Fact Check: Dan Woodton on Tommy Robinson Trial, London Chaos, and Douglas Murray Claims

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Woodton. This is Outspoken episode number 614.

Breaking right now, it appears the jury in the Tommy Robinson trial could be deadlocked. Still no verdict, but lots

of dramatic happenings from court, including this clash between Tommy Robinson and Piers Morgan. We will get

into that later in the show. Just to repeat, no verdict after 2 days of deliberation in the Tommy Robinson

trial. He is of course facing 10 years behind bars. Also breaking today, carnage in city Khn's London as his

newly pedestrianized Oxford Street descends into chaos on its first night of operation with gangs of feral youths

teaming up with the Islamist leftist mob in an attempt to break into the Balon Door Awards as a pathetic city Khn who

has unleashed this mess in so many ways. Rub shoulders with winner Harry Kaine. This is just a small taste of what's to

come. You got no must.

And today, patriot author Douglas Murray has revealed the best way to become part of modern Britain is to join a jihadist

group as the Islamists are now waiting to take over in an upcoming civil war. They get all of these benefits and we

pay for them. We pay for them. But but it it does suggest very strongly that if if you really want to meld into Britain

in the 21st century, the best thing to do is to join a jihadist group. All of the the uh the um stealth Islamists and

long game Islamists and others in our country, uh the ones for instance who've decided to spend recent years uh uh

hollering support for Hamas and so on. Um, all they're doing is waiting. They're just waiting until the time that

they can do what they want to do. There's a a passage in, I think, the Gospel of St. Matthew. Men of violence

take it by force. >> But is there going to be a political solution? With an early election now

considered a near certainty and Nigel Faraj's public meltdown becoming more obvious

for this whole well, staff incompetence. It's all well and good. advertising to businesses. But on Mondays, people who

run businesses tend to be rather busy. Part of me, you know what, can't even be bothered to watch the budget on

Wednesday. I think I'll watch Cash in the Attic instead. The journalists in this,

>> he's now even taking to GB News to beg Restore Britain voters to return by claiming Rert Low doesn't have a chance.

If those restore supporters online see that we are the only vehicle genuinely on the center right that can beat the

Labour party and come back to us then our polling will start to look very different very quickly. Joining us on

the superstar panel today, political heavyweight husband and wife Christine and Neil Hamilton. Also coming up on the

show, tension at the Southern Crown Court as Tommy Robinson and his supporters await the verdict in his

harassment case against Daily Male journalism and he is facing 10 years in prison. And Megan Kelly, Piers Morgan,

and Andrew Neil all break their silence on growing claims by the establishment and MSM that the British public just

must forgive Megan Markle because of the allegations against her father, Thomas Markle. We'll have much more on that in

the uncancled royal after show on Substack 2 with royal YouTube sensation Pete Diner. And I have nominated

alongside Neil and Christine for today's Union Jackass get voting in the live chat right now on YouTube. Neil has gone

for Alistister Campbell for describing himself as a national treasure. What the only treasure would be if that freak was

locked up for war crimes. Christine Hamilton has gone for crescent dick. She says she was the commissioner of the

Metropolitan Police at the time the force received the letter on Thomas Markle allegations but failed to act.

And I've gone for Sadique Khn for causing London carnage which I'm about to show you now. Let's go.

Carnage has taken over London on the exact day that the British capital city's failed mayor, city Khn, appeared

on the mainstream media across the globe to herald his new hellish vision of what was once the world's greatest city

before he took over. Instead, his decision to pedestrianize Oxford Street, one of Britain's most famous shopping

destinations, meant it immediately turned into a gathering point for the feral Islamole left coalition to deploy

destructive and violent tactics. Indeed, within hours, it became clear what Khan had just unleashed as gangs of hooded

youths took over the iconic road. Police soon turned up and struggled to maintain order.

Keep moving. Well done, Mr. Khan. As LBL put it at day one of Sadi Khan's Oxford Street,

pedestrianization, empty pavements, road work barriers, security guards and cyclists riding on the pavement. So

yeah, this is the grand transformation London was promised or another vanity project being sold as progress. But for

Khan, this was just all about being able to appear on liberal news networks across the world like MS now and

boasting on social media about a new era for Oxford Street. >> And the thing is you can see that this

is all just a stunt. >> Work is underway and that's it for traffic on almost 1 kilometer of the

street. A new era for street starts now and this is just the beginning. The London mayor Sadi Khan has hailed

what he called the end of two decades of decline for the capital's main shopping street as a large stretch of Oxford

Street became fully pedestrianized. Bus stops and taxi [music] ranks have been dismantled and future plans include

planting trees and creating public squares at a total cost of around 150 million. But away from those glossy

promo videos, the reality on the ground, even during the day, anything but glamorous, as London's previous street

of pride, looked instead like a total mess. Look, only the bikes, which are used so

regularly to commit muggings of innocent mobile phones, seem to benefit from this dire new arrangement. But then things

turned really embarrassing for come. But of course the mainstream media is covering this up because he is their

guy. But the prop pali mob used the newly pedestrianized Oxford Street to gate crash. The ball and door with

subversive force reporting the free Palestine chant of doom can mean only one thing at the Ball and Door ceremony.

Chaos just off Khan's newly pedestrianized Oxford Street. start as you mean to go on. The timing of course

completely mortifying given that the attention should have been on Harry Kane's win. Instead, this happened.

[screaming] [cheering] Restore

Britain's Montgomery Toms wrote with Sadique Khn's C40 net zero pedestrianization. Oxford Street is

already overrun by mobs. Tonight, police have arrived and chaos is unfolding, perfectly primed for London's Parisstyle

battleground. A West End landmark reduced to netzero [ __ ] and migrant disorder. Nomad Jed predicted London

this evening. How long before they start smashing shops, looting and setting cars on fire? Oh, but you know for Sadi Khan,

he was happy in his posh dinner suit getting his picture with Harry Kane for social media while all hell was breaking

loose outside. Hey, hey, hey, hey, HEY, HEY, HEY, HEY. As you can see, the crowds here outside

of the Balor. People are pushing and shoving to try and get past the security to get a glimpse of the likes of Harry

Kane and Laminia Mile as they arrive for the 2026 Balor. Not looking too pretty out there. The players were supposed to

be arriving at 6:00 and they have now started arriving, but the crowds out there are pushing past the security to

try and get through to get a glimpse of their favorite players. They have been so far unsuccessful. One woman looks as

though she was having a panic attack trying to get through with her children to make it through safely, but not the

best of scenes so far at Balindor for the first time in London. >> No, we're a joke. It's a total

embarrassment. We can't even host an awards ceremony without carnage. But it got so much worse. So much worse later

into the night. Let's go. Mother

This is what you have done, Sadi Khan. And yet you're celebrated. People don't know the reality, but Joe McCain

absorbed. It's all kicking off in London. If we do get riots like they had in France, our police will have no

chance. From Kosher, it's happening tonight in London. Sadik Khan's new pedestrianized Oxford Street. It looks

like the Free Palestine mob are bringing the inifard we've seen in France to the UK's capital. And I do just want to

compare for one moment For people who say I'm exaggerating, the viral video I discovered of the 50th

anniversary celebrations of VE Day in exactly the same area. I want you to compare. It was the same time of night

as what I've just shown you. Compare and weep at what we have lost. >> I'm ready if you are. So, uh, from the V

night studio, we'll pop down the road to Piccadilly Circus where Judith Charas is somewhere in a milling crowd. Judith,

can you hear me? Yes, I can, Mike. And indeed, yes, I am in the MILLING CROWD HERE AT PICADILLY CIRCUS. I hope very

much that you can hear me now. And we're quite SURE THAT THIS CROWD WILL BE SWELLED a little later on because

there's the gala concert going on in Hide Park. And I'm sure people will come down from there. It's only a mile or so,

as I say, down the road. Well, tonight we've been holding a special party at one of the oldest restaurants in London

here with veterans and civilians. They've been recalling the fantastic VE day that they spent and also remembering

colleagues in the war. I must say too though that uh when the lights outside uh all those years ago weren't anything

like as bright as this, they had two search lights beaming through those windows. None of this brash neon

lighting. and Iran is up there looking down on us all as he is tonight but in fact was put away during for the

duration of the war in fact to keep it safe along with many other statues and the atmosphere on that day in 1945

well I don't think that despite all this atmosphere here tonight nothing will ever quite match that

