Introduction to Filmmaking and Directing
- The best advice to aspiring directors: "Be a director" by simply picking up a camera and shooting, regardless of scale or resources.
- Directing requires full commitment; balancing other careers or interests is not feasible.
- The filmmaking journey is competitive, demanding passion and dedication to succeed.
Insights from Renowned Directors
Brian De Palma
- Emphasizes the importance of taste and judgment in directing.
- Discusses challenges like balancing technical demands with emotional storytelling.
- Highlights the significance of working closely with actors and maintaining creative control.
- Shares experiences from films like "Bonfire of the Vanities" and "Raising Cain," including lessons learned from setbacks.
George A. Romero
- Creator of the iconic "Living Dead" series, discusses the evolution of zombies in cinema.
- Explains the social and political context influencing his horror films.
- Talks about the importance of character depth, even in genre films.
- Reflects on the cultural impact and ongoing popularity of zombie themes.
Paul Verhoeven
- Known for blending satire, violence, and humor in films like "Robocop" and "Starship Troopers."
- Discusses transitioning from Dutch cinema to Hollywood blockbusters.
- Explores themes of fascism, consumerism, and media influence in his work.
- Shares his approach to integrating political commentary with entertainment.
Sydney Lumet
- Author of "Making Movies," a detailed guide on the filmmaking process.
- Stresses the importance of preparation, collaboration, and perseverance.
- Highlights the role of intuition and adaptability in directing.
- Reflects on working with legendary actors and managing studio pressures.
Paul Thomas Anderson
- Shares his path from short films to acclaimed features.
- Discusses the importance of originality and personal passion in storytelling.
- Emphasizes the value of collaboration with actors and crew.
Louis Malle
- Talks about his European filmmaking roots and transition to international cinema.
- Reflects on themes of love, obsession, and human complexity in his films.
Mike Nichols
- Highlights the importance of understanding actors and storytelling.
- Discusses his diverse career from theater to film and television.
Common Themes and Advice
- Start creating immediately; practical experience outweighs formal education alone.
- Learn to listen, say no firmly, and maintain your artistic vision.
- Collaborate effectively with actors and crew to bring stories to life.
- Embrace new technologies while respecting traditional filmmaking methods.
- Understand the business side of filmmaking, including financing and marketing.
- Persistence and resilience are crucial; many filmmakers face years of struggle before success.
- Make films that have layers and invite multiple viewings.
- Be true to your passion and unique voice rather than conforming to trends.
The Role of Technology and Industry Evolution
- Digital technology and visual effects have become integral to modern filmmaking.
- The shift from film to digital offers new creative possibilities.
- Independent filmmaking has grown, but competition is intense.
- The communal experience of cinema remains vital despite changing formats.
Conclusion
- Filmmaking is a complex blend of art, technology, and commerce.
- Success requires a balance of creative vision, technical skill, and business acumen.
- Legendary directors share a commitment to storytelling that challenges, entertains, and endures.
- Aspiring filmmakers should embrace continuous learning, collaboration, and unwavering dedication to their craft.
Additional Resources
- For those looking to deepen their understanding of visual storytelling, check out Master Cinematic Video Techniques: Storytelling, Lighting & Composition.
- If you're interested in honing your cinematography skills, consider reading Mastering Cinematography: Your Ultimate Guide to Practicing Visual Storytelling.
- To enhance your storytelling through camera angles, explore Mastering Camera Angles: A Guide to Enhancing Your Storytelling.
- For insights on originality in filmmaking, check out How Originality Shapes Art: Making Stories Only You Can Tell.
- Lastly, for a structured approach to script writing, refer to Mastering Script Writing: A Proven 5-Step Framework for Engaging Content.
A lot of people ask me, you know, what's the best advice to someone who wants to be a director? And the answer I give is
very simple. Be a director. Pick up a camera, shoot something, no matter how small, no matter how cheesy, no matter
whether your friends and your sister star in it, put your name on it as director. Now you're a director.
Everything after that, you're just negotiating your budget and your and your fee. Uh so it's a state of mind is
really the point. uh once you once you commit yourself to do it then the hard part starts which is that you have to
for all other paths because you can't keep a foot in cabinet making and a foot in directing you can't keep a foot in
one job and it's it's a total and all-consuming thing and I suspect that many of the difficult and challenging
things in the world whether it's research or whatever but certainly in the arts must be all-consuming because
you're in competition with people who have made that decision vision who have committed themselves 100%. You're
competing for resources. You know, it's just it's a big coral reef and uh it's a big food chain and you're competing for
resources and you're competing against people who have made that commitment. If you don't make the same commitment,
you're not going to compete. It's that simple. You know, it's so perfectly Stanley.
Good evening. I'm sorry not to be able to be with you tonight to receive this great honor of
the DW Griffith Award, but I'm in London making eyes wide shut with Tom Cruz and Nicole
Kidman. And just about this time, I'm probably in the car on the way to the studio, which, as it happens, reminds me
of a conversation I had with Steven Spielberg about what was the most difficult and challenging thing about
directing a film. And I believe Steven summed it up about as profoundly as you can.
He thought the most difficult and challenging thing about directing a film was getting out of the
car. I'm sure you all know the feeling. But at the same time, anyone who has ever been privileged to direct a
film also knows that although it can be like trying to write War and Peace in a bumper car in an amusement park, when
you finally get it right, there are not many joys in life that can equal the feeling.
I think there's an intriguing irony in naming the Lifetime Achievement Award after DW
Griffiths because his career was both an inspiration and a cautionary tale. His best films will always rank
among the most important films ever made and some of them made him a great deal of money.
He was instrumental in transforming movies from a Nickelodeon novelty to an art form and he originated and
formalized much of the syntax of movie making now taken for granted. He became an international
celebrity and his patronage included many of the world's leading artists and statesmen of the
time. But Griffith was always ready to take tremendous risks in his films and in his business
affairs. He was always ready to fly too high. And in the end, the wings of fortune proved for him, like those of
Icarus, to be made of nothing more substantial than wax and feathers. And like Icarus, when he flew
too close to the sun, they melted. And the man whose fame exceeded the most illustrious filmmakers of today spent
the last 17 years of his life shunned by the film industry he had created. I've compared Griffith's career
to the Icarus myth. But at the same time, I've never been certain whether the moral of the Icarus story should
only be, as is generally accepted, don't try to fly too high, or whether it might also be thought of as forget the wax and
feathers and do a better job on the wings. One thing, however, is certain. DW Griffith left us with an inspiring
and intriguing legacy. and the award in his name is one of the greatest honors a film director can
receive. Something for which I humbly thank all of you very much. By the third year of um uh uh Washington Square
College, I made the first short film. The key to everything besides the the other courses we were taking. The key to
the the cinema courses was the was the teacher was the instru was the professor and I was very lucky to um uh be taught
and uh kind of I would say more than taught um encouraged by a man named Hague Manujian, an Armenian American who
was very uh only wanted to make documentaries really. But uh uh bottom line though he it's all about the
inspiration. In other words uh our generation um when we started making films in the
70s in Los Angeles were considered um uh young people who had studied to make movies you it really isn't the case to
study to make as one one of the professors at New York University at that time said the only reason to come
to film school is to get your hands on the equipment and to make the movie. They can't tell you how to make the
movie. Uh you have to have it in you. You have to have the inspiration, the passion. The the thing that that is
important was the inspiration from the professor. the um overriding the
overriding compelling uh um impulse that that this extraordinary powerhouse of two or three
films I saw once when I was five or six years old they pervaded everything and that's the Italian nealist films open
city but pais open city shoe shine and bicycle thieves four films and they over they they have sort of sort of had cast
their shadow over me and my family was Sicilian Americans uh uh along with uh musicals, westerns, noirs at the time,
although they weren't called noirs, they were just movies. Uh uh and all of British cinema uh the eing studio, but
more more Alexander Cer um uh Giche, I think he's pronounced Two Cities Films um and uh Paul Pressberger.
what we saw of them. It was very difficult to see their films except for the red shoes and um uh even Gainesboro
films but the um the overriding uh British cinema was the uh was a major influence. Um make your own
industry, recreate movies. Don't pay attention to industry. Do your own thing.
I mean, put it this way. Um, you want the work to be seen, but it doesn't have to be at the
Odon, you know, no more. That's all different. That's all. It's another ancient
world. That type of film, or not even that type of film, the the the communal experience is always important. You can
make a film on a camera the size of that doororknob and still show it to 1,600 people in an audience. It's still a
great communal experience. you know, uh it doesn't necessarily mean it has to cost over 100 million pounds. You know,
it's all new. You just break it open. Break open the form. Don't just uh just, you know, have your tripod and a a
camera that's standing on it. The cameras that are being made now and of course the fact that
all AFlex and and other cameras have stopped being made and whether we like it or not, we have to deal with a new a
new technology, a high definition or digital or whatever it's called. It's it changes cinematography, the artic
cinematography, but but you younger ones, you make a new art, take what's available, push it, you
know, because it's going to go there. You could do anything. For me, everything
I did to do with a camera, to do with editing was useful experience uh and stuff that
that paid off. uh when I came to actually you know make features and really everything you do you you learn
from in terms of anytime you're shooting something a short film particularly a short
film when you try to write the script for a short film it's very difficult to write a short film I think in some ways
it's harder than for a feature to have a complete idea in just a few minutes and have a beginning a middle and an end you
know have an appropriate conclusion so you learn a lot about narrative structure doing shorter films but really
every job I did including u you know corporate videos and industrial training films and things where I'd have to go to
a company and throw up some lights and shoot interviews you know with executives and things like that. Uh
you're always learning about your craft. You're always learning about uh you know how to balance the pragmatic
requirements race against time uh using the equipment you've got in a short space of time to sort of get something
that you can you can use. It's all useful experience when you're starting out
particularly, you have to play to your strengths. You have to do something that really excites you and whatever's
different about that. And in the case of following the the nonlinear structure was a somewhat unusual choice. Um, but
it's those things that are the strength of the project. uh it's the things that you can bring to what you're doing or
bring to the film making craft that maybe not everybody else is doing, maybe not everybody else can do or has thought
to do. That's what's going to distinguish the thing. So it might seem in some ways more difficult or seem like
something that would make the project more difficult to to sell when it's finished, you know, what have you. But
for me, I think the answer was definitely to try to play to my strengths and the things that I
personally uh was passionate about. I think working in in films today, it's an era where people tend to watch films
more than once, even if they don't like them. You know, you'll see it in the cinema on its first release perhaps, and
then you'll see it on, you know, cable television television, you'll watch it on an airplane or on a hotel room or
something, uh, or it winds up eventually on on regular TV. And so I think my generation of filmmakers understood
really there's a responsibility to try and make something that has layers, something that has more to it the second
time you see it or some different aspect to it. And I chose to take the path of incorporating that desire for for a
layered approach into the narrative itself, into the story if you like. And so I've made films that have some
ambiguity to them or some layering to them narratively so that if you see them a second time, you're going to watch
them in a slightly different way. That was that was my approach. There are other filmmakers who approached it from
a purely visual point of view where they would just create very dense visuals that that would sustain multiple
viewings because you'd sort of see more in the frame. Well, Momento was based on a short story
that my brother was writing and he he hadn't yet written it fully, but he described
the idea to me and I thought it would make an excellent film and I asked him if I could uh take the idea while he was
writing his short story whether I could take it and write a screenplay uh from it and thank goodness he he agreed to
that and let me do that. So he went off and wrote on the short story and I think it took him almost as long as it took me
to make the whole film as it did to to write the short story. And it's a very brilliant story uh that was that was
published in Esquire um right when the film came out. Uh and so it was an interesting collaboration um because I
had a lot of freedom to explore the idea that he'd given me and then as I got into sort of screenplay form then I
would show it to him and talk about how I could improve it. and he was a huge help with with that as well. So we we
had an excellent collaboration on it. It was very very important for both of us. I think the original inspiration behind
the Dark Knight trilogy and particularly Batman Begins uh it was about taking this beloved character and
recontextualizing the character, setting this extraordinary figure in an ordinary world or a seemingly ordinary world. And
so for me it was much more about creating a recognizably real scenario that the extraordinary figure of Batman
could exist in and addressing the origins of that the origin story which hadn't been told in films before hadn't
really even been addressed in the comics very specifically actually. Uh and so we were able to really look at that gap in
pop culture and say okay what if we try to ground this and really explain how this might happen in in a real world
scenario. That was always the jumping off point for the tone of the films and then the influences on the films were
very varied. I mean we were trying to build a world in the way that you know Ridley Scott had done in his films like
Bladeunner for example. We were looking at the silent era, Fritz Lang's films and so forth. Um, trying to figure out
the use of the geography of a city to express a sense of metaphor or allegory with the with the narrative we're
creating, which is what the world of Batman and Gotham as a sort of heightened version of of a regular city,
you know, a kind of New York on steroids, if you like. Those were a lot of things feeding into the way in which
we approached telling those those three stories or one big story over over three films. And we went into it not knowing
that we would get to make three films. We approached Batman Begins very much as an isolated piece, but always with a
sense that okay, if we could, we would return to Goth and we would try and flesh out, you know, a bigger story
because we were interested to see in our telling of Bruce Wayne's story. there was always a finite sense to what he was
doing and that's unusual in the interpretation. But our idea was that it felt that he would need to view this as
uh a character he's created or a symbol he's created to try and inspire the people of Gotham and that there would be
an endgame to that that he would have an effect on the world and then be able to to stop. And so we became very
interested in seeing how that story would play out. One of the things that's different about
my approach to music, the way I use it in my films is I don't use temp music. Uh temp music is, you know, when you
take existing music, music from other films usually, and when you're editing the film, you put a lot of that in. Uh
then you get a composer on after the fact and say, "This is, you know, do this but different." And to me, that
always results in cues that are not what you want because you've put what you want on there and then said, "Okay, do
something different." So by definition you're moving away from what what first inspired you. So the way I've always
worked with composers like David Julian or James New Howard Han Zimmer is to say okay let's look at the script let's talk
about the ideas and then sometimes before we're even shooting or while we're shooting
you know start sending me ideas musical ideas demos based on the narrative concepts based on just some visual
images. I'd tell him was with hands, you know, I'd send him some stills of what I was doing. Uh, and our approach in every
film has been been different, but the one underlying constant is to try to not ever use temp music, to try and always
be working with pieces that have been created specifically for the images that we're we're shooting and editing. I've
been greatly influenced by uh filmmakers of the past hugely. Um, I always point to George Lucas's first Star Wars film
as a seminal influence on me. It was the first film that I remember that that really just opened up the possibilities
of what you could do with movies. Ridley Scott has always been a tremendous influence on me. I've loved the worlds
he's created, the textured quality of those things. Terrence Malik is a huge influence and Stanley Cubri is a
filmmaker that I've always greatly admired although he's one that's difficult to try and imitate or learn
too much uh from specifically but uh as an inspiration just as a great genius of of cinema and then more recently um
specific to Dunkirk I think you know the cinema of Alfred Hitchcock uh Cluso uh filmmakers working in the suspense genre
were very important to I've also been very influenced by silent filmmakers. I go back to the work of Fritz Lang and
and Mau Fon Stroheim. Uh those visions, those um ideas of what movies could do before dialogue came in,
before contemporary narrative structures came in. I find going back to those that older form of storytelling in movies to
be very inspiring. I think really the only useful advice I ever got in terms of, you know, trying to figure out your
way in to the film business, the film industry is to get yourself a script and hang on to it.
Um, it's that idea, that screenplay, that that concept, you know, whatever that's going
to be that's so important. And you have to stick to your guns. You have to find something that you can do that maybe
other people couldn't do. Uh and even if that seems different or doesn't fit into people's expectations, that's what's
going to distinguish it if you can do it successfully. So I think it's really about sticking to your guns and you know
doing something you passionately believe in rather than uh trying to appeal to some desire that you imagine other
people have for what they want to see in a film. I think you have to be true to your own passion and your own sense of
what excites you as a storyteller. Advice to a young filmmaker is to make a movie every week in super eight or high
def. Write every night and every weekend shoot for two days and work with actors. Work with a little 1,00 W lighting kit.
Set it up. Set up your shots. Get a tripod. Shoot a little scene. Work with the actors. cut those scenes together
and then the next weekend have worked on it with sound and looping and put some music to it. It can all be done for
nothing nowadays with computer and get a response and get a response from the audience and see where it's slow and
where it doesn't work and where your ideas weren't being communicated properly. Learn from that experience
sitting in with the crowd. Then go out and make another picture the next weekend and just keep doing it. Make
films no matter what anybody says and you'll be a filmmaker. Work wherever you can. It doesn't matter what, a
documentary, a commercial, wherever you can get near a camera, wherever you can, especially if you're a director. You're
not going to be a director and get until you put your eye behind into that finder. And
uh it doesn't matter what. There's no such thing as good work or bad work. There's only work at the beginning.
Yeah. If you got if you got the passion, if you got the passion to do it and you do it and it doesn't like work out, I I
worked for got three years on a 16 mm film that ended up becoming nothing but guitar picks and uh and I was very
disappointed when I realized it wasn't any good. But it was my film school. All right. And I actually got away really
cheap. When it was all over, I knew how to make a movie. I didn't want to show anybody that, but I had the experience.
I had a lot cheaper than I would have gone if I'd gone to film school. The first thing you got to learn is listen.
Learn to listen, but learn to say no. And when you say no, mean it. Mean it. Don't say no and then just back off
because then and I don't mean I don't mean as a technical term, which is it's a great word. I mean it in the
existential term, you know. So, you know, don't back off because you have the chance. It's like it's like
quitting. What what can a director on his first movie do? Quit. But if you quit, quit. But there is a lot more
competition than there was when I was, you know, like kicking around with El Mariachi. So you got, you know, there's
just a lot more to do these days. You got a lot more competition cuz everybody's got a camera now and
everybody can edit and it's it's just it's tough. I don't know the state of independent film making changes. There's
like changes. But at the same time though, yeah, there's a lot more to competition, but also those crappy
movies aren't competition if thing is like dynamite. There go, you know, all that is, you know, yeah, there's a
lot of there's a lot of people out there doing stuff, but if you know, it's like waves on the beach. All right, you make
some make a piece of nitro that you throw in an audience's lap, they'll people notice. Say I hear about an
issue. Or perhaps I look at a place in my hometown of Los Angeles and and see, oh, that this this area is is
underrepresented. This group is under reppresented. I want to know more, you know, and so through the process of me
writing the screenplay and directing this film and editing the film, I I learn about this subject. So, it's it's
really a it's a sort of a selfish thing. It's a it's my way of continuing my education. The last five films I have
co-written. So, usually it starts with just basically a brainstorming session where I get on the phone or meet him
meet my co-screenwriter in person and we just talk about the possibilities. I do have to say the one thing that has been
consistent is that we usually figure out the end very soon into the process. Um, usually in that first brainstorming
session, we we are we at least have the beginning and end. The middle has to be worked out. Um, from that point on, it's
really about um, you know, I get getting to the point where I think that we are dedicated to
this issue, dedicated to the subject matter because I'm involved with the writing process. I'm also directing. I'm
also editing. I'm also seeing the film out into the world. It does take around three years for each film to be
completed from beginning to end. So, it's really it's about getting to that point where you are on board and you're
dedicated for the long ride. Yeah. People that I've met in real life inspire a character sometimes or
sometimes it's an amalgamation of many people. My current film, The Florida Project, there is a character by the
name of Bobby played by William Defoe. I would never have thought of this character unless through my research
process I had met many motel managers who all had this thing within them that was a uh a reluctant father figure of
the the motel that they were looking over. I mean, and the people who lived at the motel. So, um, so yes, I I would
say there's always some inspiration from real life, real life people that that, uh, help me create these characters. I
love mixing it up. I love having seasoned actors, interacting with first- timers, interacting with
non-professionals. And when I say non-professionals, those are the ones that we just grab off the street the day
of and say, "Be in our independent." And we never see them again. I've been very very lucky actually to to have found
first timers who have the knack who understand the craft of acting who have the gift of improvisation and more
importantly for me comedic improvisation it really comes down to you know character to character again film to
film I embrace all mediums you know I'm an advocate for all mediums what I'm not an
advocate for is getting rid of old mediums just because new ones come in so I have played with digital. I've played
with celluloid. I did experiment with the iPhone on on Tangerine and also a short um fashion film that I directed
and I had a great time doing it. I just worked on 35 so that was a whole other experience but it gave me something I
really wanted. I wanted that organic rich feel of something tangible in the big screen that was that was acquired
through a photochemical process. That's what I was looking for for this subject matter. And so it's really about it's
it's again project to project. You might start in a place where you are forced to shoot on a certain medium, but you
quickly have to say that's what got me to this place, but I'm going to have to now figure out how this movie can
benefit from this medium and how I can make this movie in a way where looking back on it years from now, I can say I
am so happy I shot in that medium because this film would not have been this film without that. I think the the
biggest challenge is is simply um is sticking with it. You know, for so many years, if you're an independent
filmmaker, you're barely paying rent. Um you before your work gets recognized, you're the only one who's going to
believe in your work. You know, the challenge was really just getting through the years, learning how to still
stay in the industry, keep keep up on current technology, uh, by taking editing jobs, by by by
shooting corporate videos, by doing whatever I can do to just to keep fresh. And then you're you're suddenly at a
place where, you know, the struggles of those earlier films that may not have gotten attention suddenly are getting
attention because you are your current one is. So, it works out in the end, but it's a it is a long road. It's a long
road. Um, and it's just about sticking with it. I would say as you're learning your craft of making
films, you also have to learn the business side of film making and how to sell your film, how to get it financed,
number one, then how to, you know, to to to sell your film after it's completed. That that takes that's uh something that
I think you should tackle early on. Trust me, you'll need it. You'll need that business sense. I actually wish
that I had a, you know, a double major, one in, you know, in and one in film and one in business or at least took
business classes. I think that's a major thing. And then also, I would say just, um, watch all films. You know, just
don't you don't just have to watch the criterion edition. Um, those are, you know, you learn just as much if not more
from watching bad films. keeping uh yourself open to you know when you're you're watching films watch all genres
you know watch watch all nationalities of of films I think uh uh it can only it can only help you why did you want to
become a director I didn't really want to become a director I wanted to make films I knew
next door to nothing about film I wanted to be a painter and I was a
painter and I was in a uh studio working on a painting of a garden
at night and the green was coming out of this black and I heard a uh wind and I saw
the green move and I said, "Oh, that is interesting." and I thought it would be good to do a
moving painting. So, uh, there was an experimental painting and sculpture
contest at the end of the year at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts where I went to school. And, uh, for
that contest, I did a sculptured screen with three heads out of polyester resin and some painting on the screen
about 6 feet by 8t. the screen was and then I stopped motioned kind of animated but in a stop motion fashion a uh thing
that I called sixman getting sick and that was my uh film in 16 mm a little tiny balon howl camera that had single
frame capabilities and it was so expensive to make that
film relative relative to what I had then I thought that would be it that it was just an
experiment. But someone saw that and commissioned me to make one for him and that led to another whole thing.
Falling in love with film and uh getting green lights. I made um a short film called
The Alphabet and with the money I got from this gentleman who commissioned me. And
there's there's a whole bunch of things that happened, but I ended up making not what he wanted, but um something that
combined animation and live action. And then I wrote a script um for a film called The
Grandmother. And at that time uh the American Film Institute was starting and they were offering independent filmmaker
grants and on a real long shot because they wanted previous work and a script and I had both those things.
So on this long shot, I applied for an independent filmmakers grant and the first group um I wasn't in the first
group but and I had to wait a long time but I got a phone call that changed my life completely because I won this grant
to make the grandmother and I made the grandmother and on the
strength of that I got accepted to the American Film Institute, which was in Beverly Hills, California, in a
mansion. Um, and I thought I'd died and gone to heaven. So, I went out there and,
uh, one thing led to another and I got the opportunity to make Eraser Head. Uh, I got started as a writer, director,
probably just watching movies as a kid and then, uh, wanting to make films. Uh, grew up Nashville. My dad made
documentaries and I I just just follow him around as a kid. Carnivals and circuses. You would just make films
about kind of strange characters, moonshiners, kids that ride bowls, you know, uh, just different different
things. And I I don't know, you grow up around the around that world and you kind of I don't know, becomes like what
you know. And it was exciting to me. And so when when I was in Nashville in high school, I started making films and and
uh in school and then probably went moved to New York after high school and then went to school for writing for a
little for a little bit and and there I kind of you just learn like you know essential basic things, formatting and
stuff, three-act structures, it was you know stuff like that. But mostly what I mostly what I know about writing movies
was just from other movies, watching other films like pacing and different things I just kind of would would pick
up on from just watching, you know, Buster Keen movies or something. they always have. I just have lots of I
sometimes it's so so many ideas it's hard to figure out what you know what it is exactly or you know where it's coming
from or you know sometimes it's hard to tell which way's up or you know where you're at in life or what this dream
means or what it's saying. I don't know. You know, it's uh you just get sometimes just pictures just things and then you
just kind of make up characters and story lines and just feel a certain way and just invent it. If I if if if I have
like a really hard time with something, I'd usually just scrap it. Just if it if I really like if I find it like
something if I'm smashing my head up against the wall too much is for a reason. It's just it's not meant to be.
So I I try not to struggle too much with it. I don't have like the end result in my mind when I start. I'm like trying to
search for it, you know? I'm trying to make it up as I go. I'm trying to react to something. the movies are more about
kind of energy or a kind of wildness or something that's like less defined, you know, something that's more like a magic
or something. So, I don't really go in like knowing. So, usually when I'm at the end, even if it doesn't work, even
if it's maybe some type of a mistake or failure, at least I know it's interesting and then I I went for it.
understanding what it's like to live a little bit outside uh the common
realm. You know what I mean? Uh and then know what it's like to experience extreme highs and lows. And you
know, if you get locked up, you get locked up. it. You have a story to tell. What advice I would give writer
directors? You know, I would just say try to be great. Try to give extra. Try to, you know, be bold.
Try to invent your own reality. Try to, you know, do what's not been done before. I would just say don't even get
started if you're going to just try to do some mediocre because there's so much of that. Don't Don't do it just to
make noise. There's too much noise. Give me something amazing. Give me something new. Give me something I
haven't seen before in a way I haven't seen it. Let me feel something. Give me uh find some kind of magic. Go towards
something that's inexplicable. Uh give it to me. Give me something that's aggressive and gnarly
and chew up the world. Come at it from some other place, but just don't don't give me the same over and over
again because I don't want it. My name is DNV and I'm the director of Bladeunner 2049. I I'm from the
documentary world. I I try to make a short story. I did uh several uh documentaries for uh Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation, CBC uh the French part of it for Canada and then I worked at the National Film Board uh to
make my first documentary there and from there but me my soul I wanted to do fiction went from there to to to start
to do fiction. I did a short with producer and then we did I did my first feature film this way. There's a a a
famous producer uh in Montreal. His name is Rajiv Frappier and he he wanted to meet the generation of new filmmakers
and he decided to create a a feature film made of six short film. Half of them would be directed by a female
director, the other half by male director and uh those short film will be linked together made as a role and
presented in in a theater later. So as a old feature film I participate I was one of the director and after that the movie
was was quite nice little success at home it went to can and so after that the producer offered me to to produce my
first feature so it was like offered on a silver plate I must say my first I was the luckiest yeah uh the thing is that I
I uh I made a film my my fourth feature film was uh uh nominated for an academy award and and uh my it's like my third
and fourth feature were were uh traveled a lot around the world and noticed by the film industry in Hollywood and and
when I did my fourth one went to academia award I received numerous offers to direct uh at the time I didn't
necessarily wanted to go to Hollywood I was I didn't want to uh to direct uh silly sequels or things like that
it's just that I I it happened that I read a screenplay that was very strong in my opinion that has strong potential
and that was linked with some themes that I was exploring in in my movies at home. They offered me a a movie called
prisoners and I decided that as a filmmaker that it would be a nice uh experience to work with artist from
United States as a very strong artist. I took that opportunity as a want just uh I will do it once and uh it turned out
to be a fantastic experience. I was really uh moved by how uh Americans are dealing with film making. I just fell in
love with uh with their ways of of dealing with cinema and and the the artist and the craft the the amount of
experience there and uh I just uh what I thought would be a one time would became uh my
life. I know that uh uh my movies are usually quite immersive and and there's like a a strong feeling of intimacy that
you have to uh they are constructed around a very precise point of view. The more I work with them, the more I I feel
comfortable and I love working with actors and the more I feel inspired. I'm trying when I cast my actors to uh I
hope my big desire is to meet people that will inspire me and uh it's not all the actors are all different. I love
when someone is is an author himself, meaning that it has it will develop his very own uh point of view about the
character bring ideas on the set that will surprise me. I mean, I have always a very precise idea about what I want to
do. But there's nothing more exciting for me than when someone create chaos in front of the camera. And and it's all
going back to the years I was doing documentaries. I was always amazed how life organize itself in front of the
camera. From chaos, chaos becomes poetry and and and this excitement of of the spontaneity of life. I find it back with
actors and and I'm trying to create environments on set that will be um that will allow allow this thing those things
to happen. I try to give them the space as much as possible so they they feel that they have the space to to bring
ideas. One day the screenplay of of Bladerunner arrived in front of me because the producer had done a previous
movie with me, Prisoners and and uh Alcon was looking for a director at the time. They had uh it was really Scott
was supposed to direct it but his calendar was uh schedule was too busy has too many movies in the same time. So
they were looking for a director and at at first I was really uh destabilized and and uh deeply curious and and
terrorized by the idea of reading the screenplay. I understood that from the because of theatics what what the movie
was dealing with about the memory about identity quest of identity. It had a link with my previous work and and um uh
it made sense that I could do this movie. I would I understand why they came to me and I knew that technically I
was able to do it. It's a movie I would have refused 10 years ago. No question. But one day I I read it. I said I can do
it. I know how to do this. I love the the first movie so much. It's a movie that uh was part of my cinematic
education. I was like raised with Bladeunner. It's a movie that was uh by far one of my favorite movie of all
time. So it's I said I don't want someone else to this up. I mean I need I need to even it's it's like a a
suicidal mission you know it's like super risky everybody will hate me I can be banned from the cinematic community
from the rest of my life but it worth the risk artistically it's such a big challenge
but such a beautiful one it's crazy idea to do that maybe a very bad idea but I was mesmerized by the story of the
screenplay and I said yes there was a lot of female parts strong female characters not like anything I have read
before. There were more female characters in the movie than there's a male protagonist and that I thought was
really u faithful to the first movie that uh had the same kind of quality. There was hints of the melancholia of
the first movie to that uh I thought was very important. they were there. There were the the germs the seeds for that
sorry the seeds for that milakaria was were in the screenplay and and uh that reassured me in order to be very spont
spontaneous spontaneous on set you need to for me I need to to to be very prepared and specifically with a movie
of that scale uh everything will be designed everything will be created so the crew doesn't go mad you need to
really be uh precise So you need to storyboard everything. I deeply love storyboarding. Uh why? Because it allows
me in a very quiet environment with good coffee and no pressure at all to dream about the movie alone, you know, to make
the movie I want the the the the ideal movie without bad weather, without producer on my back, without actors that
don't want to sit there lines. I can do the movie I want once on paper. And I deeply love that process. I'm alone with
a storyboard artist and I draw every frame and I dream about it. I deeply love that moment. In my first movies, I
thought that the storyboards were castrative and they were like something that will be in your way as your but
it's total opposite. I deeply love them now and uh and uh it doesn't mean that I will shoot the story boards on on set.
Sometimes I just Roger Dickens and I we just throw them and say okay let's do something different because on the day
there's some a better idea on set. But most of the time uh it's a very powerful tool also to communicate for the crew.
So yes, I storyboard everything when you storyboard also it's a it's a way to transform the movie into images and and
I always it's a way to rewrite the screenplay in the way I wanted. So it's a very very important moment in the film
process. I'm very old-fashioned. I I I can I don't like to work with several cameras. I work with one single camera.
I like to commit to one point of view and and uh I I don't like to make any compromise when you look with several
you work with several camera cameras in the obligation to according to make compromise with lenses and that and and
with lighting and that I can't so I like to commit to one thing and and and to just embrace that and fully commit and
so uh I will say that technically I no matter the scale of the movie I I work with one camera I try to uh to adjust
the language to each stories what what the story will need. I must say that uh for three or of my four last movies have
the same kind of language cinematic language. There's a kind of research of of uh trying to be as simple and then
monolithic as possible that I deeply love and and I I'm hypnotized by this this this approach. I deeply love it.
Right now I feel the urge to do something different but in the past five four or five movies I was quite similar
cinematic approach in some ways. Yeah I would say I wanted to make a feature film before 30 years old. I was obsessed
with this idea and it was not a good thing. I should have uh take more my time for the first one. I didn't have to
uh hurry that much. take more my time, live a little, read more books. That's what I would say. Well, I
started off as a child actor and my dad directed some theater. But early on, I realized that a lot of the people who
were directing me in television had been actors. And so, you know, literally by the time I was eight or nine years old,
I think I had it in my mind that um I loved the business. I might one day want to be a director. And um and I was given
an 8 mm camera. Uh, I didn't really start playing around with it seriously until about uh, I don't know, 14 or 15.
But I think the key to all of that, of course, it's so much more advanced now, is starting to grasp an understanding of
the power of editing. Well, actors are always at the center of the of the sort of um, the
problem solving that goes with with trying to work a scene out. and whether it's movement or with lines, what they
have to say. Um, and so I think it's a really great training ground. It's not seeing the whole picture. Uh, but
nonetheless, um, the, you know, the the process is kind of similar. Then when you start directing, you just step away
and you don't just look at your characters problems and questions. You sort of look at the overview of the uh
of the story. So uh for me it was a pretty natural um transition even I even suggest to people who have no interest
whatsoever in acting but want to be directors or writers producers to take some acting classes to be in some plays
understand what it is to sort of be vulnerable be out there and be a part of telling the story you know communicating
it directly to the audience. It was important to me to be as adventurous as I could be and not get
labeled the way I had been as an actor. But also, you know, it's just a reflection of the kinds of movies that I
love. Like the one thing you haven't seen yet is a horror film. I I don't think I would understand how to really
make a good horror film, but I do love fantasy and sci-fi. So, that genre doesn't intimidate me. Uh and uh uh I
think it's, you know, it's it's uh you know, it's just fun fun to explore. At least it is for me.
you know, directors, some of them, some of us are sweethearts, some of us are jerks, some of us are talkative, some
are very quiet. Um, none of that really matters very much, although I, you know, I always I always think it's nice to be
decent to people, but that's me. Uh, it's not imperative. The big thing is taste. Taste and judgment. That's what
it's all about. And it's it's uh it's understanding, you know, what's what exists within the possibilities of
the story you're interested in telling, you know, and and and um and and how many of those details can you capture?
How can you sequence them together in the editing? You know, what does that add up to? And um it really doesn't much
matter how you get there, whether there's a large crew or a small crew, whether it takes a long time or just a
little while. What it really matters is what did you get and what does it mean to other people when you edit it
together and share it with them. I think that the big challenge is still trying to get uh
basic emotional ideas expressed in a challenging um logistically complicated place. So
either the weather is a factor, crowds, um technical difficulties, all that's going on. And in the middle of it is
something really human and emotional that's going to require, you know, acting with with focus and sensitivity.
The combination of those two things are always when I'm most on edge when I'm on the set because, you know, if you if you
fail in one area or the other, the whole the whole scene is destroyed. You're not going to get it that day. And that's a
whole day of resources, you know, lost. And that's always a shame. One of the things that I suggest to
almost anybody and I do it myself from time to time is whatever the genre, if there's a movie and there's a there's a
that you particularly like and there are sequences that you remember and and that you you think are
cool. Watch them over and over again. and watch him a couple of times with with sound and then watch him a couple
of times without sound because when you pull the sound out which is like the final finish that really in a lot of
ways brings a lot of you know gives a lot of the impact to a scene. You also begin to see really how the filmmakers
captured those images. Did they use the same shots over and over and keep cutting back to them? Was it always a
different shot and a different angle? Is the camera moving? Is it static? you know, what's the what's the language
that they're using and what does it mean? Um, and it answers so many questions because we we sort of
understand movies intuitively, but when you really start breaking them down and understanding what was done on the day
to create that that sequence of shots that we love that make that has an impact on us, you know, it's like a
light goes off. You just begin it it simplifies everything and removes a lot of the mystery. anybody can shoot
anything, but it's how you how you begin to build it and piece it together that I think means the most. And uh, of course,
the the the edi editorial software is so cool now that, you know, you anybody should take advantage of that and um,
you know, and start putting together putting together images.
Um, I actually wrote the story and produced Indiana Jones. I didn't actually direct it. It was that other
guy that looks like me. Um uh I'll give you two things. Um one which I've answered a few times
here around the table, so I figured I'd share it with everybody. Um which is, you know, how did I end up where I am?
Uh and um when I was in high school, I was a consumate
underachiever. Uh I hated school. Uh, I love to build things. Uh, I loved woodworking. I loved
uh working on cars and engines. Worked in a foreign car service and all I wanted to do was race cars. Um, right
before graduation, I was in a terrible automobile accident and uh was almost killed and as a result of
that sort of sat in a hospital for a long time thinking about my place in the world. uh and decided that I would give
education another try and uh took my very bad grades to a junior college and discovered social
science uh the humanities. Uh became very infatuated with uh anthropology and psychology and suddenly found something
that I really loved uh and um did very well. And then um when I graduated and I was about to go on to the last two years
of college uh at San Francisco State to get a degree in anthropology. Uh my best friend who had grown up with since I was
four years old uh said, you know, come with me to to uh to Stockton. I have to take a test to get into USC and I don't
want to do it alone and come on, just take test with me so I don't have to be there all by myself. So I said, "Okay."
So, I went up there and took the test, not thinking that I'd pass, but I did pass. And actually, I got accepted at
USC. And I said to my friend, uh, well, now what am I going to do? I said, I really like anthropology and I think I
want to do that. He said, yeah, but you you wanted to go to art center. You really wanted to be an artist and you
know, this is your second choice, anthropology. And I did. I wanted to be an an
artist, a photographer. I'd done a lot of photography and I wanted to be an illustrator. But my father said,
"There'll be no artists in this family." you know, that's a horrible way to make a living. Uh, and if you want to go and
be an artist, then you're going to have to pay for it. And he knew me well enough to know that I wasn't about to do
that. I will take the route of least resistance. I had sort of picked up my grades, but I was still a consequent
underachiever. And uh, so he said, "Well, you know, SC, they've got a a a department there of photography." I
said, "Oh, that sounds good." He said, "It's easier than P. You'll love it." I said, "Well, okay. maybe I'll do that.
So, I went down there and it wasn't a school of photography. It was a school of cinematography. And it wasn't
actually a school of cinematography. It was actually a school of cinema where you learn to make movies. And I said,
"This is insane. You mean you go to university and you can learn how to make movies. I'd never heard of such a silly
thing." So, uh, and I hadn't really paid much attention to movies when I was young. I sort of watched a little bit of
television stuff. went and saw Earth Versus the Flying Saucers and, you know, Bridge on the River Cho and a few things
like that, but I didn't know anything about movies. And I got there my first semester, I had to take a lot of
requirements, you know, Spanish, uh, science, that sort of stuff, but I got to take two classes. One was a
history of movies. Um, and growing up in a very small town with one movie theater, I hadn't seen a lot of movies.
And, um, I we didn't get a television until I was 10. So in those days, one of the main advantages of being in a film
school is when you take a history class or something, you actually got to see movies that you couldn't see. It's an
amazing thing, the world you live in today, you can actually go down to a store and just get any movie that's
almost ever been made and you can see it and then you can actually have the filmmaker, you know, in the extra bonus
disc tell you how they made it and everything. That's basically what a film school was, except you were surrounded
by a lot of kids that sort of believe the same thing you did. So I got there and I learned about movies which I
really didn't know anything about in terms of the history of movies watching really great movies and I had a
production class introduction to animation uh where eventually they gave me one
minute film and they said here run the camera you know follow these instructions move it to the right move
it to the left move it up move it down and so I took that little assignment with my one minute of film and I made a
one minute movie out of it uh I took a lot of still photographs and created a collage and a whole different way of
doing animation and put a soundtrack to it. Uh my professor was unbelievably uh impressed with it. Uh and uh it blew
everybody away in the film department and they sent it out to festivals and it won like 47 festivals. And I said, "Wow,
I know how to do this. I'm actually pretty good. Matter of fact, I'm better than anybody here. Uh I love this. You
know, this I want to do this the rest of my life." And so I was lucky enough to find my path, my passion. Before that I
had passions, you know, I wanted to be an artist. I wanted to build cars. I wanted to create things.
Um, but uh and I liked anthropology. I really wanted I was very interested in social
science, very interested in why we do things, you know, where we came from, uh, all kinds of, you know, mythology.
Um, and I realized after a few years, you know, and then I went to film school, made movies, and ended up being
where I am. But I realized that I was following on everything I did. I was following something I really cared
about, something I loved, something I was passionate about. And I kept following that passion, whether it was
cars, whether it was anthropology, uh, whether it was art, um, photography. Um, and eventually it led me to my huge
passion, my real passion, which was making movies, which combined all of those things. And I realized that had I
gone on to get my degree in anthropology, I would have probably made anthropological movies in New Guinea or
someplace and eventually been on National Geographic and, you know, the History Channel and uh been then making
features and I'd have done Star Wars just the same. If I'd have gone to art center and become an illustrator, I
would have probably started doing animation and doing animated films and making animated things and then
ultimately I would have gone on and been right where I was. So no matter which route I took because I cared about all
of them, they all led to the same place. Had I done what my father had wished me to do, which is to go into these office
equipment business with him, which I knew I wasn't going to do. I knew I hated that, my life would have been
unpleasant. And um so I think it's very important not to do what your um peers think you should do, not do what your
parents think you should do or your teachers, but to do what you inside or even your culture thinks, but do what's
inside you. You know, when I went to film school, everybody said, "Well, you're nuts. What are you going to film
school for?" You know, you're only there's nobody from a film school had ever gotten a job in the film business.
