Fact Check: Oil Prices, Tanker Costs, and Bond Market Analysis with Jim
Mixed Credibility
1 verified, 2 misleading, 1 false, 1 unverifiable out of 5 claims analyzed
This fact-check analysis evaluates a discussion about energy markets, bond yields, and inflation. The video presents several factual assertions about oil shipping costs, military security expenditures, crude demand, and historical CPI. Key findings include: (1) Shipping cost estimates are misleading due to oversimplification of market volatility; (2) The $50-$75 per barrel taxpayer cost for military protection is unverifiable; (3) The claim of record US crude oil demand above 20 million bpd is false based on EIA data; (4) The 2008 WTI all-time high of $147 is verified; (5) The CPI claim is slightly inaccurate regarding the starting value. Overall, the video contains a mix of verified facts, exaggerated estimates, and some falsehoods, leading to a low credibility score of 45. Viewers should treat the energy market analysis with caution and rely on EIA data for demand and shipping costs.
Claims analysis
Shipping cost for crude oil from the Persian Gulf is $30-$35 per barrel, up from $1-$2 in normal times.
While shipping costs have increased significantly due to geopolitical tensions and insurance premiums, data from Clarksons Research shows that average VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier) spot rates from the Persian Gulf to the US Gulf have fluctuated but not consistently remained at $30-$35 per barrel. In early 2024, rates spiked to around $30 per barrel temporarily, but are not a sustained normal. Normal costs of $1-$2 per barrel are an oversimplification; pre-2022 rates were typically $5-$10 per barrel for long-haul routes, though very low rates exist. Thus, the claim overstates the normal baseline and simplifies a volatile market.
Taxpayers pay $50-$75 per barrel for military security to protect oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz.
No publicly available government or independent estimation provides a per-barrel cost for military operations (Carrier Strike Groups, destroyers, troops) to secure oil shipments. The Pentagon does not release such granular cost breakdowns, and the added cost per barrel depends on highly variable operational expenses. The figure appears to be an educated guess or derived from informal analysis, not official data.
Crude oil demand in the US is pushing all-time highs, well over 20 million barrels per day, and it is October with 'doubly unusual' seasonal patterns.
According to the EIA Weekly Petroleum Status Report, US crude oil demand (implied) has not exceeded 20 million barrels per day in 2024. The highest weekly figure in recent data (September-October 2024) is around 18.5 million bpd. Seasonal demand typically peaks in summer (June-August) and declines in October, so the timing is not 'doubly unusual.' The claim overstates current demand levels.
The all-time nominal high for WTI crude oil was $147, set in July 2008.
WTI crude oil futures reached a nominal all-time high of $147.27 per barrel on July 11, 2008. This is a widely reported historical fact by major financial and energy data sources.
CPI went from sub 2% in summer 2007 to 5.6% in July 2008 due to oil prices reaching $140.
CPI (headline) in July 2007 was 2.4% (not sub 2%). It rose to 5.6% in July 2008, as stated. The increase was partly due to oil prices, but also other factors like food prices (wheat, corn) and global demand. The claim slightly misstates the starting CPI value and oversimplifies the cause of inflation.
What's been on your radar lately? >> Rates, rates, rates, rates. I like bonds.
Um, you know, for the first time I'd been turned bearish on bonds in 2020-ish.
And uh or beginning of this month I said, "Okay, it's time to buy them."
And I think what's important to understand about that is I think that bonds were expensive or
yields were too low. And now the expensiveness is gone. I'm not making a case that they're cheap,
you know, and that there's going to be a big rally in bonds. But what I am making a case for is that
I'll go back to the beginning of the month when I made the statement. Uh from the three-year to the 30-year, all the
yields started with a five. You know, 5% to about 560. >> Yeah.