>> look at what has happened in 30 years look at what the new labor project has done to our capital

And this is spreading across the country. A drastic change. And it is a result of governments who

have failed us. Douglas Murray overnight has said that that failure can be summed up by the inability to even stop the

invasion of the country every day via the channel. Why have we got thousands of people

still coming over in small boats from France? Why can they not be stopped? Why do those of us who pay taxes in the UK

have to pay for people we do not know and who's we have a system that basically doesn't work out who they are

in the main why do we pay our taxes for people we don't know to come in and live in hotels that most people in this

country can't afford to live in night after night themselves. Most of the British public couldn't afford to live

in even a two or three star hotel every night for the foreseeable future. So, why are those taxpayers paying for

strangers to do so? Um, this is this is um it's it's very obvious that's a problem that should have been sorted

out. Yet, it we we haven't even got on the top of that. Douglas then attacked both the Conservative Party and Reform

UK for their lack of muscle on this issue, suggesting he is moving closer to Rbert Lo's way of thinking.

Yes, I remember when Tony Abbott, former Australian prime minister who oversaw part of the Australian policy of

stopping the boats, uh I remember when he came to uh London and gave a speech about five or six years ago. uh the

conservatives were in office at the time and uh he gave a speech at a sort of conservative gathering in which he

explained how they'd stopped the boats and made sure that there was a disincentive uh to break into Australia

illegally and all of these wet conservatives uh in the room all uh sort of gave comment afterwards about how you

know inhumane and very right-wing Tony Abbott seemed to be and that really told us a lot about them. even the

Conservative Party and indeed I'd add even Nigel Farage of course who's has said in the past that he doesn't want to

deport people who are here illegally. Um they they somehow think that it makes them

look unkind and inhumane and things like that and uh that's possible of course. Isn't it

beautiful Douglas Murray saying all of this to the face of Michael Gove now his boss at the spectator and he quite

rightly raised the case of the Manchester Arena bomber as an example of how we accept jihad infiltrators.

I'll tell you what I think is much more inhumane and unkind. Uh I think it's allowing people like the Abedi family

into this country in the first place. I still want to know, and I've asked for many years, why somebody in the home

office here, several people in the home office, allowed in a family of jihadists who'd fallen out with Colonel Gaddafi to

come and live first in London, then in Manchester, one of their two boys uh uh uh blew up young girls at the Manchester

Arena um in a suicide bombing. their other boy who knew about it, young man, went to prison for complicity and uh

badly injured two prison waters by throwing boiling oil at them. Um the father seems to be supportive of the

children so far as one can see. Who let them in? And why why hasn't everybody involved been fired or sent to prison

themselves? >> Exactly. Lock them up. But it's still going on because our ludicrous deep

state is actually rewarding terrorists like the terrorists now living in Windsor just miles from Prince William.

Why is it that every time there's a terrorist plot in this country or against people in this country, the

people who are most rewarded are the people who broke in and were part of the terrorist group. Why has Mr. X, as the

um Sunday Times has had to call him, we only know about this man because of the Sunday Times excellent uh investigation.

Why does this man who was a right-hand man of Ishmael Haneir, the Hamas leader, why is he wandering around the UK freely

uh and apparently was on was on the watch list of the terrorist of the anti-terrorist squads because he was

planning attacks in the UK. Why did we allow in that terrorist into the UK? Why did he get asylum? Uh Pierers, I think,

came on came over again on a small boat like the person who uh uh put a bomb on the London Underground.

What is this? This is the easiest level. Don't allow people in who want to kill you. Don't allow people in who put

bombs on your trains, who want to decapitate your citizens or who have decapitated your citizens and who as a

reward you allow to live at the public expense in Windsor and wander around shopping at a local. Exactly. What have

we done? And I know some people say, "Oh, he's being hyperolic or he's being facitious." But actually, Douglas Murray

then says that the best way to become an accepted part of Britain these days is to join a jihadist group. Let's pretend

this was a football game. You can play for Britain or you can play for the jihadists. The people who play for

Britain we persecute. The people who play for the jihadists we reward. Nothing happens to them. In in fact,

they get treated far better than members of our armed services. They get prioritized by being put up in hotels.

They get prioritized by being allowed to break the law by breaking into into Britain in the first place. They get all

of these benefits and we pay for them. We pay for them. But but it it does suggest very strongly

>> that if if you really want to meld into Britain in the 21st century, the best thing to do is to join a jihadist group.

No wonder civil war now a distinct possibility. >> Some of the most pessimistic voices in

Britain, people like the academic David Betts say that the demographic change has been so profound and that if you lay

the mosaic of different groups who are now living in the United Kingdom with the weak sense of central attachment and

also with some of the economic problems that we've faced for nearly two decades now

>> that you have a recipe for civil conflict. Yes, >> I think that he's being too pessimistic

and too deterministic. But do you think that his analysis uh is uh well, do you think he's on to something?

>> Of course, that's what's coming if we don't address this. >> And addressing it means addressing it

reducing the number of people in this country, not just those who are who came here illegally, but also saying to some

people who came here entirely properly, but who can now >> go back to or who uh uh uh who could be

encouraged to return to certain countries because you know it's safer. >> Yeah.

>> They would have to leave. >> The the first thing is you can do nothing until you deal with illegals. Uh

if you can't deal with illegals, just give up and accept that our future is going to be the Balkans. Just just

accept it. If you if you can't, and by which I mean different groups, including native British people, will be in

constant conflict with each other. We'll have different enclaves and it'll be m >> I just love that Michael Gove is having

to listen to this from his star columnist because Douglas Murray then tells him the Islamists are now simply

waiting to take over. all of the the uh the um stealth Islamists and long game Islamists and

others in our country. Uh the ones for instance who've decided to spend recent years uh uh hollering support for Hamas

and so on. Um all they're doing is waiting. They're just waiting until the time that they can do what they want to

do. That's what's happening with the French riots. uh the men of violence uh the uh the um join in and they take over

and they'll take over and we don't know what will cause that. Um in 2011 when we had the riots in the UK the detention of

one uh and shooting of one uh drug dealer in London led to riots across the UK. We didn't learn anything from those

riots um because we didn't want to of course but we we don't know what the what the thing what the match is that

strikes but we do know that we have um hundreds of thousands of people at the very least in this country who will take

opportunity uh of the moment when it strikes. >> Oh and by the way wake up wake up

because they will end up taking the country by force. Douglas Murray predicts if we don't do something about

it first. >> There's a a passage in I think the Gospel of St. Matthew, men of violence

take it by force. >> We have completely forgotten that lesson. The men of violence will take it

by force and they will take this country by force. They will take France by force. They will burn down your holy

places. They will desecrate your holy sites. They will destroy your heroes. Uh we're sitting here in Westminster.

Um one of our heroes in this nation, Winston Churchill, who is not just a hero, but of course represents our

parents and grandparents generation who who he led and all the sacrifices of that generation. You're now allowed to

graffiti and uh um and uh desecrate the the statue of Churchill in Parliament Square and you'll be let off by the

courts if you're taken to court as happened the other week. So our holy places will be desoiled

um or burned and we will have to decide as I say in my column this week whether we want to be observers at our own

funeral p or not. Wow. So is there a political solution? Restore Britain's Robert Low is at least

fighting back. I loved this today. Have you seen this? We're just going to take a moment to celebrate it. the deeply

unfunny leftist so-called comedian Jonathan Pi being forced to post on X. Last week, I did an interview for ITV

promoting my new live show. In the interview, I say that Rupert Low has his legal bills paid for by Elon Musk. Rert

Low has contacted me to point out that isn't the case. Happy to set the record straight and apologize for the error.