Just had never happened. So you were just doomed to be a ticket taker at Disneyland. So they was like, why would
you do that? You know, why don't you take a major that you can actually get a job at? Why do But once I fell in love
with it, there was no going back even though I had absolutely no chance of making in the film business. And I did
the same thing when I um graduated. I moved back to San Francisco. And he said, "Well, you can't make movies in
San Francisco. You're crazy." I said, "But I don't want to be in Hollywood. I don't want to do that. I don't like
those kind of movies. I want to do different kind of movies." And um they said, "Well, you'll fail. It'll just
never happen." and we managed to make it work in San Francisco. So, that's the long story of
how I got here. Uh, another short story of one thing I discovered along the way is
that several speakers have talked about happiness and I've discovered along the way that happiness you have you live in
two worlds here. Happiness is pleasure and happiness is joy. You know, it can be either one. You add them up and it
sort of falls under the uber category of happiness. Pleasure is short-lived. Uh it lasts an hour, lasts
a minute, lasts a month. Um and it uh peaks and then goes down. It peaks very high. But the next time you want to get
that same peak, you have to do it twice as much. You know, it's like drugs, you know, just you have to keep doing it
because it insulates itself. No matter what it is, whether you're shopping, uh whether you're uh you know engaged in
any other kind of pleasure, uh that all has the same quality about it. On the other hand is joy. And joy is the thing
that doesn't go as high as pleasure in terms of your emotional reaction, but it stays with
you. Joy uh is something you can recall. Pleasure you can't. Uh so the secret is that even though it's not as intense as
the pleasure, the joy will last you a lot longer. Um and people who get the
pleasure, they keep saying, "Well, if I can just get richer and get more cars, you know, I I'll never You'll never
relive the moment you got your first car. That's it. That's the highest peak." Yes, you can get three Ferraris
and a new uh uh Gulfream jet and maybe you'll get close, but you have to keep going and eventually you run out and you
just can't do it. Doesn't work. So, if you're trying to sustain that level of peak pleasure, you're
doomed. It's a very American idea, but it just can't happen. You just let it go. Peak, great. Pleasure is fun. It's
great, but you can't keep it going forever. Just accept the fact that it's here and it's gone. and maybe again
it'll come back and you'll get to do it again. Joy lasts forever. Pleasure is purely self-centered. It's all about
your pleasure. It's about you. It's about it's a selfish self-centered emotion that's created by
a self-centered motive of greed. Joy is compassion. Joy is giving yourself to somebody else or something
else. And it's a kind of thing that is in its subtlety and lowness much more powerful
than pleasure. If you get hung up on pleasure, you're doomed. If you pursue joy, you will find
everlasting happiness. So with that, I'm gone. Bye-bye. Thank you. This is a 44
Magnum. As you know, the most powerful handgun in the world. Not anymore, but it was then. And it has fired neither
five nor six because it's empty. And this is one of the original guns from the movie. And when I did the second
movie, I said, "I want one of those guns. Can't you get the prop department to steal one of those guns and give it
to me?" So, um, Clint and, uh, Warner Brothers publicity guy arranged to to get that.
They put a plaque on it, everything. So, it's it's a very valuable gun now. It's become an
icon. Anytime you make a movie, there's lots of scene changes. And if the director wanted to and said, "I'm going
to do your script exactly the way it's written," which I do when I direct one of my scripts, you know, obviously when
you're there on the spot, you're going to change things. You're going to find things that are better and worse and the
actors are going to say different things and so there's going to be a lot of say a lot of changes and stuff like that.
And people always say, "Well, what part is your original?" I said, "All the parts you liked.
Clint East was very very um much that way. Very quiet, very, you know, no big deal. Very unpretentious. There's
there's no everything is is straight up. It's just what it is. Um, I am sure that he had no trouble all
of his life in dealing with fans or anything like that because he probably changed very little as time went on. Um,
he's basically the same guy now that I that I knew back then, you know, and he and he was a very good person. He's a
very generous person. He's one of the few actors that um if you call him up, he'll always call you back in an hour or
two, you know. And I've I've made movies that are some of that other actors who were famous actors, their best movies.
And if I call them up, they'll say, "What does he want? I better check." You know, none of that with Clint. Clint's
right up there. You know, everybody admires him. you know, because of that he has those old almost Midwest
values. My, you know, kind of input into the character came from a number of things. I knew a cop who was kind of a
dirty hairy type cop and he he'd shot quite a number of people. He was a Long Beach detective. and he said always he
said when um when I'm put on the case the verdict is in and he didn't usually bring the
people back you know and he and he was kind of he was a real classic kind of character because he was he was more out
of LA confidential than than Dirty Harry but he was an interesting guy because he in his part-time was a dog trainer and
he was very gentle in training the dogs that he believe that um you had to be very gentle in training dogs, but he was
not gentle with human beings. You know, I don't know.
[Music] Fore speech. [Music]
More speech. Mhm. for
[Music] foreign. [Music]
for what I want. Fore
speech. [Music] [Music]
I'm [Music] forch.
for foreign. foreign speech.
Everybody thinks that directing is an exercise of control. Well, look, to me, uh, it's a strange profession we chose
as directors because it's a combination of being tough as nails and being as permeable and fragile
as you can. And you need to sort of separate the two. You cannot be completely fragile because then you
won't make movies. You could used to become a poet or a painter, you know, because a filmmaker is never going to
die and they're going to find a drawer full of movies that he never did. Oh my god. And it's going to be on DVD and
Blu-ray. It won't be, you know, you have to be a tough mother to get into the business side and fight and tell the
bastards, "No, no, and I'm no, I won't do it. I'll do it my way." All a lot of fights. So you have to be tough in that
and you have to fight and and be able to defend what the movie needs to be defended. And then at the same time you
need to be incredibly incredibly permeable and fragile. And for example, you can be screaming at your producer uh
one moment about the crane not being ready and then you have to be completely open with your actor to watch the actor
perform. You cannot. So it's very very strange and that goes for the childlike imagination. You have to preserve that
and uh yes it can get really bad but I think that's the one thing that um that experience gives you. I've been doing
this for 25 years now and you know after year 20 you go into the set and there is a certain thing that clicks and allows
you but you're always mortally afraid. You are what you are and that's what you bring to to the movies you make. It
doesn't all we can do as artists is the synthesis of something that has been done before. We're 2,000 years in at
least in civilization. Every song has been sung, every story has been told, but your voice hasn't been heard. Your
voice is yet to be heard. And in that I package two things that are one and the same. Your qualities and your defects.
And as a Latin American, the way I live it, we could be having dinner and somebody says, "I saw a ghost." And they
say, "Oh yeah, pass the bread." You know, doesn't matter. You know, I saw a ghost. Sure you did. My grandmother came
to visit me last night and told me a secret from heaven. Sure. Where's the salsa?
magic and realism in Mexico. Same thing. Same thing. Brilliant. That's why Bono went to Mexico and said this is the most
surreal country in the world because it's absolutely true. And that's why uh what an European would qualify as an
absurdist thing is what is natural to me. You take the things that are more extraordinary and you root them in the
ordinary. The conflation of those two things. And if you uh come from a European or Anglo-Saxon point of view,
these things are different tonally. But for a Mexican, it's second nature. You know, we are alter makers. You give me
five genres and I'll organize them in a certain shape and I'll make a little altar. Crazy. It's going to have a, you
know, like magpies. We find a shiny object and accommodate next to a less shiny object and we construct things.
And that's synthesis, by the way. That's what is new. Nobody has organized those shiny bits the way you do it.
Everybody thinks the director is purely an everybody thinks the directing is an exercise of control and that's a myth
that we enthrone because of course the great legend is Eric Bonheim did 120 takes or wells knew everything blah blah
blah but I can tell you in reality the directing no matter who you are is the art of orchestrating
uh accident, you know, because of course you prepare, of course I color code and
design the movie to a tea. Of course, all that happens, but every day you're going to get 30 curbballs, the sun is
setting, the actor twist his ankle, the car crashed, whatever it is. And you cannot say, "Oh, well, because the day
cost between 25 to $125,000, you know, so you cannot stop." And and uh and and you need to take what
is there and make it work, you know. And and uh and I think uh that part then is combined with the fact that as a
childlike imagination, you need to be open to seeing what is right about it. You know, let me put it another way. If
an actor acts and you have a only one idea of how the scene should be, the actor is going to come with great
colors. He's going to put them on the table and you're not going to see any of those colors. You're just going to see
red because that's what you wanted. And maybe green is better. You can say to the actor, "Try this other way." And if
it's the right way and it's your way, you insist. But you have to be open. And the same is true of every accident you
may encounter. The there is a great Zen saying that says the obstacle is the path and it's absolutely true for a
director. Whatever you see as the obstacle is yelling at you. This is the way to a better solution. So an obstacle
is only a path that has been looked at wrong, you know, and I think that's that's a thing that we do in our craft
that we don't talk about enough. I think the process of discovery is look making a movie in in in my opinion is
you're constructing something that needs to look real. And like every lie, the more details you add, the more truthful
it sounds. If I told you I'm late because I couldn't find parking, you can go either way. But if I tell you I'm
late because I was about to park on wheelchair and this red Corvette just parked and this guy was sipping his
latte and I was honking and he wouldn't turn. you added details that you go well it's a truth experience you know it's a
true and then it's the same with film the more layers you add the more truthful it seems or real all of my life
uh when I approach a new project and I'm 50 50 years old and I've done now I don't know how many movies as producer
director blah blah blah and I still have the same emotion when I go into a project I go how much am I willing to
lose to do that image and there's always one or two images in every project that you would mortgage your house, sell your
car, give everything you have to to make sure that image comes uh to save uh what you go through. Doesn't matter if
they they give you x amount of time, but you need to always protect the images that are crucial. So there is always an
image that makes you say I'm willing to forsake everything I have in life to protect that image. And
uh the second thing I feel very important do not get wrapped in the industry side of this. That's what I
find really heartbreaking that people are now a lot of times you're discussing film with people that love film and it's
like you're listening to an agent from an agency or a head of a studio. They know the grosses. They know who's doing
this. They know is that's absolutely not important. The important thing is that tradition you are going to belong to and
do not get caught on the other side. stay true to the other side that needs you and needs to exist urgently. Yeah,
we need people that are passionate about telling stories. Numbers are great, but I I tell you, you pay when you have a
movie and it's opening, yes, pay attention to your obsessively. Saturday, Friday, Thursday, yes, but beyond that,
do not get caught in the business. That's very important to to forget. Near positions and awaiting orders, remain in
the miracle mile, engage at your discretion. I my first American experience was almost my last experience
because it was with the Weinest uh at Miramax and I can tell you two horrible things happened in the late 90s. My
father was kidnapped and I worked with the Weinstein. It's and I don't know which ones was worse. Actually, the
kidnapping made more sense. I I knew what they wanted, you know, and uh and uh I really hated the experience,
but I learned to fight and uh do things that happened that were positive on Mimic. I lost casting battles. I lost
story battles. I lost many battles. But the one thing Mimic is and 100% is visually exactly what I wanted. our
direction, camera moves, color palette, cinematography. And I realized, okay, I learned that and I learned a lot more. I
really on Mimic, I learned to move the camera and in a really beautiful choreography with the act, the actors
because Bob Weinstein was always saying, "Why don't you move the camera? You never move the camera." I go, "Okay, I'm
going to move the camera, but I'm going to move the camera the way I want And I I devised this idea of counter movements
for the others and that's the way I should now. Without that experience, I would have not
progressed. And when anyone uh approaches me and says I want to be a director, I I I always tell them then
you should just be a director and and don't say I'm going to be because you can direct good or bad. Uh, but you can
direct from your iPhone, from your cell phone, with your sister's cousin video camera, with a webcam, with
right now, except in the most abject circumstances, most people can get a hold of an image audiovisisual
generating machine and they can be directing and then realize that they are already directing. directing should
doesn't mean anymore and shouldn't mean anymore directing feature films and I I think that so as long as you have you
have minimal access to any media you should be a director if you feel like you like you want to and the advice I
feel is that it's always better to answer through your work the things you don't like in a media in a piece of
media if you dislike the movies that are being made your own show the world what you want to do what you think this
medium should be. Uh so the advice is if you want to direct direct and even easier if you want to write write. You
know I think that uh writing is the only one of the only uh things that can be done uh with very little uh resources
and even if you die and you were unpublished you still have a chance. You know it's truly you cannot do that with
directing. You need other people. You need a little bit of help. You need at least an actor in front of the camera,
you know, but but I think these are what I say is go and do it. I uh was having breakfast with Daniel Krauss who I was
doing Troll Hunters with and I said, "What what are you what else are you working on?" And he said, "Well, I have
this idea about a janitor that falls uh for a creature in a super government super secret government facility and
takes him home." And I thought, "That's it." I said I'll buy that idea and I'll write the screenplay and it's my next
movie and you know like devil's background like Vans Labyrin like this there was a complete certainty on my
part that everything would work that doesn't happen on the others there's not this those three movies and Kronos there
was complete certainty like I had an unwavering belief then it waivers at the end after you go through hell. But you
have the certainty this is my I must make this movie and it's not ego and you don't want it to be liked. You don't
want it to be accepted. You just need to make it. And it's a very different sensation than than other times where
you go, oh, I want to see this sequence or that sequence. But no, this is a complete almost u like you're listening
to a song and it comes to you complete at once. You know, I think what I strive to is to to to connect deeply with
audiences that like what I do. Even if the audience at large does or doesn't, it makes no difference to me. I make
weird movies no matter what size the movie is. And they're not for everyone. And and a lot of people may be puzzled
or say, "Why did he do this way?" But I only do things that I I hope speak to somebody in the same fetishistic way
that I was spoken to by people that got high on their own supply because I get high on my own supply. I make the movies
because I want them, you know, and I whether it's robots and monsters duking it out or it's
a post uh war fable or whatever it is, they're done because I want to I want to see them. We live in a we live we
exercise in a thing that is an act of art and an act of commerce. And the act
of commerce hurts only in that it tells you you're not communicating to more people than you than you wanted you know
and but the act of art is the principle. Uh you need to preserve that before anything else. That's your primal
concern, I think. What's some stuff that aspiring filmmakers can do just to separate
themselves from the herd, from the noise? Well, I think that be themselves. I mean, you you you can be hard to peg.
Some people may like you, some people may not like you, some people get what you do, some others think you're crazy.
But if you are true to yourself, if you only do things that you really believe in and that are personal to you, then
you know you don't need the approval of anybody else really. I mean that's that's in my opinion what distinguishes
not only the great horror filmmakers but the great filmmakers in general. you know, uh, some people can go through
life shooting bee movies and eventually they get discovered, you know, by an audience that caught them at the right
time. Some people go all their lives shooting sort of underground little things and they can find their audience
and it's a matter of being true, not trying to be somebody else or have some different type of budget. I mean, you'll
find your audience and your audience will find you. All of all of them have them. And all of them are some form of
autobiography. Pacific Rim, even Blade 2. I mean seriously like Nomach and his father uh that relationship is very much
the way I felt about my dad the poor man you know and but I always I I I would I have never made a movie that I wouldn't
die for you know and and I it doesn't matter if it's commercial or people think it's commercial I've said no to
incredibly lucrative things you know incredibly lucrative like my agent must be very unhappy with me because I go,
"No, I'm going to do this other movie." Okay. Uh uh but but uh all of them are biography. All all art is portraiture.
All art is portraiture. And all art is political. Those are things that you can't avoid. And you
will know a person like for their art if it's true more than you would know probably from living
together for 10 years. But my movies are all cabinets of curiosities of who I am. My I used to talk to ants. I used to
love insects. I wanted to be a a naturalist, a biologist, an entomologist. So you know everything you
see is portraiture. You know, I I am that weird. You're the best man I've ever met.
Uh, you do need to never lose your hope. It's an evolutionary business. Uh, in other
words, it's going to be brutal. It's going to be horrible. It's going to be merciless. And if you break, you
shouldn't be making movies. You know, it's the end of it. you you need that combination of resilience and fragility.
So, you know, it's you you have to have it because uh you live with rejection for decades sometimes as a director and
you end up making the movie you want to make. So, if I say no, that doesn't mean I'm right or I'm wrong. You just say
him, I'll show him later. you know, I'm going to make it and that fat bastard is going to have to say I was so wrong and
hit himself in the head because he didn't do it. And I think that that's the thing to do is like show us, don't
tell us, you know, do the things. And if you do them wrong, but you do them in your own terms, that's how I define
success, failing in your own terms. or first-time filmmakers, I always tell them, look, making movies is eating a
sandwich of the only thing that gets a little better is as the years go by, you get a little more bread, but the shit's
always there. But isn't it that true of life also? I think it is. I mean, I I I use another
metaphor for life, but for film, I tell you that one fits. And but you in the end somehow you
find the joy. Well, you end up you end up convincing yourself that it's peanut butter.
[Laughter] And is it ever is it ever peanut butter? I want to believe it is.
I think people are perverts. I've maintained that. That's been I that's the foundation of my
career. When you set out to make a movie, it doesn't happen exactly the way you have
it in your head. There is this exploration. There is this evolution. There's this unfolding or or
revealing of the material. It's a very very very powerful medium. You're somebody, a group of people who are
mostly strangers are sitting in the dark and they've given you access to their brains through their eyes and their ears
for 2 hours, 2 and 1/2 hours. That's a big responsibility, you know, and you have to and to me, you know, directing
is not so much what you want to see on the day. It's about limiting all the stuff that you don't want to see. As
soon as you take a camera out of its box and put a lens on it and and everybody's in makeup and wardrobe, it's I mean it's
an inherently fake thing and you're just looking for clues and and ways to sort of dispel
um what audiences have become used to in terms of the presentation of ideas. you know, you you're trying to sort of find
new clues as to or ways to sort of blur the lines between um between what is some something that's so presentational
and so um silly in itself and give it a little fair similitude so that people can kind of connect it to them. I think
the greatest thing that all filmmakers need to have is the ability to articulate your intention because if you
can do that, and you're going to need to do it, you're going to need to do it with a screenwriter, you're going to
need to be able to do it with a financeier, you're going to need to be able to do it with every single actor
that you're hoping to seduce to be part of your cast. Um, you're going to have to do it with the marketing people.
You're going to have to do it with publicity. you're going to have to be able to explain why um your film needs
to be treated in a different way, why it needs to be understood that it that it's not. If anybody has interest in true
crime, it's always it's always that, right? It's always that thing that you can't quite touch. You can't quite get
at it. You don't you don't understand what makes them do what they do. Cinema is an
inherently risky and exciting and imperfect and emotional
uh medium and it has to include all of those things. As soon as you start limiting what it is that people can say
through movies, you you're kind of inherently uncinematic. The audience has to feel it. If they don't feel bad, if
they don't feel horrible about violence, um, it's a problem. I think it's a problem for the movie. I don't want to I
don't want violence in movies to be like that. I don't want it to be a joke. I want it people to recoil from it and and
and think it's awful. And how dictatorial is is a David Fincher set? Um, I don't think it's
dictatorial at all. I mean, I'll say this. If the movie is great, I'm going to get too much credit. And if the movie
sucks, I'm going to get too much blame. When the hits the fan, all of a sudden, everybody scatters and you're
you're the guy standing there going, "Wait, who's got a suggestion now?" So, if I'm going to take the blame, if I'm
going to take the brunt of it, I'm going to make the decisions. I don't always have the best ideas. I'm not always
right, but I'm always for the movie. I have to create an environment where they can do that. And that may
mean being unkind to um to get everybody's attention so that we understand it's not
we're not going to save this in coverage. I'm not going to allow your hangover to influence how I'm going to
cut the scene. If you have four different actors in the movie and you sit with one of them and watch the
movie, you'll have a completely different view of that movie than if you sit with one or the other. But I want to
cut the scene the way I want to cut the scene. I want to cut the scene the way the story mandates, not somebody's
comfort. More important than the than the legal ability to be able to say, "I don't have to listen to you." um is the
ability to say I hear what you're saying and I understand exactly what it is that you're saying and it has no place in
this film for the following reasons. I think people tend to be reasonable when you if you can be supremely specific
about what it is that you want to accomplish. I made a crucial error. I listened to the people who were paying
for the movie and they said the way to go about this is not to work with your friends. The way to go about this is to
work with people who've done this time and time and time again. And basically that translates into meet a lot of
people who are going to resent you and your age and are not going to want to take instruction from you and allow them
to tell you what you can't do. I try to kind of um take everything that can go wrong
into account because something's going to go wrong on on any given day. Um but I don't also want to overthink something
to the point where it's just uh becomes sort of boring execution or you know checking off a list. Um I want it to be
communal and I want it to be and I want people to have an investment. I want the actors and the cinematographer and the
dolly grip and I want people to be invested in coming up with ways to make things more concise. You know, people
who label other people perfectionists are probably just smaller roles. I mean, even Helena Bottom Carter, this is a
bizarre fantastic. Yeah. Fantastic. But you wouldn't think she'd be the first kind of person necessarily to go to.
Helena was we had a script that Brad wouldn't commit to and Walker came in to do a polish and I was kind of like I you
know I feel like we're really close. He say yeah yeah we're really close but let's let's do a little more you know
spit spit shine on it. And so I said okay if we're going to do that you know Andy and I are going to come over to
your house every morning at 8:00 and we'll work until we get it right. We would make coffee and we would talk and
and uh he one day as I walked in he said, "Have you seen Wings of a Dove?" And I said, "No."
We put it and we watch it and I said, you know, she's so kind of she's such a kind of perfect little doll, you know,
do you think we can we can make do we think she can be like foul-mouthed and nicotine stained and aderalded and and
he was like, let me meet with her. So, I went to the Four Seasons when she was in town and I met her and she was
foulmouthed, nicotine stained, completely, you know, caffeinated. And she was like, "Why why would you think
of me for this?" And I was like, "I don't know." Um, and Michael Kaplan, who did the did the costumes, kind of came
up with this idea that he was like, "You know who she is? She's Judy Garland on her last legs." I was like, "Wow, that
was perfect." So, we showed her P and that's what she did. I have to ask you about the takes issue. You famously have
a lot of takes. My philosophy is you spend $250,000 on a set. You're going to put it on a sound stage. It cost you
$5,000 a day. You're going to put $8,000 worth of lights in the in the You're going to bring a $150,000 crew in.
You're going to bring actors in from all over the world. You're going to put them up in hotels. They're going to come
there and the idea is to get them out as soon as possible. Who wants to live like that?
If I fly you in from Iceland and and you're supposed to do one day, I want to make sure that we get it. There's a
point in time whenever an actor says, "I'm sorry, I just I lost. Can we start again? They were great." Right
before they pull the pin on the whole thing, they were great. And I've shown act. It's that thing of when you fall
face first into something and you kind of know you know what the text is and you know what you're supposed to be
doing, but you you lose your train of thought. It's almost always the most exciting thing. Something is really and
I was, you know, I almost know when somebody's going, "Oh, I'm sorry." You're you're it's kind of when you're
doing this and then then everything goes kaflooy. But my process is about I'm going to give you 17 18 25 bites at the
apple because you if you're smart and if you're conscientious, you've worked out in your head as an actor what it is you
want to present me. And presentation is a kind of weird translucent
diffuse plastic hyman between what I want it to be and what you want it to be, what the actor wants it to be. And
there's always this thing of like, yeah, I've gathered my I've gathered my senses and I've and I'm ready to show you my
wares. And I almost always feel like it's I almost always feel like it's
controlled. And so what I want to do is go, great, show me that we're going to shoot. We shot seven takes. Okay, now
let's start. You know, are you done? Because, you know, I know you won the Oscar last night in the tub and you've
figured out what this is going to be, but now I want to challenge. Now I want to get beyond
muscle memory. I want you to know exactly where to sit in that chair. I want you to be really comfortable
because it's your home. And so you come in, you throw your coat on the couch. When you've done that 15 times, it
starts to look like you live there. Some directors you hear don't like actors and aren't interested in that and are kind
of using them as pawns. I don't want to do that. I'm not one of those directors like I could do that. I could not
do that in my life. Like I could never. And to me, if you can help them be great, everybody wins. Like that's
the point. That's why we're here. That's why we're shooting. You know, we're shooting to make all of this great. The
camera is going to trap them in amber for all time. And it's the magic of when somebody is doing something in the
background that evolves and they come into the foreground, they become part of the action and they take over. I have to
create an environment where they can do that. And that may mean
being unkind to um to get everybody's attention so that we understand it's not we're not going to save this in
coverage. I'm not going to allow your hangover to influence how I'm going to cut the scene. I'm not going to allow
your bad hair day to be to to mandate that we're going to be, you know, the scene plays out in overs. I'm going to
get a good master, maybe three that are very different in what they're and then I'm
going to go into coverage and I may get one to three really great overs that are really interesting and then I'll broom
back and do do singles, but I want to cut the scene the way I want to cut the scene. I want to cut the scene the way
the story mandates, not somebody's comfort. Social network. Um, I remember getting incredibly excited the idea of
you directing a film from an Aaron Sen script about this subject matter. When you read a script that good, you just
say, "Where do I go to surrender?" I thought Zuckerberg was hilarious. When I was given this script, it was under very
strange kind of alien opaces in that they were like, "We're making this movie, so you tell us how much it's
going to cost and you tell us who you want to put in it." And yeah, it's an incredibly exciting thing to be able to
just cast people who are right for it. Andrew Garfield wanted to play Mark Zuckerberg. He was good. He gave a good
reading. And then Jesse Eisenberg sent his his audition tape in. And I grabbed Aaron. I brought him over to my
computer. I hit play and Aaron went, "Oh my god, he does me better than me." And I was like, "It's got to be Jesse." And
um I called Andrew over. We sat in my office and I said, "I I I can't offer you Mark Zuckerberg, but I would love it
if you would come to a readthrough and read for Eduardo." And he said, "Really? Why? I mean, what?" And I said, "Just I
think you have a mechanism. You as an actor build an umbilicus to the audience. You create an emotional
attachment. That's your gift. I don't need that for Mark Zuckerberg. I I need that for Eduardo. and if you will come
and read through, I think you'll see what I'm doing." And you know, no strings attached now. And he said,
"Okay." And he came and he read and we finished the read through and he walked out in the parking lot. He goes, "I get
it. This guy's amazing." And I said, "So, do you want to play Eduardo?" And he said, "I would love to." And
everybody was like that. Everybody just wanted to tell the story. In Gong Girl, your new film, you're dealing with
relationships between married people that are kind of not as they seem. They're kind of pretending to be
something, aren't they? Was that what attracted you to that novel, that subject matter? Yeah, I I wasn't that
intrigued where I mean the I love the plotting and I loved a you know, it's very witty. It's it has real insight, I
think, into certain feminine perspectives that, you know, maybe we we have ignored to our detriment. But the
thing that was profound, you know, we learn to we we construct a facade of ourselves. We
construct an image for people to um deal with us and understand us. You know, we learn from teachers, we learn from
parents, we learn from siblings how to present the best version of oursel and it and and then we go out into the world
as adults and we and we mate and we couple and we draw pe seduce people with with this
projection of ourselves and and often completely oblivious to the fact that the other person is doing that too. And
there comes a point in, you know, it's not the it's not the uh 7-year itch or the 3 to 5 years into a relationship
where one or more of the people who's entered into this contract says, "I can't keep it up. I can't I'm
I'm not interested in in being the man of your dreams or the woman of your dreams anymore. I I I don't know what to
tell you." And um this movie was about the resentment that that might engender. Ben and Rosman are like they're perfect
in that film. Um they were both our first choice. U Ben had a he's obviously he could be homecoming king. He
obviously could be a frat guy. You know, he obviously and and he was willing to kind of be um you know the 40-year-old
version of that. Um um he also had a very distinct relationship and understanding of
uh what it is to be in the wood chipper of public opinion. Yeah. And not have any say or any control over it. And when
we started talking about Amy, one of the things that um I realized about Rosman was that I had seen this work. I I pride
myself on being able to see, you know, an actor's utility bill. I try to gauge them, who they are, what they're made of
by the things that they default to and the and where their instincts take them. And I'm, you know, that's all I do all
day. So, I'm reasonably good at it. And I had no take on her. I had no I had no idea. And I needed that. Amy has to be
unfathomable. House of Cards. um entering the world of kind of what I would call premium TV.
You know, TV now, you know, often is as good if not better than film and Netflix kind of the was all of that what
attracted you to? Was it Kevin Spacy? What was the the rights for the show were being shopped in Hollywood? And and
and um my partners who I had sort of said, "Let's make TV together." Um were sent this DVDs, this DVD set of this
wonderful British show. And I was finishing Dragon Tattoo and they both started calling me saying, "You you got
to watch this DVD, you idiot." Like just the rights are going to be gone to this thing and it's really and I watched it
and I thought this is insanely good. It's so and it's so simple and so dramatic and it's so rich. Television
has become the place for characters to evolve. There's very little time in movies anymore for characterization. And
I think television is a place where um characters can be slowly peeled and revealed. I want everybody I want the
makeup artist. I want the boom operator. I want everybody to feel um it's it's it's the best work that they've done or
it's it's the best adaptation that we can do. My father once said to me, I don't know who he was quoting, but you
know, learn your craft. It'll never stop you from being a genius. And that's the kind of thinking, you know, that's what
you want to surround yourself with. 17, filmmaker Paul Thomas Anderson made a mock documentary about the life of a
porn film star. 10 years and $15 million later, Anderson's project has become Boogie Nights.
One, two, three. I didn't say anything. Boogie Nights is being compared to films
by Martin Scorsesei, Robert Alman, and Quinton Tarantino, and was called the most seductive cautionary tale ever made
by The New Yorker. Joining me now, filmmaker Paul Thomas Anderson, and I am pleased to have him here to talk about
this film and an extraordinary u attention being devoted to an independent film. Welcome. Thank you.
Good to have you here. Why 10 years between the time that you made that little documentary, which was about 30
minutes as I remember? Yeah. And this completion um you know I don't know I don't know I
just uh I kept playing with it um you know and and and um I I wrote it after doing the
short film I wrote it as a fulllength sort of documentary taking that kind of spinal tap approach you know but by the
time I sort of finished that um that format had kind of been worn out and done many times and and I kind of
realized I was really just sort of blatantly ripping off this final that thing, you know, you got to sort of find
a new way to do this. And in the meantime, I'd written my first movie uh which was called Heartache. And and then
just kind of um was finally called Heart Eight. It was finally called Heart. Thank you.
Those of us who love it called it Sydney. That's right. Thank you. God, it's good to be here. I feel
comfortable. Um, you know, and I don't know, somewhere in in 10 years, two hours was added on top of the half hour.
And I just kind of figured, well, the way to do this is just kind of go nuts and just make it straight narrative, but
really kind of just start writing and wrote 300 pages of stuff and eventually had a shooting script of 186 pages.
Casting. Yeah. The best the the best part. Casting and writing are kind of the same thing to me, you know, cuz I
write parts for actors that are my friends or actors that I that I don't know that I really want to work with,
like Julianne Moore is someone whose work I just loved, you know, and I I wrote this part for her, but I didn't
know her. But, um, it was great to give it to her and say, "This is for you, you know." And she said, "Yes." and John
Riley and Phil Hoffman and Philip Baker Hall and uh uh Bob Ridgley, a lot of the actors in the movie are are real good
friends of mine and it's great to to to um write parts for them because you you know they're my friends and I watch them
kind of suffer in Hollywood, you know, not being uh able to play parts that they should, you know, if they if
they're if they're good at playing the White Trash Hillbilly, they get the White Trash Hillbilly parts, you know,
forever. And I can go I can go to them and say, "So, what do you what kind of part do you want to play?" you know,
say, "Well, I want to do something other than the stuff they're offering me." You know, so it's nice to to do that, you
know. What about the lead? Marky. Yeah. Um not the first choice. No, he wasn't. Um Well, he is now. No, of course he is.
You'd like to look back and say, "I knew this all along. I knew this. We wrote it for him. I knew it would be he'd own the
part." That's right. I knew all this would happen for him. He's an interesting guy. He came by and we did a
conversation. He's very interesting guy. He's smart and smooth and and and and and not at all like you imagine. No,
no, because of all the because of all that stuff there before, you know. And it was funny cuz when I sat down with
him, well, he wasn't the first choice. I had thought of him a couple times because I'd liked him in the Basketball
Diaries and the first choice was Leonardo DiCaprio. Leonardo eventually decided to do the
Titanic and um so I went to Mark, you know, and sat down with him. But did Leonardo recommend Mark? He did
actually. I mean, I I had Mark in the back of my head. My casting director was really saying, "Mark, you're great." You
know, and my my producer was saying, "Mark's great." And Leo said, "Meet Mark, you know, not that I had to be
convinced, but um but I actually really wanted Leo, you know, and Leo said, "I'm going to do the Titanic. Meet Mark." So
I sat down with Meet with Mark and you talked about this early stuff. It was kind of funny because we sat down and I
said, "So, you know, have you read the script?" And he said, "Well, to be honest, I've only I've only read 30
pages." And I thought, "Who is this jerk, you know, hot shot guy who's only read 30 pages?" and he said, "Listen, I
love these 30 pages, and I know I'm going to love the rest of it, but I just want to make sure before I really fall
in love with this and and and want to do it, I want to make sure you don't want me because I'm the guy who will get in
his underwear, you know, because I, you know, people were offering him stuff like that, like come rap in a movie.
Come be the underwear guy in a movie, you know, and I said, I don't know anything about that. I I want you cuz I
saw you in the Basketball Diaries, you know, and I want to hear what you have to say about the script." You saw some
acting ability in the Basketball Diaries. Yeah, he was great, you know. Um, nothing against Leo, but he stole
the movie from Leo, you know. He was so great. Then why didn't you go to him first? I might ask. I just can't I don't
know. Stuck on the big star, you know. Um, he's he's not he's not, you know, unlike most of the other actors in the
movie, he's not a trained actor, you know. He's just this this thing of talent. is just this raw big ball
glowing ball of talent and he's his instincts are always Does that present a different challenge than it say working
with someone who who comes in more than just raw talent who comes in with some acting craft that they have incorporated
into their experience? Do you do it differently? Do you work differently? No. No. To tell
you the truth, no. Because you know a good actor is a good actor and and you know back to your question of casting
that's and it's the old cliche that's 99%. It it really is. It really is. Yeah. I mean I I don't have a job as as
a director to the actors. I I that's my theory is that my job to them is as a writer. It's like write them a good
part, do my job there and part choose the right person to play it. Exactly. And that's then I will I I will have
done my job. As a director, it's just like keeping your sense of humor and every once in a while reminding them to
keep it simple, you know, but it's just being a fan as a director. Bert Reynolds.
Yeah, Bert Reynolds. He's great, you know. He's he's Bert. And
again, not the first choice. No, not Well, you know what? He was the first person that I thought of when I was
writing it. I don't think you can write a movie about, you know, '7s porn and a character named Jack her who's the sort
of father figure without thinking of Bert Reynolds, you know. Um, but you thought about Warren Batty. I did. Well,
Warren Warren called me up and and I I think what I eventually I started to figure out was that Warren really wanted
to play Dirk Diggler, you know. I said, "You don't really want to play Jack. You want to be the kid in
this movie." Yeah. I said, "Well, so yeah, I talked with him for a little while about it, but now do you think he
seriously thought about making this?" Yeah, I do. I do. I think he really liked the script, you know, and uh and
why didn't he do it then? You know, you'd have to ask him. I think it's funny because when he saw the movie
um and and he called me and said, you know, that he really loved it and he said um he said that it it it fulfilled
all of his concerns that all of his concerns and why he didn't do the movie, which was his concerns about the
morality and the sort of the sort of moral center of the movie that he he just he admitted that he wasn't able to
really see in the script and I guess I wasn't able some to communicate to him through talking with him. What was that
issue for you as a director the morality of the film? because a lot of other people would have thought the same thing
that he was bothered by, right? How did you address that? I mean, what did you as a filmmaker do to have this be
considered not just some movie about pornography, but something
more? Something that had the same kind of buzz that Pulp Fiction does, right? You mean in in in whatever it was that
bothered What was it that bother Warren in the end? I think I think what he might have been looking for which which
maybe some other people were looking for was was a clear kind of moment or a clear moment when someone stands up and
says what we are doing is wrong you know. Yeah. Exactly. Some much more blatant much more
dramatic clear precise Yeah. Exactly. Making porn films this way is not right. Right. Yeah. I mean, I think there was
something that I was upfront with um the actors about and maybe, you know, was was my confusion about the issue and and
and saying that that that there's a there's a version of this movie that is confused and that that has to be okay
and that I don't, you know, I I support this as much as it really kind of turns me off and I'm confused about it and and
and we have points to make, you know, within this movie that we can put a period at the end of, but it's okay to
be elliptical about something if we are confused, you know. When you put it together, is there a
sense you had something special when you when did you first know that this was had a
chance? Um, it felt so good when we were making it, you know, like we were having so
much fun and uh and it really felt nice. It really did. And um but I think that that kind of the excitement that we had
um probably cautioned us in thinking that it's too good a time and we're too excited about this. I this is probably
like the most expensive home movie ever made for us, you know what I mean? And we'll really like it, you know, when we
watch our own videos of it. But certainly something happened. Something started to swell. I think that
there was there was a sort of buzz within kind of Hollywood, you know, people that had read the script that
were either really excited about it or or really had a big question mark about it, like will they pull that off?
Exactly. Right. Will they pull it off? Because they've got a good script, but we've seen good scripts go down the tube
before, right? You know, we've seen directors not be able to take the material they have and do something with
it, right? You know, and and you hadn't been tested that much, right? and you put these actors together and Reynolds
was not coming off of a brilliant right time and many many believe this might do something for his career in a
significant way right and same with Mark though too I mean I think the first big stop for him yeah exactly for those who
are watching this and have not seen the movie what's the story what are we looking what's this movie about
um the people who make porn movies and what happens to them in the 70s yeah it's funny because you say that you know
and and and and some people will sort of run for the hills, you know, they hear porn, they run for the hills, and you
want to kind of stop and say, "Well, no, it's sort of about the sort of the need to kind of create the surrogate family
within this world." And then they really roll their eyes and they go, "Well, you know, you're pulling my, you know, screw
you." You know, I don't want to hear about surrogate families. And then and then you sort of, you know, you just get
in this kind of tangled web, you know? It's kind of like the uh the rock star who introduces the song before he sings
it, like this is a song about love and redemption. And you're just like, "Sing the song. Just sing the song. Roll tape.
Here is our first clip. Our second clip from Boogie Nights. She's a wonderful mother. You know,
she's a mother to all those who need love. All those who need love. All those what? All those who need love.
Whose idea to put this the roller blades on the the roller uh skates there on on Roller Girl? Right.
You gonna take credit for that or Yeah. No, I'm I'm gonna take credit for it. I I'm just I'm just wondering if I should
tell the truth on how I there's there um I went to the Sundance Lab actually and uh you know to
work on my first movie and it's really kind of great up there and you go and you screen movies and stuff and there's
a wonderful guy up there was a projectionist that I kind of befriended and I found out that Robert Redford sort
of had a stash of of of movies you know like he had a sort of pristine print of the chase and of the hit the Steven Fer
movie and it turned out the projectionist had a had a porno movie so I would sort of have these late night
screenings up at the lab, you know, like after everybody went to sleep, you know, we'd all come down and go down and we'd
invite all your friends over in the middle of the night and we'd be out there in the middle of night. Go to
Redford's vault and watch Redford's vault, you know, break in. I I He's going to kill me, but but um hope he's
watching. Break in, you know, and kind of screen these movies and, you know, went through all the good stuff. the
Wizard of Oz, you know, the last real of the Wizard of Oz and The Chase and got to this porno movie where it was this
just this girl roller skating around and stopping and looking in windows, you know, and she'd watch a couple have sex
and then roller skate to the next and and I just Well, girl is born. Roller girl is born. You know, also too, it's I
think the name when you when you write uh you know, like the guy that the u the hot dog vendor is hot dog vendor, right?
Do you know what I mean? You just write hot dog vendor. I think I don't think I didn't have a name, you It was just
roller girl, you know. I maybe I'll I'll figure a name out later. It just became roll tape. Here is roller girl in
action. I miss my I love him roller girl. I'm going to really love the stupid.
I love you, Mom. A couple of things about this the what happens to Dirk? Yeah. I mean,
um, Dirk, um, you know, cocaine and, uh, you know, just loses it. Loses it. You know, uh, the
the, you know, his ego happens, you know, and cocaine and, you know, he's become a big-time movie star. You know,
how much of this is, what was the name of the John John Holmes bio? Was it who was the guy? There was a
there was a book written about Holmes. Yeah. I don't know. Uh there's I don't know. I mean there's a there's a
there's a great Rolling Stone article uh written and I don't but I don't know what it uh was something about
Wonderland because there was a Wonderland murders that was Did you base this on any original material? Uh some
some stuff was taken plucked from his life, you know. Uh original material meaning Yeah.
Right. I mean you in other words did the script that you wrote right you know come from in a sense were you informed
by you know sort of stories of porn stars who sort of had gone to the top and then had lost it because of
addiction because of ego because of Yeah I mean certainly John Holmes and there's a story of Shauna Grant and you know
pieces of real porn stars lives like Seikka you know Veronica Hart maybe to the uh the Amber character and sure it
plucked pieces but but I also think I just I plucked as many pieces from any, you know, so-called legitimate
celebrities, you know, um, movie stars, you know, who you've seen rise and fall and go through that, you know,
essentially this sort of story is any any of the Busby Berkeley backstage musicals, you know, the kid with the
dream and the rise and the fall and all of that. So, um, but yeah, we certainly did pluck pieces from a couple of things
that people noticed about this film. First of all, was the opening shot. Yeah. Yeah. The opening shot is one of
those big fun showoff moments where you get to, you know, director stretch this stuff. Exactly. where you get to go, I'm
directing, you know, this is my baby. Yeah. And I think those are okay, you know, if they're well earned, you know,
that that one isn't earned because it's the first shot of the movie, but in some way to me it kind of frees the movie up,
you know, and kind of goes have fun, you know, and this is going to be a long winding ride, you
know, and they're really fun to do. These long complicated tracking shots are really fun to do. There's something
great. I think the actors love them, you know. There's some there movie acting is so sort of pieced up and chopped up, you
know, that they don't really get a chance. Very rarely is action called like kind of like being on stage. Action
is called, you know, the curtain comes up and like three or four minutes later their their scene happens, you know,
which is kind of fun for them, you know, to really act something through and and and let it breathe and let it happen. I
read somewhere that the films you love, Nashville. Yeah. Robert Alman. Yeah. Good Fellas. Yeah. Martin Scarces. Yeah.
