study I can point to the one by the >> CSI you can cite whatever study like you cited the study on illegal immigrants earlier There there there's no like baseline no one had a counter study. >> What's the methodology of that study? Explain it to me. >> Wait, the the political violence study by the CSIS, let's talk about this one very very quickly. They go through all of the violent lethal crimes over the past decade or it might be two decades with the Minnesota in incident. And also I want to say there's a difference between the farright violence that's fully fully denounced. There's fringes of the Republican party that aren't allowed anywhere near it. My problem is that leftist ideology is an ideology of violence. The difference the difference that I see between Chuck Schumer is causing violence in communist. Chuck Schumer, let me finish speaking. Okay, so the Chuck Schumer, let me >> uh the difference that I see with uh with Democrats and Republic See, now I lost my train of thought. Oh, is uh the Democrats do have a culture of supported violence. The Republicans just don't. >> Wait, are you sure Donald Trump pardons 1,600 people who beat the [ __ ] out of cops? What's the analog to that with uh Democrats? >> Uh so he you're telling me that all of those people were violent offenders? >> No, I'm saying that 1600. How many of those people were violent offenders? >> I mean, the amount of people that beat cops, how many of them were violent offenders? Probably a few dozens. A lot of them were arrested. >> A few dozen? >> Yeah. >> A few dozen. So, so upwards of people who are violent offenders. >> Wait, you're okay with a few dozen people? Violent people. >> No. Trump went out of his way to not pardon violent offenders. >> He pardoned everybody. It was a blanket pardon. You're just >> a blank pardon for the trespassing that happened on the capital. >> Are you going to concede that Trump is the most corrupt president in American history? No, I'm not. Okay, then let's go back. >> So, my definition of corruption would be for personal gain doing things. And I would say uh going up for a bid for re-election would also be corruption if you do things you know are bad for the country in order to get reelected. So that for that reason and I I'll grant you it's an unconventional definition. I would say probably FDR or LBJ most corrupt in American history. >> Your definition wasn't even that far off mine. It's using it's using public office for private gain which is fine. I don't know about your election analogy but the thing is >> LBJ I'll have those nwords voting Democrat for the next 200 years. >> That's not corruption. That's racism. >> No, that is corruption. It's him saying I'm going to give things to this section of the population. All right. Now I let you finish. There you go. >> Speedy. >> Hey. Nice to see you again. Long time no see. >> Good to be back. [laughter] >> Um, I want to circle back to a point that you brought up which was the Trump coin. Yeah. >> And can you explain why that's such a good example of corruption in your view? >> It is the perfect example of corruption because Trump Donald Trump leveraged the hype of his inauguration two days before to release a Trump coin and then a Melania coin. Not only is this unprecedented, this has never happened like this before, but it then led to an unprecedented wealth increase over the first nine months. This wealth increase was through people funneling money into his Trump coin and getting favors in return. >> Really quick, the reason it's probably unprecedented is cuz crypto's not been around for long enough for other presidents to have done something like that. And I will Jimmy Carter put his farm in a blind trust that it was a scummy thing to do, but I don't think it's a clear sign of corruption. When I see corrupt when I think corruption, I think of things like not to circle back to Russia gate, but like the Obama administration literally spied on like the leading Republican candidates campaign and tried to frame him for treason. >> This is not true. But do you think that's more corrupt than getting $3 billion in net worth increase and >> from the from the like crypto poll? I mean, yeah, because I don't see the clear tie between like the Trump coin and like political action. >> Okay, Trumpcoin is owned 75% by Trump and his family. It vests throughout the term, meaning money gets released to Trump and his family. What this allows is for people in an untraceable manner to donate to this and then get favors. Like I said earlier, >> you don't you don't know any of that's happening. Wait, Justin's son was allowed to step foot in the United States and then went to a private dinner with Trump for the executive branch. I can listen. >> You don't know that it's because of Trumpcoin. You don't know that any of this is happening with that. Trump has sold a lot of things. Trump has sold a lot of cheap products. He sells Trump watches. He sells Trump commemorative coins and he sell Trump cryptocurrency. To me, it seems like he's like a businessman who's been doing business for his entire life and he's just doing another business. I want to draw is a scummy thing to do. I think like selling cheap commemorative coins is a scummy I think it's really important to draw a distinction between monetizing your name, monetizing the presidency by selling