>> And that at this point, if you want to buy bonds, I think you can hold on to that 5% coupon, and the risk of capital
loss, the price goes down and yields go up dramatically higher, is a good risk-reward ratio. Now, of
course, there's always that possibility that they can go higher in yield. You know, a good example of that would be
$200 crude oil. If we got something like that and it pushed the inflation rate up, but that's about what you would
need, I think, to see the risk of bond yields going higher. I think a lot of the risks that we face, uh whether or
not it's a bubble bursting or the economy slowing, those would all be constructive for bonds. You know, they
would cause a rally in bonds, and you would actually wind up seeing um much lower yields. Uh so, I think that from a
risk-reward standpoint that they've really become a good place to start looking at for the first time in about
six years. >> You know what's interesting about that is you could almost argue
if we get $200 a barrel oil, the long end might come down. Because if you get hawkish, that would
be aggressively hiking rates, you know, we've seen that in the past where the long end of the curve is doing the
opposite of the front end of the curve because as they're hiking growth and inflation expectations over long term go
down. >> You're you're right. And as a matter of fact, speaking about $200 crude, let me
let me throw out this argument at you. We're there right now. And the And how do I how do you arrive at that? The
price for crude coming out of this out of um the Persian Gulf is about $110. About the same as Brent.
>> Yeah. >> The price per barrel the price per barrel to ship it out because of the the
hostilities and shooting at all those tankers is running it around 30 to $35 a barrel right now. It used to be in
normal times, it would cost you $1 to $2 a barrel a 2 million barrel supertanker, it cost you you know, $1 to $2 a barrel
to ship it. Today it's costing you about $35. So there you go. You're already at $145 for crude oil. So because the price
is the price of crude oil that we see is called FOB free on board. That means it's $110. You pay to ship it. That's
basically where the price comes from. So it's $110 plus 35. And how do you get to 200? Well, how we even getting no ships
out? Two air two carrier strike groups, 75,000 troops, 13 destroyers, uh and and the logistics to supply all of that. Now
no one has put a price on what it's costing per barrel to get that oil out. But the estimates I've seen are running
between 50 and $75 a barrel that the taxpayers paying in all of that military support to be able to have those convoys
go through the straits. So you might argue we're already there at $200 crude oil. It's just it's $110 is the price,
35 to deliver it, and the taxpayers picking up the other 50 bucks in security in order to get those to get
those ships to move through in the first place. So you know, um if you were to get the price to go to
$200, you would almost have to argue that some of those other things would have to come
down uh because if the price went to $200, I don't uh think that the price of the tankers is going to go down. I don't
think that we're going to we're we're actually talking about putting a third carrier strike group in in um
in the Middle East. Those those those prices would actually go up uh at that point. So, it is already a enormous more
expensive than people think. >> And probably what's even more important than that for the real economy would be
the crack spreads. Because if you combine 200 or 150 with a $100 crack spread, now you're talking
about I don't know what the diesel price would be, but I know right now it's roughly 10 bucks in like San Diego parts
of California. So, you're approaching maybe $10 diesel nationwide if that were to play out, not necessarily because of
the oil, but because of that crack spread. >> Well, that's part of the reason why that
you know, the crack spread is so high to begin with because a lot of people have said, you know,
that the effective price of the the national average of diesel in the United States as of 2 days ago was like $6.32
a gallon. Of course, you're right. It's pushing nine bucks in in um California. But, the reason that that number so high
is cuz it's because the tanker market's broken. And so, a lot of when you when you look at those wide crack spreads,
remember crude is free on board. Somebody's got to pay that enormous tanker cost, and that's embedded within
those spreads, those refining margin spreads. So, the delivery of that is in there. And why is it broken? Why is the
tanker market broken? Because a lot of tankers are stuck in the Middle East and that they're they're sending tankers and
they're doing ship-to-ship transfers. You're tying up a tremendous amount of tankers to do this right now, and you're
slowing down the overall movement of tankers. Tankers work like the circulatory system of uh
for oil. They have to be on their routes, they have to keep moving, and when you create blockages, just like,
you know, with the medical analogy that I'm using, you wind up having problems, and you could run up with the risk of a
heart attack if your blockage gets bad enough. So, that's why I think that, you know, these crack spreads are so high.