And Restore Britain is fighting back on loads of fronts. This a particularly perilous time for reform UK which is

beset by paranoia over the increasing rise of Robert Low and indeed Nigel Farage throwing his staff under the bus

as quote incompetent because of yesterday's empty seat press conference which you can see in this video is seen

as illustrative of the problems within the party. He was furious as he walked out and realized the adoring crowds were

depleted just like reform's poll ratings have been for this well staff incompetence. It's

all well and good advertising to businesses, but on Mondays, people who run businesses tend to be rather busy.

So, so it might be easy. Um, [applause] and no doubt

many of those that are here, it's going to cost them a very great deal of money to have given up their day to come and

visit us here in London. As you >> Roert Meers responded, nice guy, bet he's a pleasure to work for. Luke Robert

Black, the conservative added, "It's like watching a car crash in slow motion." And when Mirror reporter Sophie

Huskinson reported, "I'm not sure I've seen an Nigel Farage press conference quite this empty." Piers Morgan replied,

"Reform is as dead as a dodo." I mean, Farage looked completely fed up. As his leadership rival, Robert Genrich,

delivered his keynote speech. I mean, you'll see here, but he didn't even pretend to laugh when Genrich made his

big joke. Part of me, you know what, can't even be bothered to watch the budget on

Wednesday. I think I'll watch Cash in the Attic instead. the journalists in this

>> and this morning Farage seemed to struggle as he was put on the spot over his close advisor Raheem Casam who has

described Kem Benedok as a I think actually right as a Nigerian scammer. Um,

I wonder what you make of comments this morning by a former chief of staff of yours, Raheem Kasam, who has spoken

about the Conservative Party leader, Kemmy Bedon, calling her a Nigerian scammer.

Do you think that's racist? >> Well, he's A, he's not a former chief of staff, B, he's currently in America, uh,

and and and C, >> he's a friend, >> and C, um, he's Indian. He's of Indian

heritage. >> Does that mean he can't be racist? >> Uh, well, I don't know. Um, you you you

tell me the answer to that. As far as scammers concerned, well, it's a strong word, but it's pretty clear that Kemmy

Badno often does not tell the truth about things that have happened and tries their very best. So, you support

those comments in her past. This is a cultural argument about whether Chemi Badnock, who grew up in Nigeria, regards

herself as Nigerian or British. It's not a debate or an argument >> that she's a scammer. you you so you

would support those comments that he made that she is a Nigerian scammer. >> I I just said to you very very clearly

that the word scammer is about someone who doesn't always tell the truth. There are quite a few instances in the last

couple of months of her not telling the truth. >> Do you think that's racist?

>> What scammer? No, I don't. >> Do you think the phrase Nigerian scammer is racist?

>> I've just explained to you there are two different words. One is scammer which tell the truth and the other is

Nigerian. Look, he is of Indian heritage. Ask him how he describes himself. Keb Badno calls herself

British. She grew up in Nigeria. By the way, this is not a debate I'm getting involved in.

>> Who is an associate of yours of yours and Reform UK? A close associate of yours and UK.

>> So what? People say all people say all sorts of things on Twitter every single day. Seriously, why

not just say no? It's not racist. Cammy Bayano herself has described herself multiple times in public as a Nigerian.

She is a Nigerian scammer. It's not racist. Why not just say that? Do not play by their games. But this is the

problem. There's this Pence movement against Reform UK, right? Because then on this car crash media round, Farage

heads to the Today program where Nick Robinson actually praised him for turning on Tommy Robinson supporters. A

decision of course that helped lead to the rise of Restore Britain. >> To be fair, you paid a price for

opposing Tommy Robinson. There's some people who don't like the fact you've done it. You're now saying, are you,

that if you like a post by Tommy Robinson, even if other people see it as racist, that that's okay. uh that

depends what the post is to a large extent but I do not I look I'm not going to have run a party where we say you

can't talk about that person or that person we have to be sensible about vetting and and we are and you know

really interesting actually we vet our council candidates to a much higher level than any other political party and

you know >> well you say that but that doesn't suggest it does it does it suggest that

people are being advised to rig their social media accounts so people don't know you see the

um also shown the country was infested with Asian families. >> At least we vet people the and by the

way and by the way the most egregious example that you're about to read out to me was somebody who was a long-term

conservative counselor who very recently joined us. I promise. >> So why did he join Mr. Bar?

>> I promise. >> Why did he join you? A man who believes No. Why did he join reforming?

>> Because he had more chance of winning his seat. >> Because he thought he was amongst

friends. Do you not think? >> No. That is absolute cobblers and you know it.

>> Then he went to what should have been comfortable terrain, the reform propaganda outfit GB News, where it

became clear that Nigel is rattled by the reform polling collapse. >> What would you say to them about winning

back support? >> Well, it depends where you look and it depends and it depends a bit who does

the polling. I remember this happening back in in May of this year ahead of the local elections and we and we exceeded

some polls by 6%. Look, there has been an absolutely relentless unending establishment assault and attack on me

and on reform that has gone on for several months and that has made some of our supporters just back away a little

bit uh and wonder you know what is going on, what is true and what is not. What I would say is this.

If this prime minister is taking us into a direction where the main center of debate at the next general election is

going to be Europe and immigration, then bring it on, I say. But at that point, completely unprompted because you know

GB news presenters do not mention restore Britain. Farage brought up RERT Lowe's party and made this plea to

restore supporters. key to our success will be uh you know those who've been tempted by thinking

that restore might be the future. They need to understand that restore at most will be competitive in one seat and

we'll be competitive in hundreds. And I think if those restore supporters online see that we are the only vehicle

genuinely on the center right that can beat the Labour party and come back to us then our polling will start to look

very different very quickly. Hilariously, because he had used that restore Britain term, which is banned at

GB News, the presenter just immediately moved him on rather than bothering to ask any follow-up question. So, I think

we all agree we are in trouble. The scenes in London overnight prove it. Douglas Murray's warning proves it. But

is there a political solution emerging or does the right remain as divided as ever? Now, Christina and Neil Hamilton.

So, great to have you both here. Neil, I want to kick off with that quite astonishing warning from Douglas Murray.

And I love the fact, Neil, that he is saying the unsayable to the face of Michael Gove, you know, the very woke,

very wet sort of fake conservative editor of the spectator who still believes in multiculturalism, who still

believes that the Conservative party can come up with a solution. And Douglas is saying, Neil, look, they are now here

waiting to take over. We have allowed these alarmists in. They are waiting to take over. And if we are not careful,

Neil, he says they will take over by force. Is he right? >> Yes, of course he's right. And anybody

should have been able to predict what is now happening. Indeed, it was predicted 60 years ago when Enoch Pal made a

speech in Wolverampton in 1968 warning of the dangers of communalism, which by which he meant uh and birds of a feather

flocking together um and in different ethnic groups living in effectively ghettos and with their own minority

interests being a a majority in their own communities. that was bound to lead to the kind of violence ultimately on

the streets that we've seen and which was seen even in those days of course in big cities in America and it was that

example that gave rise to that speech. Uh so you know what we've seen coming for a long time is this dark cloud

getting bigger and bigger and bigger and once minorities reach a certain tipping point in size in distinct geographical

areas and they as we see in places like Tower Hamlets effectively become the majority then they cease to be to all

intents and purposes part of our country and they are representatives of another country. And this is going to happen

more and more and more, especially as the Muslim population in this country rises. There were 600,000 Muslims living

in London in 2000. There are now nearly one and a half million. And uh in 20 years time, there'll be another million

on top of that. So this is happening of course in other cities in England as well. And the people who live in the

countryside and perhaps rarely go to cities may not be fully aware of the transformation of England which is

taking place and taking place let me say at an accelerating pace and yet our political class the traditional

political class has just sat on this for 20 and in a sense tacitly they've encouraged it because they have failed

to take the necessary measures to stop things getting worse. The illegal migrants of course being the most

prominent example. Still nothing effectively is being done to stop the boats and the fact that the numbers have

come down is more to do with the numbers entering the European borders on the Mediterranean and and elsewhere coming

down as well. But still they're still coming through in numbers which should have horrified us 20 years ago or still

less, you know, 50 years ago. And we are adding hundreds of thousands of people to our population every year both

legally and illegally which is exacerbating the problem we've been talking about that the minorities are on

the course to become majorities in their own areas and that means the the fracturing of the cohesion of our

country and effectively we cease to be a single nation because a nation is a nation when it feels itself

to be a nation and we now have a very large number of people who do not feel themselves to be part of