Um, Jonathan Demi. Yeah, he's the best. David Mamemoth. Sure. Yeah. Quinton Tarantino is not in there, but might as
well be included in that group or not. Uh, no. I think he's a wonderful filmmaker. I mean, I it just didn't
inform your life or your your ambition and your desires. Not really. Um, but certainly that, you know, the success of
Pulp Fiction helped a lot of people get movies made. a lot of people, you know. So, in that regard, certainly it sets
something new, something different, something that feels something that made a lot of money that didn't cost much and
was different and, you know, that's a big deal, you know, and that's great. I'm fascinated by you and the way you I
mean, you seem like a kid. How old are you? I'm 27 now. Uh, and here you are 27 years old and you've got a big movie, a
movie that everybody's talking about. You have wanted to do this since you were how old?
born. I I can't remember. There's only one other thing that I wanted to do and I thought I wanted to be a boxer, but
that was because I saw Rocky and my I don't think you want to be a boxer. You want to be like Rocky? I said, I want to
be like Rocky. He said, maybe you want to be an actor or a writer or a director or something like that. I said, yeah,
that's right. That's what I want. Yeah. But you didn't really want to act at all, did you? You never wanted to act.
No, because uh it's too hard. And you respect it. Yeah. I just it's the hardest job in the
whole world I think you know and I I don't know how they do it. I really don't you know that's why I just sit
back and let them do it and I have too many friends who are actors who would really kill me if I ever
tried. You know I would really be killed. You dropped out of school. Mhm. Because all you wanted to do was to
learn how to make movies. Yeah. That seems to me the only way to go, you know. I mean film school was
never an option. And it just it seemed to me to be a waste of time and a waste of money
in all honesty really. I mean certainly I had a leg up in that I was born and and bred in Los Angeles where you know
to to get a job on a film set is you know just as easy as you know in Detroit getting a job working for an
auto. Exactly. Exactly. Um so so I did have a leg up there you know it's just it's always it surrounds you. Um,
but you know, my my my uh film education really came from watching other movies, you know. Um, and
and I think there's um there's a scary mentality I think in film schools. My my small sort of dealing with them is is is
something that's really terrifying. I walked into a film class that was was about screenwriting and this guy the
first opening line was, you know, if you're here to write Terminator 2, just leave now. And I thought, well, that's
terrible. There's a could be a kid in the corner there that wants to write Terminator 2. That's his vision. That's
his movie. That's what he likes. Let him do it. You know, and and the mentality at film schools is we'll start out with,
you know, pmpkin. First day in class. Here's pmpkin. You know, every kid in the class
is going to just fall down. You know, what do you do? It's like they should do it backwards. You know, start with
Terminator 2 and and work backwards and sort of and and ease into this and sort of, you know, trace the sort of trace
the heritage, you know, trace it back. watch a Scorsesei movie which everyone sort of loves in the class and is very
excited by and trace back and go okay here's who's here's who he was riffing off of here's these patents that he is
kind of built upon you know and and study it that way one of the great moments of this program in its six or
seven year existence is Scorsesei talking about Fellinih you know and he wanted to and he came
here when Fellini died just to pay homage to Fellini because he was informed by Fellini the way you're
informed by Scorsesei. Yeah. In the way somebody who's 10 years old wanting to be you is informed by this and one of
the movies. What do you think Scorsesei and Alolman and Mammoth and Demi have in common?
What do good filmmakers have? Just a persistence of vision. I I think they all they all have
kept their attitudes, you know. Yeah. It doesn't seem like any of them are lazy. They just don't stop, you know, and they
they they just don't stop. I mean, there's there's something about I think all four
of them that is that the the biggest trick I think is is that they're incredibly selfish filmmakers, you know,
in the best possible way. You know, they're really making themselves happy first. And it's just wonderful that it
happens to also communicate to all of us and make it enjoyable to all of us. But there's a sort of you just see them them
sort of um I see with each of them, you know, they're sort of raising their watermark each time and really trying to
um do different things and new things while keeping their patents. You know, I don't you can watch any of their movies
and you know, you know, you're watching stamp a signature. Exactly. But also but also then frees them up to kind of make
different movies, you know, for for Scorsese to go make Age of Innocence or Demi to kind of branch out and do
something like Beloved, which he's doing now. Congratulations. Thank you very much. terrific film and and you're a
fascinating guy. Thank you. Thank you. Now, you have other reason to be happy that you live in
France because although you read in the papers every day that the French cinema is falling
down. I began reading that first about 1947. concept. The fact is that
unlike other countries, you are the authors of your films if you ever are lucky enough to make them.
This is not true in most of the countries of the world and it is something to make a movie and
to feel that you are the author and it is a glorious uh part of of the French law that I'm speaking of.
I know nothing about the rest of it. I'm I'm not no given the luck of being French and the bad luck of being
French because the bad luck of being French is that you have a difficulty in reaching an international
publicational. There are several very interesting reasons for this. One of them is the fact that you all
want to be directors. If only more of you wanted to be actors.
We might have some videts. And if we had vet, we would be able to sell French
movies all over the world. But there have only been two directors in the history of the
world who have brought the public in large quantities because of their name. I will name the two and when I
tell you that I detest both of them, I will shock you to your bones 50%. You
know Cecile B Deil and Alfred Hitchcock they are the only two who vet nobody else in France it's different people
will see a film uh you used to see a film by Jean Renoir they may see a film today by somebody who got the pop door
or even uh somebody whose name I ever heard of because I live in a provincial country where we never see any anything
by uh any other filmmaker. But it is true that you cannot fill the cell by being a
metron. And the first job as I said after the community which didn't ask for a theater which didn't ask for a
movie now they've got one. They're not going to go in to see what a director did.
And this is a very wholesome situation. Wholesome. Excellent. Because the director like the orchestra
conductor has become gleef importance is uh you know the old
the great old music used to be played by the orchestra uh and the concert mister the first violinist they got along very
well without these uh incredible Able Hams who jump up and down and weep tears and so on, calling themselves
conductors. Am I wrong? All right. And the director of the theater is an invention about 150 years
old. Maybe 200 maximum. Maximum. It was always the chief actor. with the assistance of the stage manager
who put on the play. Nowadays, I think largely inspired by the
cinema. There is a new giant walking across the planet who is called the conductor or the director.
Now this is not to say that we have not seen unforgettable things on the screen which were the work of great
metron. It's not to say that we have not seen great theater which was the work of of great metron.
But the theater and the cinema must not depend on the director. We must people always answer
that by saying yes. What's important is the story, the script. They are absolutely wrong.
The story and the script is the third most important thing because you can make a wonderful film
about nothing. Look at Fellini. [Applause]
[Music] [Applause] The most important thing in a movie is
the actor and everything which is in front of the camera
and the decadagance of the cinema. And we have a certain decadence comes from the glorification of the
director as as being not the servant of the actors but his master. Because the job of a director is to
discover in the actor something more than he knew he had. The job of the director is to
choose what he sees. and to a to an extent to create but a great deal of what is applauded as
creation is simply there. was there when he put the camera. That actor, that bit of scenery,
that that that veil that hung over the river, it was there
and you're intelligent enough to shoot it. So that the director should be very
intelligent, preferably not intellectual. Because the intellectual is the enemy of
all the performing arts. [Applause] [Music]
Let us respect and love them and cherish them and help them to be great because they are the people who have
made the cinema unforgettable. And that's the end of my
lecture. I'd like to hear somebody call me a lot. You spoke about writing for example.
Writing has absolutely no connection with the the theater arts. The writer for the cinema is doing
something else before the cinema is made. He's operating the way a novelist is operating or a journalist or a poet.
He is alone and everything about the work of the
director consists of working with many people and extracting from all of them the maximum human reestim.
maximum. I don't want to call you a liner. I I completely agree with you on the
point of um uh what we should do with actors that the actor but I would like to know what you
think about this about the fact that the directors are always using the same actresses or
actors over and over again. You don't like that? I would like to
know even go to an actor's school. I believe that the best acting is happens between actors who are
accustomed to working together. All you said two. No, I didn't mean it. Okay, he didn't mean it. All
right. There's a kind of terrible jewelry done. Yes. I mean both actor.
Yes. Because because a company of actors whether they are in the theater or in
the uh seem to be the favorites of a director such as Renoir had such as John Ford had.
They become a kind of family and they understand the thoughts of the others
before they are spoken. And they are able to produce more force, more human
energy because they have grown into a single unit in a single
Of course, the grand exception to this is the real star. And the very star is an animal
absolutely separate from actors. He may be or she may be the greatest actor in the world.
But he is not like actors. The vocation of being a star is separate from the vocation of being an
actor. It is very close to wanting to be president of the United States. [Applause]
[Music] get in the suit, huh? I was a terrible student in high school and the thing
that the auto accident did and it happened just as I graduated. So, I was at this sort of crossroads, but it made
me apply myself more because I realized more than anything else uh what a thin thread we hang on in in life. And I
really wanted to make something out of my life. And um I was in an accident that in theory no one could
survive. Uh so it was like well I'm here and every day now is an extra day. I've been given an extra
day so I got to make the most of it. And then the next day is I've been given two extra days. And I've sort of you can't
help in that situation but get into a mindset like that which is you've been given this gift and every single day is
a gift. Uh and I wanted to make the most of it. Um before when I was in high school, I just sort of wandered around
and you know I wanted to be a car mechanic and I wanted to race cars and I you know I just the idea of trying to
make something out of my life you know wasn't really a priority. Um but uh I really what the accident was allow me to
apply myself at school. I got great grades. Uh eventually I got very excited about anthropology and about social
sciences and psychology and um uh I was able to push my photography even further and eventually discovered film and film
school. I decided to go to film school because I loved the idea of making films. I love photography. Um and um
everybody said it was a crazy thing to do because in those days nobody made it into the film business. I mean just
unless you were related to somebody, there was no way in. So everything that's silly. You're never going to get
a job. Uh but I I wasn't moved by that. I set the goal of getting through film school um and just focused on getting to
that level because I didn't, you know, I didn't know where I was going to go after that. uh I wanted to make
documentary films. Uh and eventually I got into the goal of once I got to school of making a film. One of the most
telling things about film schools, you got a lot of students in those days especially, it's not quite so much
today, but wandering around saying, "Oh, I wish I could make a movie. I wish I could make a movie." You know, I can't
get in this class. I can't get any, you know, first class I had was an animation class. It wasn't a production class. Um
I had a history class and a and an animation class. And in the animation class, they gave us one minute of film
to put onto the animation camera to operate it to see how you could move left, move right, make it go up and
down. And it was a test to see um you know, and then the the teacher would you had certain requirements that you had to
do. You had to make it go up, had to make it go down, and then the teacher would look at it and say, "Oh, yes, you
maneuvered this machine to do these things." Um, and I took that one minute of film
and made it into a movie. Uh, and it was a movie that won like uh, you know, 20 25 awards, you
know, in every film festival in the world. And kind of changed the whole animation department. And and and
meanwhile, all the other guys were going, well, I wish I could make a movie. I wish there was a production
class. And so then I got into another class and it wasn't really a production class, but I managed to get some film
and I made a movie. And I made lots of movies while I was in school. while everybody else was running around
saying, "Oh, I wish I could make a movie. I wish they give me." Was always extremely curious about why people did
the things they do. Uh, and I was always very interested in in what motivates people and and um and telling stories
and building things. I've always been very into building things, whether they're chess sets or houses or cars or
whatever. And I like to put things together. And um so um when I was young from at least my teenage years they were
completely devoted to cars and that was the most important thing in my life. Uh from about ages of 14 to 20. Everybody
has talent and it's just a matter of moving around until you've discovered what it is. Um, a talent is a
combination of something you love a great deal, something you can lose yourself in, something you start at
9:00, look up from your work, and it's 10:00 at night. Uh, and um, also something that you have a
talent, not a talent for, but skills that you have a natural ability to do very well. Uh, and usually those two
things go together. Learning to make films is very easy. Learning what to make films about is very hard. And what
you really got to do is focus on learning as much about life and about the various aspects of it uh first and
then learn just the techniques of making a movie. Uh because that stuff you can pick up pretty quickly. But having a
really good understanding of history, literature, psychology, um sciences are very very important to
actually being able to to make movies. No matter how easy it looks on the outside,
um it is a very very difficult struggle. Um most people, you know, you don't see the struggle part of a person's life.
You only see the success they have. Um, but I haven't met anybody here at the academy or anywhere else that hasn't
been able to describe years and years and years of very very difficult struggle through the whole process of of
you know achieving anything whatsoever. So, um, and there's no way to sort of get around that. And the secret is just
not to give up hope. And it's very hard not to because if you're really doing something
worthwhile I think um I think you will be pushed to the brink of hopelessness before you come through the other side
and you just have to hang in through that. I've had much more down in my life than I've had up and much more struggle.
Um I mean I started a when I well oh first of all I went in the film school uh everybody said you know what are you
doing kind of complete dead end for a career because nobody has ever made it from a film school into the actual film
industry just you know maybe you go to work for Lockheed or some industrial company to do industrial films but
nobody actually made it into the entertainment business. I had no interest in going into the entertainment
business so I didn't really care. I was more interested in just doing films going back to San Francisco doing um you
know experimental films and that sort of thing and and maybe making documentaries and that that sort of thing. So I wasn't
I didn't care. Um then I finished school. I went to San Francisco and everybody said why are you going to San
Francisco? I said that's where I live. And they said you can't possibly work in the film business living in San
Francisco. And I said, well, that's I want to live where I want to live. And I will make films because I love to make
films. My first uh six years in the business was, you know, hopeless. And there's a lot of times
when you sit and you say, why am I doing this? I'll never make it. It'll just not it's not going to happen. It's just um
you know, I should really go out and get a real job and try to survive, you know, because I borrowed money from my
parents. I borrowed from money from my friends. side. I was sort of, you know, it didn't look like I was ever going to
actually be able to pay anybody back. This is a part of living. You do have to eat, pay a rent, and uh pay back your
friends who are supporting you. I mean, it took me years to get my first film off the ground. And uh as I I talk to
film students now especially I say the easiest job you'll ever get is to try to make your first film because that's the
easy one to get is the first film because nobody knows whether you can make a film or not. Uh you've made a
bunch of little projects. You've shown off you have talent and you talk real fast and you convince somebody that you
should be doing a feature and they let you do a feature. After you've done that feature, then you really have a heck of
a difficult time getting your second film off the ground because then they look at your first film and they go,
"Oh, well, we don't want you." I came from a very on guard documentary kind of film making uh world. I I like cinema
verite documentaries. I like nontory non character um tone poems uh that were being done in San Francisco at that time
and that's the film making that I was interested in. uh Francis Copela who was my mentor sort of he's a writer and uh
works with actors stage director and then said you got to learn how to do this and so I took him up on the
challenge wrote my own screenplays uh learn to write it took me three four years to get my from my first film to my
second film of banging on doors trying to get people to give me a chance uh you know writing struggling with no money in
the think, you know, working as a editor on the side, working as a cameraman on the side, getting little jobs, eking out
a living, trying to stay alive, uh, and pushing American graffiti. Um, I was still struggling with my I don't want to
be a writer, uh, syndrome. And um I had some good friends of mine that I wanted to write the screenplay, but um it took
me like two years just to get the money to do a screenplay and I got a little tiny amount of money. Uh and uh which I
had to go actually to the Can Film Festival to get uh on my own and um so finally I got this money. I called back
and I said, you know, I got the money, we can start working on the screenplay. And they said, oh, we don't want to do
that now. we got our own lowbudget picture off the ground and and we can't write it. I said, "Oh, no." And I said,
"What am I going to do? I'm in Europe and I'm not going to be back for like 3 months and I want to get this thing off
the ground." So, they recommended another student um from school that I knew pretty well and and uh I had a
story treatment that laid out the entire story scene by scene. And um so I called him up on the phone from London and I
said, "Do you want to do this?" And he said, "Okay." And um the person I was working with at that time
as a producer made a deal with him for the whole money because there wasn't very much. It was so tiny that you could
only get him to do it for the whole amount of money. When I came back from England, the screenplay was a completely
different screenplay from the story treatment. It was more like Hot Rods to Hell. It was very um fantasylike, you
know, with playing chicken and things that kids didn't really do. and um uh and I wanted something that was more
like the way I grew up. So, I took that and I said, "Okay, now here I am. I've got a deal to turn in a screenplay. I
got a screenplay that is just not the kind of screenplay I want at all." Uh and I have no money and I spent the very
last money I had saved up to go to Europe to make the deal. Um so, I had nothing. And um that
was a very dark period for me. So, I sat down myself and wrote the screenplay. I kept getting phone calls from uh
producers saying, you know, I hear you're great. I I'd made a film called THX, which had no story and no character
really. It's kind of an Avagard film. And so, I had all these producers calling me saying, I hear you're really
good at material that doesn't have story. I've got a record album I want you to make into a movie. Uh or um you
know, things like that. And um uh they were offering me a lot of money. uh and uh but they were terrible
projects and so I had to constantly turn down vast sums of money while I was starving writing a screenplay for free
that I didn't like to write because I hated writing. Um but I did finish it and I did write the screenplay and
eventually I got a deal to make the movie. Uh and then I after I finally got that then my friends came back in and
did a rewrite on it. But it was a very dark period and I could have very easily just taken the money and gone off and
done one of these really terrible movies. Um, and I don't know what that would have done for my career. But um,
there's, you know, when the times are hard like that, you simply have to say this is what I want to do. I want to
make my movie. I don't want to take the money. And you just walk forward step by step and get through it somehow. And I
got through um, actually only took me about three weeks to write that script. And I just every day would sit down at
8:00 in the morning and I'd write until about 8:00 at night and I just said I'm going to finish this as painful as it is
and um I'm not going I'm going to ignore these phone calls of lure of riches and get through this. After graffiti and it
was successful, it was a big moment for me because I really did sit down to myself
and say, "Okay, now I am a director. Now I know I can get a job. I know I can work in this
industry and apply my trade and express my ideas on things and uh be creative in a way that I enjoy. Uh even if it's, you
know, I go down to end up doing TV commercials or something uh or I fall back into what I really love is
documentaries. Um I'll be able to do it. I can know I can get a job somewhere. I know I can raise money somewhere. I know
I can do what I want to do. That was a very good feeling because I know I at that point I'd made it. There wasn't
anything in my life that was going very difficult time. my first two pictures and um when I started working on Star
Wars uh my second film American Graffiti had not come out yet and um so um in the beginning it wasn't something anybody
was interested in and um I had taken it to a couple of studios and they had turned it down and then one um studio
executive saw American Graffiti and loved it u and I took him the proposal uh he said uh you know I don't
understand this but uh I think you're a great filmmaker and I'm going to invest in you. I'm not going to invest in this
project. And uh and that's really how it got made. American Graffiti was really my first attempt at doing something um
uh mainstream so to speak. And um even it was so one it was in a genre that was looked down upon uh but I loved when I
was a kid. Uh it was about my life as I grew up. I cared about it a lot. And then on top of it, it was in a style
that was um was different from what everybody was used to. It was intercutting four stories that didn't
relate to each other, which nobody really done before. Uh now it's sort of the standard fair for television. Um and
um it had music all the way through it. Uh not just score, but actual um uh songs from the period. And that is
something that nobody done before. And they they just sort of described it as a musical montage with no characters and
no story. And so it's very very hard to get that off the ground. And on top of that, it was a a bee movie. I almost got
it uh set up at American International Pictures where they liked doing those kinds of movies. Uh but it was too
strange for them in terms of the style. uh and uh Star Wars was kind of the same situation where it was a genre they
weren't that interested in. Science fiction was not something that uh did well at the box
office. It dealt with robots and and Wookies and and things that um you know generally most
people they couldn't read it and say I understand what this is all about. they just were completely confused by it. And
um really on top of that, it was it was aimed at being a young film for young people and uh most of the studios said,
"Look, that's Disney's Disney does that. The rest of us can't do that. So we don't want to get in that area." Uh so I
had so many strikes against me when I did that. I was lucky that I found a studio executive that just believed in
me as a filmmaker and just disregarded the material itself. I was working with a with a British editor and the scenes
would come back and I'd go on the weekends and look at the scenes with the editor and they just they weren't
working and I was, you know, very down about the whole situation. So, I went in myself on
Sundays and started recutting the movie. Um, the editing wasn't obviously bad, but it just wasn't working and I
couldn't quite figure out what was going on. I mean, it was either I was doing a terrible job directing this thing or
something else. And I, as I started to cut the film together, I realized that I was making cuts that were, you know, a
foot away from where the editor had been making them. And I'd been using the same p takes that that I'd given him, but I
was just just slightly moving it ever so slightly in one direction. and it suddenly clicked in and started working
which was a great relief to me cuz for up to that point I was feeling very desperate about the whole situation. I
made a pact with myself that I was going to make all three movies and in order to do that as I started to make my deal
with 20th Century Fox um I acquired the sequel rights because I didn't want them to bury the sequel. I wanted to make
these movies and I was determined to make these movies regardless of whether they wanted to or the movie made any
money or not. And then uh I got the merchandising rights which weren't anything at the time because
there was no such thing as merchandising on movies. Some TV stuff but not movies. Uh their lifespan is just too short. Um,
but I figured I could make posters, I could make t-shirts, and you know, I could publicize the movie and hopefully
people would go see it. And because the studio you you everything is sort of a a struggle again to survive, which is the
studio won't put enough money into your movie to get it into the theaters to do the advertising. So, I will say, well, I
can't I don't have any money. I don't have anything, but I can maybe make a t-shirt deal and I can maybe make a
poster deal and I can maybe get these out at science fiction conventions and things before the movie comes out and
promote the movie. So, I did it as sort of self-preservation. I think for most creative people, they don't like others
looking over their shoulders saying, you know, why don't you make that green? Why don't you make that blue? Why are you
doing this? Why are you doing that? I don't like that. Don't don't put that in there. you know, I want to um you know,
it's sort of like Michelangelo and the pope in terms of doing the cysteine chapel. It's a very irritating thing and
I'm sure Michelangelo is very irritated with the pope. And so, you get you try to get yourself into a situation where
you only have to answer to yourself where you can ask advice of people, you know, and sort of work with your peers
and and mentors and things to try to do the best job that you can possibly do. There's nothing worse than the
frustration of having somebody who you feel doesn't get what you're doing trying to turn it into something else.
Uh, and it's a very very annoying and sort of frustrating thing and I just never wanted to go through it. I was
very fortunate as I came up through the film business that I was able to uh insulate myself from that. Occasionally
I get a studio recutting my movie at the very end. Uh, but I would always fight and get it eventually even if years
later get it cut back. Um but it comes out of film school I think uh where um the the the primacy of the creative
process in terms of making a making a film is what you live for. You know it's not a business. It's a it's it's trying
to create something interesting that you're proud of and and try out creative ideas that may seem really off-the-wall
may work may not work. Success is a very difficult thing. It's much more difficult than one might think. And um
uh when I first had a successful movie which was American Graffiti, fortunately it wasn't it was huge but it wasn't so
huge in terms of monetary um uh things and um and it came so slowly that I was able to assimilate it
a little bit. Star Wars was much more difficult. Uh and I had a lot of friends who had been very had become very
successful and they said, "Boy, watch out boy. When that one hits, you're really going to be thrown for a loop." I
said, "Oh, no, no. I I went through American graffiti. I can handle this. I know, you know, but when Star Wars
finally, you know, the reality of it hit and all of the intended things that go on around it hit. Um, psychologically,
it's a very, very difficult thing to cope with. And, um, you really need time after an event like that in your life,
especially if it comes very fast, uh, to assimilate what it is h that's happened to you and how everybody relates to you
and how your life is. Here you spent your whole life just begging and you know using every means at your disposal
to get one person or two people to say yes to your project or say yes to yes I'll do this yes you know and then
suddenly everybody says yes suddenly everybody wants you to do everything and anything you want and uh it's then you
have to start learning how to say no and uh tons of opportunities come your way wonderful opportunities and you
just you but you can't do them all if you start doing them all u your life gets very unfocused. Uh you get
overwhelmed and you collapse basically. Uh and uh you know your feelings of invincibility and stuff sort of turn
into a morass of depression and it it you know I've seen it happen to a lot of people and I went through it myself. It
just it's unavoidable if you're successful. Uh and no matter how much you think you can deal with it, you know
you can't. I've discovered that most critics themselves are cinematically illiterate. They don't really know much
about movies. They don't know the history. They don't know the technology. They don't know anything. So for them to
try to analyze it, they're lost. But your friends usually know what they're doing and they can they can critique the
technical side of things to say this doesn't work. You you're putting the cart before the horse, this kind of
stuff. Um and then the rest of it is what you like, you know. Uh it's a personal, you know, it's in the eye of
the beholder. You know, I like this movie. I don't like this movie. There's a lot of movies that are badly made that
I love. There's a lot of movies that are just beautifully made, but I don't like them. And critics have a tendency to
that's all they focus on, which is I like it, I don't like it. It's good, it's bad. Uh, and it doesn't work that
way. And so, you really have to not deal with that part of what happens. It's the same thing uh with the the audience. Uh,
you know, I've made some movies that have, you know, 10 people have gone seen. Nobody wanted to go see the movie.
Uh, and some films that the people who went and saw them didn't like it. Probably, you know, maybe a half a dozen
dozen of us actually like the movies. But that's fine. If I like it, then I'm happy with it. And you have to sort of
accept that no matter what if nobody else likes it. You know, you you you know, you're not going to stay in
business uh the business of making movies very long because you need the resources in order to keep going. So,
you have to try to find a niche audience or some kind of an audience that has the same likes, dislikes, and aesthetic
sensibilities that you have. I think one of the reasons that Stephen and I um have been as successful as we have is
because we like the movies. We like to go to the movies. We enjoy movies and we want to make movies like the ones we
enjoy. We want to be able to uh entertain the audience. We want to able to startle the audience. We want to be
able to blow the audience away and say, have them walk out of the theater saying, "Whoa, that was fantastic. I was
really uh moved by that." Um um that's where part of the fun of it is. Uh and um you know, you you want
people to think, you want people to be emotionally moved. Uh and um there's uh theory behind that in terms of
storytelling. It's been around for thousands of years. Um and um that's where something like live theater or
live performance is something that is very valuable because you get instant feedback from your from your audience
and you kind of know the the things that work and the things that don't work. Um that's the advantage that um you know
the the Greek storytellers had and Shakespeare had that us in the film industry are are is harder to come by
which is you know to be able to see see an audience reaction and then adjust to what works. So you have to use your
experience of sitting through a lot of movies. I don't ever see movies by myself. I always see them with other
people um because I want to know what works. I want to know where they laugh. I want to know where they don't laugh. I
want to know what they think about it afterwards. Uh because in the end that's that's the art that I'm working with is
is um you know trying to communicate in a way that is effective and and people react to. Uh so I can't
ignore the the the people I'm technology um uh as
um sometimes a mean sometimes an end to things and it isn't an end in certain case in the movie business movie the
movie business I mean the movie the the the act of creating in the art form of movies the craft of movies is completely
technical that's all it is it's a big technical thing as opposed to writing a book or something which is partially
technical. I mean, the writing part, the using the different pens, the different papers, that was all a big deal as you
went back. The first printing press, binding books, paperback books, cheap books for a lot of people. That's all
technology that allows the writer to reach a better audience uh and sometimes uh to um in the case of painters as
opposed to writers uh express themselves more clearly. A lot of painters, Michelangelo, a lot of painters in the
past were very adept at mixing colors and coming up with new colors so they could express things in new ways. Um the
technology of brushes and all those things were very important to how they applied their craft. Um same thing in
movies only it's you know 100fold. Uh the first movies they just put up a camera and had a train come into a train
station and everybody was amazed and that was sort of all technology. Just look at the technology. But as it grew,
it grew into more of an art form and much more sophisticated than that. And what we've been doing ever since then,
whether we add sound or whether we add color or whether we use digital technology is simply a way of broadening
the canvas so that we have more colors to work with. As it started out, it was, you know, cave paintings uh just and
they're very very beautiful and very significant. But as you get along the the technology of using canvas of
or you know sculpting in different kinds of material um suddenly it all advances to a point where it gets very
sophisticated uh and you can tell much more interesting stories and you can express yourself more clearly. Um, and
that's what's happening today. And that's why all artists are constantly pushing the technology of their medium
to be able to widen the the range that they can use their imagination. The area that has the most range at this point,
one would is probably literature and always has because it's it's the key to uh the mind and it's very direct. So uh
as you uh and there it just depends on paper and how you manage to use your words. Um but theater I mean Shakespeare
most of Shakespeare is written around the technology of the day and they do things are staged in a certain way and
written in a certain way in order to deal with the limitations of the stage of the flickering candle light and
of the rowdy audiences and and how do you get people off the sc off the stage and get new people on the stage if you
don't have a curtain and those kinds of things. So in a lot of ways the artist is restricted a great deal by the
technology of the medium that he's working in and um in film because the nature of it is and is so technological
the artist has been the most restricted in what he can do. Uh and uh digital technology and the new the new kinds of
things we're working with today that we're pushing forward allows you to to tell a bigger story and use more
imagination uh than you're able you were able to do in the past. my life is making movies and I like storytelling
and um I've got a lot of stories that are stored up in my head that I hope to get out be uh before my time is up. And
so for me looking at it just a matter of you know how can I get through all the stories in the amount of time I have
left and my dream is that I get to do it. I would like to see our society mature and um become more rational and
more knowledge based, less emotionbased. Um I'd like to see education
uh play a larger role in our daily lives. Um and um you know have people come to a a
larger understanding a bigger picture understanding of uh how we fit into the world and how we fit into the universe.
Uh not necessarily um thinking of ourselves but thinking of others. I guess the advantage that that
my generation had is when we were in film school and we were starting in the film business, the door was absolutely
locked and there was a very very high wall and nobody got in. Therefore, all of us uh beggars and scramers down at
the front gate uh decided that if if we didn't sort of band together, we wouldn't survive. And
that if one could make it, that one would help all the others make it and we would continue to help each other. So,
we banded together. I mean that's that's how caveman figured it out. Any society starts that way. Any
society begins by realizing that together by helping each other you can survive better than if you fight each
other and compete with each other. If I got a job, I would help somebody else get a job. If somebody got more
successful than me, it was partly my success. I wasn't My success wasn't based on how I could push down everybody
that was around me. My success was based on how much I could push everybody up. And eventually they their success was
the same way. And in the process they pushed me up and I pushed them up and we kept doing that. And we still do that.
And even though we all have in essence competing companies, we see it as if everybody
succeeds or my friend succeeds then everybody succeeds. So that that and that's the key to it is to have
everybody succeed not to gloat over somebody else's failure. One of the basic motifs of fairy tales is that you
find the poor and fortunate along the side of the road and when they beg for help, if you give it to them, you end up
succeeding. If you don't give it to them, you end up being turned into a frog or something. So, it's something
that's been around for thousands of years, a concept that's been around for thousands of years. And it is even more
necessary today when people are much more uh into their own in grandisement than they are in helping other people. I
mean the one thing about you here at the academy here uh is constantly about public service about helping others. I
don't think there's anybody who's become successful that doesn't understand how important it is to be part of the larger
community to help other people in larger community to give back to the community. And it's not something you do you start
doing when you've made it. Now I'm on the top. I can sort of uh enhance my joy and and self-esteem by helping the poor
underlings. It's when you are at the very lowest level and you're struggling. When we were in film school and stuff,
we were all very, very poor. We were all very, very struggling. We all need jobs very desperately. And if one of us
couldn't get a particular job, we'd send another friend in on the interview because we were hoping that one of us
would get the job. And um so you do it right from the very beginning. you can start every single day uh you know
whether it's helping your brother or sister uh or helping your peers at school uh or helping in the community.
But it's not just it's not just a kind of public service thing. It's a way of life. If America is the pursuit of
happiness, the best way to pursue happiness is to help other people because there's nothing else that'll
make you happy. You can be as rich and famous and powerful as you want to be and it will not bring you happiness. And
that's said over and over and over again. It's such a cliche that it's hardly goes it hardly needs to be said,
but people don't understand that it's actually true. And you can find people rich,
powerful, and famous. Uh, and they aren't happy. And you can find people who have
discovered the fact that it's really helping people. It's really being compassionate toward other human beings
that makes you happy. that gives you a spiritual fulfillment, a kind of fulfillment that goes way beyond
anything that you can buy. Um uh and I say it's this is a 5,000-y old idea and u every prophet, every intelligent,
rational, successful person has said it and u it's a very very simple idea. Um, and after a lot of struggling and sort
of reflection, I realized that the the time you have to give is is now, regardless of how old you
are. Um, and it's it's kind of a realization because one, it's kind of you mean I'm in that position already.
It's sort of a way of saying, "Oh my gosh, I'm a I'm I'm one of them. I'm one of those old guys that gives libraries
to schools and things and here I'm only 20 or 27 and um um I think I've seen again a lot of people go through this
who are working so hard they wake up one day and realize that those things that they say I'll do that someday I'll do
that someday. Well that someday is today. Uh and if you have the means uh to do it then this is the time to do
it. Um, and uh, it's a little hard to do when you're building up your uh, your nest egg, so to speak, your your
security blanket to give give it away, you know, and my feeling is you can't give the time away. You should give, you
know, part of your resources away. The the film world is a buzz because of the fact that you're going to work for and
with Francis Ford Copa with with Yeah. Yes. Let me Let me correct that. Uh and um you said
somewhere that you you were very fond of the Godfather but not of Apocalypse Now. That interests me.
I think it was not enough money in in Apocalypse. What?
Not enough money. No, it was, you know, 40 million uh in a picture. That was only what was
the payroll of uh American embassy in Saigon for one afternoon. Oh, I see. So to if he was going on the
money way, it's not $4 million, which is not enough. It was maybe $40 billions. Then he can maybe reach what was the
American war in Vietnam about. Mhm. And if not, if he has not for 40 billion billions dollar, then he better do a two
or three million pictures. I'm almost certain that I see the point. I'm sure you do. That Yes,
that reminds me of It's not a question. Very often in picture they oppose art to money. Mhm. And very often people think
they can they try very hard they think of themsel as artist and they try very hard to not to be linked with money to
be separated to be independent from money. I don't think so art is not independent from economy but on the
reverse economy is not independent from heart. I remember speaking with uh being invited in uh in uh Mr. Blue Dawn, the
head of Parammont and girlfriend Weston and I said that to me you are not independent of art Mr.
Bludon and he said yes and we went into his timing room and it was full of Picasso and Renoir.
Obviously it was not independent from art. Do you assume that he put those there or that the designer did?
Well, nevertheless, they were there. They were there. It was no need. I mean, art and economy are the both side of the
same medal. Mhm. Well, Picasso was not uninterested in money, was he? Of course, I'm not. No, I like money. I
think uh the money things is the only way you can have great fun in making movies. To
spend money a different way than your dad is has told you. Yeah. And this is very hard. You you became really
independent when you have the power to spend the money for the movie at your own timing, the way you want to. No, the
way the movie needs it to. Uhhuh. Uh does that mean you if you want to take three years to go back and forth?
Sure. You should have that freedom. I mean the best example is Sharplin. It t took him uh between seven and eight
years to deliver every movie and that's why maybe why they were so strong and and uh praised by all over the world.
Mhm. How do you see the the controversy which has blown over pretty much by now, but the idea of Vanessa Redgrave being
cast as the you know that there was a tremendous slap as we say about that and uh it
seems to me most of the arguments about it missed some essential points but if only because it distracted from the
work so much you it was hard to I don't understand what does that mean does not everyone on the right to be in a
concentration camp. What I mean I I mean from what I heard, why Vanessa can't be in a in a movie
playing uh why not? Because she's supporting PLO. That was the idea. Yes. And that it
so upset the the lady she played for one thing that uh No, I don't understand. She's a good actress, a good girl and uh
it was mainly maybe she'll understand better a support of PLO by playing this character.
Right or wrong? Well, right or wrong, but you need first there is nothing like one image. An image is always a link
between the result of the shock of two images. Mhm. Um, you wouldn't would you say that the
the personal feelings of the woman she played play a role in this or were important or should have been considered
above? She probably did. She did because she's an honest actress. Yeah. Uh, but the woman she played
wanted her out of it. And well, but maybe let's ask people would say she's suffered enough being in the
cast of that. Then let's ask the woman to try to play it and if if she's better than Vanessa.
That would be or maybe let's got the woman before trying to make a test and to play well an unknown Palestinian
woman and maybe it will change your point of view. Then you have to it's like any it's unlike any other situation
because there's never been anything like the concentration camps. You almost have to have separate rules for that subject
and every other subject. Yeah, that's what we said about why are people afraid by images? An image is something very I
mean it's not dangerous. You can you just have to study. If it's wrong, you do another one. It's like
it's like justice. I mean you work on experiment and then you have the good evidence. But even one evidence is not
enough. It has to be opposed to the other evidence and then the justice come from little to little.
I must ask you this before so I don't leave it out. Much is made of your peculiar way of photographing a scene
and and there are times when it looks like the camera got loose and wandered away in the middle of a
conversation. And you have talked uh in a way that intrigues me but I don't understand it about space the space
between two characters. You talk about Velasquez as the painter sometimes became uh more interested in the spaces
between people than the people themselves. I don't get it, but I'd like to. Well,
communication is being between. Mhm. So, I think the to be between is the only way to to go to the people. If you
start from one point maybe it's too strong like in this case between the Jewish woman Vanessa case because it's
too strong you have to start between and a camera I mean this camera is between us that's because of that that we can
talk to each other if not if the camera just or I use an image I mean uh to go from one station to another one you need
a train I think movies are are the train, not the station. And I feel myself as being more
as a train and less than a station. And that's an explanation why I'm less anguished because I'm not waiting
anymore for the train. It all seems to fit together. Could you illustrate it with us? If this scene
were about you and me talking, I mean, if that were the scene, it would not surprise me in one of your movies if in
the middle of that the camera were to examine the plants behind us. No, just look at the face of some nice people
here. Oh, but the space that is literally between us is this space in here. Yeah,
but this space is ugly. So, it has no Well, we we don't have blue money to decorate it with pictures. No, it's not
it's not real space. I mean, space is a is a time you need to go to someone else.
Okay. If uh what do you think of Trufo's latest
movies? Well, frankly, uh, frankly, I think it's, uh, but I'll compare to another
French movie maker is we hated by that time and I think he he still doesn't like it's CLA
and I think uh since we were friend 20 25 years ago, rather close friend well then I can see time and
space because uh it has nothing with me in common and and I've probably nothing with him in common. We say he somehow
lost you as a viewer. Total stranger. So I really wonder how can he deliver such a film today which is very successful in
France today and never been successful as he is. Why can't Americans make better movies
as you see it? Oh, they can. They can, but they don't probably don't want. Why?
I don't know. They must uh maybe they feel too comfortable at home and
uh and to create you have to go out of your room and to come back maybe but you have to go
out once or another. I mean uh and probably they don't want most of the movie makers in my it's my opinion I
mean they don't need movies uh they want to be in the business which is a quite a good reason. Mhm. Because
it's an easy business and uh but they don't they don't need really a movie to well to bring to someone else even to
one people. I know that from myself. That's why I'm I consider myself more as a
doctor or as a patient and the movie more like a e x-ray so I can show whether my disease or my
health to someone else and if he likes me like to help me to be cured or or to go or to go on. So there is an image of
myself and I needed to speak to someone. It's not possible if I if not possible to
communicate directly with words without images or just by uh uh touching but you can't touch everyone uh like that all
the day. No leads to problems. I don't know but I never and there's only a minute remaining. What was the last time
you saw what you thought was a great American film? as uh the latest one I see which is a
very good one was Martin Scoses Alice doesn't live here anymore which I think think is a great American films.
Why did that please you more than others? Well, it's too long to explain and I
have to explain or to criticize it but with images and sound just not by words which is
difficult. If not you you you do statements. Mhm. And I don't want to make statesment. Okay. In 20 seconds, I
heard the most mysterious thing about you that there was a part you had in the movie. And if you couldn't, you wanted
either Diane Keaton or Robert Dairo to play it. Uh yes. And I made a mistake because I
saw them both and I proposed both for the same part. And they say the one who will say yes, then it will be a male
character and if she was it will be a female charact. But they were puzzled. Uh-huh. They didn't understand because a
character is just to me it's a move or a motivation. It can be played by a woman, a man or a child or an animal sometimes.
Yeah. Does it bother you when they say he's a great innovator and groundbreaker, but other people must go
on from where he is. That he's not a great filmmaker. I don't understand that that you your
innovations are brilliant but that the films as a whole are are always mysterious and
disturbing in some way. Maybe it was too much but I think nowadays it will not be that way. So they are wrong saying that
now they're now they're wrong. Now they are wrong in the new film. Very fast. Good night to you. Thank you. Thank you.
[Music] [Applause] [Music]
[Applause] [Music] [Applause]
[Music] Across the channel from Sir Richard Adenboro, director Louis Maul has
established himself as not only a giant of French cinema, but a European filmmaker of world renown. He quite
simply makes classic movies. The Last Metro still grips us with taught drama. Arvo lefons is Mal's haunting childhood
memory of German occupied France. Atlantic City and My Dinner with Andre will be screened as long as there are
projectionists. Lumal's next movie is called Damage. It comes from Josephine Hart's bestselling novel and we're
pleased to welcome him here this evening. Thank you for coming. You option Damage when it was still in Gs.
Well, she she sent it to me, Josephine Hart. She she asked her agent to give it to me and uh so it was about 4 months
before before it was published. I think there was already a lot of interest in the What struck you about what was it
about this story of of an obsessed love that turns a man from a life of conservatism and order and uh solid
reputation into an obsession with an affair. A study of classic story, isn't it? Study of chaos. So, it's like a
Greek tragedy. Uh, I thought it was uh incredibly difficult to do, which is always something that interests me. Um,
and uh, I'd not dealt with anything like that for some time. A very disturbing and even shocking
uh, tale of uh, you know, what love can do to to us. Let me just talk about this. I'll lay it out. You lay it out
for me. Uh Steven, played by Jeremy Irons, is a 40-ish member of parliament, uh a conservative member of parliament,
and he meets a woman. Pick up the story as to what happened to him and and and then because
I'm interested in how you communicate what you wanted to communicate about this obsession.