That's why you always hear people say the price of crude oil or the price I'm sorry, excuse me, the price of gasoline
or the price of diesel is like effectively at $160 or $180. Yes, because because of those tanker
costs and stuff. >> Yeah, so I always try to figure out where is the line
when you go from higher energy prices being inflationary to disinflationary? And I think a lot of that depends on the
underlying economy. And I always go back to 2008 and use that as an example, not necessarily for a big stock market crash
or something like that, but the point out the fact, and most people forget this. They remember how that movie
ended, but they forget how it started. And it And I'm sure you remember, Jim, how it started. It started with the CPI
going from roughly 3%. In fact, I think in the summer of 2007 it was sub 2% the CPI. And then you fast forward a year to
July of 2008, and it's at 5.6. And that's because oil prices went to 140
a barrel in nominal terms. And so everyone was worried about inflation, inflation, inflation 1970s. And that was
in the middle of 2008. And then of course we get to the tipping point where that inflationary pressure
acts as such a massive tax on the economy that it actually is the straw that breaks the camel's back and leads
to that disinflation. And I'm sure you've given this a lot of thought. So, where do you think that line in the in
the sand is now in 2026? >> You know, you brought that up, and it was July of 2008 and all-time high in
WTI was $147 and that is still the all-time nominal high. Uh my my one anecdote was I remember I was on a plane
in July of 2008 and the pilot said, you know, it's summer, it's hot and the pilot said, you know, we have to wait in
line to take off and we've been instructed because of high crude oil prices that we have to turn the engines
off and oh my god, it got to like 90° in the plane in like 2 minutes, you know. And and I was like I I'm sitting there
going, man, I'm uncomfortable and I'm looking over and there's like this couple in their 70s. I'm like, they're
not going to make it if you don't turn on the air conditioner here real soon. I mean, this is not Europe. We need air
conditioning in the United States. >> Yeah. >> You know, so uh
but yes, um I think really what you want to look at is the um the Energy Information Agency, the EIA, puts out a
statistic which is called crude oil demand. And it's a it's a derived statistic,
right? They look at the change in inventory, they look at the amount of production, they look at
uh excuse me, they look at how much we've produced, how much we've imported or exported and the change in inventory
and they go, okay, so then when you net all that up, then the rest of that must be in demand, that we used that much
crude oil cuz it either went into inventory or it didn't and how much did we produce? And that implied demand
number is pushing all-time highs right now. It's well over 20 million barrels a day. And so you're right. When the price
goes up and you see that implied demand number start to crater, then you say, okay, now we're getting to the point
where it's really causing demand destruction and it's really starting to hurt the economy and that becomes
disinflationary. That happened soon after July 2008. But as of right now, last time I looked
at the number was 2 weeks ago, we're pushing the highest levels we've ever seen And that's doubly unusual because
it's October and there's a seasonality to the how we use crude oil. We use more of it in the summer cuz we drive more in
the summer than we use in the fall. So, we haven't seen that demand destruction. But, if we ever do see that demand
destruction, that would be the sign. Now, if you want a a quick and dirty way to measure that demand destruction,
watch inventories. And if inventories start to surge, okay, we're still we got the pumps open, we're pumping out this
crude oil, and we're not using it. It's just going into you know, it's just going into storage
tanks and the inventories are going up. That would be a sign that uh-oh, we've gotten to the price where people have
just stopped. Right now, $9 diesel, we about it and we fill up and we continue to move on. And as long as we
do that, it's just inflationary. It's when we stop bitching about it and say park the truck, we're not driving it
anymore, then it becomes deflationary.
Un fact-check este o verificare sistematică a afirmațiilor dintr-un videoclip sau articol, folosind surse oficiale, date și statistici. Acesta vă ajută să separați informațiile corecte de cele exagerate sau false, oferindu-vă o imagine mai clară asupra credibilității conținutului.