>> Douglas Murray speaks of enclaves, doesn't he? He speaks of Balkan style enclaves and I'm sorry, how can you deny

that we are not already living that in London because you can walk through parts of London and as a white person,

as a Christian person, feel incredibly unsafe because you have entered an Islamist enclave. That is a reality. But

Christine Hamilton, how frustrating do you find it that I've watched Sadique Khan lorded all over the world for the

past 24 hours? Everyone's been heralding this pedestrianization of Oxford circuses, this great nut zero

development. He is a hero. Christine within hours look at the carnage in central London in part because of the

pedestrianization. I mean in part two because he has obviously allowed it to become lawless and allow it to become

Islamist but but a lot of the reason that these crowds were able to gather Christine I mean you know that part of

London very well is because there are no longer cars coming down Oxford Street. >> Well it's it's all as well as everything

you've described it's all part of his war on the motorist. He wants to make London almost impossible to get around

in a private car. Uh, I mean the other day we were coming trying to get across Batisy Bridge because Albert Bridge is

closed and the knock-on effect was horrific. Is horrific. It's been like that for months and months and months.

Exactly the same thing is going to happen with closing down Oxford Street. The traffic chaos on all the area around

there. I mean that's theater land. It's where tourists go. It's going to be horrific. And of course that's what he

wants. He wants London to break down like that. He I mean honestly the sight of him standing there next to Harry

Kane, hero Harry was unbelievable. It really was. And I felt so sorry in that crowd. You that picture I mean honestly

Harry Kane could have just kicked him out of the arena if only he had. There were people in that crowd who had

genuinely come to see their football heroes that you you heard a little a mother saying my little boy wants to

meet his whatever. And there they are completely overwhelmed by that disgusting mob. And as for Michael Gove

sitting there like that. I mean honestly Douglas Murray has always talked sense. He always will talk sense and he's a

very very uh serious individual. Michael go frankly is a pratt and he was part of the responsibil responsible part

responsible for the situation and how he could sit there while he was basically very quietly being lectured by Douglas

Murray. how Douglas didn't point at him and say this is your >> it's on you. I guess he can't because

because he does pay his wages as a columnist for the spectator. But I still did find it quite beautiful because of

course it's like these wets that he's talking about are Michael Gove. But look Neil, we do have to speak about the

political situation. Of course I have to remind everyone you are a former conservative minister, but you're also a

former leader of Nigel Faraj's ex party UKIP. You've had your own runins with him. But I think everyone can see Neil.

I mean, we've both worked with Nigel for many years, but it really, you really don't have to be a close confident or a

psychologist at the moment to see he's not coping. He doesn't know what to do. He's not enjoying it. And the problem

is, Neil, a lot of these people will simply not return to Reform UK because I I include myself in this area by the

way, but you could talk about Restore Britain supporters. You could talk about members of Patriot Platform. You could

talk about Tommy Robinson, Unite the Kingdom attendees. They pushed all of us away, Neil. And I posted about this

earlier today and I've had an overwhelming response from people saying, "Dan, it's too late. We are not

going back to weak source Farage. It is over." Do you agree or is there a way for Nigel to somehow win the Patriots

back over? Well, it was a disaster that Rert Low was treated as he was by Nigel and by

reform that disgraceful reporting him to the police. Um, you the police turning up at his farm in the early hours of the

morning and seizing his shotguns and he's a farmer. Farmers have guns. Um, and the idea that he he might have been

using his shotguns to shoot Nigel or anybody else is of course utterly preposterous. Um, so I think if there's

going to be any kind of reconciliation at all, and I think that's very very difficult to imagine, I think there has

to be some contrition on the part of Nigel and Zia Ysef about the treatment of Robert um

>> rather than just saying as he was Neil basically, well, you know, they're not going to win. I I really think they have

to realize that ain't going to work anymore. or it's not going to cut it because we're not just going to vote for

a weak source party that hates us because an alternative might not win. It's like no, if we all think that way,

then we will win. Well, it is of course a disaster if the uh the right, let's use the umbrella term, um is going to be

as fractured as it now is uh in in the face of a Labor party which is resurgent because Burnham knows very well what

he's doing trying to get onto his bandwagon the people who defected from Labor to the Greens um also Lib Dem

headbanging [clears throat] Ramonas uh and so on if he can get them all to vote for the Labor candidate in

seats which reform might other or indeed tries for that matter might otherwise win. Uh then uh that's going to cement

this minority Labor government which only got 33% of the vote in the last general election and yet has got 60 odd%

of the seats in the House of Commons. So you know I think people have got to wise up.

>> Okay Christine, what about this point then? I'm just looking in the live chat and you know I totally appreciate there

is a divide on this issue and I want to thank Red Scala John who's not happy with me Christine he said Dan you are

losing me mate every single day there's a poke at Nigel Farage and a childish celebration for restore reaching 8% in

the polls Dan wake up mate restore are not winning the next general election Dan wake up

>> well of course of course restore aren't going to win. But as Neil said earlier, Nigel Farage is the to a large extent

the author of his own misfortune. He fell out big time with Rert No. He even accused him of having some sort of

mental illness for goodness sake. Far the history is littered with people that Faraj has fallen out with. There's one

sitting next to me now. People have left or been pushed out of Faraj's party, whether it was UKIP, the Brexit Party,

or now reform because of Faraj's personality problems. Let's call it that. He's also a worried man. He feels

cornered. He's got this parliamentary report breathing down his neck. He doesn't know what's going to happen. He

has no idea whether he's going to be hauled over the cold or let off. So, you know, he is a worried man. And I must

say, I hadn't previously seen um those empty seats. I knew that the press conference was very, very empty. But

it's seeing the actual picture of the completely empty seats. Compare that with the uh reform conference for the

general public the other day when they had thousands and thousands and thousands of people. That's that no

wonder Farage was looking pretty grim. >> Yes. But don't call your staff incompetent, Christine, in front of the

world. >> And frankly, we have experience of Rasim Cassam.

>> Oh, tell me. Tell me. Well, well, it's up to Neil whether he wants to tell or not, but anybody who

>> Nice guy, Neil, >> no. Thoroughly unpleasant, nasty guy. >> Yeah, exactly. And uh I think a lot of

people cheered when he crossed the Atlantic to to America. But >> I did.

>> But uh you know, that's the trouble. You know, Nigel's got himself into all sorts of trouble through his associates who

ultimately because he doesn't control and his current funding problems, people like George Cotrol and so on and and all

the bad publicity which has been generated by that are because he has associated himself too closely with

people who are ultimately going to cause trouble. They may not intend to, but because of their connections, their

history, their lack of judgment, then uh this is the inevitable consequence. And it's a tragedy that the reform has been

so dented by this experience. And it's not over yet, of course, because the parliamentary standards authority is

hardly a a uh a body which Nigel could place any any trust in at all. uh it is entirely an establishment body and of

course ultimately reports to the standards committee in the House of Commons which is dominated by Labour

MPs. I've been through that process myself and bear the scars from it. So you know this is not something which is

in judicial terms something which you can be regarded as fair and impartial. I'll I'll be amazed if uh what should

happen here does happen doesn't happen that uh you know he's he's going to be convicted by the standards commissioner

instead of concentrating on what really matters is is there an evidence of corruption in the donation you know what

what is it that he has promised as a quidd proquo if there was one they're concentrated on the form of registration

>> and of course he says he can't talk about it but I'm just looking at the super chat here Chris H281

says the problem is Farage always punches right. He has destroyed too many good people for his ego. Breaking right

now, intense stress for Tommy Robinson as the jury in his harassment trial against Daily Mail journalists. That

means he is facing 10 years in jail appears deadlocked after around 10 hours of deliberations. Now, this was not

expected as the trial dragged into a seventh day with the jury returning to the courtroom to ask the judge to look

at three witness statements again before the case was eventually adjourned until 10:00 a.m. tomorrow. Now, Tommy

initially looked upbeat as he arrived to be welcomed by supporters including Wendell of Urban Scoop and the activist

Young Bob. Go on yours. >> There we go.