things and actual corruption. So what Donald Trump is doing >> corruption? I think it was same example. >> Okay. So when Donald Trump gets a $400 million jet from Qar and then Qar builds a $5.5 billion golf course in their country and now Trump is doing joint training exercises with them in the United States. Is that quidd proquo corruption? >> I don't know all the details for that. So >> do you know about the $400 million jet? >> I do know about >> Is that personal gain? >> I don't. >> Is that for the American people? It wasn't given to Trump. It was given to like the governments. >> It was given to Trump. So after Trump's term, where does it go? >> I believe into like the government's property. >> The Trump presidential library. It is only for Trump to use. >> Is that is the presidential library owned by Trump? >> It is only for Trump to use. >> This is owned by Trump. Okay. So they gave it to the government and after Trump's term, it's going to the government. >> No, it's going to his presidential library. It was >> If the government owns it, they can like take it from the presidential library and put it somewhere else. They can put other >> use. just conceding that it's fine to take $400 million gifts even though it violates the imalments clause which says you can't take gifts from other countries that is just >> defin far greater issue like uh issues of corruption in our country's history and I think singling out this one where Trump not even Trump like the government was given a jet by one of our allies is not all that >> if you can handwave Trump coin and the wealth increase and you can handwave other countries giving him gifts then I guess >> I'm not necessarily handwaving it I'm just saying your claim is he's the most corrupt president where you are speculating that you are speculating. You're speculating that there was a quid proquo going on with Trump and Qatar. You're speculating that funneled money into Trump to Trump's uh campaign or whatever a few days ago the leader literal like clear examples that we've seen that there are released documents. >> So that's clear. Wait, that's clear. But Donald Trump documents Russia Gate and it being a hoax. They all knew it was like >> Did you read the documents? The documents didn't say what you think they said. They did say >> okay. Thank you. >> That was a tense. >> Welcome back. >> Hello. >> Um, okay. So, um, the prompt is that Trump is the most corrupt president, right? Yeah. Yeah. So, I would like to make a reference to um something I spoke about previously. Um the Biden administration and the millions of immigrants, illegal undocumented immigrants that they were letting in that were disservicing the like the the poverty population in the lowest margin below, legal immigrants that were coming in and working hard to get those opportunities and they were rigging the system for illegal undocumented immigrants to receive all the benefits that all these people worked for citizenship to get. >> First of all, these were asylum seekers. The border wasn't just open. There was an abuse of the asylum system, but it was open. But people were just coming through. How come in August there was 265,000 undocumented immigrants that came in with no papers and no >> no no just process no just process? >> No, >> last August. >> Hold on. Let me >> You're good. >> Sorry, I I missed my medication. >> No, you're good. You're good. So like like I >> Trust me, you're good. >> Sorry, guys. Um um anyway, so um what I see as corruption is I see my grandparents with tears in their eyes because they don't qualify for medical because our tax dollars are going towards people we don't even know are here and that are being brought here and throwing >> I don't think people should come here illegally. We agree on that. I think that Biden's border policy was rather indefensible. I don't agree with the fact that it was an open border, but I would never defend Biden's border policy. I think that it was sloppy and he should have been stronger on it. >> It was corrupt. >> Well, not corrupt. What's your definition of corruption? Corruption, I believe, is when things are happening that are an injustice to the people. And I believe that the disproportionate illegal immigration where thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of people are just coming in, first of all, taking entry-level jobs from legal immigrants that are saving up the money to keep their permanent citizenship and keep them here. >> That's a different topic. Do you know what the fake elector scheme is? >> Um, I do. >> Back when Trump lost the election, he did the fake elector scheme. How would you describe it to me? >> Um, >> here I'll I'll just >> Didn't Didn't there was some sort of phone call, right? Yeah, it the phone call has something to do with it, but essentially electors in each state certified >> illegal immigrants were allowed to vote for Biden and they were being told if they voted for Biden that they would be able to come here and receive all these benefits. That's is right. >> Who told them that? >> The Biden administration never they were being brought in here to vote for him. >> Let me just finish being given a free pass to be in here. You've been eliminated by Sorry. I get >> No, just trust me. You're fine. Hi, I'm Nick. >> Nice to meet you, Nick. Nice to meet you. So, at the end