Well, you know, I I'm not sure I want to answer you because because I think it's the the advantage of being a filmmaker
that you don't have to to explain yourself in words. Actually, this is a the script for instance written by David
Hair has very little dialogue. It's uh things happen and especially with her eyes in a
sort of mysterious way and you know it's it's the sort of the classic uh love at first sight. uh they meet in a boring
reception at the French embassy and uh they uh she comes to him to say that uh she says I to introduce myself uh I'm a
friend of your son and uh then they start looking at each other a little more than they should and uh the I was
trying to make the point that their both their lives was just about to change you know and and then It it goes on. I mean,
it's not in one scene. Then uh they meet again and then then she calls him and uh and he says he says uh uh give me your
address. I'll be there in an hour. I'll be there in an hour. And he does. And and and that starts his torid
relationship. It start it's a torid relationship at the same time because he's he's a essentially a good man. He's
also of course tortured because he's you know destroying his family. It's his son's his son his wife fiance that he's
having this affair you know he's used to live a very sort of clean and respectable but here's my point I know
you don't want to talk about this but let me try one more time here's it must it what you've got to do is show why
these two people she are entering to this crossing this divide and entering into this place where they are I mean
they really are saying goodbye to a lot of things and creating a lot of dangerous uh for themselves and he's
giving up order and reputation and everything else. It's his brother's fe. I mean, you have got to show why they
are so obsessed with each other in order to make it work, right? Well, I it's rather difficult because, you know,
um it happened to a number of friends of mine is who fell fell in love with first glance and somebody and then risked
their career and everything because of this. Yeah, I've seen that happen. people sort of drop out and and uh um
but uh but it's not it's very difficult to explain rationally by definition. It's something that uh you would explain
after it happened but on not on the moment and my I I had to I try to show that of
course it was like a magnetic attraction and and sexual attraction but also that there might be an element of
self-destruction in this relationship. Well, it clearly is on both sides and uh and it's uh it's it's bound to end uh
tragically and they both know it and uh and it's it's a lot about pleasure but it's there's a a certain amount of
uh I don't know violence and despair in it. You think a Frenchman is better this is an English story but somehow because
it's love and passion a French director is better able to do this. Well, I'm I'm not sure about that, but I can tell you
that I work with this wonderful English writer, David Hair, and who wrote my Miss Saigon, did he? No, no, he he he
wrote plenty. He wrote a number of great plays, and he's also a director. And uh when we got to those scenes, we
discussed them, but uh he refused to write them. He said, "Well, you know, I'm English. This is not my terrain.
This is all for you, Lou. Good luck. Good luck." I didn't write them. Uh, we improvise them with the actors. All
right, set this scene up. This is Jeremy Iron playing Steven with the the young woman, and I think it ends with she's
saying she's a damaged person. Set up the scene for me. Well, it's a scene after uh it's rather at the beginning,
but uh it's when he's really hooked and uh there's been before that a scene um a family dinner, which was a little
difficult for him. All right. And uh then uh he because his son who was a fiance is there and all that. His son
was you know a wonderful young man and so he follows her home and he comes to see her and uh they have a they sort of
grab each other and they're a rather warm you know love scene. And then after that, you know, they're on the bed and
they talk and uh she talks about her brother and we'll know later that the brother has been a real trauma of her
childhood because he was desperately in love with her and committed suicide. So she's a damaged person and a survivor
and that's and she she's very honest because she warns him that she's trouble. Yeah. Roll tape. Here it is.
You see, if you can imagine the worst thing that could
happen ever in the whole of your life, well, that happened to me. My brother killed himself over me.
I had to decide. I made up my mind because I could have gone
under, but I wasn't going to. Remember, damaged people are
dangerous. They know they can survive. Yeah, that's nice.
Um, may I turn to Is it a true story that that when you met your wife, um, there was a 5-hour lunch at the Russian
tea room? Yes, it's true. Yes. Yeah. A very long lunch. And love was the the the customers for dinner were coming in
and she suddenly remembered she had to go to the ballet with friends. And so we uh yeah well that's that was pretty much
that I I think at the end of this afternoon we knew pretty much it was not as violent and desperate as damages but
uh but u but we knew that something had happened that it was uh it was u forever.
Alice Arland, a friend I think uh has said that between the two of you uh it's like she would be the only possible
person for you and you the only possible person for her. There was this sense of to know the both of you that
Well, I know this that's it's terribly nice to say that because uh Candace is somebody extraordinary so
I'm very flattered. But uh um I think so because uh I had been married once and uh I was decided never
to marry again and uh Candy had been you know this has been this was a really sudden
and uh you know it's it's really interesting because uh we sort of knew each other without knowing each other
feeling and uh we would meet in social you dinners or whatever and sort of almost avoid each other. I think and
we've often talked about it. I think what happens is we knew that we shouldn't fool
around the maybe the moment was not had not come but we had to uh uh you know I think we knew I think we knew and for
for quite a few years and then as one day I called her and invited her to lunch and well this long lunch and you
really knew then best lunch you've ever had best And then there was a daughter. Uh, and
now you spend a lot of your life in Paris and she spends a lot of hers in Los Angeles. And then you get together
and and and somehow that works. Well, it works. Yes. uh you know it's not that
uh I I would I would suggest the the I've tried to suggest the producers of Murphy Brown
to shoot it in Paris but uh can't Murphy goes on location FYI comes to Paris actually when I'm not
working I'm I'm I'm spend a lot of time in Los Angeles like I'm doing now but uh after damage but uh and they spend the
summer in in France But uh you know she's uh stuck there for for a while because
uh I was happy to to read that Cheers was off the air because uh after 11 years so it means it may only be 11
years. That's right. Hope Murphy will make after 11 years you may get her back. The um a couple of quick things.
One is that you had a battle with the sensors on this thing. And they gave you an NC17. Uh, and you said at that point,
I'll never cut this film. And I did. And you did. Yeah. Shame on me. Shame on you. Well, 7 seconds you cut, right?
Yeah. Well, we changed the order of a scene and we did a little monkey business, but uh basically uh
fortunately, it's the same scene and and they accepted the the chant and gave us an R. had not realized because uh that
NC7 was such a disaster. Means anybody on 17 can't come to the film. Well, it's No, it's it's just that they they used
to call it X, which means, you know, this is pornography, which I thought was I don't think the damage has anything to
do with pornography, but uh and they they changed the name. They called it NC17, which technically means forbidden
under 17, but actually people look at it still as an X. So, it doesn't work for us. And you know, especially I I'm very
proud of damage and and I hated them to uh sort of the stigma of uh you know, I it was not it was not right.
Yeah. We Americans sometimes get obsessed by sex. Uh which you Frenchmen, I suspect, think we're a little bit
prudish, don't you? While No, I I I think it's it's different for instance. It's what what strikes me as a nudity is
a better word, not sex. What strikes me Yes. as a as a foreigner as a foreigner who lives here all the time. I know is
this uh yes there's a taboo on nudity and uh where it seems like uh violence is completely uh acceptable
you know I don't know it's the uh national rifle association I know but uh but it's it's really like that it's
sometime I must say if I was a sensor there are certain things certain violence that I think would be much more
obscene than any nudity you'll Exactly. I agree. Uh, next project, is it underway or are you still in in the
process of No, I'm I'm just going to to take uh time off. I'm I'm getting very uh lazy and I might I'm even considering
retiring. Oh, sure. And live in Los Angeles. Yeah. It's a long way from being a cameraman for um for Jacqu
Gusta, wouldn't it? It's a long way, but uh well, you know, some people think my films are a little sort of Yeah. under
well I read that somewhere someone sent it but look at this when you look this is a filmography which is a sort of like
a bibliography and look at this from 1953 to 1992 uh Alamo Bay and Lome Lucen Pretty Baby
Atlantic City I did it with Andre Crackers thank you for coming to have you Louis Maul thank you for joining us
we'll see you tomorrow night tomorrow a special broadcast of an hour with NBC News anchor Tom
Brokaw see you on Friday from Carry to body double, Brian De Pal is recognized as the master of the psychological
thriller, but he's also won over audiences and critics alike with comedies like Wise Guys and action
dramas like Scarface with his new film Raising Kane. He again treats audiences to the nightmare world of the mind. And
we are very pleased to have him join us now to talk about that and some other things. Welcome. Nice to meet you. Uh
let me talk about what is on every what everybody every article that's written about you as you know they're looking
and they're saying what you know they want to compare this and look at this and ask about you coming off of Bonfire
the Vanities. Let me at least begin there. True. Uh there's been a book written about it called what uh was
Devil's Candy. Devil's Candy by Julie Solomon who writes for Wall Street Journal.
for once for me what the hell happened with Bonfire the Vanity so that I can then put it in perspective of where you
are now with this film and go on and talk about it well it's almost the classic Hollywood story and I who have
always felt that I was sort of outside the system and could always make it work for me just fell completely uh
vulnerable to it in the sense that I had a movie that had a kind of a large budget so I thought well how am I going
to make this big kind of expansive bonfire part of the vanities and then I proceeded to try to figure out ways in
order to make the characters a little more likable so you might go to a broader audience and then I made
decisions down the line like that. Consequently, I completely violated the text of the book basically. What what I
admire about you is many things as you know but what I especially admire about you is how straightforward you have been
in saying exactly what you have said. Now so many people will say when they make a movie that's not so good. Well,
it was I thought it was pretty good or it wasn't my fault, it was somebody else's fault. You have said, as you just
said, I wish I had done it differently. Well, I made the classic mistake, which is to to change the text that I loved so
much, right? And I changed it to a point that nobody liked it because you wanted to make it more attractive in your mind
at that time to a wider audience. Yeah. You wanted to make the characters a little more likable. I mean, because
Sherman McCoy was nothing likable by Sherman McCoy. No, Asher. McCoy was an arrogant aristocrat and a very unlikable
character. Hanks was your choice or was he already was that clearly the director's call or was that the studio's
call? It's always the director's call. Casting is always a director's call. Absolutely. I mean, you may think, well,
maybe it really should be somebody else. But if you're going to go with this particular vision and it was my idea as
much as anybody's and I ultimately make the final decision. So, you can't say, well, it was a studio or people were
making me do this or making it do that. And I think what's interesting about the book in the sense that why Julie was
sort of invited in to write about it because I've been constantly asked questions over the years about well did
the studio make you do this or did the studio make you do that and it was like the reporters were writing about MGM in
the 30s and 40s and they had no sort of contemporary idea of what the system of making movies is like today. And I
thought, well, here's a chance to let them see what it's like, for better or for worse. I clearly I have done some
bad interviews. Uh, and I never go into an interview intending to do a bad interview. Uh, and you clearly went into
this intending to make a terrific film. Nobody tries to make a bad movie. When did you know this was not going to turn
out good? I guess basically when we started to preview it
and you know we sort of got all kinds of negative responses from the audience and then of course but what not before then
when you just watched it alone. Oh no no you get Oh no no you get into the you don't think you've made a bad movie and
I will say to this day this movie the way I made it is an interesting movie that I like. It is not Tom Wolf's
Bonfire of the Vanities. So, it's really bad in comparison to what it might have been. Absolutely. And in comparison to
what the novel was. It's like reinterpreting a Shakespeare play and setting it all in uh you know, the Trump
Tower or something. It's a complete different interpretation. The problem is that everybody that wrote about Yeah.
the movie read the book and consequently their first perception was this is ridiculous. It's nothing like the book I
like. Is it true that Spielberg turned down the opportunity to direct this or not? You know, have you read that? I
Okay, I I read that and they said that the reason he turned it down and others turned it down was because they thought
it was impossible to make and they were probably right and I proved it. All right then.
So, you make this bonfire the vanities and every except for a few people that love you dearly, not many people like
it. The ones that love me dearly. Worse, you've got this reporter from the Wall Street Journal who's been walking
through this thing as you did it. So, you know, there's going to be a book as well as a film. So, in the end, you see
this film, you get all of this review. So, what does Brian de Palama do then? What do you do? Where do you go? What do
you say? Do you want to hide? Do you want to go away for a year? What do you want to do? You want to, you know,
basically go in bed and pull the covers over your head, knock them out as long as possible because David Lean, after
Ryan's daughter, did not make another film for 10 years. 14. 14 years. 14 years. You know the story of every bad.
Yes, I do. No, you basically want to hide because, you know, it's like all your instincts seemed wrong. Nothing you
did worked out. you get incredible negative uh reviews and uh the picture bomb. So, the business thinks you're
completely hopeless and you begin to wonder if you know anything anymore. Yeah. Now, some say that you took this
on because you wanted some kind of a respect. I read this somewhere in Hollywood that you knew that if you made
this, it would give you put you in a certain another level. I mean, you were on a pretty good level anyway because
you I read you made a lot of terrific films. Was that part of it? I mean, did you think? Not really because, you know,
I had made such mainstream films like The Untouchables. This was by making Bonfire was a risky risky thing to do
for any director because the book was so popular. Not so much that it's a difficult dark black satire and if you
make it the way it is, you may make something like The Magnificent Amber's which is a great movie but nobody went
to see it. Uh did you then decide after the all this came out the way it did that you had to go back to your your own
instincts? Did you say I want to make a small film I want to do? Absolutely. Absolutely. uh you have a feeling that
wait a minute I'm so off base here that I got to go back and do what I really understand and uh and my wife Gayen Herd
was very helpful in this because she likes this genre and basically uh by working together we created basically
this very modest thriller. Now did you marry her after Bonfire the Vanities had you made the film? Yes. So there's some
nice things happen to you after you made this film. You have new child. Is that right? Absolutely. Raising Kane. Raising
Kane and you moved to Woodside which is outside of PaloAlto, right? Uh Raising Kane is a new Brian Depal film. We'll
talk about that film now after having explored what is on everybody's mind once they talked to him for the first
time since Bonfire Vantage came out. Raising Kane. We'll talk about that. John Lithco is in it, a close friend of
Brian Dealos. And we'll talk about that film and about the art and craft of directing when we come back. Brian Deal.
talk to me about acting and actors and you know I mentioned to you Drifusers with Richard Drifus just here and you
said gee there's a really bright actor and I said well you know uh do actors have a different kind of intelligence
than than journalists or directors or whatever they have kind of an instinctual intelligence they have they
the great thing about actors is they they feel things are not right and sometimes they can't articulate it uh so
that you quite understand what's going on but I remember once when I was doing Scarface I mean I had this scene in this
office uh where Al has to confront uh one of the drug king king kingpins and he was having problems with it and we
had rehearsed it a lot and he he he has to shoot this guy and there's something about this that didn't work for him and
we went back we rehearsed it I couldn't figure it out and then I finally I by the way he was moving I could see that
he didn't have enough space in the set to play the scene it was as simple as that but I had I could see him feeling
for something but I I had to figure out what it was he couldn't articulate later I didn't know how to or nobody knew but
there was he wanted to do something that the space didn't allow him to do and then we just built the set about three
times bigger and then he did this scene brilliantly where he sort of moves around the table to confront the and you
were telling me that Lithgow the star of this film been a friend of yours for a while I saw John doing plays in college
I mean he was where in college well he was he went to Harvard but he used to be uh do plays at the Marter Theater and I
saw him in Princeton do Molier there, you know, when I was 62, 63, and he was amazing. And I recommended him to an
director who subsequently put him in a film. And you said that he has something that Dairo has, which is what? The
ability to play different characters and physically look different without putting on any makeup. And and in
Raising Kane, where he plays a whole bunch of different characters, we didn't put on any makeup on him at all except
when he plays his own father. And he looks so different by the way he plays the part, which is very unusual in film
actors because you're mostly used to Carrie Grant or Bert Lancaster. Yeah. Or or Richard Gear where you have a face
that says this is the star and you're not used to making having them look completely different within the
characterization of what they're playing. Set up this scene. I want to talk about Raising Can a little bit
here. What's the What's the film about? The film is about a child psychologist uh who gets very obsessed with raising
his own child and uh to the point where uh he winds up uh kidnapping her for all types of strange deeds. Uh and uh John
plays this uh child psychologist uh and uh there all kinds of other characters that you don't know whether they're real
or not because they may be imagined and they may actually and I read somewhere this film cost about $11 million. Is
that right or Yes. Uh we we came in like a million seven under budget thanks to under the budget. Thanks to my wife the
producer wife. Yeah. All right. Stan roll tape here is raising Kane directed by Brian De Palmer produced. There is
the woman in there. The actress is Lolita. What's the Divid who was in Blaze with Paul played Blaze Star. Yeah.
Uh this is going back to form for you. Uh is it easier for you? I mean, are you do
you feel sure they're in these kinds of what what's the appeal? Well, the thing is that you make all kinds of different
movies, but I always have these kind of mystery and suspense ideas. And this is an idea I had for many years. A friend
of mine was a child psychologist and he had a child and he quit his job and stayed home to raise the child and he
was going to write a book about it. And I thought, what an strange idea sort of studying your child. Then you think,
well, maybe if I have a little trauma here, I can study how it grows and progresses. And that was the whole basis
of where this came from. And raising Kane is the character that in fact was studied and how in fact he evolved as he
grew older. Do you have some great dream as a director that you have not yet fulfilled? I mean is Oh yeah,
absolutely. To do what? Well, we're all great admirers of David Lean because he made like the perfect
movie and you Lawrence of Arabia but I think Bridge on the River Koi is really the perfect movie. Why? because he
builds all his characters and he sets the the political world. He brings them all in conflict and of course they're
all right is wrong for every one of them. Everyone who thinks they're doing right is absolutely doing wrong. And
then he brings all these characters to play out this tragedy in this great physical scene of this blowing this
train up on this bridge. It's like the perfect movie and terrific actors. Oh, fabulous. Uh, and it says something
about the whole the concept of war for Americans, for the English, for the Japanese. Yeah. Life and death,
everything. Yeah. It's just like, you know, culture changes, everything. Everything's in there. Lie had a lot of
the same elements, too, though. Yes. The hardest thing for you is finding the right property. I mean, finding
something you really want to make. Well, after you've made like as many movies as I made, and I'm working on
like my 22nd now, you you want to try to expand your vision as much as you can. You want to use all the things that
you've learned. And then you have to have an idea or an emotional thing that stirs you enough to put all this to
work. And the problem most of the time is that there's there's nothing that moves you enough to do it because you've
made so many movies and you know all the pitfalls and mistakes. So you or it's not something that's going to evolve in
a way that's going to be exciting to you. Where are you the happiest? Uh you know used to say about Hitchcock that he
was the happiest before the shooting started that blocking out the shots you know and and right having the idea
having it all come together. See I tend see I'm a basically I'm a visual stylist so I basically get some incredible
visual idea and in raising Kane the interesting idea was that well suppose I told a mystery story an entirely
different way. Most mystery stories are going from character to character and getting more information, which works
great in books, but you know, when movies, you know, you drive up to the bar, get a little information, then you
go and talk to the reporter, then you go and talk to the ex-wife, then you go and talk to this and that. And it's
basically a lot of scenes of people driving over to places and talking to people, right? Talking like you and I
are talking now. This to me is kind of boring on the screen. So like in raising a show. Yeah. But yeah, not on the show.
We are talking heads. But in Raising Cain, I tried to tell a mystery in which all the information is disclosed through
dreams. Yeah. Fantasies, flashbacks. So, you don't know if it's real or not until you've sort of seen it from a whole
bunch of different points of view. Then you've got to sort of determine whether what happened did happen or was it
imagined. And consequently, the audience is working all the time. And it's great because if you watch it with an
audience, you see them sort of arguing about it and saying, "Did that happen? Didn't she do that? Isn't he real?" And
then they finally get it all put together in the end, which to me makes a very satisfying. Do you like the editing
process? I mean, do you like being in the editing room? Yes. But see, my movies are so well worked out in advance
that it's not like you have to sort of piece it together. You don't have to save it in the editing room. No. No.
It's just really a selection of shots and you pretty much know what you've got anyway. So that's pretty much well this
has a very complicated structural style in the sense of uh you know their whole dreams within dreams within dreams and
the audience is constantly being pulled one direction and the other to th to those who say that that uh casting is
75% of a director's work. Do you say BS or what? There's so many things that are so important. Casting is very important.
If you have a an actor that's not up to the role, you're dead in the water. you you know you cannot cut around to like a
bad performance. You basically have to cut it out. So you know it's very important. But see the great things
about movies are there's so many things that are important. The script's important, the actors are important, the
directors are important. And when you see it all cooking like in a great film like Lawrence of Arabia or or Bridge on
the River Qua, you say my god this is what it can be. It can be this big, this wonderful, this vast, this emotional.
Uh, and most of the time we see like the smallest of things happening. This is a silly question, but why don't we have
more Bridge over the River Quad? Why don't we have more Lawrence of Arabia? Why don't we have more Casablanca? Why
don't we have more Citizen King? Why don't we have more? Well, great movies, I think, are always made when you get a
great group of talents like the Renaissance together in the same place at the same time. And you know, we had
had Sam Spiegel, you had, you know, a great script, uh, you had David Lean, you had you had all these things that
came together at the time and made this great movie. The problem today now, and I was thinking about this a little bit
as I was thinking exactly that question. You know, when they had when the old studio system existed, it was
interesting. You could get a whole bunch of really great actors because they're all under contract and you could say,
"Go over to Sound Stage X. you're making Castle Black of this week, you know, and and they went because they were on the
contract. Now, I was thinking, how do you get all those actors together? You call my coits. You can't get them
together because they're too expensive. Yeah. You know, I was sort of blessed with something like the untouchables
when I was able to get Cosner who was basically was not discovered then, even in a couple of movies, but untouchable,
Shan Connory, Bob Dairo, Andy Garcia. And when you get all those actors together in one movie, wow, it's always
great when you've got But soon as you say that, I'll tell you the story of Robert Dairo and and Merrill Street, who
I admire as much as anybody in the profession making that film that was just terrible, right? You know, they're
two great actors turned out in a movie that didn't work. Well, that's that is always possible, but there's nothing
better than having your best talent all in the same place at the same time. You know, did they exceed what you thought
was going to happen? Were did the combustion was it synergistic? Absolutely. I mean, you have Kevin Coer
and Bob Dairo going at each other. It's like that's really exciting. You know, it's just great actors rise with great
actors to act with. They get It's like you're a good interviewer. You're a great interviewer. So, you get a good
interview when you're dealing with somebody that rises to the occasion. Right. You got a couple of dead heads
here. We'll put everybody to sleep. That's right. Early than we want to go. Thank you. Raising Cane is the film. Uh
Brian De Palmer is the director. It's good to see you. Good to have you back. How exposed are you to the critics
personally? Are you very upset if you get a bad review or can you shrug it off?
It it it's a very weird thing. I more upset by good reviews as my friends will tell you. I can't tell you why. Uh, but
those who know me well know by now to seek out some critical thing because that cheers me up more than seeing one
good one after another. I know it sounds nutty, but I Yes. I get to feeling very unreal and very
undeserving if if the good ones go on for a while. And what I I fasten on it. Oh, this guy didn't like it. Oh, yeah.
Right. I agree with him. I think for the half hour afterwards and it it sort of keeps me alive. The New York Times
critic Stanley Calfman as well as many other critics and newspapers and periodicals have credited you with the
superb performance that Elizabeth Taylor turns in and Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf? Now I know you're going to say no,
no, it was all Elizabeth Taylor. But how did you coax and nurture this performance out of her? Well, I think
coax or nurture are not words that I would choose. A performance belongs to an actor. Uh you cannot cause anybody
truly you can't cause anybody to do what they can't do. What Elizabeth does is hers and she's responsible for it. What
I did, I think, is to serve it well because you know, you do many takes in a movie and then you have literally
thousands of decisions to make. Which moment do you use? And I think I saw it very much the way Elizabeth saw it. So
that I I chose to use the particular takes, the angles, the shots in which she found the thing that that was most
right. So we did it together. It's the way an actress and a director work. Were you ever overwhelmed by the Burton in
the beginning when you thought you were making a film with them? Did it frighten you? No. I must say I tried to be I used
to arrive on the lot, you know, because I I'm very sleepy in the morning. I would try to wake myself up and I would
say, "Wake up. You're directing a picture with the Burton." And nothing would happen. But what I was eventually
overwhelmed by was uh the job they did. the their professionality and and Elizabeth has an
very strange thing which is that when you see her do something, you know, you're standing next to the camera and
you say, "Well, that's good." And then the next day you see it on the film and it's 10 times better. It's like
something hap, she really knows something about movies that many people don't know. Something happens to it in
that developing bath. What kind of a director are you in terms of your technique? Are you a a holler
the way autotreer is supposed to be? Are you a comforter? You a pussycat? What? I would say neither of those. Uh I don't
holler. You know, I have maybe once or twice. You holler. There are people who like to be hollered at as you begin to
discover after a long time. And so I have hollered a couple of times. But generally, you know, and I don't mean
this in any way modest. It's just true. The director is there for other people. You're if you're doing a play, you're
serving the author. If you're doing a picture, you're serving the picture in yourself, but also the actors. The point
is to help the actors. And if you can't help them, you're not doing your job. There's no point hollowing at them.
You're involved with so many projects this year. It seems to me every time I pick up the newspaper, I read of
something else that you're about to do. Would you enumerate just what projects you are going to do? Oh, it's not that
complicated. I'm on Monday, this Monday, I'm starting rehearsal for a musical by Sheldon Hearnick and Jerry Bach who
wrote Fiddler on the Roof and it's called Come Back, Go Away, I Love You for the Moment. That's not part of the
title for the moment. No, that's my comment on the title. Uh, and it's three separate stories, all musical, and it's
going to star Barbara Harrison, Larry Blighten, and Alan Alda. And I'm look forward to that. And I'm scared because
I never did a musical. It should be That's right. It is your You've done comedies on Broadway, but not musicals.
No, I figure let him sing. And then I'm going to do a picture called The
Graduate with Larry Turman and that isn't cast yet. And then I'm going to
do a picture called Catch 22. I also have read that you're you have your own production called Icorus. Yeah, Icarus
production. It's not what it is is um I would like to get together with the many
people that I' I've worked with and u help each other. And it seems to me one of the things that happens in America
really more than say England or France is that when people begin to work a lot in theater or in movies, you all rush
off in opposite directions and you start companies named after your children. You never see each other again and that I
think the important thing is to join up together. It's called Icarus Productions, which
I'm very proud of because Icarus, as you probably know, was the man who thought he would fly to the sun and he made
wings out of wax and feathers and the sun as he got too close to the sun, it melted the wings and he fell into the
sea. Very symbolic, said the interviewer. Now, what does that It's just a reminder
to myself, not to get too cocky. Which brings me right into my next question, just as if it were a song cue, and that
is that you're without doubt this year's number one celebrity. You're too sensitive not to be aware of this. How
does this explosion of fame affect you? Is it marvelous, as I would think it would be? Well, yeah, it's nice. Uh, the
main thing you should know about it, uh, and you must know this from yourself, is that you don't notice anything. I mean,
you're still home, you know, but you're invited to everything. Every girl wants to meet you. You're the most eligible
bachelor. You're I'm sure there isn't a party that they don't want you to come to. Yeah, that's the best part. That's a
good part. Yeah, that really is just fine. You know, and I have there's nothing wrong with that at all. And it's
like this terrific present. Uh as for the rest of it, uh you you don't notice it. You're not aware of it because I sit
here at home and I see my friends and I work a lot and that's about all I notice. Sometimes I read something in
the papers. Now, what has success taken away from you? Anything?
I hope not. I'm The reason I'm hesitating is because I'm trying to decide whether it's success, whatever
that is, or just getting a little older. Um, what I'm sometimes afraid of is that you do get a little insulated.
Like I went to the movies last week and there were four of us and we I we had to find a place to park
the car. That took about 40 minutes and then we lined up for another 40 minutes to get into the movie. Then we get
inside and the candy machine was broken and the girls gave a very complicated candy order. So this other guy and I
went out and we had to get this kind of bar here and an ice cream sandwich there. Then we got back into the movie
and it was 106° and the air conditioning had broken down. And so we wanted to get our money
back, which we did. It took another half hour. We had to sign something. And then we went all the way
across town. I won't bore you much longer. There's a point to this. And went to the same movie in another
theater. And the evening, which was going to the movies, cost $12.50 for four of us. Now we can afford
it. But I started to think, you know, that I'm fairly insulated. You know, I usually get driven somewhere and or I'm
going to somebody's house. You could have called up and gotten those tickets free and gotten the best seat if you'd
wanted to. Well, my point is exactly that that it was sort of fun really, you
know, and if you get too removed from just living like going to the movies is not supposed to be too hard. And I got a
little worried about myself because I thought, boy, I'm exhausted. Wow. you know, I'm not going out again for a
while. That was really rough going to the movies like that. And you don't want to get too u insulated and get too easy
on yourself. I think that's the only soft that's the only danger. You've been doing very well financially for many
years now with Elaine May when the two of you used to do your improvisations together. But in recent years, I'm sure
you've made lots and lots of beautiful money. How do you indulge yourself? Everything. I spend my money. Uh, I'm
not sure on what I I and I I don't think about it too much really, you know. I I buy things I like for myself and for
other people and I go places I like to go and then I forget about You're not a car bug or a I Yeah, I'm everything now
and then. I was a car bug for a while and I got great cars that I wanted and then I came back to New York and I can't
really use a car in New York. So, I sold the car to buy a painting and like that. That's not bad. We keep talking about
Elaine May and you can't talk about Mike Nichols really without talking about Elaine May and the wonderful
improvisation team of Ela May and Mike Nichols. Do you think you'll ever go back to being a performer again? No, I
don't think so. Except that I really do get a kick out of working with Elaine and what we do together. So, we might do
that now and then just because we enjoy it. Uh, other than that, no, I'm much happier this way. No, I'm not a good
performer in that way, you know, like even when we Elaine and I used to be on the Jack Par show, we would just sit
there boring because we're not good at being on. And then you start to tell an anecdote because you've planned it
because they said, "Yeah, tell that anecdote about the time you got your foot caught in the subway door, whatever
it is, and that you're in the middle of it and you're so bored with it yourself. You have to be a performer, which I'm
really not." In the early days when you were working as an actor, did you think in the back of your mind, uh, really
what I'd like to do is to direct? Oh, no. No, no. It worked the other way around. I in a str I fell into directing
the way I fell into everything I've ever done by accident. Somebody said, "You want to direct a play?" I said, "Let's
try." And then the minute I started, I said, "Aha, yes, this is it." And then I realized sort of looking
back that I had been thinking about it without naming it for years that really what I'd done with Elaine and this group
we had in Chicago and everything that interested me about the theater was to be thinking about directing but I didn't
know it. We'll be right back with more conversation with Mike Nichols. First this message.
Tell us about your early background. Where were you born and where did you grow up? A little of this I already
know. But I was born in Berlin, Germany. And my father was Russian. My mother is German. And then
we came over here because it was necessary in 39 when I was six. And then we settled in New
York and I went to school and I went to college in Chicago and here I am. Can you remember anything about Germany?
Yeah. You still can't even know. Yeah, I think about it sometimes because uh we got out oh maybe two weeks in
time. Two weeks before it would have been too late. And uh that is to put it mildly lucky. And I think that if id had
a life how different it would have been. Do you remember the first job you had? You know I was a camp counselor. I was a
horseback riding instructor. I think that was my first job. I taught horseback riding. Were you good with
children? No, I was good with horses. I was lousy with children. You've now, I'm sure, been interviewed innumerable
times, I guess. What's your least favorite question? Oh, that's hard. My I don't like um terribly general questions
like who are you really? You know, those are very hard to answer. Is there anything you wish an interviewer would
ask you which he never has? And if so, tell me. I'll ask it right now. You ask great questions. I'm very happy with
your questions. I'll trust you. All right. Now that you have quote everything, what frightens you, if
anything? I'm sorry to think so long. Uh what frightens me really is is loss of
sensation. I think is the only thing is not to feel. And that um that is seems to me for everyone to
be the single thing to avert and avoid as long as you're feeling I mean to be feeling lousy is also very interesting
you know nothing wrong with that sometimes but I think my the only thing that really would worry me is to begin
to withdraw to cease to feel. I have one goal really which is to be a good movie director because I love making movies
and I would love to know how to do it better and better and I love the idea of what I feel about movies which is
that if you come into movies you're really apprentice to giants because there are people who have done
extraordinary things in movies I think more practically than in any other field right now. Who are your giants?
Oh, Fellini and Trufo and David Lean and endless people. The great thing about movies is they're about a hundred very
very talented people and that interests me immensely because that's a much greater
feeling to see how far you have to go. And again, I don't mean this modestly. It's just that movies are a very big
thing that interests me more than say working in a field where you think, "Oh yeah, well, I'm as good as anybody
else." What kind of movies do you like to see? All kinds. I'll see any movie and do. Why do you have a picture of
Charlie Chaplan upstairs? I like him. Not because he's an idol, but just because he's a man you like. Yeah, he's
as close to an idol as as I get. I don't idolize people. Exactly. I admire them and I admire him a lot.
If someone were writing about Mike Nichols, let's say in uh oh what in Russia where you might not be known and
they had to do a little squib the kind of thing that they do in a play bill and someone said give us the facts and tell
us what we should what is most pertinent about you what would you say this very boring this guy who directs
plays and movies Sydney Lamett has made some 39 movies in four decades as a film director His
first was The Stunning 12 Angry Men, Dog Day Afternoon, Prince of the City, Serpico, Network, and The Verdict
Followed, among others. A DW Griffith award winner, Lamett has just published a memoir of a life in the film business
called Making Movies, and I am very pleased to have him here. Welcome. Thank you. It's great to see you. I take this
this is the upcoming uh with all the power we have, we can get an upcoming New York Times magazine
review. New York Times review. Actually, we got it because uh it's out early. Roger Eert says about you, "Making
movies is a sane, even invaluable book about the job of being a movie director. From the creation of the screenplay
screenplay to the final previews, Mr. Lamett explains every step in the process, drawing examples from his own
career with startling honesty. This is not an autobiography, but is a more revealing than most memoirs, discussing
with complete frankness the tech the technical, practical, financial, and artistic decisions a director makes." He
ends by saying, "I am sometimes asked if there is one book a film gore could read to
learn more about how movies are made and what to look for while watching them." Excuse me. He concludes by saying, "This
is the book. Why did you write this book? I mean I mean obviously if you thought you'd getting these kind of
reviews then you have achieved the goal of making a book that would be a companion for everybody who wants to
enjoy movies." I I I never expected that kind of reviews of the kind of uh success it's been meeting with Charlie
where we've in our we're in our second printing and we haven't been out that long which is terrific. I wrote it
Charlie because the I was so tired of the theories. I was so tired of students not knowing their work. You know I I
taught a post-graduate course at Yale uh many many years ago um movie course. I film it's tough for me to say the word
film. cinema won't pass my throat. Uh yes and and then I did another one in Colombia about four years ago. I was
amazed at the ignorance of the students and then also in terms of the general public, you know, the that perennial
thing that happens when you uh uh people passing a uh some when you're shooting in the city and they're passing your
location and the first thing you say is what's everybody standing around for? You know, and the fact is very real work
is going on. And then the second thing that happens which is when uh if they come to the studio and see some of the
work there. I never knew movie making was so hard is what they inevitably say. So I thought that uh there'd be kind of
a value uh on all levels just to really get down to how is a movie made? What are the steps? Who's involved? What are
their jobs? Uh on both a creative level and a technical level. Okay. I want to talk about all of that and also talk
later about some of the actors you've worked with whether it's Brando Fay Donaway many others uh and in terms of
what they bring to Alpuccino what they bring to the table when you work with them but but let me just start off
talking about make when do you where does it a movie start for you? It starts when I either have read a script that's
been sent to me and uh what happens Charlie is I just react completely instinctively. I'm not I'm not analyzing
it. I'm a I have no theme. I have no uh idea of the kind of picture I want to do. I'm open and a very good audience.
And what what to me is interesting is that almost uh every time I've accepted a script, it's been on the first
reading. If I've had to read it more than once, chances are I've said no. And u it doesn't grab you at first reading,
then you pass. Well, you know, there are there are obviously deficiencies in this. I've done some very bad movies,
but I've also done some very good ones. And you also say that some of the movies that you did because a you needed to
work. Absolutely. You got tired of waiting around for the right film, so you just made one or because you needed
the money. In some cases, those films have turned out better than the movies you made because it seemed like the best
thing in the world for you. Absolutely. You you know what happens? Uh I don't think anyone anybody good really knows
when the work is going to turn out good. I I'm not being falsely modest here. I I think there's a reason I've gotten good
results and and other directors will never get good results. But it's a question of preparing the ground in such
a way that the lucky accident can happen. And I know this is true of musicians. I know I know many writers
feel that way when you just prepare the ground so that the piece can take on a life of its own and run away with it.
Let me ask something that I've always wanted to ask you and others and it may even apply to you in some instances.
I love The Verdict. You haven't made anything since The Verdict that I like as much as I love The Verdict. Uh
Francis Ford Copelan hasn't made a movie that I really liked a lot in a while. Now, he would differ and say this was
really good and this was really good, but I think the majority of filmgoers and critics wouldn't say that. Mh. How
does someone like Copala, you occasionally and other people who have shown they know what it's about and
they're at the top of the class, right, fail at making good movies. It happens, Charlie, of two reasons. First of all,
there's that very very important area of selfdeception, which is which is really necessary to even go to work in the
first place. uh because the work itself is so hard, you've got to be prepared to say, "I believe in this. I don't see the
problem." A kind of plunging in with faith. And very often it's misdirected. I've had two pictures in which around
the second or third day of shooting, I realized, my god, I was wrong. I've got to go through with it, but it's
never going to be what I thought. I've got to go through with it. And worst of all, I can't tell anybody because I'm
the director, right? So, so, uh, there's that. Then there are pressures. Uh it's a very strange marketplace out there
now. And I know the rules of that jungle very well. And uh I always used to say I need one hit so I can get the money for
three more flops. Yeah. And now it's getting even more severe. And I think in my view uh the taste level is slowly
sinking in this country. Not just in movies, I think generally. Let me tell you an interesting story. I interrupt
you. I had lunch yesterday with a great editor in America who said to me, "Who are the great poets today? Who are the
great novelists today? Who are the great filmmakers today?" He said, "I think that we are not somehow today in our
producing greatness like we used to." Now, a lot of people bemoone the good old times in the golden age of
Hollywood, the golden age of television, all that. But here was a very he was somebody who would be classified as an
intellectual saying, "I don't see it out there." I said to him, you know, you're a great editor. Why don't you go
commission a book? Get somebody to write a book about that. What's happened to us? What do you think has happened in
movies? Television. I think basically what's happened, we are now probably what on
our third generation of people who did not know life before television and that they're used to they've been they've
been brainwashed into a state of acceptance of what television producers uh think is reality. Aaron Spelling's
version of of what reality is. And you know that wonderful line in network when Peter Finch in his rage says to the
audience, "For God's sakes, you're real. I'm just a picture." You know, and and which really sums it up because
um that people's contact with reality is completely determined by the box and it's an isolated experience. Let's just
start with that. It's not done. It's not shared in any way and I in my view uh it's causing a major crisis to to uh in
all aspects you know I just came back off off this book tour Charlie and and what how can you hit cities more
architecturally different than let's say Boston Washington Chicago San Francisco LA you know they've almost got a culture
they do have a cultural difference about it but you know what's happened. There's a homogeneity. Oh. Oh, every city has
its pizzeria uno. Every you can go from pizzeria uno to Armani, you know, depending on how much how much money you
want to spend. And every hotel is owned by the same people. We stayed at what is called a boutique hotel in San
Francisco. A charming little place. It's owned by a chain which is opening boutique individual hotels all all over.
And I think precisely you you use the the word right on that that homogeneity is going to destroy us. Couple of things
about movies that are intriguing me. You don't believe in speaking of this you don't believe that these testings in
preview audiences which can cause directors and studios to force directors to change endings are necessarily good.
Right. Right. I think it's disaster. I think because again it's forcing it onto a kind of homogeneity. Uh the the whole
testing process. Look, I'm not a fool. I know that movies have to make money, and I'd be thrilled to change the picture uh
not all pictures, but some pictures uh to see if it can make more money. But the fact is there is no correlation. I I
I once asked the man who conducts the research group, what is the correlation between your percentages and the cards
that you break down in demographics that make the mind boggle uh and the eventual performance at the box office? Right.
And he said, "We don't have those figures. No one's ever done a study." No. Well, of course he's lying. Of
course, he has the figures. The fact is the figures just don't work out the way he would like them to work out so that
he can get hired more. Yeah. The other thing, another incident from the book, Brando
Brando will give you on separate takes separate performances. One is he's reaching deep inside as an actor, right?
And going for what is inside of him that gives expression to the idea that he wants to convey. The other is a more
studied in which he is simply acting the performance. It it looks identical, Charlie. It's just empty inside. But it
but on the surface it looks as if it's exactly like he as an actor if you the director choose the wrong one not the
one that genuinely comes from inside he won't give you anything from inside for the rest of the film. You've had it. Now
you know a lot of people say well listen what right does he have? That's so arrogant. What right does he have to
test a director? Uh I don't feel that way. And maybe it's cuz I passed the test, but the point is that
uh acting is about self-revelation. And that's a very painful process. And he in my view has a right to want the person
watching it to be able to tell the difference between when he's doing it and living it
and when he's simply indicating it. I don't think it's it's invalid. A great a good director can't screw up a great
script. True or false? False. You can screw up. A great script can get screwed up regardless. Funnily
enough, in my view, great scripts can get screwed up more easily because the demand that they make is so much
greater. I don't have to tell you you how is there anything more boring than a bad hamlet.
Well said. Yeah. And nothing more powerful than a brilliant Hamlet. Well, that's what that's what it was for,
right? To to So acting then is 75% of the game, the performance. Certainly certainly in the theater. Certainly it
is in the theater. In the movies, you you've got a great great helper. That camera, it can do an awful lot of things
that uh that can compensate for even a bad performance. It can't create a good performance, but it can provide an
element that the performance should have provided. Okay, I want to take a look from 12 Angry Men. What an appropriate
film. I remember once going to a class about and oh no, it was part of um management training or something like
that and they had us see it. Some psychologist wanted to see this as a group of as an example group dynamics.
Right. Exactly. Certainly appropriate now as we are fascinated by what's happening in the
jury room of the Simpson trial. Uh but take a look at this. This is 12 Angry Men starring Henry Fondom and others.