>> Yes, sir. >> Smiling. Smiling again. Yeah. >> When it's in context, you don't even say

it's not negative. >> He's looking good again. >> Hello, Mr.

>> There we go. Mr. Mr. >> Good Tommy. Now, earlier Tommy had promised to

recreate what has become a famous AI meme showing him dancing alongside his big security guards for the week if he

was found not guilty. It was AY audits that first captured the picture, which has now gone viral.

>> Wendy's being brutal. >> I got to be brutal, bro. >> There he is, baby. Get out. Excuse me.

Excuse. >> I think Ed had to shoot Ed to shoot off a little bit. get a job done

to shoot off. Yeah. >> Thank you. I can't get well done. Ay, >> just give me give me

>> What's yours? What's your role? Who won? >> Beautiful. >> West Well, West Ham lost on the weekend

if that helps. >> Beautiful. >> Beautiful.

>> Thank you, gentlemen. >> Go on. Look. So, look, he seems in good spirits, people. Yeah.

>> Did he win? >> He doesn't. Nothing's happened yet. Yeah.

>> A [ __ ] hell, >> Tommy. >> Thank you for coming. Thank you for

taking the job. Thanks for coming >> from 10k people. Yeah. Good luck.

>> 10,000 people. Come on. >> Go on people. Yeah. >> Thank you, Tom.

>> We want to win tomorrow night. >> No, we don't want New Lon to win tomorrow night. Yeah. Can you do me a

favor? Yeah. Can you do do me a favor? Yeah. Can you put >> Can you put some prayer sign put some

prayer hands in the chat for Tommy? Yeah. >> Let's put Let's Let's put some Let's put

Let's put some of that in there, friend. >> Cuz let me remember people. Yeah. Let me tell you. Sorry, mate.

>> Um, >> let me tell you, if it wasn't for this man right here, there'd be a lot of

people that are still still sleeping, wouldn't even know what is going on. >> And I can't really say what I want to

say. >> Sorry. Can you press the button for me? Sorry.

>> No, we can't. That is the problem. Because of the contempt of court laws, we can't. We are going to return though

to Tommy in just one moment given there has been this huge clash with Piers Morgan as they await the verdict.

However, major breaking news today from believe it or not the same court where there has been a major development in

the other trial captivating the world with Russell Brand found not guilty of one of the charges against him. Judge

Mr. Justice Benathan instructed juries to acquit the star on an indecent assault charge in relation to a claim

that Bran tried to drag an MTV worker into a toilet in 2001. The judge ruled that the charge Bran faces should be

attempted indecent assault, not indecent assault. The case concluded for today. Jurors have been sent home with

proceedings expected to resume at 10:00 a.m. tomorrow. The big news though, brand due to give evidence. But of

course, Tommy has already given evidence in his case and we recreated that evidence using exact transcripts of what

happened inside the courtroom. Watch. How did the article make you feel when you first saw it?

>> I was shocked. I was scared. I was scared because The Mail Online is one of the biggest publications in the world.

My wife divorced me in 2020 because there was threats to the children at the home. I tried to keep my ex-wife out of

the media spotlight as I had to go out in public with a certain element of fear.

>> What happened in the immediate hours after the Mail Online article was published.

>> Within hours, the hotel was named everywhere. Social media users were uploading videos telling people to go

there. My first port of call after seeing the Mail Online article was to contact the editor of the Daily Mail who

I rang continuously but received no answer. >> You sent a direct message on X to Mail

Online journalist Jacob Durnhuber on 5th August 2024. Why did you send that message?

>> I was just trying avenues to get someone to talk to me. This isn't journalism. This is endangerment. And it added

nothing to the story. >> How did you manage to obtain the phone number of male online journalist Andrew

Young who was involved in writing the article about you? I have a private investigator company who came back with

a phone number and email. I was still trying to call Daily Mail editor-inchief Ted Verity when I got in contact with

Mr. Young. >> What were you trying to achieve from the call?

>> I wanted the Daily Mail to discuss with me about the wrongness of what they have just done. If I was to do this to you,

would this be okay? It's so morally bankrupt. I also wanted to ask Mr. Young that my ex-wife's pictures be removed

from the article. Why did you not ask for the picture of your ex-wife to be taken down in the ex posts?

>> Because it hadn't exploded yet. I didn't want to draw attention. I was in a race against time.

>> Why did you share an image of male online reporter Jacob Durnhuber on his ex account on 6th August?

>> If I'm honest, to put pressure on him. I wanted him to come to the table. >> Did you consider the potential

implications of sharing the image? >> In my head, I'm doing what I need to do in that moment to try and get rid of

that image from the article. >> Did you want to expose Mr. Done Hoover to threats of violence?

>> Not at all. I didn't really think about what he was being exposed to. >> Did you think the act was reasonable?

>> I felt it was totally reasonable. Still do under the circumstance. >> Now, we will of course be hopefully

bringing you a verdict tomorrow. Please God. However, as Tommy faces peak stress as

he goes through hell waiting for this verdict, he has entered into an astonishing back and forth in this

ongoing fight with Pierers Morgan, the host of Pierers Morgan Unensored, posting an image on X featuring peers

alongside criminals including Gary Glitter, Gain Maxwell, Max Clifford, Ralph Harris, and Harvey Weinstein.

He wrote, "How long have you known Pierce Morgan?" Morgan replied with a picture of him

going headto-head with Tommy Robinson on Good Morning Britain, adding, "I knew you were a wrongan the first time we

met." Well, Tommy wasn't having that. and he responded said someone who would have known about

grooming gangs while being the editor of one of Britain's largest newspapers. Labour MP Anne Crier raised the issue

back in 2002. Channel 4 broadcast concerns of Pakistanis grooming underage girls in 2004

while the peers apparently hid from the scandal to protect his precious job and his newspaper the Daily Mirror.

Then speaking more widely about his he added he is always late with news. He always tests where the political winds

are blowing before coming out with anything. He waits for the Overton window to move before he does anything.

Pier is a self-absorbed narcissistic wanker and a coward. It's people like us who move the Overton window. Only then

does he grow the tiniest pair of bollocks to say anything at all while vomiting his virtue signaling online.

Pathetic weasel and cuck of a man. A disingenuous scrot. There is currently no evidence I can find that Pier

Morgan's Daily Mirror reported and crier's warnings about Pakistani heritage men grooming and sexually

exploiting young girls when she raised the issue publicly. despite the story being reported elsewhere nationally

before Morgan left the paper to the superstar panel. Christine and Neil Hamilton. Well, okay. So, firstly, we

can't talk about the trial unfortunately because of the contempt of court laws. I've stuck to that all week. Of course,

we have to legally. That is very, very important. But Neil, you've got to admit, Tommy Robinson, what a unique

character. you know, in the midst of this absolute hell waiting for the jury to come back, he has just picked an

international fight with Piers Morgan and he wasn't backing down there because I do think he has a real point, Neil

Hamilton. Pier is always after the curve, isn't he? And I think he's going to realize too late that the Islamist

takeover of the disunited kingdom is real. Because at the moment, you know, he's saying, "Well, I'd much rather you

go so I can have my chicken tikka masala. Everything's fine." >> Yeah. Well, peers can take it. I'm sure

he can dish it out. So, he can take it, can't he? Those who live by the sword die by it. And I must say, as

vituperation goes, I thought that um Tommy Robinson's tweet was absolutely marvelous. But uh uh certainly an object

lesson in how how to hurl abuse at somebody who who very probably deserved it. But you're quite right about Piers

Morgan. Um you know he was the editor of a top selling tabloid newspaper and yet he completely ignored the growing

scandal which as Tommy rightly said was actually first properly exposed by a Labour MP Anne Crier. I was in the house

with her husband Bob Crier um who was a very leftwing labor MP but I always got on with him perfectly well and cordially

in human terms who was a genuine uh supporter of his workingclass constituents and so was his wife Anne

who was the MP for Keithley um and uh you know she was horrified by this scandal and the way it was being covered

up not just of course by the political authorities and the police but also by the mainstream media uh who sat on the

story and demonize people like Tommy Robinson for taking this issue by the scruff of the neck and bringing it into

public prominence. And Tommy is undoubtedly in my opinion uh you know one of the the greatest victims of

lawfare in in our country. Uh a lot of the uh of the prosecutions that have taken place against him uh would not

have been taken against other people who are not quite so prominent or or controversial. and politically

effective. So, you know, I I do think that there's a basic unfairness in the way that he's been treated over the

years. And we see this also with, you know, his friend Danny Tommo who was denied bail uh in

>> who is in jail who is in jail >> and and is in jail and will be for the next six months until his trial date. So

he has been detained as a prisoner never having been convicted of anything in relation to this current offense.