of the day, do you think Trump has been a net positive to this country? You call him a fascist. You're calling him all these terrible terms. Do you think Trump has done good things? Has Trump done good things? Sure. I think Operation Warp Speed was good. Do I think he's a net benefit to this country? No. I think the erosion of democratic norms that we've seen throughout Trump's term is absolutely absurd. I want to repivot to the fake elector scheme because I think that one's really really important. Essentially what Donald Trump did was as he after he lost the election, he understood that he lost the election. There were electors in seven swing states. He had people forge their signature and act like they were the dyeleed electors when they worked. >> Who was the president the past four years? >> Biden. >> Biden, right? >> But at the time this was Trump. This was when Trump this was when the transition of power was happening. >> He he still worked within the confines of democracy. >> He did not. The fake elector scheme was necessarily illegal. That's why people were arrested and indicted. That's why all of the fake electors in the state of Georgia were arrested on a RICO charge. A RICO charge. And Donald Trump's corrupt ass then said, "Let's pause this investigation." >> But you call you call him a fascist. He works within the confines of democracy. He's he's a >> It's not. Do you think the 2020 election was stolen? >> I don't think it was. >> Okay. So, do you think that Donald Trump claims it was stolen? >> He was not the president. >> Does Donald Trump claim it was stolen? He he he says there's uh serious arguments against why he should >> not just serious arguments. He said they stole it from me. He said this is awful. He said they we need to take our country back. So you guys keep taking problem with me calling him a fascist. But then most of you guys conceded that the 2020 >> That's dangerous rhetoric. >> Wait a minute. It's dangerous rhetoric to convince half the country that the election was stolen. Do you think it's fascistic to try to thwart the peaceful transfer of power and get your vice president hung while he's certifying the election results? >> He he did. >> Did people chant hang Mike Pence? Does Mike Pence support Trump today? Wait, what happened? Why isn't Mike Pence his VP right now? >> Trump was not in office. He He conceded. He He didn't He never conceded. He call He didn't call in, please. He's never He has never conceded till this day. Can this pop up somewhere? He was not He was in office in action. He He didn't He didn't call the National Guard and come in and say >> he conceded in action by storming having his base storm the capital >> in 2028. He's gonna, you know, he's done, right? >> I mean, he does a lot of 2028 hats. Is it okay to say that's a little bit weird and fascist? He he's been he's doing incredible things for like what? >> He's making this country great in a lot of ways. He's he's bringing back a lot of jobs. He's making this country great if you were a billionaire. If you were potentially on Epstein's Island and don't want to get caught, he's making this country great for all of the wrong people. Meanwhile, in our generation, unemployment is up. Prices have gone up. It's a mess. >> I just I really do think that um this this this rhetoric of hate needs really does need to stop on from the left. you're comparing someone uh to Mussolini Hitler, Franco, all these guys. It's it's evil and we we just can't have this in in this in this democracy. >> I'm not saying he's genociding people like Hitler, but I'm saying the election denial, the erosion of democratic norms and everything that Trump has done to my city of Chicago is absolutely insane. It's definitely fascistic and there's just no doubt about it. >> All right, time is out. See you later. [applause] I would like to choose the blue shirt guy. [applause] The reason why I chose you is because you very clearly challenged me and knocked me off for a second on the Medicaid thing and I actually that was good. It was a good debate and I want to continue a discussion on your claim. Let's hear it. >> Perfect. I appreciate it. My claim we'll be kind of going back to that first claim that we talked about earlier is that the left in the United States is far more fascist than the right in the United States. >> Really, how do you define fascist? >> Yes. So, let's start off with that. So, I define it as one that wants totalitarian rule and it aims to establish that by dissenting forcibly opposing views. >> How do you define totalitarian? >> Um, I' I'd say authoritarian totalitarian just like like one party rule. >> Okay. So, how does this describe Joe Biden or any Democrat more so than the person who denied elections, more so than the person who is literally indicting his political opponents? We can talk about the indictments. Do you think that uh I should say? Yeah, let's talk about the indictment. >> I would love to talk about that. >> So, you brought three indictment the three sets of diamonds earlier with Leticia James, James Comey, and the third one was >> Well, it was more that Donald Trump sent out a post naming three people. >> Let's just dive into the details of those cuz cuz you you said that that's an example of fascism on the part of the president. Absolutely. So, let's dive into each of those. So