Overview of Texas Public Policy
This summary covers essential facets of public policy in Texas, focusing on the budgetary process, major state revenue sources, and important policies in corrections and education.
Texas Budgetary Process
-
Dual Budget System: In theory, both the governor and legislature draft budgets, but the legislature handles most of the process.
-
Key Players:
- Legislative Budget Board (LBB): A 10-member joint committee including the Lieutenant Governor (chair) and Speaker of the House (vice-chair), along with other legislative committee chairs.
- Controller of Public Accounts: Certifies biennial revenue estimates and holds significant power by controlling revenue certification.
-
Process Steps:
- State agencies submit budget requests.
- LBB organizes hearings and drafts the budget bill.
- Budget introduced to House Appropriations Committee.
- Passed bill moves to Senate Finance Committee.
- Conference committee reconciles differences.
- Controller certifies revenue estimates; if disagreements arise, a four-fifths legislative vote is needed to override.
- Governor may sign or exercise line-item veto.
For a broader understanding of budget processes and legislative roles, see Understanding the U.S. Congressional Budget Process and Earmarks Explained.
Major Sources of State Revenue
- State Taxes: Main revenue source, predominantly regressive taxes like sales and property taxes.
- General Sales Tax: 6.25% tax on most retail purchases.
- Selective (Excise) Taxes: Levied on items like cigarettes, liquor, gasoline; often hidden within purchase prices.
- Gross Receipts (Franchise) Taxes: Tax on gross revenues of certain businesses.
- Severance Taxes: Levied on raw materials extraction such as oil and natural gas.
- Federal Funds: The second largest source, mostly matching funds for joint programs like Medicaid.
- Other Revenues: Income from licenses, fines, public land leases, and state lottery proceeds.
- No State Income Tax: Texas uniquely lacks a personal income tax, relying heavily on regressive taxes.
Texas Corrections Policy
- Historical Leasing System: From 1870s to early 1900s, Texas leased prisons to private contractors; abolished due to abuses.
- Federal Court Intervention: In 1980, the U.S. federal court ruled Texas prison system unconstitutional (Louise v. Estelle) due to overcrowding and rights violations.
- Federal Supervision: A Special Master was appointed to oversee reforms; supervision ended in 2002.
Texas Education Policy and Funding Equity
- Historic Development: Public education system established early but faced chronic underfunding and resource shortages.
- Gilmer-Aikin Laws (1949): Improved education by raising teacher salaries, setting minimum school year, establishing State Board of Education and Texas Education Agency.
- State Board of Education: 15 elected members setting K-12 policy.
Landmark Court Cases on School Funding
-
Rodriguez v. San Antonio ISD (1973):
- Federal case challenging property tax-based school funding as violating the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.
- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled the federal constitution does not require equalized school funding.
-
Edgewood ISD v. Kirby (1989):
- Texas state constitutional case addressing funding inequality due to reliance on local property taxes.
- Texas Supreme Court found the system unconstitutional under Article 7, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution.
- Required substantially equal access to funding with similar tax efforts but not absolute equality.
For additional context on how public opinion can shape policy decisions, consider The Impact of Public Opinion on Gun Control Policy Decisions.
Summary
Texas operates a complex budgetary process dominated by the legislature, relying heavily on regressive taxes instead of income tax. Its correctional system has faced constitutional challenges resulting in federal oversight. Public education policy has evolved through legislation and significant court rulings addressing equity in school funding, illustrating ongoing challenges balancing resources among diverse school districts.
To understand how federalism influences state policies like those examined here, visit Federalism in Action: Environmental Policy and Marijuana Legalization.