>> When Hugh Edwards when Hugh Edwards didn't spend a day didn't spend a day behind bars the prolific BBC pedophile

when you see that the men who are currently in some cases being charged over the RAF Fairford incident not being

remanded in custody. I mean it is sick. It is sick. And there is so much more I want to say about the Tommy Robinson

case, but of course I will await the verdict, Christine, which may not come unfortunately. You know, it is looking

like this could be a hung jury, but again, let's just hold off on that. Christine, how do you feel about Tommy

Robinson's accusations against Piers Morgan? >> Well, I love that long tweet that you

read out. I mean, I think I couldn't put it better myself. Uh, you know, Morgan, he he's a big boy. He can he can take

it. he gives it out. So, I mean, not many people would risk standing up to to um Pierers Morgan in that way. And good

old Tommy, he's never been afraid to stand up to the powerful. I mean, let's be honest, Pierce Morgan is incredibly

powerful. He has a a big media empire now. He controls an enormous amount of output. He can he can destroy people if

he wants to. And there's Tommy saying, "No, mate. You're not going to destroy me." But I do feel very sorry for him. I

mean, he's now got to wait another night. Uh if the jury can't reach any conclusion, he may have to go through

the whole business all over again with a new jury being sworn in. Um and as Neil said, in the meantime, Danny Tommo, his

I nearly said partner in crime, but you know what I mean. Um uh is languishing in prison on reform for slashing a onand

slashing a a migrant dingy. Well, wouldn't we all love to slash those dingies? You would.

>> This is what our public authorities should be doing. slashing the dingies to stop them coming to this country cuz you

only have to do that a few times and and the whole problem would disappear. >> I mean, it won't be very long before the

whole country is up in arms like Danny Thomas slam. We'll all be there slashing dingies. I mean, bring it on.

>> Exactly. And then what are they going to do? I I do just want to share with you in terms of staggering court cases. I

mean, it's pretty staggering. Certainly yesterday we had Tommy Robinson, Russell Bran, Chris Brown all in the same

courtroom. But today at Westminster Magistrate's Court and you can see this courtroom image some extraordinary

details emerging this via the Daily Expresses Michael Nolles. So we now have this is in regards to AR Fairford. We

now have Muhammad Abdul Karim 24 and Nomman Eshke 24 both appearing in court charged under the National Security Act.

Now Abdul Karim is accused of assisting a foreign intelligence service by acting as an intermediary for the handler Ali

while Es has been charged with entering a prohibited place for the purpose of being prejuditial to the UK. This is all

around what went on at RAF Fairford. The group were ordered to drive the van loaded with petrol by a handler known as

Ali who police believe was working on behalf of Iran. This is all evidence that was heard in court today. No

explosives or improvised explosives were found in the vans. Police did find a metal oil drum in each, two of which had

petrol in along with hard plastic water butts and internet enabled dash cams. Abdul Karim is alleged to have aided the

organizer Ali who is believed to be abroad and to be acting in the interests of the Iranian state. Ali is also

potentially connected to an incident at the Israeli embassy earlier this year where propaganda videos were posted

online suggesting it had been attacked with a chemical weapon by a drone. The court heard prosecutors alleged that

Abdul Karim aided Ali buying equipment for the mission and receiving multiple payments from him

totaling £70,000. Before the men allegedly enlisted by Abdul Karim traveled to RAF Fairford,

£300 worth of petrol was filled into the drums in the back of the car. So, another extraordinary case, this

time involving very obvious potential foreign interference.

It's terrifying times. And as Christine and Neil Hamilton say, the deep state decide that the person who needs to be

locked up as Danny Tommer. And of course, we will be bringing you, we hope, a verdict on the Tommy Robinson

case tomorrow. We hope and we pray. Breaking today, Megan Markle now being called out for her dodgy story regarding

the allegations against her father, Thomas Markle Jr. as Piers Morgan speaks out for the first time, Andrew Neil

speaks out for the first time, and Megan Kelly completely destroys the fellow American. Now, you do need to remember

that when she was in the royal family, Meghan Markle claimed in her holier than thou preachy Californian woke mumbo

jumbo style that women should be empowered to use their voice. Something by the point of the video I'm about to

show you, she had decided not to do in regards to the allegations against her own father.

You'll often hear people say, "Well, you're helping women find their voices." And I fundamentally disagree with that

because women don't need to find a voice. They have a voice. They need to feel empowered to use it and people need

to be encouraged to listen. >> As Sir Griff put it, Meghan Markle told the world that women have a voice. And

yet, for eight years, she chose not to use her voice to speak up for the children that had no voice. The Sussex's

are monsters. No child left behind. my ass. And no wonder people dismiss everything she says about these sorts of

issues. By the way, look, >> my husband and I spend a lot of time working on online harms, specifically

surrounding protecting our children. Not ours personally. Not ours personally. Not ours personally. Not ours

personally. Not ours personally. Not ours personally. Not ours personally. Not ours personally.

>> So, you get the point, right? But that could have gone on and on. So now Meghan Kelly has completely gone in on Meghan

Markle. And by the way, she is not defending Thomas Markle. She's pretty certain that Megan's dad could end up

being found guilty. But of course, there is a process that has to go through because we believe in due process. But

she has now compared Megan's behavior to that of her half brother, Thomas Michael Jr.,

>> but look how he reacted versus how she reacted. There is zero chance she was told we're

investigating when they weren't. And even if she was told that, why did she stay silent for eight years? Why, as

recently as December 2025, when she still believed he was a child sex abuser, had she said nothing.

She doesn't even allege that she called back the Metropolitan Police in year 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and a half to say, "What

happened? What happened? Is he or isn't he? What have you done to satisfy yourself that

he's not abusing little girls right now? >> And as a result, Megan Kelly believes that this decision by Markle is

reputationally catastrophic because of her previous holier than thou approach. >> And let me tell you why it's even more

gling. Because this woman, from the time she's come on the public scene, has wanted us

to know she is an advocate for girls and women. That's how she wants to be known. her little podcast archetypes trying to

get rid of words like [ __ ] and like stereotypes about women who are tough being [ __ ] No, you're just standing

up for yourself. This is her whole thing. How she's our protector. She's standing up for women and girls. She'll

be the one. Her little book about Pearl, like all the stuff. I lost my voice. I want girls to have their voices. Her

whole origin story about how when she was 11, she saw the commercial for Ivory Dish. soap and they ended it talking

about women of America, you need this product and what she did when she saw that sexist ad marketing dish soap to

women. >> And Megan Kelly actually then pointed out this Meghan Markle speech to the UN

in 2015. This was the same speech which I showed you a little bit of yesterday because remember she offered praise to

her father Thomas Markle on the biggest platform she had had up until that point.

See, I had been in school watching a TV show in elementary school and um this commercial came on with the tagline for

this dishwashing liquid and the tagline said, "Women all over America are fighting greasy pots and pans."

Two boys from my class said, "Yeah, that's where women belong." In the kitchen.