Leticia James was indicted for mortgage fraud and there was there's actually if you read the indictment there's a pretty good evidence that Leticia is actually guilty of mortgage fraud. James Comey, I don't think they've unsealed that indictment yet, so we don't know exactly what he's being charged for. But Michael Cohen, who is obviously a super anti-Trump guy, even went on MSDNC, MSNBC, same thing, and said that James Comey is probably guilty of those charges, and John Bolton has been denied. Listen, >> listen, my problem is not with Leticia James. I actually think it's fine for this investigation to go on into Leticia James, and I think she should be tried by a jury of her peers. The problem is Eric Sebert, who is a federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of Virginia, a very wellrespected guy, he was told to indict those three people and he refused. >> Wait, wait, let me finish. He refused to bring those indictments. Do you know what happened to him? >> Yeah, he resigned. >> Trump forced him to resign and threatened him. And then that week, Donald Trump, >> if a prosecutor isn't going to do their job, they should 100% resign. Prosecutor is the one who resigns, then absolutely. You don't deserve that job. >> Do you think it's the job of the president of the United States to number one, force them out of their job, and number two, direct people? Okay. Okay. So, can you name Joe Biden doing that to anybody? >> Uh, yeah. Him directing Merrick Garland to open investigation of president. >> How so? When did he direct Merrick Garland? >> That was what that was one of the things that Joe Biden said in the leadup to the lead inauguration. Yes, he did. Him and other prominent Democrats called for President Trump to be held accountable for January 6th, which is what Merrick Garland was doing. >> No, no, no. So, wait. You think that Trump directly, Do you know the Pam Bondi tweet I'm talking about? When Trump tells Pam Bondi, he says, "Pam, I need you to indict these people." >> Yes. That is in the purview of the president United States. Yeah. Absolutely. To make sure United States not supposed to direct his attorney general. I want to ask you one more time. One more time. If the left when did Joe Biden direct Merrick Garland and can you quote it because what you just said was a lie. Joe Biden never direct obvious that that Joe Biden directed Merrick Garland. Did you say he hired American that was what Demarland did on day is that it's quote obvious that Biden did it but you have no evidence. But this obvious tweet from directing Pam Bondi is not enough in your eyes. >> It doesn't matter if it's public or private. The the fact of the matter is that on the right we actually prosecute people for real crimes they committed. Whereas on the left they make up crimes. For for example the one crime that Donald Trump got committed on the state of New York by lead falsifying business record. They had they had to combine two separate two separate crimes. They got to combine them into one. Extend a statute of limitations just to charge President Trump on. Do you even know the mechanism for for how they found him guilty? >> Like like what like what did they find him guilty of? >> Falsifying business records 34 times. >> Like Yeah. Do you know what the actual what the actual crime was that they were alleging? >> Yeah. He was trying to pay Stormmy Daniels and they lied about the payments. >> Yeah. They they said that he should have classified the I believe as a as a campaign expense. I personally don't think that that should be >> classif but the jury did the jury thought it was so you disagree with the jury of Trump's peers that were picked through the process of vadier by Trump's own lawyers. >> Yeah that yeah that was absolutely yeah it was a obviously politicized trial in >> the trial isn't politicized. >> Um no because there's actual evidence of mortgage fraud there crime. Should he be charged? >> Yes. >> Okay. Yeah, he he didn't crime up. >> Wait, according to who? >> What do you mean according to if you if you read the do if you read the actual >> I've read the indictment and it went through not only a grand jury, the indictment, but then an actual jury that Donald Trump and his lawyers >> a grand jury that that's not evidence of anything. >> Of course. Yeah, that I can use the same thing with Leticia James. Literally, they say that a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich. >> So, before you call it in fascistic act, why don't you actually see the evidence and let trial play out? >> You're not you're not engaging with what I'm saying. >> For sure. So, but let's move to the other reasons why the left is more fascistic. So the main reason why I would say that is the rise of political violence that we have seen on the left, especially in the recent years with with Donald Trump attempting to be assassinated twice and Charlie Kirk's actual assassination. That is the textbook definition of fascism. You don't see that on the right. >> Do you think both you don't see that on the rights? >> No. When was when was the last time that Joe Biden had an assassination attempt or Barack Obama or Bill Clinton or any prominent Democrat politician? >> Melissa Hortman and her husband and her dog were shot in their home. They were shot in their home by Vance Bolter. You're talking about the