Here it is. Tell me about that movie and directing that scene and the way the camera pulled
out so that you could see all of the people leaving the table. Well, clearly it's a scene in which uh a man takes off
on a racial attack juror number eight or whatever. I I love that they never had names, only numbers. and um and slowly a
protest uh evolves. What what one of the things that was very important because it has to be completely believable and
it is very tough to make that believable that uh 10 other people would be so would there'd be such uni unanimity in
an opinion especially on an on a racial level that they'd take make this uh uh step of protest. But if you noticed,
Henry Fonder, our hero, was not the first one to get up. Uh the first one to get up is actually a uh a character who
has come from a very similar background. So he's the one that starts it and then others get up out of I hope out of
character out of what the characters were. But the interesting thing, Charlie, is that doing it in one shot,
doing it as a slow pullback um prevented it from becoming obvious and sentimental. In fact, uh it it isn't
for about till three or four pe till about the fourth person get up that you even realize it is a protest. Uh you
don't know at first whether the guy isn't just going to the bathroom, right? you know, just want to shake his legs.
And also, but by doing it in one shot, I avoided all those uh silly intercuts of somebody going, you know, glowering this
way or drat or any of those obvious reactions that would have had to have happened uh if it had been cut up. I
also would have destroyed Ed's tempo. Ed Begley, who played played the man, is was a superb actor. And the very fact
that he could gauge the performance by how and when people were getting up and moving away from as you saw the way he
runs down in energy is is is quite moving. Fond of him to work with.
You know there are certain actors Charlie who are so pure that for me at least they become a barometer of truth.
I can measure the truthfulness of myself of my own work and almost every other person's work on that set by what they
are doing. Uh fond was one of those and uh I don't know of a greater compliment that you think you can give
anyone. Pacino speaking of actors dog day afternoon there was that long scene on
the on the phone. Uh, I think that's as uh extraordinary a piece of fil of of movie acting as I've ever seen. Uh, it
was very complicated uh the way I set it up because I wanted him to do both phone calls. The phone call to his uh male
wife and his female wife uh in continuity and yet the two scenes together ran 14 minutes. I don't know if
you're aware but a magazine and film only runs 10 minutes. So I had to uh I had to from a technical point of view I
I was using two cameras starting the second camera when the first one was almost out of film and so on. Uh the
thing about Al is he also has uh this purity mixed with mixed with this incredible
uh undeniable anger. Uh he's so dangerous up there on the screen. Even even in a moment of complete
vulnerability, you know, you have a feeling that he can just turn around into something. I I'll never forget that
amazing moment in Godfather when uh I think it was Godfather 2 when uh Diane Keaton tells him that she's had an
abortion and he's just been pacing up and back, pacing up and back, very still in that inner stillness that he's got.
and all of a sudden he flies across that room and hits her. Uh it it's an explosion that's absolutely terrifying.
And he has this in him, I think, uh this sense of uh of rage. What does a directive give actor like Pacino?
Two things. First of all, you give him a person who understands what he's doing. the the thing that we were talking
before about Marlin uh which is very important to him. Second of all, once you've got that, you can find sources of
stimulation for those feelings that he may not have been aware of uh in the performance of another actor in the
physical staging of the she the scene or in the instance of uh the two phone calls in Dog Day Afternoon in the way
that I shot it. So so that by the end of it it got very complicated. Charlie, you know, the story was they were in that
bank by then for 9 hours and I just wanted him in a state of exhaustion beyond. Now, that state of exhaustion
does another thing. It opens up emotions. I'm sure you've found and and most of us have found that when we're
tired, we weep more easily. We laugh more easily. We get angry easier. That's right. We're just wide open. And when we
finish the first take, I said, "Al, I'm don't cut camera." I said, "First, don't cut
camera, Al. I want to go back and do it again." And he looked at me and he said, "You've got to be exploitative deleted.
Kidding." And I said, "I am not kidding. We have to go again. Action." And he started again from the top.
And uh and in the meantime, while that little the exchange went on, they had changed a magazine of film so that when
he finished the second take of it, he literally didn't know where he was. I mean, the exhaustion was so complete.
The amount of he didn't recognize that the second take was better. He didn't know when we talked about it afterwards,
he said, "I didn't even know. I forgot that you told me to go again. I didn't even know we did a second take." But
when he saw Russia the next day, he did. He sure did. Um network. This is a Howard Bill when he's giving his speech
and and has a heart attack. Take a look at this and we'll talk about the scene when we come back. Any acting
programming you've seen? Yes, it does. Uh tell me about the scene though with Peter. Well, you know, he's he is a
magnificent actor and as you know, part of the point of that whole speech is that the the show always ends on him
having a fit. I mean, he's in no real danger. He just has a fit and the fit is the music cue.
Uh he's a consumate actor. Interestingly enough, the same thing that I did with Al on his Dog Day speech, I did with
Peter on his first uh I'm mad as hell, don't take it anymore speech. Two cameras so we could go from one take to
another. Uh he wanted that part as badly as any actor I've ever known. I felt it was
very very important to get an American for it. And um Peter was living in the in the
Caribbean at the time. I I don't remember which island. And said, "Look, I've got with me." He came he flew up to
New York. He said, "I've got with me a tape of Walter Kronhite, a tape of John Chancellor. I am going back down and I'm
going to work for two weeks and I'm going to come back up to New York and I'm going to read this whole part for
you." And he did, Charlie. He did. And uh he read my reservation was only about the accent. I mean as an actor he's
magnificent. And he came back up and read four lines and Patty and I said it's yours. Pati. Yeah. And it was Did
he win an Oscar for that? He did postumously. Postumously. That's right. It was uh it was an it's extraordinary.
Uh, I was we were, you know, before the Oscar, while the voting is still going on, the company flies you out there and
you hustle like crazy trying to pick up votes. And Peter and I were scheduled to uh do a radio show that morning and
Beverly's Beverly Hills Hotel. Uh, there's a small staircase down from the second floor and literally as I came
down the staircase, he was sitting below and I saw him go over and uh that was it. That was it. Yeah.
knowing what you know and putting a lot as Rajie Ibert says if you want one book on making movies this is it the title is
making movies uh what do you wish you had learned earlier I mean what have you learned that's important that you wish
you'd known from the beginning I wish I'd had a little I don't know if you can learn this I wish I'd had a little
better taste I taste taste yeah I think I think I tended to overstate an awful lot that may have been because I really
wasn't used to having come from television I wasn't used to to an image 30 or 40 ft wide and and and that takes
that's a whole different aesthetic, you know, scale is is critical. So making for a television screen is a very
different act than making for a movie screen. Yeah, I I think so. Uh you have to tell the story differently. You you
have to use the camera differently. So I wish I I wish I'd had a little more restraint.
Um but there were things I like too. Right. I had a lot of courage which uh you were noted for making political
films, films that had to do with a passion about politics in the broadest sense of the world. Not politics and
who's winning elections, but the politics of you, you know, you were passionate about that. Can you make
those films today? I think it'll be very tough. I don't know. I haven't tried. But my guess is that they are running so
scared and the cost of production is up so enormously. You know, Charlie, if a picture doesn't grow nine figures now,
by that I mean over hund00 million, they really look at it as a flop. Notwithstanding how much it costs. Yeah,
exactly. But the reason they look at it that way is because most films now cost over 30 million to make, I guess. I I
think that's the the average cost has gone up to there and and the prints and advertising are now equal, if not
greater, than the cost of the movie. What What's your favorite film that you made that I made? Charlie, I wish I
could tell you. I I I'm ducking the question and as you know I don't duck many. Uh I duck it because in a way it
makes the or an orphan out of the others. Yes indeed. What film that you have seen do you wish you had made? I
couldn't have made it. So it's safe to say that I think the best movie of the last 10 years is Hoop Dreams. Do you
really? I think a documentary. I I think it's an astounding movie about America, about people. Uh that there's just not
there's no way of saying too much about that movie. sort of missed it on the Oscars, didn't
it? On I think they made a great error by trying to uh Well, it wasn't a great error. I would have loved to seen it
nominated for best picture because to me it was. All right. Making Movie by Sydney Lamett. Um it's gotten good
reviews. It really is an understanding of how the business is made. Learn a lot about cameras. You'll learn a lot about
how actors approach their craft. It is not about a gossipy book about actors and actresses. It is really a book about
one man's love uh for the craft of making movies and how he goes about it. And when you come away with this
experience of reading this book, you'll understand more about movies which all of us love. You never really get an
opportunity. You take an opportunity. Uh you know the in the film in the film making business no one ever gives you
anything. Nobody ever taps you on the shoulder and say, you know, I've I've really I've really admired the way you
uh the way you talk and the way you draw and I think you'd make a good director. Doesn't happen that that way. You have
to you have to constantly be pulling on somebody's sleeves saying, "Hey, I want to direct. I want to direct. I want to
direct." And you have to be willing to make sacrifices to to do that. Uh the mistake a lot of people I think make in
in in Hollywood is that they they think well I'll get to the top of my field as a whatever editor, production designer,
writer and then I'll just move laterally into directing and I'll be more respected and I'll have more more power.
Doesn't work that way because you drop right to the bottom of the of the the pack as a as a director. You have to
work your way up in that. I'm not saying it's not done, but but um so the the the way I did it was I came in through
production design, which is good because you're thinking visually and you're very aware of the of the director's problems
and trying to tell a story and how the the environment is, you know, a manifestation of the narrative in in
some way. And um you know I I I sort of proved myself as a production designer in the in the
the scrappy stay up all night for 15 days in a row kind of independent uh film making uh that was done at at Roger
Corman's place. This was in the in the uh early 80s. And uh when they when they see that you have the creativity and the
stamina and that you basically understand film making, it's not a ridiculous leap in that in that
environment to say, I now want to try my hand. I want to I want to direct. Uh, and I just basically went up to Roger
one day and said, "I'd like to direct second unit on this the film that that we were making at the time, which was a
low-budget science fiction horror picture." And um, he gave me a camera and a couple two or three people and we
started a little second unit. And the second unit basically became this steamroller that wound up shooting about
a third of the picture because they were falling way behind on on first unit. So they'd give me the actors and say,
"Well, do scene 28 and scene 42 and all of a sudden I was working with actors." And that was terrifying because I hadn't
really thought that part through yet. You know, that in order to direct you have to work with actors. It's not just
about sets and visual effects. And so it was simultaneously a shock and a joyful discovery
because I found that all actors really want is some sense of what a writer can bring to the moment. Some sense of a
narrative purpose. What what am I doing? What am I trying to what am I trying to do here? What's the scene about? Um and
it's really pretty much that simple. So it was that was the next epiphany, if you will, which is this part of it is
fun, too. The part I didn't expect to be fun, the part I didn't expect to be good at turned out to be in a way the most
fascinating part. I wouldn't say I was good at it right away. It took it took me a long time to realize that um you
you have to have a a bit of a an inter language with actors. Uh you have to give them something that they can act
with. You can't tell them a lot of abstract information about how their character is going to pay off in this in
this big narrative ellipse that happens in scene 8. That doesn't help them. you know, they're in a room, they have to
create a an emotional truth in a moment and um you know, they they have to be they have to be able to create that very
quickly. So, they need they need real tangible stuff and that's that's a learned art, I think. But um coming from
from writing and understanding what they're feeling and what they're thinking, what the characters feeling
and thinking and having thought about that a lot for months in advance is is the way that that I get enough respect
from the actors that that they trust what I'm saying, they trust what I'm giving them to
do. I was hired to direct a film called Piranha 2. I was hired by a very unscrupulous producer who worked out of
out of Italy. And um he and I he put me with an Italian crew who spoke no English even though I was assured that
they would all speak English. And I actually had to learn some some Italian very quickly. And I'm talking about in
two weeks because that's all the prep time I had because I was actually replacing someone else. and I was put
into an untenable uh situation and then and then fired several couple weeks into the into the shoot and and the producer
took over directing and it turns out that he had actually done that twice before on his two previous films and
that was his motus operandi in order to get the financing and then axe the director and in the course of of
throwing me off the movie. He never showed me a foot of the film that I had shot. He he held on to the dailies. He
wouldn't we were shooting in Jamaica and he would I would shoot in Jamaica. dies would go to New York to be processed.
He'd fly to New York and look at them and not send them back for me to see. So, I wasn't even seeing my own film.
So, he, you know, he basically came in and said, "Your stuff doesn't work, doesn't cut together, it's a pile of
junk, and you're off the movie." And then he took over the film. And I thought, you know, I I really don't I
mean, okay, maybe maybe I'm just bad. Maybe I'm just not good. So I went to um you know a couple of months later I went
to Rome to find out sort of the truth like what what really happened and he wouldn't show me any of the film and I
had been in Rome prepping the film for a couple of weeks before we went and I remembered the code to to get in and so
um I went in and I just ran the film for myself and it wasn't that bad because all I wanted to know was just one simple
fact. Could I or could I not do this job? And so, and I made a few changes, you know, before I flew back, which I
don't know if they ever caught. I I don't know if the editor ever noticed that I actually fixed a couple things,
but uh uh but you know, I had to I had to know whether whether what they had said was true. So, here's a case where
everyone around me had basically said, "You stink. You suck. You don't know what you're doing." And I just and I
accepted it. But then a little voice kept saying, "I don't think so. I don't think it could be that bad." I remember
doing some pretty cool stuff with the actors in this moment and that moment and I looked at it and it was fine. So
then I thought, you know what, I I actually can do this and I just fell in with a pack of, you know, thieves and
wackos here. And but I also realized that I was going to have to get busy and create my own thing. That nobody would
hire me after that experience. Nobody would hire me and just put me on a film. I'd have to create my own thing and hang
on tenaciously to that in order to be able to direct again. And that's why I wrote The Terminator. And I had many,
many people trying to buy that script, but I wouldn't sell them I wouldn't sell the script to them unless I went with it
as the director. And of course, that was a turnoff for almost everybody. But we did find one low-budget producer who was
willing to make the film. And that was John Dailyaly at Hemale. And that's how I got my real
start. The road to success is like Harold and the purple crayon. You draw it for yourself. You have to imagine it
first and then you have to draw it and then you have to walk it. But uh I think many people draw many lines that don't
necessarily lead there. But the ones that do lead there are done by that are done by that process. Not not for
everybody. Some people can fall into good luck. Uh some people can have it handed to them. But I think great
majority uh map it out for themselves. But you always have self-doubts. And when you're working in a u a public art
form like film making, you don't really need self-doubt because if it's if it's bad, you're going to hear about it
exactly what's wrong with it. And if it's good, you'll hear what's good about it. So there are plenty of other people
who will in inform you. Uh so self-doubt is not really is not really uh necessary. You can sort of just set that
one aside. Just drop it at the door. Uh what you need is a lot of confidence to stand up to the slings and arrows, the
the barrage of negativity. Because what basically it boils down to is that um we we exist in a peer environment. And when
we're when we're sort of on the fringe or on the outside and we're trying to get in, all our peers are like us and
just a just a bunch of friends or people with with similar interests and none of them think you're special. They think
they're special. So no one's going to give you uh encouragement or very few people will give you encouragement. Um
they'll it's like that old adage it's not enough to succeed your friends must also fail you
know so you're not going to get a lot of tremendous encouragement from your peer group and you can't feed you can't feed
on that energy. can actually support each other in very tangible ways. But I think that that thing of dude, you got
it. You're going all the way. You're not going to hear that. And you're certainly going to you're you're certainly going
to face rejection after rejection. You're going to knock on a lot of doors and you're going to have to prove
yourself. Um but I think, you know, I think you kind of know that going in. If if you're going into the film making
process, I think you have to go in with your with your eyes open that that's what it's going to be like. And there's
a here's an interesting thing that there's a tremendous temptation to do a workaround or to do to do a moral or or
or ethical workaround or shortcut in a lot of situations because it's easier and it's just you're you're so needy to
get those little breaks and so on. And I think a lot of people get get sort of um um ethically shortcircuited at that
stage and they never recover, you know, because I think a lot of people would say, well, you know, I'll do what I have
to do now, but then later I'll be good. Doesn't work that way. You are who you are. And I, you know, fortunately, I've
managed to to get where I am without with the occasional burglary aside, uh, without having to to really uh um um
hurt anybody or or go against my word. I think ultimately your word becomes the most important thing that you have. It's
the most important currency that you have. Having a successful film is very important currency as well, but in the
long run, your word is the most important thing. And if you say you're going to do something, you have to do
it. Um, and I think that that's what what saw me through on Titanic. Titanic was in some ways the roughest uh project
that that I've ever been involved with. And what saw me through on that was that I had a relationship with the people who
were quite rightly panicking. Uh, but they never completely panicked because they knew who I was and we always
treated each other with a kind of a respect. And I always I always did what I think was the the right or ethical
thing throughout that. Even though it was costing me millions of dollars personally
um right out of my pocket to do it, I felt I had to do it uh or they would never trust me again on another film.
And I think that that's ultimately the most important currency that that you reap from any situation.
pretty much every day. But you know, the thing is that when when you're in a leadership position, you can never ever
manifest that. You can never manifest the panic that you feel inside. Um, and Titanic was a situation where I felt, I
think, pretty much like the officer felt on the bridge of the ship. I could see the iceberg coming far away, but as hard
as I turned that wheel, there was just too much mass, too much inertia, and there was nothing I could do. Um, but I
still had to I still had to play it through. There was no way to get off. And so then, you know, you're in this
kind of um situation where you you feel you feel quite doomed and yet you still have to play by your own ethical
standards, you know, no matter where it where it takes you, you know, and ultimately that was the salvation
because I think if if if I hadn't done that, they might have panicked, they might have pulled the plug, things might
have been very different. I mean, the whole thing might have might have crashed and burned, but it didn't. You
know, we held on. We missed the iceberg by that much. Well, Titanic was conceived as a
love story, and if I could have done it without one visual effect, I would have been more than happy to do that. Uh, the
fact is that, you know, the ship hasn't existed since 1912, at least not at the surface. Um, so we had to create it
somehow. I visualized making a lot of big sets and so on and keeping the the visual effects to a minimum, but uh it
turned out that obviously it was it was a big visual effects show before we were all said and done. But that wasn't
really my my motivation to make the film. And I don't think that should ever be the motivation to make a film that it
should it should be a means to an end. Um, you know, certainly there's a an aspect uh of me that likes big
challenges, big stuff, you know, whether it's whether it's big physical construction or visual effects or
whatever. I think that's what I do best. And I think there are other people that work at a much more intimate level and
do that solely that are better at that, you know, but I think that in that it was definitely a goal of of of Titanic
to integrate a very personal, very emotional and very intimate film making style with spectacle and try to make
that not be kind of chocolate syrup on a cheeseburger, you know, make it somehow work together. I think the spectacle got
people's attention, got them to the theaters and then the emotional cathartic uh experience of watching the
film is what made the film work. Um because and and I think also I think the spectacle served it but was not the
defining factor in its success. Once again, I think it's a question of balance. It's sort of like looking at a
painting and saying what part of the painting was is the part that that makes you like it. It's sort of all of it and
it's all of it working together that makes you like the painting. I didn't know for a long time.
I was fascinated by the sciences. When I was a kid, I used to spend all my time out collecting pond water and looking at
it through my microscope and trying to identify the the various prozzoa or I'd be looking through a telescope trying to
find the great nebula in Orion or or whatever. you know, my my brain was going in all these different directions.
Art was always sort of there. I was always drawing, but it hadn't really manifested itself as the as the main
thing. And all the way through high school, even into college, I I majored in physics. Uh I hit a kind of a wall
with with the maths. Uh and you know, possibly with with a bad teacher who kind of turned me off to uh to calculus
uh um at at a critical moment. And even though my grades were very high in astronomy and and physics,
um I switched to uh to English because I wanted to write. Uh so it was it was sort of going in two different
directions. It was a long time. It was about I would say I was 25 or 26 before I really settled in and said this is it.
This is the decision. I'm going to work in film in some capacity. And what finally attracted uh me to film
in such a definitive way was it was the only place I could reconcile the need to tell stories and to work in a visual art
medium and the desire to understand things at a techn technological level and my fascination with with engineering
and technology. It's one of the few uh uh media that are are so dependent on technology. So, it was a way to fuse
those interests. I didn't know where I'd wind up within film. I I actually started as a model builder and quickly
progressed into production design, which made sense because I could draw, I could paint, and so on. But I kept watching
that guy over there who was moving the actors around and setting up the shots and and uh I had never quite pictured
myself as a as a director. I had pictured myself as a filmmaker, but I had never pictured myself as a director,
if that makes any sense at I mean, I had wanted to make films and I understood at some intellectual level that the
director was the person who was most in charge creatively, but I'd never sort of pictured myself in that role, kind of
standing up there, the guy with the the the monle and the megaphone, you know, um had no meaning for me. Uh but then I
watched a couple of really bad directors work and I saw how they they completely botched it up and and missed the visual
opportunities of the scene when we had put things in front of them as opportunities, set pieces, props and so
on. And they had these great actors to work with and they just blew it. And there was a moment where I said, "I may
not be very good at this, but I know I'm better than that guy." And that was kind of a critical moment because when you
realize that you can at least be better than somebody else who's already doing it, then you can visualize yourself
doing the job. There were several light bulbs at several different times and the first
one was when I saw 2001 of Space Odyssey for the first time and the light bulb there was
um you know a movie can be more than just telling a story. It can be a piece of art. It can be something that has a
profound impact on your imagination, on your appreciation of how music works with the images and so on. It sort of
just blew the doors off the whole thing for me and and at the age of 14 and I started thinking about film in a
completely different way and got fascinated by it. It's also to my knowledge one of the first films that
really had a definitive making of book. It was such a a fascinating film that they actually they they made a book
about the making of 2001. It's the first one that I knew of that was available and I read it from cover to cover 18
times and didn't understand half of it until many years later. But it started a process a process of of projecting
myself into the into the idea of actually creating images using these high-tech means. Of course, I did all my
my low tech analoges of those means, you know, by buying models and gluing them on pieces of glass and moving them
around. But it was good training to think spatially and to think uh you know, in terms of storyboarding and so
on. So I was already a filmmaker, but I hadn't really realized it yet. And then ironically that was happening in Canada
thousands of miles from Hollywood and and we subsequently moved at the age of 17 for me to Los Angeles which is very
close to you know the the the black hole of Hollywood itself. And yet at that point I I sort of said well I don't know
if I can get there from here. I don't I don't know if uh you know who am I to say that I could be a filmmaker? Didn't
make any sense. Um, so I abandoned it for for grown-up things and I decided to be a scientist. Uh, and it wasn't until,
you know, many years later that I realized that this is really where my my heart lay, you know. Um, and then the
next light bulb was really just the one that says just do it. Just pick up a camera and start shooting something.
Don't wait to be asked because nobody's going to ask you. And don't wait for the perfect conditions because they'll never
be perfect. It's a little bit like having a child. If you wait until the right time to have a child, you'll die
childless. Uh, and I think filmm is very much the same thing. You just have to take the plunge and just start shooting
something. Even if it's bad, you can always hide it, but you will have learned something. you
know, I didn't really have anything to say, but I had a lot of images, a lot of things crowding into my to my mind
visually. Um, I had read tons of science fiction. I was fascinated by other worlds, other environments. For me, it
was it was fantasy. It was not but it was not fantasy in the sense of pure escapism. It was um as uh Isaac Asimov
used to say, science fiction uh readers are people who escape from reality into worlds of pollution, nuclear war,
overpopulation. And you know, it's uh it's a it's a it's a way of modeling the future or the present through the
through the future. So, you know, growing up in the 60s, coming to my kind of um um intellectual awakening in in in
high school, uh at a time when the world was in complete chaos between the war in Vietnam and and civil rights and all of
the upheavalss, all the social upheavalss, you know, uh free love, um you know, everything that was happening
in the late '60s, it um it it gave one an interesting perspective being a science fiction fan
and looking at a world that was coming apart and thinking in very apocalyptic terms about that world and I've never
lost that sort of um almost a a fascination with apocalyptic themes and Titanic is just another manifestation of
that because for me that film was just a microcosm for uh the way the world ends. However it ends, we don't know. But if
it ends by by the human hand, it'll end in the way that Titanic ended, which is through through some casual simple
carelessness. Um, so you know, being being a child of the 60s in in in that way, I think very much influenced the
way I I looked at uh what could be done with film. It was also a very interesting time in film making, the
history of film making because it was the the time when the when the when the paradigm of of studio film production
was completely deconstructed and and the independent film was emerged and all of a sudden the world the the filmm world
was turned on its head and a film called Easy Rider came out that was made for $40,000 and made more money than any
other film of that year including all of the big studio films. And so the the big smoke stack industry of Hollywood was
suddenly threatened from within by these these auras these these punks these these young you know George Lucas'es and
and Martin Scorseseis and um you know so it was a fascinating time and and that's the time
at which I came into my awareness of what film was and what film could be. So I I was definitely informed by that but
I would say I didn't really have anything to say yet. you know, I I just had a lot of images and ideas, but but I
hadn't hadn't, you know, found my themes. It took took time for that to happen. Took another few
years. Never give up because it's going to be unbelievably hard. It's going to be a ridiculously brutal uphill fight
all the time. And you just have to have tremendous stamina and and self-confidence to to power through it.
Um you have to not listen to the naysayers because there will be many and often they'll be much more qualified
than you and cause you to sort of doubt yourself. But you know what I learned from those early days was to trust trust
my instincts and to uh to not back off. Um because when the hour gets dark, your instinct is to or your your
your tendency might be to say, "Well, this is just too hard and no, you know, nobody should have to go through this in
order to accomplish X, whether it's a movie or or or whatever." But to to in in the pursuit of excellence, and I
think you can be in the pursuit of excellence when you're working on a low-budget science fiction horror film,
if it's how you define it, um you have to go all the way. It's that simple. Now, I don't mean trample over people. I
don't mean turn into a into a screaming maniac. I mean you have to be able you have to have made that commitment within
yourself to do whatever it takes to get the job done and to try to inspire other people to do it. Because obviously the
first rule is you can't do it all yourself. Even though you may know how to do many of these different tasks, you
physically can't do it. And you need you need a team and you need the the respect and the trust of that team. So that was
that was a lesson that took me a while to figure out because at first I just wanted to do it all myself. I was like,
"Ah, you're doing it wrong." You know, and that doesn't that doesn't work. That doesn't ultimately achieve the the
vision, whatever the vision is, whether it's, you know, someone else's vision or when you, you know, in my case when I
started directing was my vision. I couldn't I couldn't push people out of the way. I had to I had to learn to
inspire people to give me their best work. And I also had to learn to accept what they brought, even if it was either
a not as good or b good but just different. from what I had imagined and say that the the end result of of our
collective efforts will be exactly that. It'll be um all of our efforts together. It won't it won't ever be exactly the
way um I imagined it. And that that's I think an important lesson as well is that in any group enterprise, it's going
to be the sum total of the of the group. So, choose your group well and go go in with that little voice in the back of
your mind that says be be zen about it. Be philosophical. It's ultimately going to be the best that these people can do.
And you know, that's that's an interesting thing because it a little bit flies in the face of the
Atur theory. Um, and I I was sort of I was sort of raised aesthetically on that on that a tour theory, you know, and
looking at, you know, we the much vaunted Hitchcock films that were planned down to every frame and every
molecule through storyboarding and it all, you know, flowed from the from the forehead of Zeus. It's not that way. You
know, you're you're a band leader. When you're doing your job best, you're a band leader. It's tough and I'm still
I'm still learning it. Uh, but I've learned it well enough, I think, to do some of my best work as a result of that
lesson, you know, by inspiring the actors on Titanic and and in fact, everyone on
that film, the production designers, the people that were, you know, there there there were several thousand people
working on that film by somehow inspiring them to do their very very best, they brought me, I think, the the
um all of the elements all of the moments that eventually became that film. I couldn't have done
it all myself. Couldn't have done a fraction of it. You know, I had dark hours on Titanic that
were just as dire, if not more dire, than on my on on Piranha 2 when I got fired, on Terminator when we had, you
know, all these problems. I think that that there's just an I think that you have to find some kind of inner strength
that says what I'm doing is right. It may not seem right to other people and I I may not be able to please them right
now and I'm going to have to proceed on this path for a while until I can demonstrate to them that what we're
doing is probably the right thing, at least the best that I know how to do. And ultimately you reach a point where
people will hire you because you have uh the strength or some people call it vision. I don't that that's a bit of a
lofty word. Um because I don't think it's something that comes to you necessarily in in the night. I think
it's something that's the process of of of a very rigorous mental processing of the data on a day-by-day basis and and
and the possibilities what you can do and what you can't do. Um, and over time people will realize that that you have
what it takes to be in that situation where nobody really knows the answer. Uh, although a lot of them think they do
or say they do. Um, and you've come up with the right formula. And to have come out of these battle situations a number
of times with the right formula on a consistent basis, uh, they tend to trust you more as you go along. They'll never
trust you completely. The they, whoever the they is. In my in my business, it's it's uh you know, the studio that that's
putting up the money, the completion bond company, whatever, the bankers, the people that don't really understand the
day-to-day sweat, blood, and tears of of the creative process, because it that's another lofty term, the creative
process. When you're on a set, the creative process consists of, oh my god, how are we going to do that? You're
going to have to move the wall back three feet, and then you're going to have to pile up some boxes over here and
put the camera on it. It's all nuts and bolts things and then you have to be able to switch that off in a heartbeat
and think about what's the actor feeling, you know, what's the what's the character feeling at that moment and it
might be some really important very pivotal scene for them. So, um I I would say there's there's a certain tenacity
that's required and that tenacity manifests itself sometimes in in in unpleasant ways and other times it can
manifest itself in very in very noble ways when you can get other people to go with you that extra mile. And um I think
a lot about of what is misunderstood about about my particular film making process is that I get people to go that
extra mile that they've never done before and they go into new territory. They go beyond what they previously
thought were their limits and then afterwards they talk about it like it was a big adventure. Oh man, we worked
around the clock and you know, we all almost died. And it sounds like an indictment of the of the production as a
bunch of wackos. But when in fact, they're actually um they they want to share the fact that they that they did
this that they that they they did go beyond they went beyond in their in their creative capacity as well. And
that's why they always all come back and want to do it again. Maybe just not right
away, but I don't make I don't make films back toback anyway. So that I usually give them a year to go out and
see what it's like on all those other boring movies and then they then they all want to come
back. I lived in a small town. It was 2,000 people in Canada. Um little river that went through it. We
swam in the you know there's a lot of water around Niagara Falls was about four or five miles away the Niagara
Falls and uh so you know I've always sort of loved the water uh possibly as a result of that and that's manifested
itself obviously in my in my work and in my my own uh private time. I do an awful lot of scuba diving. I love to be on the
ocean under the ocean live next to the ocean. But um you know in terms of of uh you know
some wild family dynamics or anything like that nothing that would necessarily indicate anything. Um I would say my my
mother was an artist. She was actually a housewife but she you know she was an an amateur artist. My father was an
electrical engineer. So right there you have a collision of of you know left and right
hemisphere thinking. Um and I I think I got sort of equal parts of of both. Um my mother was definitely an influence in
giving me a respect for for art and the arts and u especially the visual arts and I used to you know go with her to
museums and so on and I when I when I was learning to draw I would sketch things in the museum whether it was an
atruscan helmet or a mummy or or whatever. I just I was fascinated by all that.
Um, you know, I think out of out of an, you know, an attempt maybe to to get my father's respect or or interest or or
whatever, you know, I was or or maybe it was just a genetically passed through love of technology. Uh, I was always
fascinated by engineering, always trying to build things. Definitely a builder. And sometimes being a builder can put
you in a leadership position when you're a kid because then it's like, "Hey, let's build a go-kart." uh well, you go
get the wheels and you get this and pretty soon you're at the center of a project. Uh, and uh, I think that that
um, you know, certain things must just be genetic because I look back at, you know, who I was at 10 years old or 9
years old and I'm the same person now, you know, and and uh, in in in essence in the in uh, uh, wanting to uh, wanting
to build things and wanting to get a lot of people together and do some grandiose thing, whether it was build a fort or a
treehouse or an airplane once we built an airplane. not intending it to fly, just hang from a tree, but you know, uh,
that sort of thing. And I realize I'm just doing the same thing now, just getting a bunch of kids to, you know,
help me build a fort, except that now it takes, you know, $100 million and the kids are all my age.
Yes. Good student. Um, mostly because of curiosity. I mean, a real natural curiosity. I wasn't trying to please
anybody. I wasn't trying to um it was for me it wasn't competitive against the other kids. It wasn't about trying to
please my parents so much as I just wanted to to know things. The sciences, history, even math uh to an extent. Um I
was just, you know, I was just switched on somehow. And I I think you know um that's the most important thing when I
look back to that formative period and I'm thinking junior high through through high school that it was a six-year
period. Um it was curiosity and I I'd spent all my free time in in the the town library and I I read an awful lot
of science fiction and the the the sort of the the line between between reality and fantasy blurred, you know. I mean, I
I was as interested in the reality of biology as I was in reading science fiction stories about, you know, genetic
mutations and post-nuclear war environments and distant, you know, interstellar travel and meeting alien
races and all that sort of thing. I read so voraciously. I mean, it was it was tonnage. I I rode a school bus um to
school for an hour each way each day in in in high school uh because they they put me in a in a in a program an
academic program that could only be serviced by this high school that was much further away. So I had two hours a
day on the bus and I read I tried to read a book a day. Um and usually it was it averaged a book every other day. But
if I got really interested in something it was propped up behind my my math book or my my science book, you know, all
during the day in class. Um so it was it was really more by authors you know it would have been um you know Arthur Clark
and AE van vote all the the kind of the the mainstream old guard of of science fiction at that time and then in the
latter years of high school then you get into the the newer you know the newer guys at that time uh you know uh Harlon
Ellison Larry Nven people like that but it was it was pretty much a steady diet of science fiction
A critical moment for me, I would have to say, was in was in my um uh we didn't call them sophomore senior year sort of
things there. It was in in the in the uh 11th grade. Um my biology teacher, Mr. McKenzie,
decided that what our school needed was a theater arts program, and we didn't have it. There was, you know, there was
wrestling, basketball, football, you know, it was a very jock oriented school and there was no theater program
whatsoever. So, we started a theater program from scratch. We bootstrapped it. Uh, he he taught it and I think he
might have done it for nothing and uh we took, you know, we took the class, but we really had to we had to build the
props and the scenery and the costumes and just do everything ourselves. and we had to turn the the you know the stage
into a proper working stage and uh took a year but we started putting on our own productions and and I think that was
really a pivotal moment and uh you know so my my biology teacher was the was our our muse at that time and uh I think the
fact that we were having to do everything that it wasn't handed to us may have um created a kind of a work
ethic that paid off then in independent film production because it's the same thing you you're you're finding scraps
and bits and pieces and putting it all together and putting on a show. And it's that sense of being able
to to create some moment of glory, some showmanship out of nothing, out of bailing wire. Uh that um is maybe the
lesson that was learned there as a result of this this man who just decided to have a theater arts program.
Otherwise, you know, I would have been just, you know, somebody who was marginalized by the fact that it was a
very athletically oriented school. And now I've gone back to the school uh recently and and found out that the
theater program is the thing that the school is most proud of. Their teams are doing terribly, but their theater
program is doing great and they're winning in all these, you know, dramatic dramatic awards around the around the
province. This is back in Canada. So, that's his legacy. But anyway, I think the the point is
that that is that um a a teacher can be absolutely critical at the right moment uh in your life and they can be um a
mentor and sometimes it's it's only just one comment that they that they can make. And I remember I was talking to
this this man, my biology teacher, and and he said, you know, I've seen your your uh
your aptitude tests or whatever kind of testing they did back then. uh you know 30 years ago in Canada and um we believe
that you have unlimited potential. Now I don't know if you'd ever seen the tests and I don't know if
any of the data indicated that but hearing that and knowing that somebody somewhere believed that I could go
accomplish something was a big contributor to the self-confidence necessary to overcome all these things
later because you're going to have 10,000 people telling you why you can't do something. Sometimes it only takes
one person to tell you that you can do something and you take it to heart. Otherwise, I wouldn't have remembered it
all these years, you know, and I remember where the conversation took place. I certainly didn't think of
myself as gifted. Um certainly the standards for being gifted in in my environment were if you were if you were
good in little league or if you were good in football or you know so so I was I was more like the like the um uh the
kind of the misfit the outsider and of course the misfits and the outsiders all collect together like this kind of you
know pawn scum around the sides and uh and that's where all the you know the I think the the good ideas come from. I
certainly never thought of myself as as u you know superior or gifted in any way. Just different def definitely
different and and hap satisfied to be different. Maybe not always happy to be different but satisfied to be different.
What it your defense mechanism becomes to be you know contemptuous of people who don't think outside of the box. And
um you know now I you know I've I've spent I spent maybe you know a 10-year period in there you know uh being in a
way kind of uh intellectually snobbish and saying you know you guys are just a bunch of jock idiots. And then I've
spent the last you know 25 years trying to reintegrate myself into a kind of normal being you know being being a
normal person uh and uh with you know limited success probably but uh I would say that um my father was
completely unsupportive in any way shape or form and was really sort of just sharpening his knives waiting for me to
fail. so that he could say, "Aha, I was right. You should have gone into engineering." Um, and it was always this
this sort of attitude of, "Well, you know, one of these days you'll get a real job. This film thing, you know,
will pass as a fad." And so, there was zero support there. And I actually think that it it it made me angry enough that
I had to succeed. I think if I had had a soft, rosy, supportive kind of it's good if you do
it, but if it doesn't work out sort of thing, it would have been different. But it it kind of made me mad. Uh, and I had
to I had to prove that that that I was right, that this was the right thing to be doing. And I think it made me mad
enough to get good, you know. um my mother of course at an earlier time was was very supportive of the art
um and and u you know the visual aspect of it. So it was an interesting kind of um dynamic there that that probably
actually served uh served me in the long run. Although it was it's hard to see it at the time. It was certainly difficult
financially but you know you learn to uh uh you learn to to survive. you learn to uh you learn to prioritize and you learn
I think also that if you're going to do something you have to do it all the way um and you have to just put put it
before all other things. I think it's you know the old adage the harder I work the luckier I
get. I think chance is is not a big factor in the long run. It can be a huge factor in the short run being at the
right place at the right time. But certainly the critical factor even with that chance is being able to recognize a
true opportunity and seize it the moment it presents itself and not wait and overthink it because it will pass, you
know. Um, and I think there are there are many talented people who haven't gotten to fulfill their dreams because
they overthought it or they were too cautious and they were unwilling to make the leap of faith. I think there are a
lot of people who are who are wos sleeping rolled up in a carpet remnant down in some alley someplace that also
were made that leap of faith and either made it at the wrong time or or never had the the skill to back it up. So,
it's it's necessary but not sufficient to have that as part of your uh makeup. But I think if if you don't have the
ability to to make that leap of faith, uh it's going to be harder for you to accomplish something great because there
are going to be moments there are going to be little windows of opportunity that open for a split second and you either
squirt through or you don't. But at the moment that you do that, you have to have prepared
yourself. You have to have prepared yourself for that fight because that's going to be the fight of your life.
Whatever that opportunity is, when you grab it, it's going to be more energy than you can manage. It's going to be
grabbing the tiger by the tail. And if you have not prepared yourself uh mentally for it u through study, through
knowing and and and hypothesizing what it will be like when you're in that position, you won't be able to deal with
it. And half of what you've concluded before the fact in in your in your theoretical projections is going to be
wrong, but half of it'll be right. And that's the part you're going to you're going to prevail
with. The films that influenced me were were so disparit that there's almost no pattern. I Stanley Kubrick was was an
influence because I loved 2001 of Space Odyssey. And the more I learned about him and his methodology, the more I
realized what a what a what a uh a rigorous uh um I don't even want to use the word perfectionist because that has
a kind of a fussy connotation of of unnecessary work of unnecessary complication of the process. I think
that his process was was uh everything he did was necessary. Um, and but it was it was it was a rigorous intellectual
exercise for him. And I was inspired by that. I've since come to to learn that for myself it doesn't work that well.
That there has to be there has to be some chaos. There has to be some uh looseness so that the so that that the
actors are given the opportunities that they need to uh give you their best. Um, and that you have to not have
preconceived it in such crystallinly perfect form that you don't leave the door open for the magic because the
magic doesn't come from from within the the director's mind. It comes from within the hearts of the of the actors,
I believe. And and so you just have to be there to kind of seize it at the right moment. But that was definitely an
influence and an important and an important influence. And the films, it was all the films that I saw in the my
last two years of high school. Those are the films that I and maybe my first year of college. Those are the films that
still burn very vividly for me. And they were everything from Woodstock to Catch22 to Easy Rider to um The
Graduate, you know, it was such an amazing time. I mean, up through, let's say, The Godfather, you know, it was
just such an amazing time in film production. Bonnie and Clyde. Um, you know, just just an amazing uh time, very
eclectic and and just breaking all the rules. Star Wars was very interesting because um that was probably the film
that galvanized me to get off my butt and go be a filmmaker. And and the way it worked for me was that that um you
know, I was an artist. I was fascinated by space. I was always painting spaceships and and living in this world
of these whizzing, you know, uh dynamic uh space battles and all that sort of thing. And I could I used to play, you
know, um we used to play battleship when we were in class where, you know, we'd just send coordinates to each other by
notes and try to blow Well, we turned it into space battleship and we'd draw these elaborate spaceships and try to
blow each other up. You know, that's that was, you know, my my senior year in high school. So, you know, I was living
in a Star Wars world in my mind and and all of a sudden I saw this film and it was like somebody had reached into my my
hindb brain and yanked out a lot of stuff that was in there and I was seeing it on the screen realized and not to
take anything away from from from George's creation because it's obviously phenomenal milestone, but my reaction to
it was not, "Oh, wow. That's cool. I want to see more." It was, "Oh, wow. I better get off my butt because
somebody's doing this stuff." And and it, you know, and they're beating me to it. That was that was my reaction. So I
I you know I I basically quit my job and started uh you know doing a little film with visual effects and sucked my
friends into that vortex and we all quit our jobs and fortunately we've all managed to successfully transition into
film making of that of that little group of four people.