hello everybody in this lecture we're going to discuss public policy in the state of Texas so after reading chapter
12 and watching this lecture you should be able to describe the budgetary process in taxes identify major sources
of state revenue and explain the major aspects of both correction policy and education policy in Texas in theory the
state of Texas has a dual budget system which means that both the legislature and the governor can draft and proposed
state budget however in practice in state of Texas it is the state legislature that handles most of the
budgetary process so during the first phase of the budgetary process which means before the budget gets to the desk
of the governor the Legislative Budget board and the controller of public accounts are the two major actors during
this process the Legislative Budget board is a joint committee of the Texas Legislature that consists of 10 members
the chair of the LBP is the lieutenant governor and the vice-chair is the Speaker of the House and then the board
includes the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee and the house and the chair of the House Appropriations
Committee and a chair of the Texas Senate state affairs committee and a chair the Texas Senate Finance Committee
and then the lieutenant governor gets to pick two more members from the Senate and the Speaker gets also to pick two
more members of the House to complete the ten member membership of the LB V now the main job of the LB B is to
handle the request or gather the request for the budget from different state agencies
once these requests are gathered and hearings are organized to you know get these numbers of the different state
agencies to justify their request the lbb will draft a budget which is a bill and then that bill gets introduced in
the house and more specifically it gets submitted to the appropriation committee in the Texas House once the
appropriation committee goes through the necessary step it's like any bill then the bill will get to the House floor and
then you know if it passes its gonna go to the Senate gets introduced in the Senate Finance Committee and goes
through the process and then if boats you know if it passes the Senate the bill now the budget the final version
gets reconciled by a conference committee okay now before its final passage the controller of public account
has to certify the budget so the controller's job while the LBV is drafting the budget is to come up with
the biennial revenue estimates okay because remember in the state of Texas we do have a biennial budget the budget
that is drafted and introduced and ultimately passed it's a budget for a two-year you know it's a two-year budget
it's a biennial right so the constitution of Texas gives the controller of public account you know
tremendous power during the budgetary process so he or she gets to estimate the biennial revenues of the state's
okay and the only way the Texas Legislature can overcome the estimates of the controller of public account is
by four-fifths of the vote by both chambers so if the controller public account certifies the budget which means
that if he decides if he or she decides that the budget is within the revenues that the office of the controllers
expecting the state to have in the next two years then the final stage is the budget goes to the governor and the
governor can either you know sign the budget if he or she does dad the budget becomes official it becomes law and he
or she may actually go ahead and exercise a veto more specifically he has the option of using the line-item veto
over specific provisions of the budget so this is briefly how the budgetary process works in the state of Texas now
the state of Texas has several sources of revenue mainly the two major sources of revenue in the state of Texas are
state taxes and federal funds however the state also does collect revenues from interest investments from public
lands and other non tax sources so as far as the taxes in the state of Texas we do have a general sales tax okay in
the state that's the sales tax you pay when you go for example grocery shopping okay so in the state of Texas it's a six
point two five percent that's the portion of the state tax general sales taxes these are broadly based you know
taxes collected on the retail price of most items okay not all items but most of them okay state of Texas all in the
state of Texas also does collect selective sales taxes okay these are also known as excise
taxes back in the day they used to be known as sins taxes okay these are taxes levied on the sale manufacture or use of
specific items such as cigarettes or liquor okay also includes gasoline most of these selective sales taxes are
hidden taxes because the taxes are already included in the items purchase price another kind of taxes that are
collected in the state are gross receipts taxes and severance taxes gross receipts taxes they are also known
as the franchise tax and our taxes are the gross revenues of certain enterprises not all businesses but
certain types of businesses severance taxes on the other hand these are taxes on the production of raw materials such
as natural gas and oil now most of the taxes levied in the state of Texas are regressive okay such as the sales tax
you know use taxes regressive taxes these are taxes that impose a greater burden on people who make less money
okay so regressive tax is pretty much the textbook definition if you will of a regressive tax this is a tax that pretty
much would happen you know as your income goes up your effective tax rate goes down not your effective attack not
your tax rate but your effective tax rate goes okay so low income citizens they pay a larger percentage of their
total income tax I mean a larger percentage of their total income in taxes than do high income citizens okay
so this is the major characteristic of a regressive tax as your income goes up your effective tax rate progresses your
effective tax rate goes down okay so the more burden on low-income citizens okay I think about sales taxes think about
property taxes in the state of Texas most of these are examples of regressive taxes so the state of Texas relies
heavily on regressive taxes as you can note the state of Texas is only one of very few states without an income tax so
we don't have an income tax in the state of Texas income taxes they can actually be structured it's easy to structure
them formatives okay on progressive tax aggressive tax that's the opposite of a
regressive tax in a progressive tax system as your income goes up your effective tax rate also goes up as your
income goes up your effective tax rate progresses it's the name progressive taxes so the wealthy people will pay
their proportion if the progressive tax system is the one that is used now we said other state revenues the second
largest source of state revenue in taxes is the federal government in the form of matching funds and these are federal
monies monies that we get from Washington given to us to match the state's funding on a joint program so
most of these federal funds that we get you know web news from the federal government they come into state a they