Minnesota lawmaker case. Yeah. What what is your evidence that that's rightwing? That he was rightwing. He was appointed by Tim Walls. >> The guy had a list of Republicans that he was going to their houses or sorry, the guy had a list of Democrats. He was going to their houses. I misspoke. And he was trying to take them out. He killed Melissa Hortman and her daughter by by Democrat lawmaker. >> This is not true. This dude was a Republican. He was a Republican. Are you claiming that this was Democrat-on Democrat violence? What is your claim here? >> There's no evidence that it was Republican on Democrat violence. Listen, there's also no evidence he was not appointed by Tim Walls. He was a part of some board that Tim Walls was also a part of. This is like so what's what's your evidence that he was motivated by by by right-wing politicians? >> A few things. He left or in jail. He said that he did this because he doesn't like Democrats. I promise you he told someone this in jail. He also literally went to I think it was five different Democrats house, but only two families were home. And he killed Melissa Hortman and then he shot the the man, but he survived. >> Sure. And so here's the big difference between here's a big difference. Here's the difference between that and what happened with Charlie Kirk and President Trump. On the right, you really don't see anyone celebrating that. On the left, you absolutely see people celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination. You saw people on TikTok and Instagram saying that they hope that the shooter who shot a President Trump missed. They're like, "How how can you miss?" That would never hight. We don't celebrate assassinations. You guys do. >> Can you name one Democrat in power who celebrated? >> One Democrat in power who celebrated? No. My point is that my point is that one point is that this is that this is a cultural problem with the left. The left as a whole, their culture is fascistic that you guys can't name one Democrat in power who celebrated. But when Nancy Pelosy's husband Paul Pelosi had his head bashed in with the skull, somebody sorry had his skull bashed in with a hammer from somebody who supports Donald Trump. Trump and Don Jr. posted memes about that. They posted memes about it the next day. Do you think there is a difference between somebody in power making fun of a violent crime versus random people online? I I think I think that it's indicative when you have the entire left as a whole. >> No, answer my question. Is there a difference between there is there is a difference because when you see an entire political ideology the whole like pretty much the entire grassroots leftist operations. >> So now you're categorizing my entire party as like what a violation >> I think on college campuses as a president of the college Republicans of America when when chapters across country tell me that they're tableabling on campus you have people coming up celebrating that Charlie's death that that is indicative of a cultural problem with the left that is that you just don't see on the right. You don't see >> I absolutely do. >> Well, when when was the when was the last time you've ever seen you've ever been on a college campus and see someone on the right, you know, trying to celebrate political? >> I don't even have to look at college students. I can look at the actual leaders of the party who are making fun of Paul Pelosi. What about Mike Lee? Senator Mike Lee or Representative Mike Lee made fun of Melissa Hortman and made jokes about it. Do you condemn that? >> I I don't know what what jokes did he make? >> He was saying that it was something about the shooter being I don't even know. He was making a bunch of jokes about the shooter doing this for some crazy reason and then he got confronted in Congress. He made a series of jokes online that he had to delete. Do you condemn that? >> Are you saying that he was making fun of people on the left saying that that it was politically motivated? Then no, I don't. >> No, he was making fun of Melissa Hortman days after she died. Okay. Do you think it's okay for Trump to post like AI videos of Paul Pelosi or whatever? He posted an AI video of Nancy Pelosi laughing about Paul Pelosi. I >> I didn't see the video, so I I can't say. But what I can say again, >> I didn't see people on college campuses doing this, so I can't say. I don't know. I I mean you can you can pretty easily look at social media and find people celebrating it. I mean like like people said earlier you have you have people posting >> but no Democrats in power. >> What do you mean no Democrats in power? If you want to talk about Democrats who are trying to get in power, we could talk about the Virginia AG candidate Jay Jones who said that he hopes that >> people on the right kids die. [cheering] I condemn that. >> You condemn that? Perfect. So then he should drop out of the race. >> Sure. Can you name a single Democrat in power who didn't condemn that? >> Um yeah the the v the guy the person who's running for Virginia govern in a debate last week she said of course I condemn it. Even Jay Jones enough to tell him to tell him to drop out of the race. >> She should tell him to drop out. But here's the here's the here's the fundamental difference right now. You are pointing to people on my side and you can't name a