The thing that is exciting about film making is that is to think back to the moment in time right before you had the
idea and think about that at the moment that you're s sitting or standing on the set and there are thousands of people
around and they've built this huge set and there are all these actors and there's all this energy and all this
focus and realize that it's all in the service of of something that was made up out of whole cloth, you know? I mean,
that's fun. I mean, that that's what an architect must feel like when they drive down the street and they look up and see
a building that they designed. It's something that you imagined made tangible. And I I get that rush much
more on the set than I do when the film is done. Because for some reason, when the film is done, you've lived with it
for so long that it's not new anymore. And it's it almost seems like just destiny. That's just what it is. But
there's a time on the set when it's when it's new and you can walk into it and you can see it and it's this physical
tangible manifestation of pure imagination. U now as much fun as that is, it becomes a curse the next time you
sit down and face the blank CRT and you have to come up with something because you know that there's going to be a
moment in time when everybody's going to be standing around having built this and having gathered to do it and this huge
human enterprise and you better think of something good, you know. So it it's sort of it's sort of the rush that you
get out of it, but it's also the uh the the the thing that haunts you before you start. I think that that characterizing
whatever I've brought to film making is probably best left to others. Um I know what I've tried to do, which is tell
stories that that um excite the imagination and maybe say something at a at a thematic level. uh maybe something
about the human condition with respect to uh our our human relationship with technology because ultimately I think
all my stories have been about that to one degree or another and um uh to allow people to step through that screen into
into that world whatever it is you know whether it's the world of the abyss or the the world of the Terminator or or or
Titanic to let people live in that create that space for them and let them live in in uh in the shoes of those
characters for a while. That's what I that's what I set out to do. It's up I think it's it's uh really up to others
to sort of sort it out uh what what it ultimately means. The thing is that that I see I see my things that I've done
that I know were inspired by other things. I see then other filmmakers picking up on my leads, taking it
further, and I realize that it's part of an ongoing creative process that that that uh is kind of self
self-perpetuating. And I so I I I think of myself as part of a as a link in a chain of of cinematic ideas. And it's
fun. It's fun to to to have that place. Ultimately the front the frontiers of film making have never
changed. I mean I think they change in the specifics of of the technology and the technique but ultimately it's it's
somebody sitting in a room writing. It's actors saying the lines in front of a lens and that image being captured and
that little slice of life that those characters those relationships being made alive in the minds of other people
all around the world. I don't think that is fundamentally going to change indefinitely. I think the specifics are
going to probably change a lot. You know, we'll have electronic digital uh presentation of the films, you know,
projection of the films. That's going to then start to inform the entire post-production process where we're
ultimately we won't be working on film anymore. We'll call it film, but there won't be any film involved. Uh it may be
shot uh electronically. film itself as a as a substance as a as a thing may be obsolete within within 10 to to 20 years
other than you know atistic art artists who choose to shoot on film because of some real or perceived artistic need in
the same way that that people still make pots by hand even though there are machines that make them beautifully. Um
but um I think that uh you know from a from a visual effects standpoint I think that visual effects are it's happening
now. It's not even the next frontier. Visual effects are just becoming integrated into the basic fabric of film
making where they're not something other. They're not something that um uh is uh outside of the normal film making
process. Now all directors are working with visual effects. Uh and it's just become as basic to the technique as as a
light or a dolly or or or whatever. Um which is good. I think this is good. It's good to think to to uh um it's
empowering I think to the imagination to let people create whatever it is they want to create and do it in a very um uh
in a very easy and straightforward manner which visual effects are now capable of doing because of the ease of
of uh digital compositing terms of computer graphics and and animation. And I think that's going to continue to to
uh uh have an increasing role. And um I think that u you know very real characters will come out of that. I
don't think we're going to replace actors. They're going to have to be non-human characters. I think there has
to be a reason to do a CG character. And the reason is it can't be you or I. It can't be somebody that you that you cast
and stick in front of a camera. It's got to be something different. But in the traditional techniques of putting rubber
on people's faces and making rubber puppets and moving them with hydraulics and so on, I think are are going to fall
by the wayside. Actors will still be empowered within that process because it'll ultimately still be a performance
created by an actor at some in some way. They just won't have 5 lbs of makeup stuck on their
face. There are many things that that I'd love to do. There are still a lot of stories that I want to tell. Um, I get
very excited by all kinds of different stories. I'd love to do a film uh with a scientist as a main character and and
really try to communicate to people the passion of science because I don't because our culture thinks science
is kind of unhip. You know, scientists get it, but I think that the greater community doesn't understand how
scientists think, what drives them, and how their passion can be as great as the as the passion of an artist or the
passion of a of a great athlete, which which our culture respects much more, unfortunately. Um, I'd love to be able
to crack that nut because I don't think it's been done well. I don't think Hollywood has served the science
community well. Um, they're usually stereotypes, you know, geeks, bad guys. um or distant unemotional people. And of
course, none of that is true or it can certainly be true of individuals, but it's not generally
true. I used to think that the great films that I saw, the great works of art were just something that somebody
imagined in every detail and then went and did. I didn't realize that the creative process is is the end result of
a lot of different people bringing a lot of different things to the table and it's impossible to predict and it's a
real time monitoring shaping molding process that goes along and the end result may be quite different than than
than what you imagined when you you started out. Um but that that's what that's how it works. That's what it is.
Um, in terms of of achievement, you know, I'm I'm at an interesting point right now because I've
just, you know, just having done this this film, it's definitely a a high watermark and I have to I have to
evaluate what that means. Do I let do I let the success of that overpower my my artistic instincts? you know, because I
there's a lot of things I want to do and and some of them I know for certain are going to be disappointments to people
who think that that, you know, I'm going to come out and and try to kick Titanic's butt because it might be some
little intimate thing or it might be something that's a little offcenter. And I think that um um what I find,
interestingly enough, is that sometimes um success brings with it a tremendous amount of scrutiny and anticipation of
what's going to happen next. and that that's not a good thing necessarily that that you don't you want to have the
freedom to just just react instinctively as an artist and not second guess not second guess yourself. Um so you know
when I've been speaking to to young people which I've been doing a lot lately that that are right at the at the
the cusp of of sort of deciding that their path I relate to where I am right now. I relate where I am right now a
little bit to to where I was when I was 17, 18 years old and thinking, "Oh, I've got to make this big decision, you know,
I've got to make this big decision what I'm gonna be, and if I mess it up, I mess up my whole life, you know, and
it's just not like that. It's um it's an evolving process." So, the I think the the illumination that I I might be able
to share that might mean something to people that are 17, 18, 19 years old and right in that point where they just
think they've got to make this big decision is you've got time. As long as you follow your heart, you'll be going
the right direction for you. It may not be the direction that everybody around you thinks you should be going, but
it'll be what's ultimately right for you. And I think the problem for a lot of people, especially when they show
great potential, is that all of a sudden you got 50 people in your hip pocket telling you what you should be and what
you should do. Um, and that sometimes people need a push. other times that those voices can be can be deflecting
you off off your true course. And I didn't find my true course until I was 25. So you've got time. I don't think
you have till you're 45, but I think you have at least until you're, you know, in your in your mid20s. And of course there
are there are stories a legion of people who don't find their true calling until they are in their 40s or 50s. I had the
um the great opportunity to uh become briefly friends with a woman who who uh died recently at the age of 105. She's
an artist in California named name named Beatatrice Wood. And she was a little bit the inspiration for the character in
in Titanic. In fact, in fact, I called her up and asked her permission to use her a little bit to interview her and
use her as a kind of a model for this character, even though Beatatrice had no connection to Titanic itself. and she
said, "Oh, I I couldn't possibly do that because I'm only 35." She she you know, she was she was 102 at the time. Um she
didn't she was an artist who who none of her significant work was done before she was
90. She kind of switched on when she hit 90. And that's I think that's an interesting thing to remember.
what people call obsession or passion uh for me is just a work ethic. And I think it comes a little bit from an insecurity
that I'm not good enough, you know, that uh that I have to that there are other people out there that I admire that I
that that I that I grew up admiring that are that are still, you know, that are still making movies and those movies are
great. And you know, I've got to compete with these these guys and these these these women and and you know, have I
thought of everything? Have I thought of every detail? Is this the best the scene can be? you know, so that it it it comes
a little bit from a healthy insecurity. The healthy insecurity that makes you better, that makes you better as an
artist. Um, and just from a kind of gonzo intensity, you know, I mean, it's just I just like to do it full boore.
For me, it's not about being comfortable. Um, I want to be in there. I want to help the guys move the dolly.
I'm I'm at my best when I'm neck deep in ice water trying to work out how we're gonna, you know, keep the lights turned
on when the water hits the hits the the the bulbs, you know? I mean, the the more the challenge is, the more I enjoy
it. And the more I can lead lead other people into these situations where they all think they're going to die, the more
fun I'm having. Uh, so needless to say, there we have a few washouts. We have a few people that don't like my version of
day camp. Uh, but I would say that that 80 or 90% of them feel like they've been through something. They've done their
they've done the best that they've they've done in their professional careers and they're usually uh pretty
eager to reup for another one. Well, as a Canadian, the American dream had a had a a very negative and
pjorative connotation when I was growing up because it was this kind of, you know, cultural imperialism. Um, you
know, I grew up in a border town on the other side of the border in Niagara Falls, Canada. And uh but you know since
I I'm I moved uh to the United States at the age of 17, I actually feel very much like like uh I I'm probably in my basic
genetic nature much more American than Canadian because I really believe in a lot of the I I believe strongly in a lot
of the traditional values of this country in terms of of uh respecting individuals rights the the uh the rights
to you know the freedom freedom of speech and a lot of a lot of the things that that are that are in the basic
fabric of the of this country. And I think that, you know, Americans and and Canadians even to to an to to a large
extent are are they come from from frontiersman stock. Uh so they're they're people who he you know heed
their civilization out of the out of the wilderness. It wasn't given to them. You know, it's not like people growing up in
in Italy or France in the shadow of past glories from thousands of years before. You know, we made what we have
and we don't have a great cultural depth like they do, but what we have is ours by God. And um you know, I like that. I
like that about it. You know, it sort of it sort of puts your your hand on the tiller of destiny in a way. and and
America definitely has their the its hand on the on the tiller of destiny for this planet for good or bad doesn't mean
you know what you're doing necessarily. But the other thing is that Americans are are very very happy to to argue like
crazy about everything and just hold hold things up to ridicule and challenge that other countries just take for
granted. And I think that's a good thing. I mean the whole Monica Lewinsky thing is the dark side of that. You
know, it just goes on and on forever and the other countries all think we're a bunch of idiots. But it's it's a
manifestation of a good thing that that that uh everything has to be examined and challenged and that's that's a great
thing. I mean certainly you know from a from an achievement standpoint anybody can come here from anywhere and if
you've got the goods it's a meritocracy you know it's it yes there are there are there are inequities just like anywhere
but the in but we challenge the inequities. We we're we're trying we're trying, you know, trying to to to
evolve. Other countries aren't many other countries certain other countries aren't even trying to evolve. They're
not trying to challenge those inequities, you know. So, I think that there's something that can happen here
that's unique. And certainly because America has embedded within it this um um this thing called Hollywood or the
movies or whatever which is this kind of um mecca to which filmmakers from all over the world come and participate.
It's become a kind of entertainment slash you know pop culture leader for the for the world. And so there's a
there's a grave responsibility in that as well. I'm not sure that that responsibility is necessarily being
being uh you know that mantle is being worn well necessarily right now but uh but it's the place to be. You
know I could go on for hours about about that. The Hollywood studio system collapsed after World War II. It made
way for a new breed of independent filmmakers they included and think about this list. Marty Scarces, Brian De
Palmer, Steve Spielberg, George Lucas, and especially Francis Ford Copala with the Godfather Trilogy and Apocalypse.
Now, Copela developed his epic yet very personal style within the major studios. Then he started his own company, Zord
Trope, and even bought his own movie studio in the early 1980s. Welcome. Thank you. What was it like growing up
in your household? And when did all of this sort of sense of of of feeding this male legendary copa imagination begin?
It it was a I think very magical uh childhood. In fact, for years I thought my father when I was little was a
magician and it was only when I was a little older that I realized he was a musician. Yeah. Uh but I very much
remember the sound of the flute uh as a little kid because being a symphony uh musician he practiced uh you know and
prepared and warmed up and I always used to hear this kind of uh beautiful sound and to this day when I hear a a flute I
just brings back my father to me. I lost him a couple of years ago. And I had an older brother who was extremely uh
important to me, five years older and always leading me into exciting new areas, literature when I was young. And
uh and it was just a it was just a very magical family, I think. And we had the Italian American influence. My dad
always uh although you know my grandparents and my parents really loved America as the Italian America does,
they always made me feel as though our Italian culture was something to be proud of and we ate pizza when no one
ate pizza and we had wine at the table. They used to call you science. Yes. Why was that? Well, I was a boy scientist. I
loved more than anything technology and uh uh learning about the lives of the scientists and I I always had in my
life. I do now a little shop where I would build things and try to make inventions and and uh ultimately was
always I was uh always involved in the radio club or the science club or I I could make little bombs that would blow
up a remote uh when I was little and and I just loved science and puppets and I think ultimately um and because puppets
are sort of scientific a little bit, you know, you have a string and the mouth opens and that ultimately led me to
participate uh in the lighting of the of the school plays. Yeah. And the love of movies.
I always loved movies. My brother used to take me. My my my first impression of films were the Corda films, The Thief of
Baghdad, The Man Who Could Work Miracles. To this day, I I adore the the work of Alexander Corda and that unique
style that they had. But um you know, we went to the movies. I always went with my brother and uh but it but I first
became involved in theater before really thinking that I might be a film director. Uh I was I I from going from
being the person uh who did the lights and worked on the tech crews of uh high school shows or what have you ultimately
I became in my college career uh you know kind of interested in directing mainly because I was always up on a
ladder hanging a light and watching the the professor direct the actors. And after a while, I got the confidence that
I could do it and I started to do that. Other than than Alexander Cordo, who influenced you? I mean, who was shaping
the way you thought about film and the way you thought about what you wanted to do with your life? Well, first I have to
say that it was uh uh the theater and the work of Tennessee Williams and Ilia Kazan. Uh being a drama student of the
50s, uh these were the magical names. of course Marlon Brando. Uh I I really uh loved and responded as many people to
Tennessee Williams plays and uh read them very young and in fact I did a production of Street Car Named Desire
when I was 17 in college. I became a little bit of the the boy wonder of Hofra College. I I in fact started the
drama club that's still there, the one that I did and I even tried to start a a Hofra cinema workshop uh which in those
days funny how it is now but I think two students came but I had a very uh did you merge something though? I mean was
it something you created something called a spectrum or you merged the spectum? Yeah. What it was is there were
two big organizations. One was the drama organization, one was the musical comedy organization which I I was a uh and I
discovered that the funding for the plays was really coming from the uh the student activities fee and what I did
basically was become president of both of them at the same time and merge them together and issue a a decree that all
these students could direct the major productions of course and that's how I got my chance. Was being at Ha shaping
influence? Totally. Ha was a wonderful place. I had wonderful uh uh teachers uh some of whom are gone. Professor
Beckerman who later went to Colombia and you know this was precedental to let uh young students take over actual normally
in a school the faculty directs the shows the big shows and NAFTA had a beautiful theater and still does and uh
you know partly my own political maneuvering but also I think under a proud eye of the faculty we took on some
enormous production as kids and and musicals uh original musicals and it was I think the encouragement
of of you know an artist needs a young artist needs to know that they can even do it in order to aspire to do things
and I got that at Hofra. Well, I read a story about you going to the movie and seeing Sergey Eisenstein's 10 days that
shook the world based on the John Reed book and that somehow you it changed your outlook. Well, I wanted to go to
the Yale drama school and I I really wanted to be a playwright uh in those days and it was a you know it takes
years to make a writer and certainly my efforts as a playwright although I had a draw a playwriting scholarship at Hofra
I just was uh um you know I just didn't feel that I had any talent and talent was a big commodity in my in my family.
I mean my father was uh you know very uh tough on whether you had the gift of talent or not. At any rate, I didn't
feel I had any writing talent, although I would write every day and try and so I sort of became a director in school uh
almost by default because I seemed to have ability to get the show on and to get the sets built. But one afternoon
around 4:00 on a on a fall day, the little theater uh I saw a poster that said they were going to show this
Eisenstein film. I had never heard really of Eisenstein. And I saw 10 Days that Shook the World with three other
people in this room. And I was so uh uh impressed. I'd never seen, of course, it's a silent film. I had never seen
film that worked like that. And it was on that day that I said I wanted to uh to to be a film director and not a a
theater person. And it's funny because Eisenstein himself who was a theater uh designer uh in his in his uh
autobiography refers to the fact that on a certain day equally he said the cart broke and the the driver fell into
cinema. So he had a kind of and for a while Eisenstein became a little bit of a guiding influence cuz I I felt it was
very good that I get a good theater basis in theater craft and acting uh and then go on to to movies. And to this day
for young people I would very much recommend that they work in uh one act uh the one act play form and and and
with actors and and in theater before they get involved in uh in the movies. And a a lot of directors don't have
really the experience with working with actors that they might get if they start because what they go to film school and
then go directly to working in movies and never hit a theater. So even in film school it's amazing really all over the
country there could be a film department and a theater department and the students don't mix. They don't know each
other. uh the directing uh students in the film department will never go and do oneact plays which is the best thing a
film director could do to first work with the performances and the content without the uh burden or the the the the
uh obligation of the camera you know and then having done some one act plays and really have a sense of how you you help
an actor get to what you want then go on and start to see what's the best way to put a camera to it. But how did you get
from from being influenced by Sergey Eisenstein to working for Roger Corman who everybody knows is the king of the
bee movies yet at the same time has touched the lives of a lot of people. Well, I went to the UCLA film school uh
in 1960 and uh um you know the first thing they told you at UCLA was well 10% of you are going to even stay in this
program much less become movie makers. Yeah. And it was very much uh what we felt was uh you know our wildest hopes
were that we could maybe make an industrial film or uh you know or uh or whatever kind of film a US uh um agency
film or something but the film uh feature film directors didn't seem uh you know they were older and they didn't
no one from a film school had ever directed a feature film. So, uh, you know, it wasn't it wasn't as it is now
where young people have the model of Steven Spielberg and they want to go in his footsteps. It was it it seemed like
a closed uh thing and and of course I I having a lot of theater experience. I was dying to work with a camera and I
was very and I and I was a writer which and I was a writer who had put in a lot of years trying to be a writer whether I
thought I had talent or not. At least I I did it a lot. And um uh there was an ad for um uh Roger Corman. We all knew
that one thing about Roger is he made a lot of films and if you would work cheap, you could work in films and be
around a set and and I hadn't even been on a movie set in my life. So, uh I remember that the day I was waiting for
the call back of whether I could go in for the interview was also the day that the phone company was going to cut off
my phone because I didn't have any money to pay the bill. And I was just sitting there saying, "Please don't cut off the
phone because I'll never get a job." Yeah. Because it, you know, and then sure enough, I did get the uh the call
and uh they did cut off the phone about an hour later and I went was interviewed and and and I I got this job which was a
funny job. Uh Roger's uh assistant interviewed me and that led to a relationship where I sort of became his
assistant because I would do everything. I would wash his car. I would move the sod of his lawn. I would rewrite
scripts. I'd be the dialogue director on the Vincent Price movie and I would edit all night. In fact, I even used to slump
over the movie and even be sure that when he came in at nine, there I was with my arm over the movie and you were
taking care of Yeah. And he would see that I had, you know, been there all night, which I had. Yeah. What led to
the first film? Well, Roger uh Roger in his closet had you know um sort of these rolls of old film uh you know really
even they weren't even uh little trims was whole cans of films that he had left over and there was a uh there was a
perfect tone recorder which was a sort of movie sound recorder and I mean equipment to a young film student is you
know is such a scarce and difficult thing to come by especially in those days before video that um uh I heard
that Roger was going to go to Europe and make a film called The Young Racers. And uh he asked me, he says, "Francis, well,
you're at UCLA. Do you know any young guy who could be a sound mixer?" I said, "Hi, Ken." And uh I went home and I read
the manual. And sure enough, Roger brought me to Europe as the sound man for a film he was making. And I and I
did that. And and I was also second unit photographer shooting uh the Grand Prix races. This is I mean a wonderful period
for a guy 21 and uh then miraculously just before we left I won the first prize in the Samuel Goldwin writing
award which had never been given to a a film script. So I had $2,000 which was the prize and I bought myself an Alfa
Romeo sports car. That's what they cost. And I mean I was 21. and I was working on a movie around a set and uh and uh I
knew that Roger always made a second film wherever he went because he would have the company pay for the first one.
It was AIP and uh since everyone was there and the equipment was there, he'd always do one on his own to, you know,
kind of average out the costing film. Yeah. But he had to go back to do The Raven, what a movie that became The
Raven with um a very wonderful film that he directed with uh Vincent Price and uh I think Boris Caroff and Peter Lorie.
Really a nice little a little film. And so I said to him, "Let me make the second film." and uh stayed up all night
and wrote a script and and and and got Roger to give me $20,000 to go off to Ireland, which was an English-speaking
uh uh country, so that I could, you know, get actors and stuff and uh and make my first film, and that's how I did
it. Did you remain close as you became famous and had your own studio? Yeah. Well,
Roger was appeared inside uh as in the cast of Godfather 2. He was on the Senate Investigating Committee. Roger
loves to act. And Roger told me once, Francis, if you stay thin, keep your hair, and have a lot of money, you'll be
young forever. He's pretty hard to do than to say. Most people say, "Well, I have two of those."
Talk about Apocalypse Now first, because I've got that here. And and it is so central, it seems to me, to your life.
And if you look at Godfather and then Apocalypse Now, look back on it and tell me what your hopes were and your
expectations. I mean, your wife has made a documentary that a lot of people thought was an incredibly good
documentary. Uh, Jean Cisco thought it was the best movie he'd seen that year. Uh, it was an extraordinary story in
itself. Well, the origins of Apocalypse really in a way don't don't begin with me. Uh, I had become a at a very young
age a director of big studio feature film. Probably I was the first film student, right, uh, to get that
opportunity. And I was actually making feature films at at Warner Brothers. And around me began to collect through an
association with a a young USC student who was a kid and who uh came uh one thing led to another and became a kind
of assistant at first. And this is George Lucas. George Lucas. And I, you know, recognized his um intelligence and
uh knowow right away. And he became sort of my friend. I didn't have a friend like a little bit like a younger
brother. And so George, it turned out, I didn't even know this when I had met him, but George was uh really an
extraordinary USC student, uh uh had won every student award. He he was really a heavyweight even in his own world there.
And a lot of young people gathered around or were George's friends. And since George was now working uh for me
at that time and with me, they sort of would come in to get inside the studio. and and our office was filled with
people who later became the famous directors of that period and they included well uh specifically John
Milius but it was John Meas was also a writer and he was a writer at Carol Ballard uh Caleb Desel um uh what's his
name um Brian Palma was around and uh of course you know was like we we were the Trojan horse we were in the studio and
we could get in through the gate and uh so they were around and we were always talking and the idea uh I think even
Carol Ballard had always uh been the one to say that he would like to do the classic heart of darkness the Joseph
Conrad novel which um of course Wells had wanted to do and and prepared but never made and also around was John
Milius who was beginning you know he's a great storyteller Melius and he was telling about these young guys surfers
who came back from Vietnam and and the vision of Vietnam was different than any war. I mean, it was uh guys on LSD
looking at the the rockets in the air and and uh of course the the use of drugs as an element in that war and
these extraordinary anecdotes that were coming back, guys surfing on the on the brakes in Vietnam. And this collection
of uh impressions and stories he had heard, he wanted to work up into a piece that originally I thought was called the
psychedelic soldier. And the idea was that George was going to direct it and John was going to write it. And Carol
Ballard was in there also talking about Heart of Darkness and stuff. And at one point, not not my idea, but at one
point, Milius and George decided that they would somewhat borrow the idea of of the boat going up the river to attach
all these vignettes that John was uh talking about to something uh that he would write. And uh I I was interested
in getting George the chance to direct a feature film. And in fact, I succeeded. And George made a film called THX1 1138,
which was his first film. And the idea was that George would make as his second film a script that John would write. And
I at that time I was able to wangle from Warner Brothers some funds to give all these young people money so they could
they could do it, including George. And uh John Melius began to write a screenplay which finally he called
Apocalypse Now. And it was um uh it was done and it was a very uh good script we thought and George was going to do it.
And um then we had a lot of you know setbacks and the the administration at Warner Brothers sort of dumped us. I
think they saw THX 1138 which was so far out in their minds that it wasn't what they thought they wanted to get into.
And ultimately uh all these scripts and stuff um because I had had the success with The Godfather Warner Brothers made
me buy back which is sort of I mean that's out real. When have you ever heard of a studio head that when he
leaves has to pay for all the projects in the development? Well that's what they did to me and I ended up with all
these scripts and I went to George and I said well George let's do Apocalypse Now. And by that time, George was
already going on and uh doing other things. And I think he was even I forget what he what he was doing. I don't know
whether he was writing Star Wars, but he had already made graffiti. But anyway, George couldn't do it. And then um I
went to John Melius who who who directed a fabulous picture. I thought his first picture Dylan uh Dillinger Dillinger,
right? And uh really his one of his best pictures as a director. And I I certainly was impressed with John. And I
said, "Why don't you do Apocalypse Now?" It's his kind of movie to do. Yeah. And and he um they wanted to do it, you
know, at 16 mm and, you know, maybe uh do it in much more in a newsreel style, which was George's concept. And um I
wanted to do something else. I was writing the conversation. I wanted to do the conversation and the film later that
years later I got to do, right? So uh also another thing was happening is is my entrepreneurial spirit which had been
honed at Hofster College uh was was in action and I realized that we could basically we always wanted to be
independent and control our own destiny with film and against the idea of the big company that would kind of just use
us and tell us what to do. So I developed with uh some of my friends the idea that we would go around the world
and we would make a film that we would finance by getting each country to put up an amount of money uh as partners in
advance. In other words, Italy would put up so much money, France, etc. And we would uh get the money by getting
distribution advances and therefore we would own the picture. And I knew we could do this. But the question is uh
you know John Millius wasn't able to do Apocalypse turned it down or said I can't do it. So it sort of fell to me
and I was the head of the company and I I believed that I could finance it this unique way which I thought might be a
precedent that we could maybe go on and continue to do that and by doing that we would be basically build a real company
that really could make movies and give new people chances and own the movies. So, at one point I decided, well, you
know, I always like the idea of this uh of the this idea and I like the script and that I would do it myself, but I had
different ideas about how to do it uh than George and and and even John. Number one, I very much wanted to make
it even more like Heart of Darkness. And in fact, if anything, uh make it be a kind of transliteration of Heart of
Darkness to the Vietnam setting, which was not really what they wanted to do. The end of the original milliac script
uh was quite different. It didn't didn't really end in the same way as or without any of the kind of philosophy of heart
of darkness but rather ended in a in a giant battle in which uh the Willard character joins with Curts and together
they hold off the you know, you know big John Wayne battle scene and that that didn't really feel right to me. Uh but
also I didn't want to make it in 16 mm. My idea was to do the opposite. To go there and make it in IMAX, right? You
know, and to kind of make it in 3D, make it in quadrophonic sound to to kind of be able to go in and and uh rather than
a documentary, uh to make it in in the opposite of that. And so, uh what happened was I did uh basically
put up again my own money which was in the form of my house that by that time I had come into possession. This is after
I mean the extraordinary thing about this is after the enormous success of Godfather right well Godfather and then
really what was catching lightning in a bottle Godfather and Godfather 2 and the conversation so I was in I had won all
these Oscars I had won five Oscars you were the director of the decade right and here I am no one had ever touched
the Vietnam subject uh no one had ever made a film a feature film other than John Wayne who had made the green berets
and I was going to take up all the money I had made which I had uh among other things bought the the the great
Ingalnook estate which was the the queen of the Napa Valley and I put it all on the line to borrow the money which along
with the advances from all the European countries I was going to go off to the Philippines and make this film and but
let me interrupt you as we look at this now I mean before I even go to the clip and before I hear a lot more about this
was it the worst decision of your life? No, not at all. Not at all. Oh, I don't I I wouldn't say that at all. I think it
was uh I think it was a great decision. I mean, when else is it the time to go on an adventure when you're, you know,
kind of was what was I 34 years old? Yeah. Uh I don't think it was a bad decision at all. But you mean you had
all this going for you and some have said that it marked something that it was a turning point in your life in your
career and that you rolled the dice. Yeah. But that was and you didn't. That was the thing to say. I mean I as we
know very often the story is written before the story happens and all I had to do was to go off to the jungle in
this condition and ask for a modeicum of privacy which is let me try to make this film and already as you know the reports
were coming back that oh it was a disaster uh primarily because no one knew and it was just a mystery. Uh, and
the story would to be that the guy who had made the Godfather and who despite all odds made a second Godfather that
people thought was as good as the first and made the conversation uh was out there somehow failing because that would
be more interesting than if I were out there succeeding. But it was a controversial project for all the
reasons you just said. I mean, you didn't want to do it in the beginning and then you know you Harvey Cartel was
was hired on and then he was fired by you over whatever differences or whatever. differences. It was uh not at
all that Harvey's a great actor. It was purely that as I saw the material, the kind of actor Harvey Harvey's like a
magnetic guy in that school of acting which is which is the focus is on Harvey, right? And the character was a
kind of witness who just was passive looking at this stuff. And I that was basically uh in my mind also Harvey was
uncomfortable in the jungle. Uh and I just you know I had everything writing on it and I just had to make a call uh
still admiring Harvey. You know that it's not a question of Harvey. It's just a question of the kinds of things that
happen to you in this film. This is what a director does. a director makes decisions and that's why you want uh to
have someone who's not afraid to make a decision you know and uh I guess I felt that number one um the fact first also
movies were at that time starting not just apocalypse but we were to see the trend that movies were going to cost
more money than a movie had cost in the past. It was in those days you could make the conversation cost under $2
million, but no one had ever heard of a 20 or a $30 million movie. I mean, Cleopatra was What did The Godfather
cost? The first Godfather cost 6.5 million and the second Godfather cost 14 million. But that index was continuing
to go had nothing to do with Apocalypse. Apocalypse being an ambitious production was going to be another milestone on the
index of cost. We today they talk in terms of films costing $80 million. This is a phenomenon of of timing and the
cinema has nothing to do with what's interesting about this. You think that we that we've come full circle and that
the new wave of films are going to be small interpersonal about relationships. Do you I I I what I feel in a nutshell
to get off apocalypse now come back to it is that we live in a world right now that if anything needs a cinema that
sheds light on life and on the relationships of men and women and family and ideals and and and and and
but in a new form a new content. Whereas the film industry basically is such an important industry that it by by nature
must keep manufacturing a product because it has to have the people go back every day like you do at at a at a
fast food thing. So they're into and the whole and when I say the cinema, it's the whole hub of it, the criticism, the
studios, everyone wants there just to be basically old content done well. And I feel suddenly, you know, there there all
these young people writing scripts hoping to be discovered to make their fortune. And I just feel that sooner or
later, some god knows 19-year-old is going to write a script that's really about life and that is about that is new
because once again, it's about something real. You theory that you think that's going to happen. I would assume that
there must be 50 scripts around. No, the young people, they're all writing scripts. that's the next Sleepless in
Seattle or the next film noir or no one writes a film about what they think about their their their brother and
although are they doing that in I mean that's what Marty started doing too I mean he went back and wrote a film mean
streets right was about just that the kind of thing you're talking about that's why it was so welcome I mean even
then now all the more as we live in an age where basically each year whether it's a sequel or not it's basically a
recycled and the name of the game even the critical establishment doesn't want anything really new because then they
have to say whether it's good or bad. They would rather have something. This is always what happens in art. You know,
the painters back then wanted a picture that looked like But is the piano something new? I haven't seen the the
piano yet because I've been sort of away, but my hunch is it's probably not. Probably not. Probably not new. I I
don't know. Have you seen anything that that represents what you're talking about that's really new? Nothing. No.
No. I kind of took a year off Yeah. from film, from seeing films, uh from really everything. Just since I'm 16 years old,
this is the first year I took off. Just to be able to look at everything with new eyes and so you don't you not
watching films, not not right. Not maybe Reservoir Dogs is new. I haven't seen that. My kids tell me it is. It is. You
know, so so but that's what I think is going to be the next exciting uh you know. Do you want to be part of that?
Sure. to the extent that my weird personality and and abilities can be part of that. I I feel I think all the
time about about life and about about the big picture of life which is you know uh spirituality and philosophy and
politics and and and and and what a new society could be like and how it could be beautiful. how we can retain the
great traditions of the past which is to say, you know, a book and at the same time have one foot in the past and have
yet one foot in the future and somehow I mean this is all I think about. Uh what have you learned? I'm going to come back
to Apocalypse and and Godfather because everybody wants me to talk about that with you because it's so much a part of
cinema history. But what have you learned in this year? What have I learned? I mean, what have those fresh
eyes seen? It it's inappropriate me to try to give you a sentence. All right. I'm not
looking for a summary, but I mean, just give me some sense of I basically feel that there are going to be some
opportunities that happen um that that uh perhaps can give me what I'm looking for, which is once again the adventure.
I think that once again um there could be live cinema, there could be live television that is writer driven that
the whole uh quality of writing and and uh the thinking and content that is really the most essential part of the
cinema could once again uh get out of this outrageous kind of what they call developmental process and once again
have authors who bring their views which is their views of life and their views of of people to be at the center of then
whatever the cinematic or television uh uh product is and that ultimately perhaps live ten think about it
everyone's talking about television and and uh the the incredible interconnectivity
and channels and telephone cables but yet live television which is which is an art form of its own which we demonstrate
in United States in the ' 50s which is which is writer uh which starts with the writer and which can go out live with
live performance and in a way that is less uh easy for the so-called corporate mind to control because when you go out
live you're in the hands of the artists. This to me is one of the most exciting new fields and I say new field knowing
it's an old field where the whole world is going to be able to connect with some actors and some writers and some
directors and yet you don't hear a peep about this you know in the world. But on the other hand think of this. I mean, we
we hear about what the well-worn uh ideas of what's wrong with the world and the destruction of the rainforests and
the extraordinary problems. Yet, no one will ever even say what the real problem is, which is
overpopulation. It's the problem is not that they're destroying the rainforest. The problem is that the planet was not
created to house more than four or five billion people. So, the very often the things that are at the root and the most
interesting is the thing that no one will talk about. So for me, live cinema or performance cinema could be uh one of
the new areas to to for a person like myself or or anyone who's serious about really uh interpreting life for the
world, which is what art does. Let me test this on you and I'm not a psychiatrist, but listening to you and
having read a lot about you, I see this and that's why I was interested in what had shaped you and how you came to get
involved in movies. It's an interesting combination because I have talked to so many directors on this broadcast and
most of them most of them on their short list of great directors is you at the same time there is this question in the
public arena what ever happened to Francis Ford Copela? How did someone who did such sort of seinal films like the
Godfather why isn't he making great films? Steven Spielberg just made Schindler's List. He's continuing to
grow. Let's say we wonder if you're continuing to grow and we wonder if the reason is you had all you were so driven
by so many passions, family, entrepreneurship, building
empires and institutions that you didn't have a whole lot of time left for doing what you really did which is make great
movies. Well, my first response, my first response would be number one, my films were not greeted as great films
when they came out. Even Godfather, which is the only film I ever made that had a what we will call a great success,
was very controversial and critically uh was really uh at the time it was a mixed reaction critical hit. My films are
unusual partly because uh I look at art as an adventure and I I mean what other film director if you took his first film
and his seventh film are so dissimilar. My styles are always different. Uh I'm very willing to to go in different
directions. I don't just basically make the same kind of film. I hear you. And people can say so right from the
beginning in time and I lived through it. So I know my work was always greeted even Godfather 2. I mean if you remember
back the reviews and the and the buzz to use a contemporary word was that Godfather 2 was not as good as Godfather
1. I know it because, you know, I was crushed because I knew that if that happened uh and and I couldn't live up
to the the promise of Godfather one, which at the time I spent my time uh defending that I hadn't romanticized the
mafia and that it had value as a piece of art. So that since in those days the films that I made which are today
considered classics uh were not considered classics equally so the films that I've made more
recently have the same reception but that does not mean that they were as good but but just because they're now
saying did I say whether they were good I didn't say the first one all I'm saying is that the judgment of these
films in their time was always that Francis Copela is promising but the reaction is mixed and that's the same
that they've said about films just to pull one out of the hot, the Cotton Club, right? But look at the Cotton Club
and then consider how it was received and yourself see what you think of the picture or uh you know my theory is that
when a film is unusual and tries to break new ground that when that when uh like a new food that you put in front of
a person I eat that I don't like that cuz I have no but six years later ah that's I remember that stuff my mother
used to make wow I like that better than Hershey bars. So my only point is first of all it's not important whether a
person is making great films or not because as we know what really makes a great film is one thing whether it lives
right and that can only really be judged later on. So for me, but but let me ask you if because it lives. Do you think
just you that the Cotton Club is going to live like The Godfather will live or like Conversation or even Apocalypse
Now, which many people think was twothirds brilliant and right. Well, that all my films were were considered
that way. In my opinion, Cotton Club is not in the same league, even close. When was the last time you saw it? Been a
while. Yeah. Look at it again. The main thing is No, no, but I'm I'm interested in you because I I have not one tenth of
the ability to judge a film that you do. I'm saying, do you believe the Cotton Club is in the same league with The
Godfather 1, Godfather 2? Forget Godfather 3 for a second. It's not for me to talk about my films as to what
league. But I'll tell you this, aside from the fact that many of the films I made post my studio were made more
because I had to make a film and Bob Evans said, "I want to make the Cotton Club. Uh, go make it." And I made one
film after another basically on demand. Uh, I would say that the reason you make a film is a very important ingredient
and what that film ultimately likes. But to shock you, I think that some of the films that I've made in this period when
you look at it in the long t term will be reviewed on the same will be viewed on the same level as those earlier
pictures. And I that's what I'm interested in. Name me those that you think might have that you think are
every bit as good and that history will be kind to. Oh, I think Cotton Club for sure. I think Tucker for sure. Yeah, I
agree with I think a film that's really out there and weird and uh people are just starting to understand that it
doesn't work like a regular movie is Dracula. You know, when I make Godfather 2, as I said, the first I remember going
under my bed on the floor under my bed because that's what a man does because he can't just break out crying at the
reaction to Godfather 2 were things that I overheard. You did what? I went under the bed in the space between the bed
just to kind of hide because I couldn't. We're talking metaphor here, aren't we? No, we're talking real space under the
bed because there are very few things a man is supposedly allowed to do to express how he feels, but because I sat
in a room after a screening and could hear people discussing the picture that didn't know I could hear it and heard
the the things they said about Godfather 2, which was and you just wanted to go hide, get into the under the bed. In
fact, you did get under. I did because I felt secure under the bed. So, uh, a a filmmaker, you know, uh, basically put
something out there on the table and the people judge it and usually with me, I have never had a wild hit except for the
first Godfather, which was based on a wild hit of a book. People were very critical. They went to see it because
they they love the book. People were very critical of of that movie. Marlon Brando Mumbles.
Uh, I said that there was a great There was a great praise of his performance in Godfather. Sure. And as time went by,
the praise got greater and greater. To me, you know, what can I say? I don't care. But I am saying that when you make
unusual films that you do not tend to get the praise in time that you get five or 10 years later. And I can I already
hear people telling me things about movies that got that same mixed uh reaction. You know, I saw that again.
That was really, you know, that was I can't get that. Are you saying to me in your head you that that that that you
have lived up to the expectation that you had for yourself after the start that you I didn't live up to the
expectation I had for myself with the Godfather or with the with Apocalypse. Well, let me talk about Godfather for a
second. I mean, we I want I love Apocalypse Now and I want to talk more about that, but we're off to somewhere
else now. I'm told that when you delivered the rough cut to Evans at Paramont Godfather one, it was scheduled
for for later distribution that he he said Rob Bob Evans said I can't I this is not there. You go back and make a
better movie. Is that a true story? Now you'll get the the real truth. Okay. I was editing Godfather in San Francisco.
Paramount was in LA. Bob Evans told me that when you bring me the film and show me the film, if it's over uh an hour and
15 minutes, we're not even going to talk about it. The movie is getting brought to LA and you're not going to work in
San Francisco. Just for the benefit of the audience, Bob Evans is at that time head of production for Paramount. I was
told that if the picture was longer because they did not want a long picture. If you want to retain your
privacy and edit the movie in your own studio, which is partly why I had done Godfather was to keep being able to keep
all these young film directors alive and and it was very important to me to be able to finish the film in San
Francisco. I was told if I brought the film down at Paramount and it was over this length that it was going to be
edited down in LA where they could supervise it. So we made the film, we made a cut of the film. It was an hour
and 45 minutes and it was the movie. I mean I have it on tape. Even in those days I was editing using tape.
What are we going to do? We we have a movie that's an hour and 45 minutes. Evan says if it's over an hour and 15
minutes it's going to LA. So for a week we sat down and we cut out this scene or half of this scene and we brought a
movie down that was 100 was was an hour and 15 minutes. Evans looked at it and he says you have destroyed the picture.
You have taken all of the the the texture the family stuff out of it. He says you're bringing it down to LA.
Which translates into he was bringing that film down to LA where he could kind of be all over it no matter whether I
brought it down at 115 or 145. So then we brought it down to LA where we put back all the film that had been before
we brought it down and we made it up to uh 145 minutes and he looked at he says see now it works. Yeah. I mean this is
what it's like in Hollywood. I you know this is why you want to create your own studio. It was to be able to allow
artist to have freedom from that kind of mentality. And you got it, but then you had to take
all these risks and you lost it, right? I didn't lose anything really. I mean, uh, uh, do you have, you don't have the
studio? Do I don't have the one in LA, but I have the one in San Francisco. I mean, do you have the freedom now and
the resources to, I mean, to make the kind of movies you want to make? Well, that's tricky because the kinds of
movies that I really want to make are not cannot be easily classified by what was successful two years ago. So, I
really wonder if anyone other than Steven, right, you know, uh, can make the kind of movies they want to make if
those kind of movies are really new and that really break a lot of what the wisdom of the distribution business and
the industry says. In other words, I don't think anybody can. Yeah. You haven't seen Shanders, right? Not yet.