come to the state of Texas in the form of matching funds care dollars that the federal government provides the state to
match our funding on some joint program between the United States and the state like for example Medicaid state of Texas
also collects revenue on licenses and fines and interest investment land income so we a state of Texas owns
public lands that leases out and collects income on that revenues from that and we have other non taxes revenue
such as at Texas Lottery okay so in the next two slides we'll talk briefly about April of areas a couple of public policy
areas discuss the history of them in the major landmark cases that characterize these two public policy area starting
with crimes and corrections policy in the state of Texas so the state of Texas did have a prison system pretty much
built very shortly after he joined the union now in the first pretty much 4050 years talking here Beach
you know 1870s all the way to the first decade of the 20th century the state of Texas entered into a number
of leasing arrangements okay they leased out their their prisons to private contractors and you know railroads for
example and gave them you know control over the lives of prisoners in the state of Texas however by you know 1910 these
leasing arrangements were abandoned because obviously of abuse and scandals however these abuses continued under
state supervision and in the pretty much 1980 the federal court okay in you know the United States federal court declared
in a case Louise versus Estelle that the Texas prison system was unconstitutional because of so many issues like
overcrowding poor medical care for security for prisoners in the harsh discipline violated you know harsh
discipline that violated the right of the inmates and as a consequence the full court appointed a special master
okay versus a court-appointed officer and the job of this special master was to
oversee supervise if you will the system and try to eliminate the constitutional problem were identified so however the
federal supervision ended in 2002 as far as education is concerned the state of Texas had had a public education system
at least nominally if you will since its first constitution in the 19th and early 20th centuries so the school they were
pretty much very you know short on supplies short on facilities and teachers and textbook however in 1949
the state legislature passed a set of laws that pretty much try to address the shortages okay and these laws they were
all together up the Gilmer acre laws and among the things that the set of laws did they raised the teacher salaries for
example they set a minimum school year they created the State Board of Education and the Texas Education Agency
okay the State Board of Education which is still in operation today this is a 15-member board fifteen members are
elected from single-member districts around the states it is the policy-making body for the tests for the
k-12 education in Texas and the Texas Education Agency that the administration that in charge of executing the policy
recommendations of the State Board of Education now in the state of Texas we had to land places that helped shape
Texas education policy especially when it comes to funding equity okay so in the first case was Rodriguez versus San
Antonio ISD in this case it was about the constitutionality of using the property tax to fund the public system
equitably in the state of Texas okay so pretty much the plaintiffs here Rodriguez they raised the issue like how
constitutional is or is you know is funding the public school system in the in the state of Texas you know by
property tax is that equivocal is that constitutional okay so the lawyers for the plaintiff they argued that the
system of funding schools through the use of local property taxes violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the United
States more specifically they claimed that it violated the Equal Protection of the 14th amendment and they argued
that the school district was incapable of raising sufficient funds per student because you know some school districts
they the value no the value of property in some school district was too loud okay to raise any meaningful funds
however in this case right here the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the states including taxes were not
required to subsidize for school districts okay therefore the question now has to go has to be addressed you
know through Texas Constitution instead of through the federal or through the US Constitution and the federal courts
now the question has to be addressed through the Texas Constitution and the state courts which brings us to the
second case which is Edgewood ISD vs. Kirby so in this case here a jubilee of plaintiffs here they claim or they
argued that article 7 more specifically section 1 of article 7 of the Texas Constitution mandated an efficient
system a free public schools ok so they sued pretty much the state of Texas it was you know the Mexican American Legal
Defense Fund it was the one that sponsored this lawsuit and they sued kerbals at the time the state education
commissioner okay on behalf of Edgewood so they sued Kirby on behalf of Edgewood ISD and the argument is state reliance
on property taxes to fund public education discriminated against poor children okay
because it denies them equal education opportunities now after long years of litigation it took you know about five
years for this case to be ruled to be settled in 1989 the Texas Supreme Court okay held that the public school
financing system violated the Texas Constitution okay so however the court did not demand
absolute equality in per student spending but it did require substantially equal access to similar
revenues per student at similar levels of tax effort okay so just to recap for these two cases the Rodriguez case what
we get be San Antonio this case was adjudicated at the federal level okay using the Equal Protection Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution so the federal courts in Rodriguez case said that the u.s.
tuition pretty much did not require States to provide equitable public school systems okay which brings us to
Edgewood Edgewood on the other hand was adjudicated in the state of Texas in the state courts use in the state
constitution the Texas Constitution more specifically article 7 second and in this case here Edgewood the Texas
Supreme Court ruled that the use in property taxes to fund you know you know that they ruled that the financing
system of public schools in the state of Texas was unconstitutional because it violated specifically the Texas
Constitution so make sure again you read chapter 12 and complete the assignments
Texas relies mainly on state taxes, especially regressive taxes such as a 6.25% general sales tax, selective excise taxes on products like cigarettes and gasoline, gross receipts franchise taxes on businesses, and severance taxes on oil and natural gas extraction. Federal funds provide matching revenue for joint programs like Medicaid. Notably, Texas does not have a personal income tax, making regressive taxes a significant part of its revenue system.