I remember feeling shocked and angry and also just feeling so hurt. It just

wasn't right and something needed to be done. So I went home and I told my dad what

had happened and he encouraged me to write letters. So I did to the most powerful people I

could think of. Now my 11-year-old self worked out that if I really wanted someone to hear me,

well then I should write a letter to the first lady. We need more men like that just as we need more men like my father

who championed my 11-year-old self to stand up for what is right. >> So Megan Kelly believes that Markle has

entered into a PR disaster entirely of her own making. What kind of a champion of women and

little girls would stay silent about a child sex predator who was again allegedly shown on camera in these

videos according to the son actually abusing young girls and Meghan Markle seems to

have known that too cuz her letter says more than just the child sexual abuse material which would be bad enough. she

believed he was abusing little girls would stay silent and not make sure that there was an investigation of this guy.

She would have been much better off from a PR perspective and a just a human decency perspective if she had never

said a word about knowing about this back in 2019. I'm not blaming her for the actual behavior. I'm saying once

told she, you and I, all of us would have an obligation to make sure that a

meaningful robust investigation was underway. And if after 8 years we didn't have satisfactory

information, something more would have been required like a public statement. This is deeply wrong.

She has sacrificed any claim she previously may have thought she had to this mantle of defending women and

girls. Please stop. Now, Pierce Morgan has broken his silence, too. You will understand that a whole load of people

in the Sussex squad and friends of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been specifically criticizing both of us. And

as I said on the show yesterday, it wasn't me and it wasn't Pier Morgan who knew about these child sex abuse

allegations facing Thomas Mark. Okay. So don't look at me because if I knew, I would have ensured that the public knew.

I would have ensured that the police knew. I would have ensured that there was public pressure. So something was

done. I think everyone knows that I would not stand by and allow something like that to fester just like Meghan

Markle did. But when Dom Hair posted to Pier Morgan saying you owe Megan an apology, this was his response. I'm very

sorry her father is an alleged pedophile and that she knew this while falsely accusing the royal family of being

callous racists. I have to be honest, I know there's a lot. We don't agree with Pers Morgan on but in that case it was

like burn. That was one hell of a response. He broke his silence overnight on Uncensored to demand for more

questions to be answered by Megan, which I think is completely fair enough, don't you?

She and Prince Harry have always cited his collusion with tabloid newspapers as the reason for the breakdown in their

relationship, including during that infamous Oprah interview. Harry then said in their Netflix show that he

shouldered the burden because if it wasn't for their marriage, she'd still have a dad. In his memoir, Spare, Harry

blames the tabloids for corrupting an elderly, vulnerable man. All of this played out in the six years between the

first time they saw allegations he was a pedophile and the latest new allegations by Thomas Jr., did they simply not

believe the claims made in a 2019 letter? What changed before Megan wrote that letter in 2025? And what exactly

did she accuse him of? Now, what is happening here though in the United Kingdom is a major push by our deep

states institutions and mainstream media, including the stateowned British Bashing Corporation, to pull a sigh up

on us, right? To use these allegations against Thomas Markle, to get us to change our mind on

on his daughter, on Thomas' daughter, Megan. The BBC actually wrote, and I mean, I guess they were acknowledging

the reality. It could still be an uphill struggle to become more popular beyond her own vocal core group of supporters.

A survey from Yuggov earlier this month found 22% of people had a positive view of Megan, compared with 49% who dislike

her. That suggests there is still some way to go before Megan fully wins the trust of the British public. I mean, no

sugar, Sherlock. It's the understatement of the year. Fascination, yes, but affection, not always. For the British

public, California Megan hasn't always translated well. But perhaps this complex, still developing story and the

light it sheds on previous years might mean there is a more rounded view of her on the future. Well, Allison Pearson

says absolutely not. When LBC posted it's time for the king to welcome Megan back into the firm, the Daily Telegraph

star columnist replied no, absolutely not. And now that great big establishment figure Andrew Neil has

weighed in too, saying there is no apology coming from the British public because no apology is necessary. Watch.

>> It really is a grim, harrowing story uh with a grim cast of characters. Not just the father, though he's pretty much the

definition of a grim, I would suggest, from what we know, but also the son, the 60-year-old son. He's a strange, dodgy

character as well. Uh then the first wife, now deceased. Apparently, she was an alcoholic. Uh and she's the one that

sent this letter to the Met. Uh we now learn um I think in 2018 I think as you said Kate um about uh the the father

about Mr. Marco. And of course, it's an appalling thing for Megan Marco to discover all this about her father,

>> assuming it's true, and the evidence seems to be at least somewhat going in in that direction. But I think, you

know, I wouldn't rush into apologize or even to change one's opinion on on things. It doesn't roll back everything

she did in these appalling interviews, the Netflix documentary, and so on. And Andrew Neil, and this is important, also

questioned Meghan Markle's contradictory predictions given what she now claims she knew at the time.

That letter was in 2018. The Met informs her about these accusations against her father. And yet by early 2019, she has

briefed People to tell People magazine, which carries it in a subsequent article, that she'd like a

reconciliation with her father. And then in the 2022 Netflix documentary, she says on the

record, quote, "I've always been a daddy's girl." M >> well if you knew what the content of

that letter was in 2018 and the Met has informed you about that, why would you say that?

>> Well, of course. And I just want to bring one more piece of evidence to the table. What about 4 years after the

letter when Megan was interviewed on Netflix for her own reality show, right, where she controlled the content and she

said of course she was close to her father. They spoke several times a week and it was only once the media got

involved that the relationship was destroyed. Now remember, she is saying this four years after that first letter

from Thomas's first wife, Roslin uh Markle was passed to her by the Metropolitan Police.

>> So your you and your father were close most of your life. Is that right? >> Yeah. I mean, you know, family, so it's

never easy, never perfect. Of course, I talked to my dad several times a week and you know,

>> but when did things start to go ary there? >> When the media got involved, it was

incredibly painful and the world is watching this drama play out. It was a problem that needed to be solved and

they wanted [music] me to make it stop. >> So, let me bring in the superstar panel now, Christine and Neil Hamilton.

Christine, of course, there are lots of questions to answer. And when it comes to Thomas Markle, those questions may

well be judicial, okay? And they may well be legal. I mean, the son, which has been in cahoots with Thomas Michael

Jr., has published a whole load of pictures today showing the Philippines authorities going through all of this

apparent evidence. I would argue it didn't help that Thomas Michael Jr. decided to take a whole lot of coin from

the Sun newspaper in order to sell this story. If if he really really really was just concerned about justice, wouldn't

he have just gone to the Philippine authority without the Sun newspaper without these accusations that maybe the

evidence have been tampered with? But let's just leave that to one side because what Meghan Kelly is saying,

Christine, is not that there is any suggestion in her mind that Thomas Markle is necessarily innocent. She

says, "Of course, we've got to look at the allegations, but rather that Meghan Markle unwittingly has destroyed her own

reputation here by claiming to be some sort of humanitarian, some sort of human rights activist, especially when it

comes to children." Yet, literally did nothing. What? Because she was worried her dad might sue her or she was worried

about the bad publicity. Well, I mean, talk about a dysfunctional family. In the in the immortal words,

you couldn't make it up. I mean, it is absolutely extraordinary. And it's I mean, Megan Murky, as far as I'm

concerned, so many things um just bring more questions than answered. I mean, if if I was told that my father had been

doing that sort of thing, my first thought would not be to go to the son and say this, that, and the other. It

would be to actually confront my father, say, "What the hell's going on?" It wouldn't be to report him. It really

wouldn't. Did you love your father in the way that she said she did? It it your first instinct would not be to

expose him in that extraordinary fashion. So, and also this whole Metropolitan Police business um doesn't

add up. Uh Sh may not be expected to know that the Met has no jurisdiction for what might have gone on in the

Philippines, etc. But I I can't get my head around the fact that for eight years, as you spelt it

out, she didn't inquire. If she really thought that there was some genuine um prospect that her father was a serial

abuser or a watcher of abuse, she would have asked the Met. She'd have said, "What's going on? What's happening?" And

by then, of course, it isn't just Meghan Markle who knows about it. Harry would have known about it. The whole of the

Royal Enclave would have known about it. All the the royal private secretaries would know about it. It would be very

well known to a large number of people in that sort of circle. So why did nobody say what's happening? Why did

nobody say have you reported this to to the FBI to the Philippine authorities? I mean so many questions are left

unanswered by this. I find it quite extraordinary. And why did Thomas Markle Jr. who had seemed to be despite all his

faults a bit of a saint. He'd gone over to look after his father. Probably because I now realize I now feel because

he was getting paid and that was his lifeline, his financial lifeline. The minute Thomas Markl senior turns off

that lifeline, Thomas Markle Jr. turns on him and goes to the sun with all these allegations. I mean it it's that

whether we will ever know the truth in in the long run, I don't know. But we have to remember that everybody is

innocent unless proven guilty. And Thomas Markle Senior at the moment is innocent because he has not been proven

guilty. He has not had a fair trial. He's having a trial by media which he may deserve but I don't know. You don't

know. It's not for any of us to say. >> No. Well, I absolutely do not believe in >> I do not believe in uh trial by media.