No. Yeah. He said an interesting thing. He said, "If I'd made Shendlers before, I don't think I would have wanted to
make a dinosaur movie." You know, look at I always felt that that Steven was a prodigy. And when people used to say
that his subject matter was infantile or what have you, I say, "Hey, he's 45 years old. Every year he gets older,
he's going to bring his talent to new subject and get his confidence." And uh you know, it doesn't surprise me at all
that he's made a a distinguished film. He's made a lot of distinguished films. Yeah. Back to you, Godfather. Uh why
tell me in your mind what it was about. Uh, everybody wants to talk about that that the mafia is an American
corporation. They want to talk about the family and all of that. What was in the director's mind? Okay, we'll change from
what we were talking about, which was Apocalypse that we kind of were halfway there, but we'll go to The Godfather. To
me when I read the book I have time. When I read the book The Godfather, it seemed to me that and those of you who
remember the book, there was this story of a family that seemed classical almost, you know, kind of uh like
Grecian or or uh of certainly of that or Shakespearean. And at the same time, there was this kind of Irving Wallace
novel about a a woman whose vagina was too big. I mean, half the book was dedicated to a doctor who made a woman's
uh genitalia smaller. People don't remember that now, but when I looked at the book, in fact, I didn't like the
book at first cuz I thought it was sleazy. But this story of a of a man who was a king who had three sons and uh uh
each son represented an aspect of him and there was going to be a question of succession. That is what I saw when I
looked at the film. Whether it was Joseph Kennedy and his children's or someone who lived about a patriarch.
Yeah. Is it I know you hate this question, but I'll ask it
anyway. Is it the film that you cherish the most? Not at all. It's not. No. What is? You know, you asked me a lot about
what I thought of my work and I said more or less I really believe that my body of work is all about on the same
level. I mean, I have never I my flops of which every director has, are probably among the more interesting
flops than people have. Did you learn from them? Sure. I every film I make is an experiment in preparation for the
next one. I never really did what it was I intended to do, which was to be really a writer of
original material, original stories, original scripts, uh because I can that I direct. The only ones who ever done
that is Woody Allen and to which I take my hat off. I being a well-trained theater director and versed in musical
comedy and and uh you know the feeling that I could do a comedy I could do Shakespeare I could do anything that
worked against me because what I really wanted to do was to write original material for the cinema and then direct
it and I only did it on two occasions the conversation and the rain people much earlier and for that reason uh I
haven't lived up to my expectations and if I am to live up my expectations in this period of my
Uh it would be because I do that. Yeah. And you're a young man. It's still time to do that. I mean my sense of you also
and I don't want to impose my projection of you onto you but it is that you know you wanted you had a huge
appetite. Yes. You'll give me that. And secondly that huge appetite was directed towards creating you know a vehicle that
could do the kinds of things without the interference. I'm a builder. That's exactly what I would like to build a
city. If someone said to me what do you want to do. I was I want to build a new city. I want to build a new society. I
mean, I'm just a builder. So, whatever I'm going to get to do shy of that uh is going to be what I do in these next
years. And and and your vision is to be some is to the vision you have is still to be
the builder. It's what I am. So, I'm really pleased to be able to introduce to you the
director of the Living Dead trilogy, George A. Romero. Thank you.
So, I'm going to ask you a couple of questions and we'll open it up to you guys. First, I can't believe people
still show up to see this movie. Um, anyway, we'll talk about this later,
but all I see are the mistakes that I made. No, I mean that's the thing is like the
the film came out, you made in 1968 and um it kind of went out on the drive-in circuit. It just kind of it kind of
creeped out there. It didn't really get recognized right away. Can you talk about the journey of that? Well, you
know, the fact is that it it uh when when the film was first released, um it made money. It actually it cost us
about 117,000 and uh it made about 700,000 in the first year in those
drive-ins and neighborhood theaters and you know blah blah blah and we said wow this is an easy business then it went
away I mean just disappeared and then one day somebody discovered that there was no copyright on the film because we
had our title our original title was Night of the Flesheaters. And we stupidly as young
filmmakers put up put the copyright bug, the little C with the circle around it on the title on the title card. And when
they changed the title, that bug came off. And all of a sudden, there was no copyright. They didn't notice. We didn't
notice. Nobody noticed. You know, it was one of those things that just one of those the one that got away. And all of
a sudden there was no copyright on the film. So you know the moment that people realized that I everybody was selling it
on VHS and you know everybody could release it without having to pay any royalties or anything else. And that's
that's really the journey of that film. Then all of a sudden the French discovered it.
this a a magazine called Cahedo Cinema uh which you may know wrote this huge article about it
being amazing important American cinema and I wasn't thinking of it as that at all but they everyone who was sort of
noticing the film was talking about the racial issue and uh to to us. It wasn't a racial message at all. In fact, we
were what when when we cast Dwayne Jones, when Dwayne Jones agreed to do it,
uh we didn't change the script. And when Jack and I were writing the script, it was the guy in our mind was Caucasian.
And the same things happened to him. And people are saying, "Well, here come these posies with posi with dogs and
going after the black guy." They were going after the guy when he was white and and uh so that was not our point.
Our point was more the disintegration of society, the inability to communicate, the fam the disintegration of the family
unit and that's the stuff that we were uh and you just you just picked him because he was the best actor you could
find. That's it. Dwayne was the best actor from among our friends
and and so the before the French discovered it. So, uh, back in the 60s and the the the early '7s, horror films
were kind of for kids. Uh, they had like the Universal Bella Losce Dracula and the Boris Carlo Frankenstein. And they'd
have like matineese where parents could go drop off their kids, they could see these silly old horror films. But
somehow Nidal the Living Dead got lumped into this circuit. And so, um, I think Roger Eert actually wrote a piece about
how he went to one of these screenings and it was like a double bill of one of the kind of tame films and then Night of
the Living Dead and he's like and the kids were enjoying themselves for the first film, but then as soon as Night of
Living Dead started, they were crying and running screaming and and there's actually kind of like part of the
American kind of mainstream writing like in Writer's Digest who just like this, you should know what your children are
watching just like ripped into it. Well, there, you know, Eert's article was picked up by the Reader Digest and and
uh it it became a cause celeb. It was one of the three films that were cited when when people were arguing that that
we need we need to control these guys. We need to control filmmakers. You know, it it was one of the one of the films
always cited when the people were arguing for an MPAA or for whatever the MPAA became.
Um I guess it still is the MPAA but uh it was it was the equivalent of kind of like a an Oprah Winfrey social scandal.
Yeah. Basically. Um but then it was really the acceptance and this is kind of often the case once the French say
it's okay. Everyone jumps on. Yeah. I started to watch Jerry Lewis. the um so just talk about again the the
making of it because this was you had just a very small crew small I mean one color films were predominant but the
film was you chose to shoot the film in black and white was that a budget constraint or it it was initially uh you
know back in the day when we made this film uh cities the size of Pittsburgh which is where we made it had film
laboratories 8635 complete film labs, processing, work, printing, doing the whole thing
because the news was on film. This is before video of any kind, before videotape and the news was on film. And
it's really where I learned to uh you know use the pencil hanging out with these journeyman editors in one of these
labs and um so we were able to actually make the film
uh and and complete it and um that was you know it we were able to actually finish the movie with the title
Night of the Flash Eaters. And then the night that we Russ, my partner and I, Russ and I, Russ Striner and I were were
driving it to New York, we had the first answer print of this of the film in the trunk of our car and driving to New
York. We heard on the radio that Martin Luther King had been assassinated. And that I think is where the whole race
thing came from. I mean that that sort of made the film that much more um exotic or that much more just yet just
hearing that news what you had in the trunk suddenly it changed wonder if this is going to be good for
us. I mean you know you hate to say that but you know it's obviously the thing that
that occurs. Yeah. people would read I mean it was very rare to have like a black lead hero and and sometimes with
the way it was I mean America was still segregated to some extent in the south and some theaters down in the states and
in the drive-ins wouldn't book this because of just because of the the color of the hero's skin. Yes, that's right.
That's right. And you know what? Even when I made Land of the Dead, which was what, four or five years ago, I I don't
remember when it was Universal. Would not let me I had this I had this convention. I I had used um
African-American leads in all of the Dead movies up until that point. And I wanted I wrote the character again as an
African-American because I said, "Well, hey, you know, if that if I can do this a little bit to help, uh great.
Universal wouldn't let it happen even then, even as recently as that. They said, "Can't do it." And so I I
said, so as a result, I made the lead zombie an African-American. And you know, I thought that was sort of my
retaliation. And the interesting thing again of like the the time period that this was shot and there's an amazing
really great documentary called American Nightmare that you should try and seek out because it's just about horror films
in the 1970s, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Dawn of the Dead, and it looks at how these filmmakers were making films, but
at the same time they're reflection of like the cultural and social political time uh that they were made in. And the
beginning of this documentary starts off with intercutting scenes between news footage of Vietnam, the the racial
strife in the South and Night of the Living Dead and Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and you can't tell the difference
between news and and the horror films. Um, and it's just really remarkable. It takes a minute to to recognize which is
what's what's Memorax. And that and that's one of the magic things about the film is that that there
is there's a realism to it. Um and like I said before, horror films were considered to be like, oh, just, you
know, for kids, for trick-or-treaters. Yeah. Well, you know, I and and to to a great extent they were
benign then, but it wasn't it wasn't really it was like, you know, the beast from 20,000 fathoms. It it wasn't so
much Dracula and Frankenstein and the early stuff. It was uh when we were out it was, you know, the 50-foot woman and
stuff like that. And they were, of course, much more benign. They basically had no no message except that atomic
energy might destroy us all. And um that was it. and and so we were trying to number one push the envelope a
little bit on the gore even though today it's nothing and um your question about black
and white uh originally you know I actually argued when we were making the film because we came to a point
about a week into the film about a week into the shooting the film where we had some investment
And we tried to decide, well, we could switch to 16 millimeter and go color and re-shoot that week or stick with 35 and
stay with black and white. And I argued at the time that the most brutal scenes that I've ever seen, one of the most
gory things is the image of Brando after they beat him up in on the waterfront and he's got blood all over him. And I I
just I felt that it it was more gruesome. And I think that that had something to do with news with news
because the news was all black and white at that time. There was no color TV yet. And uh I always felt that that that
black and white the blood looked more real and and in color most of the color blood was John Wayne blood, you know,
and uh not not very realistic, a little too bright, a little too red. And I I I honestly felt that black and white blood
looked gorier. And so I decided to stick with black and white because when you look at the the blood and gore in Dawn
of the Dead, it's it's cartoonish. It's and I mean as as gruesome as it is, it's it's still laughable. Yeah. So Oh, it's
meant to be Exactly. It's supposed to be. It's meant to be funny. Do we have any questions from you guys?
Let's see. We have We have uh people with microphones here. Okay. So, uh I can't see anybody. Yeah, we've got some
people. Here we go. We've got someone over here, I think. So, they're going to run a mic over
here. Hi. First of all, I'd like to say thank you for coming. Oh, thank you. This is really an exciting moment for
us. Um I'm a grad student at OKAD. I'm interested in knowing about uh your methodologies pre and post film and I
guess during the film too. Um creative process. What kind of methodologies do you use? Did you have to do interviews?
What kind of research did you need to do before the before this film? I mean one one of the things is that uh pretty much
throughout your whole history of all your films you were the writer with like just a few exceptions. Can you talk
about the the process of where you get your inspiration from the news? I guess uh I I often I mean I
I when I'm sitting there writing something I I will have CNN on and uh it does you know it's like that's my
wallpaper. Uh I usually get the idea from I get some germ of an idea like for uh when I when we made Dawn of the Dead.
Uh I resisted for 10 years wanting to do another one because particularly after the Kah de cinema wrote these glowing
things about it and then it was invited into the museum of modern art it became important movie and I'm sitting there
going wait a I didn't as I said all I could see were the mistakes in it but um technical mistakes
and I didn't want to do another I socially knew the the people that were developing this the shopping mall where
we shot Dawn and it was the first first shopping mall that we'd ever seen. The first indoor shopping mall that anyone
had ever seen in Western Pennsylvania and I went out a few days before it opened and I saw all these
trucks coming in with everything that you know Americans could ever want. And uh I said, "Wow, this is like a temple
to consumerism." And and uh that was the thought and that's where the thought came from. And then I I started to I
started to write a script that had that at its core. And I always sort of look for that in in in my
in my fantasy fiction. I'm I'm always looking for uh the core first and then sort of build
around it. Uh that's part of my process and then going through it. I I always I used to edit my own stuff. I used to in
those days I used to shoot my own stuff and um it was it's it's it's very hard to to learn how to collaborate with uh
when you're used to having that absolute hands-on control. It's hard to learn how to collaborate and you have to have
relationships. You have to have really good relationships with people. And now here I
have better relationships I think than I ever had in the Pittsburgh days. And um I'm there all the way through the
edit. I'm, you know, I'm I'm sort [Music] of making sure, you know, sort of uh I
don't know, being the guardian angel, sort of watching over the the that that part of the process all the way to the
end. Um, as far as the scripts, when I the idea always comes first. It has to come from some sort of
a germ of an idea. It's like I know a lot of people Colin you were saying the other day that you know you people come
to you with movies that they've young people with movies that they've made. They're all zombie movies something but
it has to have something at its in its soul right like let the right one in had something you know had a little
something different instead of you know the the other vampire junk that's uh around and and um so that's what it is.
Yeah. Um, I mean, you should see we actually screened it last night. Uh, George did
do a vampire film called Martin. Uh, which is a very different take on what the vampire is and whether or not
he's even a vampire. Um, but that's what you've been special at. You've always kind of taking a convention and kind of
twisting it around. Turning it around. Yeah. Sometimes that's where the idea comes from. To go back to your question,
uh, sometimes it's just a twist on an idea. When I when I started to do Martin, I wanted to do a comedy. I
wanted to do something silly about how a vampire would have to always, you know, be changing his driver's license and,
you know, making him look older. Uh, things like that, silly things. And then I said, "Wait a minute. This I could do
something a little more creepy with this." And uh I you know some point somewhere when I'm in the shower the
idea comes and you get it it pops. And then when I'm actually doing the writing I basically just sit there and write. I
I don't I don't get up. I just get up to, you know, eat, sleep, um
drink and um I I'm I'm basically stay there. That that's the way I work. Uh, when I'm
really when I'm really deeply into something, I I I I don't want to be disturbed.
Do we have any question other questions here at the back? Okay. Where? Okay. Stand up so we can see you or wave or
something. There we go. Way in the back. Uh, what is your biggest challenge as a director?
My age. No, you know, I'm joking. Uh, you know, it's always different, man. It's just
always completely different. Sometimes, depending on who's holding the purse strings. Sometimes you can't use the
people that you want to use. I've had directors of photography forced on me by studios and and
uh, you know, that's usually the that's usually the big challenge. And so I prefer to
work in in an environment like here uh in Toronto. Since I've been here, I've been able to sort of, you know, I
gravitate towards people that I that I feel have the same sort of [Music]
um aesthetics and and uh and we we wind up becoming friends. I mean, that's the way
it was in Pittsburgh all those years. I've worked with the same sort of little family of of uh of technicians and and
uh now I have uh you know a new little group here that that I love working with and um it's great relationships are are
the most important thing and if you've got those good relationships you know you you don't you
can shorthand your message you you somebody you say something and the the DP knows exactly what you're
talking about you don't have to repeat yourself or, you know, overexlain or whatever. I've been in situations where
I was I I shot a film called The Dark Half where the DP was a big deal DP, a guy that worked
for Merchant Ivory, Tony Pierce Roberts, and there's a scene, for example, where these people are coming
home for the first time. They're they're the their house, their country house has been closed basically for the winter and
they're driving up for the first time to this place. And Tony said, "Well, wouldn't it look
better if there were lights in the windows?" And I said, "Yeah, it would look better, but it doesn't make any
sense." And he got his way. He was able to call the studio and insist. And this guy nearly got me fired
off this film and and uh because he had the power. He he was looking to win an Oscar and he had the power and he won
that argument and and um so if you look at the dark when they pull up to the house the lights on in the house and I I
I wasn't able to say anything about it. You wind up having to fight and duke it out on every little
point and uh that's no fun at all. Yeah, it's it's it's a very what a lot of people don't realize is how fickle the
business is and a film can be made or cancelled just on on on a whim often and that's happened to you often. Oh yeah.
And that's happened to so many other people. We have a another question. There was a hand. Okay. There's one over
here. Yep. Go ahead. Oh uh I was just going to comment on Creep Show. Oh, over here. Oh. Oh. Oh. Over this way. Yeah.
Oh, okay. Over this way, George. See, I I only hear out of one ear, so I have no stereophonic hearing. I can't tell. I
was just wondering, uh, just to get away from the zombie thing for a second, like uh, Creep Show uh, was like an
anthology. I was just wondering if you're ever going to attempt something like that again because I I thought it
was pretty unique and Well, you know what? I would love to. I think they remade a Creep Show 2. I I
don't even I'm not even sure about that. Creep Show Two and there's a Creep Show three. Yeah. I mean, you know, Steve, I
don't think Steve had anything to do with it at all. I don't even think Richard did. Uh, Richard Rumstein, my
ex-artner. I think it that somehow Warner Brothers sold it off. I I don't know how it happened. I'd love to do it.
The the wisdom in Hollywood is that anthologies don't work. And and um I I don't get that. I mean, one of
these days and there's going to be an anthology that'll blow the roof off again. There's there's a good um it's
actually playing I think in Toronto now, but it'll be coming out on video and VOD. There's a really great horror
anthology called VHS. Check it out. It is and it's done by directed by around four of the top
young horror uh directors and writers and it's super fun and it's it's proof that anthologies do work, but it was an
independent film which was done for next to nothing. I also saw in Lu I wait we didn't see the film but there's
something of the dead uh with many many directors. Oh, the ABCs of death. ABC's of death. Yeah. ABCs of death. Uh we
just had the world premiere here in September at the film festival and it's 26 short films about death. Each one
it's like a children's book. Like A is for uh D is for dog and it's 26 different directors and some of them are
strange, some of them don't work, but like half of them are just incredible. It just But I mean that's the thing with
an anthology. You're always going to have you're always going to have one which isn't as strong as the other
three. And I it's just the the the way the mix works out. So, oh, definitely. I mean, there's there's no question. And
then trying to decide when we were trying to decide what order to put the stories in Creep Show. Uh I mean, there
was more arguing about that than about anything else on the production. What order should we put them in? Let's get
rid of Jordy early and uh let's put Lesie Nielsen in the middle somewhere. That's and here's got uh still over
here. Still over here. Okay. Well, then we'll get to you. Hi. I just I was at the uh screening last night of Martin
and I had forgotten how special that film was and it really moved me and I wanted to thank you for it first of all
just for making it. It's an amazing film. I'm happy it's out there. But my question is actually about um the role
of women in the dead trilogy. I really enjoy the trilogy. I'm a lifelong fan. But if you look at a character from the
first film, say Barbara for example, and then you look at Lori from Day of the Dead, there's quite a journey there. And
I was just wondering if you wanted to comment about that. Like I I I think Day of the Dead's almost a feminist film if
you think about the other two characters, the Roads character and the scientist character. They're kind of
caricatures of masculinity. So I was just wondering if you wanted to comment on that. Well, it's interesting because
someone went mentioned this uh the other night when we were when I was doing the first
uh talk with uh Colin. Um I when I made Night of Living Dead, I
was I was as unaware of of Barbara's um problems as a woman as I was about Dwayne as a black man. I mean, I I I
just said, "Come on." You know, I I I didn't I I just thought with Dwayne, I said, "Come on, it's 1968, man. Nobody's
going to care about that." And and with with Barbara, I fell into the old trap of the
damsel in distress. You know, she breaks her shoes, she breaks her heels, she falls, she does everything, and she
winds up being catatonic and ineffectual all the way through the movie. And it it took me a while. It only when people
started to talk about the film, no one mentioned that. Nobody mentioned that. Oh, this is this is not very nice to
women. Everybody was just all about, you know, what a racial statement. No one ever mentioned it. And I but I noticed
it. I said, wait, I that was wrong. and and um so when I did the remake when I wrote the remake of Night of the Living
Dead, the one that Tom Cvini directed um I made her much strong made Barbara much stronger and then I've sort of been
apologizing ever since and I I think that uh that's the Sarah is the maybe the strongest maybe Aza in Land of the
Dead but she's also bit of a victim, but uh she's pretty strong, too, in the end. Uh anyway, I've I've tried to
uh apologize. I think you have. I mean, in in in Day of the Dead, Sarah is like just as strong as like Sigourney
Weaver's Ripley in in Aliens. Like, it's a good sharp character. But I mean the interesting thing is in these films
everyone has they think that they're doing the right thing and it's always either the wrong thing or that's not the
only choice. That's not the only choice and that's it. She was she was Sarah in Day of the Dead is wrong about a lot of
you know the way as much as she forgives Frankenstein and you know and she's just wrong about she she's too easy on on the
situation. She should have shot roads, you know. Um and and um so I was also trying to stick a
little of that in there that because Ben in Night of Living Dead is wrong in the end. He's he was wrong. He was wrong
about arguing. He was wrong about the basement. He He's wrong. And in the end, he's proven wrong. But,
um, I was trying to do a little bit of that, uh, irony there with her, too. And, and just, uh, to let you guys know,
tomorrow, Saturday, we are doing a triple bill. We're going to be showing Night of the Living Dead, then Dawn of
the Dead, and then Day of the Dead, and I'm sure those size are from people who aren't in Toronto. Um, and also actually
Day of the Dead. Take it. Day of the Dead. a beautiful 35mm print and it's actually uncut because when the film
first came out in Ontario, the Ontario film review board, our sensors cut the hell out of it. Um, so uh, yeah, you'll
be able to see it in all its 35mm. Do that. I I just heard that from you the other evening. Yeah, there's there's a
scene in the film and I remember when it came out on VHS where there's this this character who shoots himself and puts
the gun to his mouth and pulls the trigger. But in the Ontario cut, you heard the gunshot, but then you just see
him slump down to the wall and there's something missing. And that's like a very integral part, not it's not an
integral part of the film, but it's a very elaborate special effect. It's not real. it. Um, I mean, we could spin off
on that. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, when people say the there's there's a great quote by and and I don't mean to I'm sorry to
interrupt. Go ahead. Well, the quote is there's a quote from Gdard, and I hate dropping this because it sounds really
ponyy and pretentious, but uh, talking about film and talking about blood, Gdard says, "It's not blood. It's
just the color red." And that's anytime you see someone screaming and getting squeamish and
really upset, I'm like, "No, that's not blood. It's just the color red. You're interpreting it as blood, right? Yeah.
So, we've had someone who's been very patient here with a question. Hi. I was just wondering um your zombies every
movie look a little bit different. They get scarier and more gorier. And I was just wondering when you u made Night of
the Living Dead um if you kind of had that vision of what your zombies look like now in your recent your more recent
dead films or if you is that something that you build on every movie. You kind of you know give them a different look.
Um, and it's always interesting to see every movie how, oh, they're gonna look different or it's creative. Well, no.
And actually, when I made the first film, Night of the Living Dead, I didn't call them zombies. I didn't think of
them as zombies. I to me zombies, I was doing dead people. And zombies, according to the Serpent and the
Rainbow, and these guys are right about voodoo, they're not dead. They're given some sort of blowfish powder that makes
them subservient and makes them slaves. They're not dead. And so I thought I'm going to make the dead for some reason
stop saying dad and I thought I was doing a new creature and uh I don't know Carl Hardman and the people that did the
makeup bakes because it was black and white it was very forgiving. It was basically just pasty looking and sunken
eyes and you know we were really very simplistic. there were only a couple of makeups that were a little more
elaborate. Uh, and that was it. And then all of a sudden when people started to write about this film and started to
call them zombies, I said maybe they are zombies. And so I called them zombies in in Dawn of the Dead. I finally used the
word zombie. And um what happened there basically was not much of an advance cuz Tom Ceini was he
was in his early days of doing makeup special effects and basically those zombies are just gray. I mean if you
look at them there there's nothing special about them. And it wasn't until Day of the Dead that Tom had come a long
way with prosthetics and with being able to, you know, do the the effects work. A and uh that was the first time that they
sort of really advanced. And then after that, by the time we got to the land of the
dead, you know, we had all all the benefits of, you know, everything, all the pro, you know, the the
best prosthetic makeup and the best CG and everything else that that we were able to use. And so you you know, you
use what you what you can. And um so that's really it was almost an accidental process. We were growing up
as the that as the the techniques were were growing up. And just to to note um about your undead, your undead don't eat
brains. That's something which other people have run with. We before we did the the we had a discussion here the
other night and I heard someone in the audience go brains. I'm like had nothing to do with just this gentleman's work.
Um your zombies your undead don't eat brains. My zombies have never eaten brains. They're this
misconception, you know, they could never crack it open. It's like a coconut, you know, they could never
crack the skull open. So, I where that came from, there's actually kind of a fun film, uh, Return
of the Living Dead, Dan Oannon's film, which is kind of looking at it's it's like a postmodern fun take on the genre,
and that's kind of where it came from. Um, but I mean the great thing is that your your zombies, they all have
personalities. And I mean, if you look at uh Day of the Dead and Land of the Dead, you've got one that's just in just
enriched with a story and character and is is one of the main focal points. Oh, I one of the main characters in in the
movie in in both of those films, Day of the Dead and Dawn of the But I've always tried to give them charact even even in
Dawn the F when I when I first realized that they were zombies, I didn't want them to just be these sort of um
faceless and I wanted them to have um a past. And so, you know, there's a nun, there's a softball player, there's, you
know, there there I try even just with wardrobe to make them um familiar to that extent, familiar.
And I I think that's important instead. You know, you look at the remake of Dawn and everybody's wearing running shoes
and Nikes and they're running. I don't get it. But, uh, talk about that. Slow slow zombies versus fast zombies. Slow
for sure. If they're dead, they're slow. They run. Automatic. Automatic. If they're dead, they're slow. If they run,
their ankles will break. That's right. That's what I always say. All right, we got time for two more
questions. Let's see. We're following the beacon over here. Yes. Hi. Um, Mr. Romero. Um, okay. So, I was born in ' 89
and I'm from Hong Kong, so zombies aren't actually a thing I grew up with on a regular basis, but I saw a few
other horror movies. Um, and the trope I actually grew up with was that in in horror movies, no matter what the
adversary, um, it's always either the black guy or the woman who dies first. And so when I was when I watched Night
of the Living Dead, I, you know, that was actually what stuck out for me was that you had a hero of color and that he
got it. He died last. Yeah. Um so that was just an observation about how you know that piece of work is obviously
translating through time and over space. Um my question is um despite you receiving a lot of Midnight Madness
zombie movies and apparently most of them being terrible. Um can you comment on the fact that we still seem to be
undergoing some kind of zombie renaissance in pop culture? I don't get it.
I honestly don't. First of all, I'm a little pissed off because I used to be the only guy. Now everybody's in my
playground, you know. Uh and and uh it I don't get the whole thing. I
don't get the zombie walks. I don't get why 4,000 people come out and you know, TA's a lovely person, but I you know,
what is she? The pied piper. How does she get 4,000 people come out and put that goop on? And this this is our
friend who runs the uh the the Toronto Zombie Walk and every year it grows and grows and then every cities are doing
them all over. Um yeah, but unbelievable. We were in Strasburg, France and my wife Suz went out and and
all of a sudden encountered this zombie walk. I mean, she couldn't get across the street. It was like the marathon,
you know, the New York marathon. You have to wait. And there were there was a festival in Slovenia where you were able
to judge the films and you did it by phone and they were like they were and they were so excited they were like tell
George we're doing the first zombie walk in Slovenia. I mean is is it because I mean there's
kind of almost kind of an end of times hysteria and is this people kind of like gripping onto you know I maybe
somewhere way way deep. I just think it's Halloween, man. And I I don't think I don't think that I don't think zombies
have been supported in popular culture, popular fiction by movies. Because if you think
about it, what zombie movie has made more than a hundred million bucks? Zombie Land is the only one. And they're
not dead. Uh, so that's not the kind of numbers that usually interests Hollywood. Yeah,
they're making a Zombiel Land 2, but you know, um, no movie has has gone through the roof that way. It's video games. I
think it's video games. There's millions of video games on our iPads. There are probably 75 zombie
games on on just on the iPad. and and or huge huge bit from Resident Evil through I mean there's a House of the Dead.
There's a million big best-selling zombie games. Yeah. And a lot I guess a lot of that is just kind
of a different context for the shoot them up for like a first person POV. It's like okay well we've shot we've
done army games. Well, you can get away with shooting humans if they're zombies. then it's just kind of another kind of
conceit for I think that I think exactly that's exactly right and I think that that's really what's kept the zombie so
popular over the over the years uh and I I frankly I don't understand I mean if you you can talk about well the end of
days you know is are people worried about the end of days I you know I'm I'm just worried about the end of my days
I mean for me the thing which always interested me in in this particular genre wasn't so much the fact that it's
the undead, that it's zombies. What scared me was always just the last man on earth scenario where you wake up and
life has changed, life is different, your loved ones are gone. Whether it's zombies or or anything else, just being
the last man on earth, that's what I always find scary about these things, not the threat of of flesh eaters,
right? We This might be the end for Yeah. Well, you know, The Last Man on Earth is the the the the name of Vincent
Price, the Vincent Price version of I am Legend. And I sort of loosely I am Legend is loosely
responsible for Neither Living Dead. I Am Legend, which is written by Richard Mat, who is like a great uh horror kind
of fantasy author. Um and so yeah it was so it was kind of inspired 911 was kind of inspired from that in many yeah I
mean I I wanted to do something about I wanted to do the first day instead of you know instead of I am legend is about
uh the whole world has become uh everyone in the world has become a vampire and there's one guy left and
that's the last man on earth and um I wanted to do something about well how did that start and go back to the
first night and that's really that's the only sort of loose thread that that was inspired by I am legend with night but
we got time for probably one more question here okay there's up there sorry the people with the beacons
they're the ones who are picking there so where where is it or what wait up Yes. Here, this gentleman here.
Make it good. A lot of pressure. Now, um, when you first came out, you said that when you saw the film, all you saw
were the errors. And I'm wondering in your process, when do you look at a piece of work or one of your films and
say, "I recognize there are a lot of errors, but it's time to share this." That's a a very good question,
particularly for aspiring filmmakers. I can't watch a movie. I can watch one of my
movies. Once you've been through the whole process and you live with it, you live with every frame of it and you're
making frame by frame decisions and boom boom boom and you finally put it to bed. You're never certain at that moment what
it's how it's going to play. Uh, and I try except for events like these where I
didn't come to watch the movie because I didn't want to be see it again. Um, I try not to watch films until, you
know, at least two or three years later. Recently, there was a screening of of Land of the Dead at Deluxe. They had
a ed editor's uh the Canadian edi Yeah. editors association Canada screening and we Susan and I went and uh it's the
first time I'd seen it. The first time either of us had seen it all almost since it was made and
um it it played okay. I mean I wasn't disturbed by all of these problems. When I look at Night of the Living Dead,
screen direction is off. I I I first of all, I didn't know enough about screen direction. I didn't know that
conversations were supposed to go that way. You know, they're both looking the same way. And and uh I some of the stuff
I just wasn't educated enough even though I'd watched films. Basically, all of Night of Living Dead was basically
stolen. All shot selection was stolen. Uh but more from Orson Wells. People say it's Hitchcockian but I I think it's
more from Wells from Wells is uh Shakespeare films uh McBth uh Oll the lighting particularly I I was I
was aping I was stealing from Orson Wells and trying to do my best that best that I could with it. And
uh now once I got away from it, once I started to learn about some of these basics, that's what I mean. I all I can
see now are the the stupid little errors. There's a jump cut in it. There's
um you know, which I I didn't realize. I It looked like I could cut. It's the same shot, but there's a
jump cut in it. And uh I cut a piece out of the middle and it looked like they were in the same position, but they're
not. And you know, it's just stupid little things like that. And and um that's really it. But now, man, I I'm
I'm much I' I've been over the last only maybe five years or so really comfortable with the process. And I I
can actually I used to cover my ass by shooting single shots of everybody in the room and uh you know so I could cut
the script, edit the script any way I wanted. And now I'm happy and and comfortable with sort of choreographing
moments and you know thankfully because that's the only that's the best way to economize
uh when you're on the set. It's also a good way to keep people from cutting out of your movie.
All right, on that note, let's hear it for George A. Romero. These two elements are are the most
important of everything. You know, everything is dominated by these two. All the world, whatever whatever happens
is dominated by sex and violence. We're going to go back further in time first um to 1973. And I thought it's still
quite early on Sunday. We want to ease you in gently. So, we're going to show the
opening three minutes of Turkish Delight. That that opening, with the exception of the uh uh the badly
translated lines, um is pretty faithful to the opening line of Yanvulka's novel upon which the film is adapted. Um I'm
just curious by the film's staggering success, do you think at that moment in 1973 this was something that people were
just waiting for? Yes, I think there was what you would call probably a certain sexual
revolution in Holland. Um, much more, let's say, being open-minded towards sex. Um, and of course, the writer of
the book, um, Yan Wilkers, was one of the persons that introduced an an extremely realistic and, uh, direct way
of, uh, of of writing a novel. I mean the realities that he describes in his book based on his own life mostly um uh
he he takes these elements from memory it's all things that happened and he put them in a certain order and at the end
the girl dies but um but it is um it's really one of the two writers John Walkers is one of the two Dutch writers
at that time uh that uh led in this revolution ion I think you know by their uh directness by their the way they
described let's say sex the other writer is rather but he was let's say uh introducing u being gay to the Dutch
people he was he got extremely popular by really really in the 60s or so marrying his his boyfriend so both
writers in two on in two different directions opened up the eyes of the Dutch and this
film was made in the same year as Marco Ferrari's Lagran booth it was made a year after uh Bernard Bertluchi's last
tango in Paris did you see this film as as being part of a wider wave of film making or did you feel that this is
something that's much more specifically about Dutch mentality at that time um well of course I I
I based myself on on on the novel really and I did not really uh take any cues from uh other movies. Um the style of
course is certainly different than Better Luchi and um I felt that it was something that was
possible in to describe something so directly and so realistically in Dutch society that people were aware that
these things were happening. In fact we all talking about how to describe reality and how far to go isn't it? I
mean the the the reality of sex basically is often especially when you look at nowadays American movies it's
all expressed in a completely cryptic way um elliptic every whenever there is a sex scene the
the woman keeps on her bra that is let's say really exceptional I could tell you but but I mean they do that and all that
has to do with let's say um making more money because then the movie is not an uh R and is a PG PG-13. Everybody can go
in and it has certainly to do with a certain degeneration of the capitalist system, but we might go too far there.
But um I think in Holland I felt that that's that was the way we lived at that time. you know, I was in my early 30s
and and promiscuity um having two lovers or three that was a really in in the let's say the more
somewhat more elevated quote unquote uh artistic circles was a must and uh I was fortunate
but I mean it happened at that time you know and it felt that way and of course the whole movie this let's say a pretty
dark beginning but I think there's a lot of of romance in the movie and and tragedy in fact but I think the whole
the the treating let's say nudity and sexuality in in in the way in in let's say in an open-minded way was um not
only done by me but many Dutch filmmakers at that time so I'd say Um one several of my friends basically my
friends directors made movies where sexuality was let's say uh portrayed in a completely different way than 30 40
years uh 30 years before and this period um your your first feature um was businesses business in 1971 and then you
follow us two years later with Turkish Delight. Um, how difficult at that point in time was it to actually make a
feature in in the Netherlands and what was the film making environment like at that time there? Well, there was
basically very little done in Holland. I mean I think at that time um they made one two or three movies a year and but
then they let's say they they um they built a film school in Amsterdam and so in in the late 50s um and so people
started to look at movies younger people start to look at movies in a more professional way it was really not a
profession I I'm a mathematician in fact and and and I became a filmmaker later. But when I announced to my father b that
I was let's say after my studies that I would wanted to become a film director the first thing he said is but nobody
makes movies in in Holland and which was true but because there was this whole group of young people included my uh
later becoming director but he was then my DP Yond who did speed and uh later in the United States they all were let's
say uh um coming together B although we all of course full of jealousy and animosity but very exciting about that
we were still uh all trying to to make movies and and there was certainly help from the uh from the Dutch government
that um had also created this film school to to allow young people to experiment with film and they put money
in that you know I mean all European movies are made with government money isn't it in general and So that started
at that time that the government was really give it giving it a push started in interesting enough it was a
right-wing or perhaps not it was a very right-wing government but they were really had no problem at all with the
kind of movies we were making for them was important that people uh that the money they invested would come back and
if that was done in the way of Turkey Delight or the other way they don't didn't care you know that was um in fact
that in comparison to the leftwing governments that came later was much
better. Unfortunately, you you mentioned that you studied mathematics. Um there are a lot of
stories that swirl around your career and I'm not sure how many are apocryphal, but there is this one
wonderful story that as you're about to embark um uh to America for uh to shoot Robocop, you received a letter from your
father. Yes. In fact, my father was of course extreme after me do making the Turkish
delight and other movies that were really very successful. My father my father was and my mother too were
extremely disappointed that I didn't become a professor like my my friends at the university they all became professor
and that I had chosen this this profession of director and on on the day nearly of in the week at least that I
was going to the United States to make Robocop my father gave me an an let's say an advertisement of in the newspaper
where they were looking for a part-time mathematician teacher here and then when I said but I I make
movies he said you can do that there's time as your teacher basically high school there's time you can do that as a
hobby but this was real I mean I'm not exaggerating one word here I mean I was I was flabbergasted you know that he
basically that they looked at it they were so disappointed and I read later uh some papers that my mother wrote uh
before She died and there disappointed was there till the end of their lives and and of course by then they had been
going to my movies and they had basically everybody their yeah the environment was extremely positive about
them but they could never adapt to the fact that they had become this kind of uh film director
with regards to the uh content of your uh films. One New York Times critic described the Turkish delight author Yan
Rulkas as writing without sparing our morality or senses. And I thought that's a very good description of you.
Say that again. Um they wrote of uh Vulkers um that he writes without sparing our morality or our senses.
Yeah, sure he did. And your films? Well, I I took it from him. No, it's true. I mean it's I didn't
invent it. No, I mean I I the honor should go to young vloggers really for for daring to write that and then uh our
our movies were basically based on that. But um you know I I'm I'm really coming there is something else there. I mean if
you look at at at the Dutch painting and and the painting say in the 17th century and compare that with painting in Italy,
France and and and England then you see a sense an enormous sense of reality in these paintings these Dutch paintings
you know your own boss for example is very famous that's the prodigal son it's not so so small but there is basically
the prodigal's son leaves the bordello and on the side of the bordello there's a guy is peeing against the
wall. I mean that basically Dutch painters did that. I mean you would not expect that in an Italian Renaissance
painting in any way in it or Rembrandt that basically has been etching since let's say population with his wife or a
woman pooping or peeing and in fact Picasso used one of these etchings basically to write make a painting about
that. But I mean that was there that we we we grew up. I mean if you at elementary school or even in high school
the this 17th century is called the golden age of Holland and and that was all you grow up in that atmosphere of
reality that basically yes people are peeing and pooping pooping and yes that why why do we hide that? Why would so
they did they basically they painted it and I think what Walers did really and especially after what I said about the
translation uh Walers is grew up in that kind of atmosphere and me too and I thought basically that reality should be
taken seriously you know and that we should not hide that there is a representation of of of of reality that
basically wipes out all these kind of what people call extreme but it is this Not true. The truth is really that these
things happen. Yes, of course. And and that there is should not be a problem in portraying them. I mean that's what I
feel. So I never felt any restriction with sex for example. I I what I try not to do is to
imagine scenes sex scenes to do something that out of my imagination. I always feel if I do a sex scene that it
should be based on sex that I know otherwise I think you easily drift off in pornography. But if you if you know
that what the the the actions you take with men or woman that there are based on reality because you have seen it you
have participated then I think you can use sex in a very interesting way and then it's not so much about the sex
anyhow know it's about what you see when you look in each other's eyes you know that's what during the sex is more
important all the sex together I think um I I mentioned in the introduction about the fact that you've produced some
of the most satirical films made in Hollywood but Something that people don't often recognize is how funny all
of your films are and there's such a warmth and humor in a lot of the characters. Yeah. Sure.