Texas uses a dual budget system where both the governor and legislature draft budgets, but the legislature primarily controls the process. Key players include the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), chaired by the Lieutenant Governor, and the Controller of Public Accounts, who certifies revenue estimates and holds veto-like power. The process involves agencies submitting requests, LBB hearings, committee reviews, reconciliation in a conference committee, revenue certification, and gubernatorial approval or line-item veto.
Historically, Texas leased prisons to private contractors in the late 19th century, a practice ended due to abuse. In 1980, a federal court ruled the Texas prison system unconstitutional for overcrowding and rights violations, resulting in federal supervision and oversight by a Special Master. This oversight continued until reforms met standards, and supervision ended in 2002, marking significant improvements in corrections policy.
Texas public education has been shaped by the Gilmer-Aikin Laws (1949), which improved teacher pay and set education standards. Key court cases include Rodriguez v. San Antonio ISD (1973), where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled federal law does not require equal school funding, and Edgewood ISD v. Kirby (1989), where the Texas Supreme Court found the state’s reliance on local property taxes unconstitutional for funding inequities, mandating more equitable funding with similar tax efforts across districts.
Texas constitutionally prohibits a state personal income tax, instead funding government primarily through regressive taxes like sales and property taxes. This reliance means lower-income residents may pay a higher overall tax burden relative to income, influencing policy debates about fairness and funding adequacy for public services such as education and corrections.
The Controller certifies the state's biennial revenue estimates, which essentially set the spending limit for the budget. This certification power can influence budget negotiations significantly; if the legislature disputes the estimates, a four-fifths vote is required to override the Controller’s certification, making this role a crucial check in the budgetary process.
While not detailed extensively in the video, public opinion impacts policy through advocacy and political pressure, influencing legislative priorities and reforms especially after high-profile court rulings like Edgewood ISD v. Kirby. Understanding the dynamics of public opinion can help predict future policy changes in education funding equity and corrections reform in Texas.
Heads up!
This summary and transcript were automatically generated using AI with the Free YouTube Transcript Summary Tool by LunaNotes.
Generate a summary for freeRelated Summaries
Federalism in Action: Environmental Policy and Marijuana Legalization
Explore how federalism shapes policymaking through real-world examples like environmental regulations under the Paris Agreement and marijuana legalization. Understand the division of power between federal and state governments and its impact on legislation and enforcement.
Comprehensive Overview of Unit 2: AP Government - The Three Branches of Government
This video provides an in-depth exploration of Unit 2 of AP Government, focusing on the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, as well as the bureaucracy. It covers the structure, powers, and interactions of these branches, along with key concepts like gerrymandering, the budget process, and the role of the bureaucracy.
Understanding the U.S. Congressional Budget Process and Earmarks Explained
This video breaks down the U.S. Congress budget process, highlighting the roles of appropriations committees, mandatory vs. discretionary spending, and the controversial practice of earmarks. Learn how earmarks impact federal spending and the political dynamics behind them.
Understanding Fiscal Policy: Objectives and Instruments
This video provides a comprehensive overview of fiscal policy, detailing its meaning, objectives, and instruments. It explains how government expenditure and revenue programs impact production, employment, and national income, while also discussing the tools used to achieve these goals.
Comprehensive Overview of Land Titles in the Philippines: Key Concepts and Updates
In this informative video, Attorney Al Jumrani provides an essential update on land titles in the Philippines, covering significant changes and concepts related to property ownership, co-ownership, and the latest legislation affecting land registration. This lecture is particularly beneficial for law students and those preparing for the bar exam.
Most Viewed Summaries
Kolonyalismo at Imperyalismo: Ang Kasaysayan ng Pagsakop sa Pilipinas
Tuklasin ang kasaysayan ng kolonyalismo at imperyalismo sa Pilipinas sa pamamagitan ni Ferdinand Magellan.
A Comprehensive Guide to Using Stable Diffusion Forge UI
Explore the Stable Diffusion Forge UI, customizable settings, models, and more to enhance your image generation experience.
Pamamaraan at Patakarang Kolonyal ng mga Espanyol sa Pilipinas
Tuklasin ang mga pamamaraan at patakaran ng mga Espanyol sa Pilipinas, at ang epekto nito sa mga Pilipino.
Mastering Inpainting with Stable Diffusion: Fix Mistakes and Enhance Your Images
Learn to fix mistakes and enhance images with Stable Diffusion's inpainting features effectively.
Pamaraan at Patakarang Kolonyal ng mga Espanyol sa Pilipinas
Tuklasin ang mga pamamaraan at patakarang kolonyal ng mga Espanyol sa Pilipinas at ang mga epekto nito sa mga Pilipino.