>> No. >> You know, to answer your question, Megan Markle has done herself no good

whatsoever. I mean, with a few people maybe, but not with the wider public. No.

>> And then Neil Hamilton, she knew. Okay. She knew because she addressed the letter to him and delivered this letter

to him in a hospital in the Philippines after he had lost his lower leg where she where she now claims this was the

moment that it happened. She now claims that that letter included the I guess the the ultimatum or or the or the

horrible news for Thomas Markle that he would never get to see his grandchildren because she believed he was a child sex

offender. Now, Neil Hamilton, she knew he was in the Philippines. What is the Philippines quite famous for you? You

know, child sex abuse. So, again, I really don't think it helps that she knew she sent this letter privately to

Thomas Markle, but she didn't alert the authorities unless Neil she didn't really actually believe her father was a

threat. >> Yeah. Well, what did she actually know at that time? The letter from Thomas

Markle's first wife was written in 2018. She had been divorced from Thomas for 43 years when she wrote that letter, 1975.

So, what evidence was there that Megan could have relied on that uh her father had been engaged in the illicit

activities that are now being alleged? Uh, I say nothing. Of course, we haven't seen the letter that uh the first wife

wrote to the Metropolitan Police, so we don't know what it contains, but I can't I hardly think it can contain anything

which would stack up as evidence in a court of law. And what is there therefore for the authorities to

investigate if that's all you've got to go on? Of course, everything has changed as a result of this cache of videos and

documents um which Thomas Markle has bundled up and given to the Philippine authorities, but that was only in July

of last year. So, up until that point, Megan had no reason whatever to doubt her father's denial of any of these

allegations because there was nothing else apart from the the word of his estranged ex-wife to go on. So I just

think this is nonsense and you know she is as we know a selfobsessed narcissistic grifter of the worst kind

and uh uh this I think merely cements that reputation that she's got. Uh I think far from

something which is going to make her more popular amongst the British public again. It's just going to reinforce the

stereotype which we have of her which is fir, you know, on display um every single time she opens her mouth really.

Uh so I don't think this is going to play well for her at all. I I can completely agree with Andrew Neil and

Piers Morgan and indeed you on this. I I think that uh her own dysfunctional family um obviously she can't not be

responsible for the other members of her family, but my goodness me uh you know this is a horror story in

>> Yeah, but she can be responsible >> if she was told something by one of those members of her family. She can be

responsible for actually passing the information on to appropriate authorities and demanding that they act.

Whereas her initial statement made out that she had been informed about this by the Metropolitan Police as if there was

an investigation underway. Well, that wasn't true. Actually, all that had happened is that the Metropolitan Police

had received a letter and clearly thought, "Oh my god, we can't become mired." Now, I know people are saying,

"Well, the Metropolitan Police made a huge mistake. They should have passed the letter on to the American police." I

get all of that, but they clearly received this letter and thought, "We can't become mired in Marle family

drama. Let's pass it on to the actual woman who's got all of the power here because she's a member of the royal

family. She can then report it to the FBI. And by all accounts, Megan didn't do it. But look, do stand by because

we're about to reveal today's Greatest Britain and Union Jackers. But first, I just want to get to your super chats

because of course we're talking about this whole issue of the downfall of London. And back to Common Sense now.

Thank you so much. Says, "It is clear that Europe has passed the point of avoiding violence because the enemy is

violent. Nobody wants this, but it was thrust upon the people. Throughout history, the men banded together to

protect their tribe. If they didn't, their way of life disappears. I pray they band together sooner rather than

later. And on this brilliant interview in the spectator by Douglas Murray, Chris H281, who is number two today.

Thank you, Chris says, "I watched the full interview. Douglas was on fire and go was as pathetic as you would expect

from that treacherous little troll." Kim Thomas VP 4VM says, "Now that city car is closed off Oxford Street, how are the

emergency vehicles and police going to get there? Uh, and on Nigel Farage, Zuzu Zoid says, "Reform members are waking up

to the fact that Farage has screwed up big time." Abby 724 says, "As a lifelong conservative, I voted reform last time,

but never again. Restore and Roupert will get my vote." And Viper 44XX says, "You may not get an election anyway due

to this government trying to push a war with Russia." And I do worry about that. I'm not going to lie. Okay, here's a

reminder of who we nominated. Alistister Campbell nominated by Neil Hamilton for describing herself as a national

treasure which is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Uh Christine has nominated Cresick because of our

previous conversation. Christine says she was the commissioner of the Metropolitan Police at the time the

force received the letter on the Thomas Michael allegations and failed to act. But I should say there is going to be it

looks like there will be an investigation into why that letter wasn't passed on. And I nominated Sneak

Khn for his destruction of London. And I feel guilty, guys. I feel guilty about this. But you know, it's a huge win.

It's a huge win for me today. Crescent added just 3% of the vote. Alistister Campbell 10% of the vote. But come on,

it had to be Sadique Khan because he's destroying London. And 87% of you are saying he is today's worst Britain in

the world today. But you two can nominate for the greatest Britain. Is that fair?

>> Yes, it is. We nominate Harry Kane. It's got to be Harry. >> Oh, yes.

>> I mean, you know, we're not football fans, but at last, here is somebody to make you proud to be British. And I just

I was so thrilled when he won. It was terrific. At last, a Brit won it. >> And we'll forgive him being photographed

as Sadi Khan. [laughter] >> Well, you know, Sadi Khan probably forced himself on him. And I imagine

Harry Kane is just one of those very polite people who would never say no to someone getting a photo. That was my

take on that. I don't think Harry Kane was politically endorsing City Khan. At least I I really hope he wasn't. But he

[laughter] wasn't. >> Christine and Neil Hamilton, I politically endorsed the two of you.

Thank you so much for being a fabulous superstar panel today. Our husband and wife, political heavyweights. Uh but

there is much more royal news. >> Heavy. [laughter] >> Well, you don't want me to call you a

lightweight, do you, Christine? Uh Christine and Neil Hamilton, thank you so much. We're heading over to Substack

now, though, because there is much more royal news. P Diner standing by on that royal YouTube sensation because you do

know Megan's just announced she's got a big job in Australia. This is nuts as well. Uh you can find us at

www.outspoken.live but we will be back with you live tomorrow 5:00 p.m. UK time midday

Eastern 9 a.m. Pacific. Now it is a big day tomorrow because we may get the Tommy Robinson verdict but it is also

the budget and we have Liz Truss former prime minister to analyze what hell is about to be unleashed by John Healey. So

do be with us tomorrow 5:00 p.m. UK time. Oh my god, I got it wrong. It's 5:00 p.m. UK time, 1, sorry, [laughter]

let me try again. I always get this wrong. 5:00 p. p.m. UK time, 100 p.m. Eastern time, 10:00 a.m. Pacific. That

is because of the daylight saving changes. So, do hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Uh, subscribe for for

Outspoken as a podcast on Apple Podcast, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast. You can find us on Facebook now, too,

for exclusive content. And most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for