I I was going to get on to talking about humor with sex and just the idea that that that scene is humorous, but the way
that you represent sex in the films, um, a lot of people have always talked link the sex with violence in your films, but
exists in many many different ways. Um, and I just wonder over the years, have you kind of has it annoyed you that
people see just a two-dimensional attitude towards sex and also perhaps bring too much of their own moral
compass with them? No, that's yeah, that happens. But I think um there's nothing you can do about it. And sometimes after
10 20 years, people start to look at it in a different way. So you have to hope for that, you know. But um I I like sex
of course. I mean, I represent sex because I think it's something wonderful. I mean, that doesn't mean
that sex cannot be abused in a terrible way, you know. I mean, the amount of rapes in the United States is about
1,800 a day. So, that is one every minute. So, sex can be completely abused. But in general, I think what you
what happens in sex is something that can you can if it that you cannot really express in any other way. You know that
what you see in each other like we disc said it before but during sex if you look at the at into the eyes of the
other. I think there is something that you feel there that exist but you could not basically find words to said to to
describe it. So I think that mystery or whatever you want to call it is uh is why I think sexuality gives you
the possibility to express things that you cannot say with words and and very difficult but somewhat better with
images. And it's quite interesting as well that I know years ago Awesome Wells said that um you know sex is something
that shouldn't necessarily be represented on the screen because it stalls the narrative. It doesn't move
the film forward at all. But looking particularly at the films you made in the Netherlands in the 1970s,
um it's so integral. It comes back to this idea of realism that it's just accepted. It's not everything has to
stop. So we have the big sex scene. It's just something that devel is also can be used very easily as
a plot point of course and um I think I I I strongly disagree with Ozone Wells um but Owell is American in it. So
I they are not too open-minded about that in the first place. And so I think that um that I mean it's not so that
that movies are all about plot in it. Plot is important and American movies plot is much more important than in
Europe. I mean um that whole system of of making a movie in
3x that is really this plotting structural plotting is very American. And I think um the movies I did in in in
in Europe and and many other people did in Europe be it TFO or Fellini or or whoever I mean if you look at that
dovita or eight and a half which is fantastic movies and there is really not much of a plot than seeing Marello going
down and down and down and down isn't it? So if you but that's not nearly not plot that's just kind of tragedy and I
think there is too much insistence basically in the United States on plot. So I think
um on the other hand we all know that if you have a plot if something doesn't work very well as a scene or whatever
then the plot takes you over that you know because you still want to know how this let's say what's what's hidden and
what should be revealed. So I I I it helps you when you make let's say mistakes that that if you don't have a
if you don't have a plot and the scene is not good then you basically you lose your audience but with plot it's more
difficult to lose your audience. So I think there is an advantage and pragmatic advantage to having a plot but
in fact if you overplot and and I really think that it's about plot alone then I think there's a problem with um Katy
Tipple. I read somewhere that um at one point in time you you said that you would like to remake it and I wonder if
Showgirls ended up in a way kind of being that remake. Well I I never thought about that. I mean it's possible
you know I I felt that especially the last part of Katy Tipple you haven't seen that doesn't work when she goes
then she becomes a kind of a revolutionary or whatever I don't believe it and and so I would like to
remake it but in fact I had an American project that I wanted to use for that but was to make a movie about one of the
first real feminist in the United States Victoria Woodhull in at the end immediately after the civil war and um
and basically I had in Nicole Kitman wanted to play that but we never got it from the ground you know and it was very
interesting Victoria Woodhill comes out of very low class she was a prostitute but at let's say when she was 45 or
whatever she tried to become the first female American president very interesting career is it
But um she she didn't succeed. I mean I perhaps it happens now you finally but but um not for Victoria but
um so um yeah that's yeah this would be my answer more or less. It's not a real answer but there's a quote by Renee
Sutend where she says most women in Paul's films will not rest until they've got what they want. they usually win and
they let no one stand in their way. Could you talk um about your attraction to these really strong female
characters, but also the way that in the film we see them so often through a male gaze, but it feels like the women are
actually controlling the scene and the way things unfold. Well, perhaps that has been lately the
case with the two movies I I did with this L and um and and Blackbook. Um but of course there are many other movies
basically where the males are dominant you know so it's not that I only do female strong women basically I do also
interesting strong male characters um but if somebody gives me a script about the strong woman that is then in general
I would be attracted to that. Yeah, but you cannot explain why, isn't it? I mean, because perhaps I'm I'm married to
a strong woman. My daughters are strong women. So, I'm really surrounded by by by women in my life. Yeah. And so,
um, so that I choose that, let's say, yeah, it's really a choice. I I I read the script or the book or the whatever I
and I I like the character of of the woman. But if it would be a man, then probably it would be the same. But
lately has been my interest has been apparently more towards uh women. Yeah, sure. But I I I cannot explain these
things, you know. I saying, yeah, I can give you expla explanations and stuff, but I think they're all not true, you
know. So, it's really that I don't know. I mean, I like women and I like to be with women. Um, I feel very comfortable
with women. For me, having coffee with a woman is more interesting having a beer with a man. It's more but perhaps that's
what plays, you know, but I don't know. I mean, this character, the character in
the force men, the the it's the male character of course that that is the protagonist. Yeah. I mean Renee Sundak
um is is probably a killer woman. She has pro probably but it's not sure killed three husbands and but he might
be the force man the force man he would be the first the force you see he but he escapes but but she gets more or less
what she wants. That's true. I mean Rene is right there. But um yeah well I mean it's always
interesting when the when the protagonist at the end of the movie comes out more or less okay isn't it
especially nowadays I mean there were movies in the in the 30s and the 40s which these what do they call film noir
I mean Sunset Boulevard being one of them and and and and there are other of Billy Wilder basically and and other
directors that did that were the hero the protagonist at the end of the story dies but that's nearly impossible now to
propose and there's a project that I have in the United States uh which is a what you would call a film noir and um
it's still not made because the main person the protagonist dies and that makes it really impossible to get
financing it's interesting that I mean what what what happened there is not clear let's
say that that it was kind of interesting and acceptable in the United States to have in the 3040s movies where your main
character dies and that people would go be going there that they would like it and they would be interested and now
that basically that is excluded you know so you cannot do that to your audience perhaps they might be upset or they
might not like it and I mean that plays a part all the time but I I don't know what happened exactly that you cannot
make that movie anymore more. There was uh one young British director um a couple of months ago I was talking to,
so I'm not going to say their name, but they they had a pitch with a Hollywood producer and the Hollywood producer was
very unhappy because they found out they hadn't bothered to read it. They just said, "Tell me it quickly." And uh and
they said, "But do they die at the end?" And they said, "Yes." And they said, "Well, I'm not really interested. How do
they die?" Old age. What can I do? Um, let's let's actually talk while
we're here about Hollywood and your move to Hollywood and how how easy was the move?
Um, yeah, I got lucky. I mean, I got in the hands of a very good producer, John Davidson. This one of the two script
writers was always with me on the set. They prevented me to make terrible mistakes against American culture
because I didn't know that very well. But it was uh it was a realizing that I didn't know the
actors that I didn't know the country I didn't know the locations didn't know the crew it was like a very uh
successful uh u transformation of myself and I mean it worked you know I it could have perhaps been many European
directors have of course have tried to make movies in the United States and some of them worked but I think because
I I accepted that I had to go with the flow. The flow really is what they want anyhow. I mean then still in that
perspective you can still give it your own spin. That's what I did with Robocop. Certainly I I made it mine and
I used my interest in comic books when I was young. I used that to overlay it and and let's say pushing the irony or
satirical elements of the movie. But it was um yeah you don't know these things. In
fact, you can the transition to to France basically now this this year or last year was similar of course you go
to a country you don't my my knowledge of French was limited at that time uh you don't know the crew you don't know
the cast no you don't know any locations really and you you jump in and then if you surrounded by good people that are
friends you become friends and I have the feeling that by surrounding myself with American people in Robocop. I
became kind of American. Interesting enough, the movie I made before that, which is Flesh and Blood, that was
basically a medieval story. Rhau was the main character. Uh, and um, we did that. That was the first movie I did in
English. And I try I didn't want to go to the United States. I mean, so I I made Flesh and Blood uh as an for Orion,
basically the company that later did a Robocop and and that was let's say an that was a failure. I I I was trying
I I I didn't want to become really American. I made let's say a half step and not a full step. I I tried to do to
to think okay I use American movie but I I'll stay in in Europe and that did not work because I was surrounded by
Europeans. There were a couple of American actors. Jennifer Jason Lee was in that movie for the female
protagonist. But um but I I think the fact that I was surrounded by Spanish people, Dutch
people, some English people, um German people and I I yeah it failed really because I was not aware of of American
thinking and basically in Robocop I I I I came into really I stepped into the unknown. waters of the United States. I
mean, if you want to use a a nice sentence there, but um that's I I felt that that after, let's say, um after the
failure of of of Flesh and Blood, the head of Orion, that was Mike Metavoy, said to me, let's say, "Yeah, we like
the film making, but it doesn't work. It's not it's not American enough. And if you want to make an American movie,
you have to really come to the United States and live there and be among Americans and
then you will be American enough. And that's what happened. You know, ultimately I in fact pushed by my wife
uh pushed me basically to uh uh to accept the Robocop that I didn't like in the
beginning at all and and and said okay I'll take care of the kids and basically and you go to see to do to make the
movie situation in Holland had become very very bad in fact in my film situation and she convinced me basically
to do that to do the movie and do that movie and she was right. You said that you stepped into the waters of Hollywood
and it strikes me watching those films that um you you immediately became an Olympic swimmer. Um what is remarkable
about these films like so much of your other work is the level of intelligence and wit that you bring and and satire
particularly in the case of Starship Troopers on a level that I don't think Hollywood's really really ever seen.
Right. But uh sure um but that's not only me. that is really also uh at Numayire and and and the producer John
Davidson. So I mean we wanted to do this. I mean, especially in Starship Troopers, we were really fighting with
the book of uh of Highline, which is, if you read it, is pretty mythistic and you could call it easily uh fist and and so
we were struggling with that because we didn't want to do that. But we so we found a way with the kind of the irony
and the and the um and the hyperbolic way we did the scenes to to counter that to counter
the by exaggerating this kind of fascist to utopia. So I think that was something that at and John Davidson that we worked
on really we did it with three people you know. So I I I I cannot uh claim that as as my own invention and it was
also written that way and and by then and at and I were really uh we know knew each other very well. So we had an
enormous amount of fun in writing the script of Starship Troopers. We were laughing all the time when we invented
the scenes basically and that was such a such a pleasure based to work that way and and feel that you that you were
doing something that that pleased that you were pleasing yourself you know that you say let's exaggerate all that and
and and and show these heroes in Starship of course they're the heroes of the movie
the protagonist of the movie are all heroes but tell them tell the audience once in a while they're also fascist.
That was the idea and that's why we used all these imagery of Laney Reaper style. I mean, if there's really uh many shots
in uh in Starship Troopers that they copied from Triumph of the Will, which is the Nazi propaganda movie of Rever in
134 and to to tell the audience that this was really not by us saying this is a wonder, this is wonderful these
people. No, say yes, these are your heroes, but by the way, they're fascists.
I think that was such a for us such a pleasure to do that and and of course in in retrospect if you look at the
development especially the last half year in the United States then you could say that we've the intuition of of
especially of at I say but at least let's say of of of all the three of us that some elements in American
society were were could be going into a fascist action. That was basically what we felt and we took many examples
basically from Texas, the death penalty and other things. Of course, at that time that was George Bush basic being
the governor and um so we we felt that there was a stream in American society talking about
Robocop is more urban is that this is but I think Starship is about foreign policy. Yeah. American follow. It's not
of course about Brunois. It's about the United States. But I think that was also nice to put it in other terms and to
play with that. Not in a way like we going to show the world how the United States is. No, it was really written
down with pleasure. It was fun. We were lighthearted when we wrote these scenes and laughing sitting over coffee and
laughing and laughing. And I think in reality, of course, we used elements also in in in Robocop and in Starship
Troopers, we used elements of reality and and and and and extrapolated them in them in a yeah,
what you would call hyperbolic way. So, um yeah, this just an explanation basically how how we did this, you know,
that we didn't do it. I mean in retrospect you're sitting here and you're talking and you can say well we
had this goal and this goal but it's it's to me it was amazing thinking back about the movie that we did it in such a
nonchalant way. So really like and yeah let's do that. So I mean that's why there is this with all the carnage that
is in Starship Troopers a lot there is also something really funny all the time you know that so um I
think we should certainly credit at Nummire as much as as me for inventing this and and and finding this way of of
portraying let's say a big American movie in a way that that you rarely see. And and and and yeah, they take in
general even in the remakes of our movies, they take everything much too seriously really. And we they're
really that's Yeah, I think we we were like children a bit when we invented them. Of course, with Robocop
and um Turtle Recall having as its main antagonist um the head of a company who then moves into politics um and and
tries to be a leader. Obviously, that's so farfetched it wouldn't really happen. No, that's But one of the reasons I
wanted to group these together, I know normally you see Basic Instinct, Total Recall, and Robocop the psych psychosis
trilogy going together, but the reason I wanted to group these three together is the violence in them. Um it is very
cartoony. It is very comic book, but it's interesting compared to Marvel films today. That scene with the robot
in Robocop is incredibly excessive. And I know you've attracted a lot of um criticism for the level of violence, but
it strikes me we shouldn't just be accepting violence. If there's violence on the screen, it should be presented in
a way that perhaps jolts us perhaps. Sure, violence is Yeah, I'm I'm against violence. Yeah, you might say I love it.
But artistically, yes. But of course in real life, no, that's the difference. You know, artistically, I think it
functions within the framework of the movie that you're making and and then especially in the the case of L, I think
if you the violence that with the with the rape that's there. Yeah. You cannot basically there's no other way to shoot
that than as a violent scene in it. And and um I I'm not afraid of violence in
movies. in real life is a completely different situation. But in vi in in movies, I
think I mean we know that violence is part of the world. It's not even even part of the world. Violence is part of
the universe. I mean the whole universe is one violent creation of whatever it is or or a space-time accident or
whatever. Um but um if you if you really study I mean there nowadays is so fantastic if you look at the the
photographs that are made by the by these telescopes that are now all all around us basically in space and the
photos they make of of of the of the of the cosmos of the universe and you see as you there big books like this you
open them up and you see millions of stars in it and then basically very small stars are a little bit a bit let's
say hazy. These are all galaxies. All galaxies like the buil the Milky Way. And to realize that these elements
basically come together and are destroying each other. So there are galaxies. There's photographs of two
galaxies that you see that basically are entering each other and you know that all the planets and all the life that is
there will be destroyed. You know people planets will be taken out of their out of their orbit and
basically people whatever is there animal life or or or very far very uh let's say much more intelligent life
than we have at the moment is all destroyed you know I mean it's like for me I I think have perhaps also
grown up a bit um in in World War II isn't it I was a child of six, seven when basically the
war ended. But we live living in the H. It was continuously bombed in fact by English and Americans because they were
trying to hit the V V2 rockets in that that were sent to London in fact but they they made some mistakes. So they
basically total quarters of the hake were ruined to live in that and to see the dead bodies on the street and the
and the blood and the ruins and that if you as a child of five six think for me that is kind of what life partially is
and basically if you go into Syria whatever that's how it is that is that violence that destruction is there on
this earth and that's what we do to each other and so um I think you have to really take um pay attention to to
violence I think because it's it's let's say as sexist then of course the positive thing is it sexist than sex is
of course only for babies of course but of course yeah sure I mean no that's the point you know evolution is basically
has created that trick yeah it's a trick it's an evolutionary trick basically that you basically are so happy to uh
put yourself on top of another but because we need the babiesh that's evolution wants babies and so
that's but you could say that's a positive thing but the other side is the negative this destruction factor and
these two are dominant in our our in the world. Yeah. destruction and and let's say regeneration and and and pro and and
and and uh going on with evolution that's you could call that probably positive you know at least yeah I would
say that's probably positive and then the other side is the negative and these two elements are are the most important
of everything you know everything is dominated by these two all the world whatever whatever happens is dominated
by sex and violence and so I I think you cannot deny that and and that I'm attracted to it is because it's so
important. Well, I mean, I have been basically seduced several times to consider making a sequel, the sequel for
Robocop, and that was immediately in the aftermath of of the of Robocop of the of the Robocop that we see here. Uh, the
same applies to Total Recall. Same applies to um to basic instinct but ultimately I've never done it because I
felt that it was always less than what I had done and and I think if you make a sequel then you have to do at least you
have to come close to what you what you did and I think that's not possible because you know already what you're
doing and I when I did Robocop and all these movies I didn't know what what was going to happen I stepped into an
adventure And that adventure makes inspires you. But if you know already the trick, then
basically you're not inspired anymore because you know it and you do it. So it's very difficult to make a very good
sequel. The only one I I I I know is I is Starship Star Wars 2. That I think is a good sequel, but that's rare, you
know. Even Godfather 2 I is not at the level of number one at all, I think. But yes, thank you. Um
but um and I I gather um we were talking outside about um uh after Soldier of Orange was released. Uh Steven Spielberg
was a fan of the film and and and you talked to him. I gather Steven Spielberg was considering putting your name
forward for Return of a Jedi until he saw that's what I heard basically and it came I think from some it could be
gossip but it came through his producer Kennedy and that that's Spielberg was really an admirer
of Soldier. Yeah. And he he called me and and said you have to come to the United States. Holland is too small and
we I know I'll introduce you to the studios that he did and then I I at that time I was working on spatters and a
certain moment I thought okay that's interesting to give him spatters. Well that was the end that was the end of the
relationship. Yeah. Well, entertaining for me that I think sure I would change it if I think it's
boring. Yeah. Or change the scene or take it out the scene. In fact, strangely enough, on this movie I just
did l that was two and a half hours. We took out 25 minutes because I thought that
the story didn't allow two and a half hour. And so basically, yes, I would change it. But in in in general, um I
would accept it, you know, at that I read it and we we that this kind of shock of recognition
is that you think okay this is good this is this is me I can do this he wrote it for me but he didn't write it for me but
I feel that he wrote it for me and and then you do it and and I would not study that too much you know I think I I think
intuition there is is is extremely important and even if your intuition is not always right there was an
interesting interview long time ago was Ingar Bergman and they asked him how he did all these things and he said it's
all intuition and for 80% I'm right my intuition is right 20% I'm wrong I'm wrong but then I take the 80% and I
trust my intuition even if there are 20% wrong so I I feel the same you have to you have to use intuition if we don't
I mean what is intuition that is probably something that is behind the consciousness but it's still part of the
brain I'm talking about mystery or let's say of God or whatever you know I'm really talking about this and I think
there's something there and that functions basically without us knowing really and then it sends at a certain
moment if you're lucky it sends back information that that is what you call intuition because you you don't know the
process that's happening here it's a this computer let's say is the conscious computer we are
close with our computers coming close to that the the unconsciousness is also there. also but
that's a computer that is basically we are very far away of that you know I mean that's something that I trust that
there is something else there and sometimes you you're working and you can't find it you can find it and
then you think about I mean if you don't think it doesn't come you know you have to activate this this other areas by by
trying trying and then a certain moment it's given to you it's fantastic when it's given to you and suddenly you Oh
yeah. Oh. Oh, I have to do this. Well, I mean, I know that at that time when this uh slaughtering went on,
you know, was was really for many months was a kind of a very dark period because it was so much
animosity and so many criticism. But I I I remember that in these in these couple of months that I said to
one journalist, well, let's see how it is in 15 years. Yeah, I said that. But I don't know if I really believe that. Um,
of course this the the movie was partially miscon yeah not perceived in in exactly in the way I I I wanted but
um it it has yeah I think the way the people look at the movie now feels to me a bit more d
more in in in uh in the direction that I thought that we had been working. But of course after um when the film came out I
I I couldn't even believe that basically that I had been working towards something you know because it was so
destructive that you think okay this is horrible what I have made but I thought I had made an interesting movie happened
for that was the second time that happened happened once also in Holland when the the this movie spatters that
you saw with the two boys with the girls when they are basically having so-called sex that was the sameh There was
basically so much animosity on television, radio, newspapers, everything for months and months and
months were people on pissed off in Holland completely. I mean, so I mean, of
course, Shog was a bit deja vu, but the situation in Holland was ex they accused me of being against women, against
homosexuals, against let's say handicapped people about I mean there were groups and they had let's say they
formed a group the anti anti-patters committee. Yeah. Right. And and in the front of the cinema with big boards and
all that stuff, you know. So I mean they hated spatters not even so the the audience went there but to a certain
degree but from the let's say the level of intellectual cultural elite they hated it. Yeah. And and the show goes
the same. So now in Holland sp is seen as an interesting movie about young people.
Well, I mean, I try to to work with the same crew. I mean, but that but often, of course, when you go to the United
States and then back to France, you you can try to keep a couple of people with you, but in France was already forbidden
to the everything on the everybody on the set had to be French. So, although I try to bring a couple of people or from
the United States or Holland, that was forbidden. And and what happens some people die. I mean I I had two one
not not not much then nothing big but but no but if you look for example in my American and and
Dutch movies well you don't know them so well but look at the American movies I worked with two composers desel bezel
polyuris and Jerry Goldsmith and basically and I would one movie the robocop is
bezel to recall is Jerry And it's on and on it's half half and then both died and then you have to find somebody. So both
died and when I was working working on on blackbook ultimately um because of the financial uh uh deal that was with
England and Germany and whatever. uh we decided that we wanted we had to take an English composer and then basically I
found I looked at all the tapes all the composers in the in the UK that I listened to all of them 10 or 15
basically that are working for movies and then I found and Dudley um and she did the Starship Troopers she did black
book and she did L so at certain moment you have to move because people are not there anymore they don't they disappear
and but if possible and if I would always try to be with the same crew as long as possible. So as long as as they
are available that's does not does not exclude the advantage it can sometimes have to
change but my changes are always were always based on the un unavailability of the person that I wanted. So, but
sometimes changing you learn a lot, you know. I mean, I I learned a lot basically when I was doing L from the
this the French uh DP that I have uh Stfan Fontan basically. So, you learn and that you I would not have learned in
the other way, you know. So, I think it's it's good to change but I try not to change. If I if I like somebody, I
try to work again with them. Uh yes. In fact uh uh um I wrote that book
uh after going to a Jesus seminar it's called in the United States in San Francisco for about 15 years. Um I
attended that because I wanted to make a movie about Jesus from the very beginning and basically I wanted to know
what was really in the in the New Testament what was authentic and what not. And so I I attended that seminar
that was looking and giving uh colors to the to the gospels in it. So uh one uh to the actions of Jesus and the words of
Jesus and so in four colors. So red would be yes that's Jesus and and then pink would would be uh well that sounds
like Jesus and gray would be no could be everything you know and black would be not not Jesus. It was so threearter was
black. Yeah. Most of the of the of the gospels are not true. I have to tell you.
And this and Jesus didn't come back. No. You It would be great. I would be a fan. I'm a big fan of Jesus. But
um so after that doing that I I of course nobody wanted to make this Jesus this Jesus that I basically had in my
head basically which was more perhaps in direction of yeah chavar or whatever but um um then I decided okay for in the
meantime I'll write a book but I'm still trying I have not tried again with three three writers to to to to at least make
an outline and I have failed till now. I I I have not been able to make my book into a movie yet, but I'm certainly uh
still trying. Yeah. So, I hope I succeed. It will be would be sensational. Sure. I would go back back
to I mean I'm still living in Los Angeles so if there would be an interesting script like the one we
discussed in the here the the film noir where the hero dies I would immediately do that you know but I have been a hard
time to find something that really interests me and basically um making movies all over the world is a little
bit the same you know that's not on the set is really not that different but with the in the case of El recently I I
I felt that I had an excellent Excellent producer Ben Sid Benite who worked also with did Carnage with Pollonsky and and
Croninberg maps of the stars and uh some other he just did something with Walter Hill. Um he is a really great producer
and I I felt that I was completely protected you know more well some of the movies in in Hollywood basically I felt
also well protected but of course with going into the direction of hollow man I felt that I was drifting drifting
towards cliche and and I felt that I should stop that after two one two years reflecting on what I had done with
hollow And I really felt with all the interesting special effects whatever that there was not no no no no no no
meaning to the movie. I felt the meaning would have been really about what how far would somebody go being invisible
you know which is is Plato in fact and and and they didn't want that in fact that
was that was most too brutal because of course then you would go much further than you ever see in the movie you know
so it was like I I should stop and then I started to look back at Europe and then we did black poop
um we'll see a clip now um from L but I I want to refer back to a quote um from quite some time ago by you. To me, an
actor is someone who walks from A to B and when I snap my fingers, they turn. I thought it came from Hitchcock. I I I
I thought that was a line that you actually said in interview with someone. I I think I thought that that I quoted
Alfred Hitchcock. With that in mind, though, working with someone like Isabelle Lupair, I wouldn't say
anything. I really let her go. She amazed me completely. Sometimes I I I knew that
the scene had ended and that I should say cut. Yeah. But I was so fascinated that she she continued the scene.
Sometimes she continued in such a way that the next scene that that was supposed to be adjacent in adjacent room
was already done. She integrated it and we said, "Oh, next scene we can is done. We don't have to do that."
You know, she is she is there is something that you cannot describe with with Isabelle Pair. um she takes it
really in directions that that are not in the book, not in the script, not in my head and basically in adds that to
the movie and I've used it all because I felt that's her intuition of course also because she's a woman of course um was
better than mine and I let her go because I said okay she's such an artist that if she can go that way and go so
far into orgasm or whatever things you will see in the movie. Uh that um she she knows what she's doing and
and she believes in it and the authenticity makes everything possible. So I think I've never seen that in my
life. Yeah, it is an exceptional level is a value pair and um yeah, she's one of perhaps one of the
greatest actress in my eyes in the world at this moment. Yeah, I I believe um there is one more screening of L during
the festival. So try and catch it if you can. If not, Picture House are releasing the film in January. It is an absolutely
extraordinary film by a brilliant filmmaker. Thank you so much to the LF for organizing this event. But most of
all, can you please join me in thanking Paul Verhovven? Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I'm going to just come back
to it was a great introduction that you gave. Um, I just wanted to ask like maybe a few kind of follow-up questions
about some things that you touched on and then we'll open it up to the audience. Um, you talked about how your
Dutch films were really sort of um, rooted and invested in in reality. Um, and then, you know, moving to the States
and working in uh, the sort of science fiction blockbuster idiom, a totally new kind of language. But watching Robocop
again today, I think it's it's really striking how much the film actually relates to the um political and social
reality of 1980s America. Sure. But I think that um we have to thank really the two writers, Michael
Miner and at Nummier who basically presented a lot of these things already in the script. I mean I I came to in to
the United States was 85 86 and yeah I jumped into this movie but I was not so much aware of the political
situations that were around. So I I I'm very um um I'm absolutely sure that none of these uh political observations were
coming from me. They they were really there. A lot of that was already in the script and I'm sure I used it and and
basically having been a child during World War II and being occupied by the Germans in in the in the 40s in Holland.
I mean I recognized a lot of stuff and in some way but although differently so but I mean it's really at Numay and
Michael Miner we who set up this kind of political um um level that the movie has. I mean some of them were global
things too like just the idea of like privatization and corporatization you know Yeah. Sure. But even that was
already in the script. So I mean we discussed a lot and I I added some scenes and this and but in general I
would say I was uh ignorant to a large degree living in Europe in a different situation in Holland. I was really
ignorant about everything or not everything but a lot of things that were really uh happening in the United
States. And so I had to I I was um that newer um was with me on the set during the whole shoot of the movie. And every
time that I made mistakes culturally mostly perhaps also in dialogue, he was there basically to help me. And on top
of that, we had an a wonderful producer, John Davidson, who was there with me all the time and and protected me against my
European mistakes. What do you mean by European mistake? Well, that basically I remember that
basically when I was reading the the the script for the first time, there was a a text where what do you mean brother? And
I wrote in the I still have it. I wrote in on at to the side why it's not established
established anywhere. It's really his brother. I mean it's true. You know, that shows my ignorance about certain
things in the United States. I I mean, I got better later when I was doing Starship Troopers, you know, and I'm
still doing better now, but I have not been able to show that to the American audiences. I mean, I'll get my sounds
now. Perhaps we talk a bit about how you made, you know, made this film yours. I
feel like one thing that's run throughout your career is as you touched on, you know, you often work with
material by generated that you don't write. uh that's sometimes based on existing material, but um I think you
found a way to make really personalized uh I would say all your films. Um and I'm wondering you you mentioned a few
things in relation to Robocop. Uh and I was struck by um you mentioned Mandrean. Can you talk a little bit about Yeah, I
mean again, you know, it's something that that I didn't really invent there. There were this basically in the script
when I got the script there were really this let's say interventions I would say in the main narrative the main narrative
is about Robocop but let's say there are the commercials and and and certain issues of the news and whatever about
the American presidents in in in space and whatever I mean these elements were already there I mean so when I when I
got the script I felt that they should be there as abruptly as possible that they would not really be somebody is in
a room and you see the television is on and then you see what's on the television. I felt it would be extremely
that it would be really modern and and to cut it right into the main narrative, interrupt them the main narrative, show
these kind of conversions or news reels and cut back to the narrative. And I and I I base that really on on my admiration
for a Dutch American uh artist painter Mandrean who if you know his work basically works with these squares of
blue and red and and green and whatever but then it's in let's say there are very sharp black lines in between like
chuck chuck chuck black and then there are these these squares there. It's all abstract abstract art. And I felt that
the the this movie should do the same that it would not not prepare you for for television news or whatever. It
would you just throw it in your in your face. And of course I was coming to the United States was anyhow completely
coming from a from a European Dutch background. I was completely taken aback by showing terrible news basically on
the level of of of the the rocket that exploded at that time and then basically intercut by a commercial, you know, I
mean there was a tragedy and and and and and extremely emotional news and and then basically suddenly you get bum in
between, you know, and that was so non-European they would never do that at that time. Of course now they follow the
American you American culture imperialism is all over the world of course we know that you know so but but
we also in Holland and and the whole of Europe everybody has followed that example so but for me it was really at
that time think okay I'm going to do something really uh something that is let's say in movie making it has not
been done I mean in the news in television you could see it anyhow but then but it was not basically used as a
as an art form. I I think I used it a little bit more for structure and and and and innovation. And you use the same
device really in Starship Troopers which you Yes. Basically when then when we started to get this group together a
couple of years later uh John Davidson me at Nummire and my DP Josh Vicano um we wanted to do another movie together
and we did that with Starship Troopers and then we decided basically that it should should be let's say similar to
Robocop although let's say the the the the news reels are much more showing uh That's a a kind of a um political point
of view and that's saying that that these people I mean it has to do with the double narrative of Starship
Troopers. I don't know if you've seen the movie but but there is the main narrative that is really about young
boys and young girls fighting giant bugs. You know that's the main issue. But then there's a counternarrative that
says by the way these people are fascist. So that's the point and I think that's very let's say interesting in and
and and perspective of today of course. Yes. Very relevant. Um okay let's uh let's talk about Jesus. Um because yeah
raise you go. I was not a fascist. No Jesus was not a fascist. That was not a good transition. But you you did talk
about the Old Testament and the New Testament in your introduction and and um you've referred to Robocop as the
American Jesus. Uh sure. Well, first of all, I mean, Old Testament, I meant when I read the
script and and studied the script, the real the scene that really seduced me and convinced me that I had to do this
movie, even if it was in a different culture and language, etc., which is the scene when he comes to his house and
basically and sees these images this like flashbacks about his former life and I and for me that meant basically
looking at paradise lost and basically that's the way I shot it that's the way way I I asked Bessel Polyuris to write
the music that it was really let's say opening the gates of Eden and so I I felt that was the scene for me that I
say Okay, I can make this movie and I can give something really new to let's say important for me which is
not too much on the nose really but I can shoot it that way without anybody noticing what I'm doing and that's
basically why I said old testament of course that is lost paradise is beginning of the of the of Genesis isn't
it and so the other thing the Jesus stuff um that's that I felt Then when I was looking at the movie at the at the
script further, then I started to see another metaphor which is uh Murphy being crucified and
resurrected. And so I felt that the that the death of Murphy which is very much in the beginning 15 20 minutes inside
the movie basically that it should be as cruel and as diabolical as the crucifixion of Jesus. And basically as
you know in the old in the New Testament it says that even the people the passing priests basically laugh at him and say
come down from the cross. And so I felt I mean you see basically the the the people basic the gang is laughing. I
mean that's all me repeating the crucifixion of Jesus in let's say in a in in in film language of the now. Um
and later the resurrection basically is the same. There is this moment that we go to to a total blackout and what what
what people that are Christian would say descent in hell of Jesus descent in hell and and and
and conquering Satan. But for me it was a blackout in fact and um and then coming back step by step and and
becoming reprogrammed in a different way. And if if you really would take the the the gospels and look at at the words
of Jesus after the his so so-called the resurrection, you would see that his language has become
extremely simplistic like like what what Murphy says, isn't it? Uh thank you for your cooperation. I
understand. There's text like that continuously throughout the movie. If you look at the post at the post
resurrection words of Jesus the same why do you don't touch me here feel and touch do you have something to eat it's
really that you know if you read your gospels there is nothing more than that nowhere is there any any possibility to
see the Jesus that has been described before his his death which is all about parables ethical behavior and and let's
say the the the blessings and all that stuff that seems to be all evaporated. He only says, "Can you give me some
fish?" Very interesting. So I I felt that that Murphy resurrecting should be simplistic and basically have a program
and have very few words till he at the end comes back to himself and say, "I'm Murphy." That was the idea. I mean, I
didn't push that. Of course, you see at the end of the movie uh the four last scene when he walks basically when you
see them uh um when Clarence Bodker is there and you see there the walls of of say the walls
of Jerusalem or the walls of Troy or whatever and they walk up to towards each other. Robocop and and
and Clarence Bodica the mean the meanest guy of the movie. And then I built underneath the the water, I built a
grit, you know, so that he could walk over water and say, "I don't arrest you anymore. I'm going to kill you." It
doesn't say that, but he means I'm going to kill you now. And that's why I call it the American
Jesus. Um, I just want to get into the just the the production of the film a little bit. Um, I was just looking again
at the the book. um on your work by Rob Bener and he describes the making of Robocop and devotes many pages to uh the
the Robo suit. Yes. And it was quite a challenge for Yeah. It was quite a challenge that b that was a really
mistake of of of of at Numar and me when Robbo team for the first time presented to us the the the Robocop suit basically
that he had made in clay. So it later had to be of course reproducing other material. uh we started to comment on
that and we thought we had better ideas and you can see how how wrong you can be as a writer director um because
we tried to um to push our version of Robocop on Rob Boutine and inspired by Japanese comic books and which make him
made would make have made them much more bulkier I would say and that took us really I would say sometime and we talk
really about a couple of weeks perhap even more that we um didn't say see our mistake and finally we did of course be
and we apologized but of course the production of the suit was heavily delayed which had a consequence that
when we were shooting the movie the suit was not ready and that that Peter Weller who had been bas had been
uh practicing with let's a a football outfit to find out what you could do and how how to work in a suit like that. I
mean, none of the everything that he had worked on worked. I mean, he couldn't move. He couldn't move this, he couldn't
do that. And it was a really a panic on the set. We had to stop production and and revise everything. And it was all
our my and and mostly mine, of course, mistake to to think that I knew better than Rob Bin, who is anyhow fantastic. I
mean he's enormously gifted guy and as is Phil Tippet who did here at 20 or nine
and starship who did all the animals. I mean I'm so lucky that I was bas it's all coming from John Davidson. I didn't
know these people. He brought these people to me. I mean thanks. I think this movie became this so so interesting
and so so wellcraftrafted I think because of John Vincson who be who was let's say showing me the way how to do
such a science fiction movie I mean he knew much more about science fiction and and special effects than I had never I I
didn't have that knowledge you know he he taught me how to do this so I mean I'm I'm very thankful to John Davidson
you know a wonderful producer But you talked about, you know, Peter Weller getting in a suit and this
restricted movement. But I think the suit even as you see it in the film is is quite bulky. It is like this very
heavy physical object. And I think that's that's that's interesting. But yeah, but the the version we had we was
a little bit different, you know. I mean that's also why in the beginning when we finally that uh that the original plan
was to in the aftermath of Terminator James Cameron Terminator one we thought that it should be Arnold and then Rob
Bin against said to us if you take Arnold on top of that that costume that would be coming really over the top. You
should have somebody very slender, very slim and basically and the only important thing is how his jaws
look. So we basically casted partially on jaws. He Peter Weller has really the good jaws
you know. So it's I mean it's horrible to say this but it's true or too you know I mean we also looked at his talent
and we did auditions or whatever that but ultimately the decision really of the whole crew was based on this.
Um can you say a bit about working with with Peter Weller? We actually invited Peter Weller to come tonight and he uh
said he really would have loved to but he's in Hawaii working on Hawaii 5, but uh he's um was very excited about that
we were showing this uh and doing the retrospective. But can you say a bit about working with him? It's it's as you
say it's a film, you know, you barely you don't see his face for a lot of it and somehow um there is I think more
than in most action films certainly there's a certain pose and a certain vulnerability to this character that he
develops without even really being able to show his face. Yeah. And and in the beginning like I just explained he was
very unhappy and miserable in fact and thought that that in fact it was nearly let's say an insurrection I would say
something like that that he couldn't didn't want and and couldn't do it and he was fully right. The costume came
much too late. He had no time to adapt to that costume. It was coming in in the morning at 5:00 and then at 5:00 in the
afternoon 12 hours later he come to the set and say be a Robocop. You know, it was absolutely ridiculous, of course,
what we asked Peter. And so after we solved that and we sh were shaking hands and say, "Okay, now this we we know how
to how to operate now and let's let's do it." Um, I I it was a very smooth sale. You know, he gave me his word and I gave
him, let's say, all the time and and and that he needed and from there on it was a really wonderful production and he
suffered a lot. you know, it's to be in that costume is extremely extremely unpleasant. It's warm and we were
shooting in Dallas was very high temperatures and and he never complained anymore and he was he was a great great
great guy to work with, you know. So, all right, let's take some questions from the audience. Uh, all right, we'll
start at the very back. Yeah. During the whole prediction production, the the government or of the
mayor, office of the mayor in in Dallas promised that the lights would go on, but they never did. No, I chose it with
John Davidson. we were there we were thinking about Dallas or Houston and we chose Dallas because of that of they had
this uh skyline with one of the at that time innovative one of the buildings was surrounded by blue fluescent let's say
light like around the building and that felt at that time of course now you see it all the time but at that time felt
extremely let's let's say futuristic and that's why we chose Dallas but it never went on no we were waiting and waiting
And finally we just shot it because it was just we was I think it I I never never came back. I think in fact was too
expensive. I'll just repeat in case people in the back didn't hear a question about
whether you made any significant changes to the script. No, not really. No, I mean
it I added one one scene basically which was uh the guy bas the the bad guys that take the woman uh try to rape the woman
on and I I I invented that scene. Sure. I mean shooting through the legs of the woman to hit his dick in it.
That was me, right? Question about this is about uh how I guess how Robocop fits into this
80s action movie and the male action hero. Yeah. Well, I mean I have not studied that and
and I'm not aware really if it had any influence. I certainly it has been difficult also in in the let's in the
remakes. Um, and even in the sequels has been difficult to imitate imi imitate the style of the movie which is
partially of course ironic and has a kind of a lightness about itself and it's not taking itself completely
seriously realizes that b that this is not happening yet and that it is a little bit weird what's happening. Um
but I think in all these sequels be it that they have made of my work now be it sequels and and remakes I mean they
always seem to to I think the studios always wanted not to have a layer of lightness a layer of
irony sarcasm or whatever satire I mean that is now that they want to do starship troopers isn't it that was
recently in the newspapers that they go to remake the starship troop Starship Troopers. Um, and this it's was said in
the article and and through the the production team of that movie of the remake that they would go back more more
and more towards the the novel. And of course we we really tried to get away from the
novel because we felt that the novel was fascistic and militaristic. I mean it is
And we at Numay and I and John Davidson we all felt that yes the adventures of these young people as I said against
their bugs isn't it? I mean the the there's this line in the movie where it says the uh the only good bug is a dad
bug. In fact, there on you see it on screen is John Davidson himself who says that. But you feel that um that going
back to the novel would really uh let's say fit very much in a Trump presidency really.
I I wanted to just follow follow up on that. um you know the point that you made about how it's how hard it has been
to replicate the tone of of of this Robocop and of actually of your other films. And I think this is kind of a a
signature of yours is just this ability um this ironic tone u this the way the film functions as an allegory without
being too serious. Um I'm wondering if if this is something that you you it's sort of a signature. Do you come by it
naturally or is it something that you work on with the material in terms of No, it it it comes really naturally I
think I mean it comes up I mean even in if you ever see this move movie the French movie I just did l you will see
that which is let's say really about rape uh you will see that there is still a certain lightness a certain kind
of you can laugh or perhaps you don't laugh you smile and I think that I always felt that that it was important
to to stick to that but it it comes to my mind in an automatic way organically really I I can't I I doubt if I can do
it without that you know unless perhaps well I think every movie has that I think so I'm it's it's something
that that you don't even uh that I don't really try to do it happens just happens when I read the script then it comes out
that way in I had you in know that. All right, we can take uh one final question. Uh
yes. Yeah, I was six, seven years old when the movie when the war um ended. Um sure. I mean, I grew up when when you
start to become conscious of the world, when you're probably four years old or something, when that really start when
you start to look around. If you grow up for three, four years in the atmosphere of destruction and persecution and
occupation and bombing and and which was I lived in the H which was the governmental city of the Germans and the
Dutch collaborating Dutch government which was bombed all the time because of the F v2 that they were sending from the
H to London. Um then you think that's the world. You really grow up in thinking the world is like that way.
It's like growing up as a fouryear-old in Syria now, isn't it? Then you think that's it. That's how it is. And I think
that always will play a part in my mind. Of course, I found out after the war, you find out that peace is a
normality. I mean, of course, of course, Americans have never been occupied and neither have the English. So perhaps
that is an experiment, an experience that is really at that young age that might be defining the way your brain
works in the first place. You know that I feel comfortable when I think about destruction and and death and and and
all that stuff. Um that feels completely natural to me. I I am not afraid of it. I survive that and and and I think I use
it all the time but not in a conscious way. It comes up, you know, say, "Oh yeah, this is horrible. that you did.
Well, you have a few more opportunities to hear Paul speak. Uh, next film is Starship Troopers and he'll be joined by
the star of the film, Casper Vanine, Johnny Rico himself. Uh, and tomorrow night we have Turkish Delight where and
we'll do a Q&A with Paul after that. And then we have Showgirls uh where we'll be joined by Gina Gershan. So, uh, I want
to thank you all for coming and Paul really thank you so much. Okay. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very
much.
Heads up!
This summary and transcript were automatically generated using AI with the Free YouTube Transcript Summary Tool by LunaNotes.
Generate a summary for freeRelated Summaries

Master Cinematic Video Techniques: Storytelling, Lighting & Composition
Discover how to make your videos look cinematic by mastering storytelling, visuals, sound, and lighting. Learn practical composition tips, lighting techniques, and editing advice to create engaging, movie-like videos that captivate your audience.

Mastering Camera Angles: A Guide to Enhancing Your Storytelling
Learn essential camera angles and shots to elevate your filmmaking. Discover techniques that enhance storytelling in your films.

Mastering Cinematography: Your Ultimate Guide to Practicing Visual Storytelling
Unlock your cinematography skills with practical tips on composition, lighting, and more for stunning visual storytelling.

How Originality Shapes Art: Making Stories Only You Can Tell
Explore how true artistry lies not in inventing new stories but in interpreting existing ones through your unique perspective. Learn from filmmakers like Alfonso Cuarón, Paul Schrader, and Park Chan-wook how personal experience and honest metaphor transform familiar plots into powerful, original art.

The Enduring Legacy of Film Noir: A Reflection on Society and the Human Condition
Explore the evolution of Film Noir and its reflection of societal issues from World War I to modern cinema.
Most Viewed Summaries

A Comprehensive Guide to Using Stable Diffusion Forge UI
Explore the Stable Diffusion Forge UI, customizable settings, models, and more to enhance your image generation experience.

Mastering Inpainting with Stable Diffusion: Fix Mistakes and Enhance Your Images
Learn to fix mistakes and enhance images with Stable Diffusion's inpainting features effectively.

Kolonyalismo at Imperyalismo: Ang Kasaysayan ng Pagsakop sa Pilipinas
Tuklasin ang kasaysayan ng kolonyalismo at imperyalismo sa Pilipinas sa pamamagitan ni Ferdinand Magellan.

Pag-unawa sa Denotasyon at Konotasyon sa Filipino 4
Alamin ang kahulugan ng denotasyon at konotasyon sa Filipino 4 kasama ang mga halimbawa at pagsasanay.

How to Use ChatGPT to Summarize YouTube Videos Efficiently
Learn how to summarize YouTube videos with ChatGPT in just a few simple steps.