single Democrat in power who made fun of Charlie Kirk. You can't name a single Democrat in power who said that Jay Jones what he said was good. I can point to multiple people and AOC who come out after the fact of Charlie's assassination said he was a racist and and were against memorializing an American hero in Congress. >> So they weren't celebrating any of it. Okay. There is a fundamental difference between the way the two parties function. And it's because Steven Miller the other day said the Democratic Party is not a political party. It's a domestic extremist organization. >> When you have one of the people of that of that of that political party going out and celebrating the death of the other side, then absolutely categorize the entire party 100% needs to be deratized. The entire party >> the Democrat party. >> Okay. But you can't name a single Democrat. >> It is a problem when it is a problem when the base of your of your party is celebrating other people's death. It is a problem when people of your party are openly calling for death for death of people like Charlie Ker. It is a problem when the when the motives of the shooter are very clear that it was emboldened by Democrat politicians when they have catched this fascist. So that it is it is clear that Democrat politicians l you know rhetoric around Donald Trump being a fascist name that we have seen assassinations. That's the reason that that Donald Trump was tried to be assassinated. That's the same reason that Charlie Kirk was assassin. >> Is there any proof that Thomas Matthew Krooks was even a liberal? What's your proof? >> That Thomas Matthew he he donated to Act Blue. >> That's not true. >> He What do you mean it's not true? Yes, it is. He registered as a Republican solely for the purpose of coming after Donald Trump and and voting in Nikki Haley in the primary. >> So this is your proof. He was like 20 when this happened. >> When mean he was 20. What does that mean? >> He didn't even donate in the last election cycle. >> It it was obvious that he was a Democrat, like I said, because he donated to Act Blue before. >> Wait, so it's obvious he's a Democrat, but Melissa Hortman Shooter, who had a list of six different Democrats, isn't a Republican. Do you see the double standards here? And the No, you don't. >> Not Not at all. It's that throughout this entire debate, you guys are able to draw connections. Even with Pam Bondi, you said that Biden, there's no actual proof of Biden asking Merrick Garland to do this, but the proof of Trump asking Pam Bondi to do this isn't enough. >> Again, the proof is that Merrick Garland on day one did it after being appointed from Biden. >> He didn't. He slowwalked it. He did not do it on day one and Biden never asked him to do that because there was a clear Merrick Garland was a [ __ ] He was somebody who slowed every single case. He was absolutely a [ __ ] I mean, if he was actually as strong as you guys thought he was, then Trump would probably be in jail for trying to overthrow the 2020 election right now. There was no crime there, but >> time times out. >> Thanks so much. [applause] >> Good work, man. >> A lot of people in this room probably thought I was going to be way more mean or aggressive or insufferable, but there was this vibe where afterwards everyone was like, "Hey, that was a great conversation, and we need more of those. In fact, I might have more conversations." So, I think there's a dynamic where this proves that America still can be based on conversation and not online divisiveness. I think Adam was such a nice young man, too. And especially, he's someone I feel like, dude, we could totally hang out with, right? That's something I really respect. I could tell he was prepared and he had brought notes and he was ready, right? And I think sometimes you get into conversations with people and [music] you just can tell very quickly they don't know what they're talking about. >> I do um appreciate that he did acknowledge he agreed with some of my points. He didn't just veto it because we're on different sides. You know, I I very much appreciated the fact that he was extending his arm to compromise. >> The the thing that Adam said that I agreed with the most is is that of the the kind of moral issues in Donald Trump. That is an Achilles heel that the Republican party has right now. Just that impropriy that um honestly Adam is correct to point out that exists in my opinion in both parties. Adam was very nice. There was a moment where Marty cooked him. he uh really really showed him that he was wrong. And he admitted, you know, he said, "You got me." And I think it takes a really big person to just say, "Yeah, I'm wrong." >> Because at the end of the day, if you have a, you know, real ideological, you know, opposition to someone else, try to convince them otherwise. Don't don't try to cancel them or stop talking to them or or hope that someone kills them. >> I think conservatives and liberals can come together by trying to shed the online algorithms that divide us and promote the most outrage and having more in-person conversations about issues that [music] matter. Once you strip the online divisiveness, you find a human being on the other side who's willing to shake your hand
Download Subtitles
These subtitles were extracted using the Free YouTube Subtitle Downloader by LunaNotes.
Download more subtitlesRelated Videos
Download Subtitles for 1 Gay vs 20 Straight Men Video
Enhance your viewing experience by downloading accurate subtitles for '1 Gay vs 20 Straight Men | Surrounded.' Subtitles help you understand dialogue clearly and make the content accessible to everyone, including non-native speakers and those with hearing impairments.
Download Subtitles for Top 10 Most Heated Debates of 2025
Access accurate subtitles for the 'Top 10 Most Heated Debates of 2025' video and enhance your viewing experience. Downloading captions helps you follow every argument clearly, improves accessibility, and supports better comprehension of key discussion points.
Download Subtitles for 1 Doctor vs 20 RFK Jr. Supporters Video
Access accurate subtitles for the intense discussion between Doctor Mike and RFK Jr. supporters. Downloading these captions ensures you catch every detail and understand the conversation clearly. Enhance your viewing experience with easy-to-follow subtitles.
Download Subtitles for Are Trump Voters Having Second Thoughts? Video
Access accurate subtitles for the "Are Trump Voters Having Second Thoughts? | Roundtable" video to enhance your understanding and follow the discussion effortlessly. Downloading captions ensures accessibility and helps capture every insight from this engaging political roundtable.
Download Subtitles for Christian vs Jewish vs Muslim Women Video
Enhance your understanding of cultural perspectives by downloading subtitles for the insightful video "Christian vs Jewish vs Muslim Women | The Bridge." Accessing captions helps viewers follow complex discussions and supports better comprehension across languages.
Most Viewed
Download Subtitles for 2025 Arknights Ambience Synesthesia Video
Enhance your viewing experience of the 2025 Arknights Ambience Synesthesia — Echoes of the Legends by downloading accurate subtitles. Perfect for understanding the intricate soundscapes and lore, these captions ensure you never miss a detail.
Download Subtitles for Girl Teases Friend Funny Video
Enhance your viewing experience by downloading subtitles for the hilarious video 'Girl Teases Friend For Having Poor BF'. Captions help you catch every witty remark and enjoy the humor even in noisy environments or for non-native speakers.
تحميل ترجمات فيديو الترانزستورات كيف تعمل؟
قم بتنزيل ترجمات دقيقة لفيديو الترانزستورات لتسهيل فهم كيفية عملها. تعزز الترجمات تجربة التعلم الخاصة بك وتجعل المحتوى متاحًا لجميع المشاهدين.
離婚しましたの動画字幕｜無料で日本語字幕ダウンロード
「離婚しました」の動画字幕を無料でダウンロードできます。視聴者が内容をより深く理解し、聴覚に障害がある方や外国人にも便利な字幕付き動画を楽しめます。
Download Accurate Subtitles and Captions for Your Videos
Easily download high-quality subtitles to enhance your video viewing experience. Subtitles improve comprehension, accessibility, and engagement for diverse audiences. Get captions quickly for better understanding and enjoyment of any video content.
If you found these subtitles useful, consider buying us a coffee. It would help us a lot!