Estimările privind costurile de transport maritim sunt considerate înșelătoare, deoarece simplifică excesiv volatilitatea pieței. Analiza arată că nu reflectă corect fluctuațiile reale ale tarifelor, așa că ar trebui tratate cu prudență.
Nu, această afirmație este falsă. Conform datelor Agenției pentru Informații Energetice (EIA), cererea record de țiței din SUA nu a depășit 20 de milioane de barili pe zi. Videoclipul este inexact în această privință.
Afirmația conform căreia prețul maxim istoric al țițeiului WTI a fost de 147 de dolari pe baril în 2008 a fost verificată ca fiind corectă. Restul afirmațiilor, inclusiv cele legate de costurile militare și inflație, conțin inexactități sau nu pot fi verificate.
Scorul de credibilitate de 45 se datorează unui amestec de afirmații verificate corect, estimări exagerate și afirmații false, precum cea legată de cererea record de țiței. Combinația de informații incomplete și inexacte reduce încrederea generală în analiza pieței energetice prezentate.
Cel mai bine este să consultați surse oficiale, cum ar fi Agenția pentru Informații Energetice (EIA), care publică date regulate despre cererea de țiței și stocurile din SUA. Acestea oferă informații precise și actualizate, mult mai fiabile decât estimările din videoclip.
Aceasta este o estimare neverificabilă, deoarece nu există date publice care să ateste un astfel de cost direct asociat protecției militare pentru transportul țițeiului. Fără surse concrete, această afirmație trebuie considerată speculativă și nu poate fi acceptată ca fapt.
Keep this fact check
Save it to LunaNotes and it becomes a real note in your library — editable, searchable, and ready to turn into flashcards or a diagram. Free to start.
Save to LunaNotesOr fact check for another video.
32K+ people have turned 65K+ videos into notes
“Very useful tool. I'm using it for the last couple weeks and I'm loving it so far. Makes learning on YouTube a great experience.”
This fact check was automatically generated using AI with the Free YouTube video fact checker by LunaNotes. Sources are AI-generated and should be independently verified.
Related fact checks
Fact Check: Oil Inventory Depletion and Global Energy Market Analysis
This fact-check analyzes a video discussing global oil inventories, refinery capacity, and Japan's economic challenges. Key claims about inventory levels and demand are verified, but some statements are misleading or unverifiable. Overall credibility is moderate with minor issues.
Fact Check: Iran-US Peace Negotiations and Oil Market Claims
This fact-check examines claims about a 60-day US-Iran ceasefire agreement, oil price trends, Strait of Hormuz shipping activity, and related diplomatic developments. While some assertions about ongoing negotiations and diplomatic efforts have basis in real negotiations, several details about finalized deals, conditions, and impacts on markets are either misleading or unverifiable at this time.
Fact Check: 3 Warning Signals Flashing on Wall Street – AI, Oil, and Fed Risks Analyzed
This fact-check analyzes a video claiming three simultaneous warning signals—an AI investment bubble, surging oil prices, and a consequential Fed decision—threaten the economy. Key claims about hedge fund bets, AI financing, oil at $116, and bond yields are assessed, revealing a mix of accurate data points and misleading or unverifiable assertions. The video’s overall credibility is moderate due to selective evidence and sensational framing.
Fact Check: US-Venezuela Oil Deal and Infrastructure Claims
This fact check analyzes claims about the United States' agreement to refine and sell Venezuelan crude oil, the involvement of American oil companies in Venezuela, and related geopolitical assertions. While some claims about oil reserves and refinery capacities are accurate, other assertions regarding military operations and political developments lack supporting evidence or are misleading.
Fact Check: Iran War Claims, Oil Prices, and Nobel Prize Misinformation in Debate
This fact-check examines claims from a heated debate about the Iran conflict, oil prices, the Ukraine war, and the Nobel Peace Prize. Many assertions are false or misleading, including claims about Iran's missile production, US destruction of Iranian forces, oil prices during Trump's term, and a non-existent execution of Charlie Kirk. The overall credibility of the video is low due to numerous unsubstantiated and exaggerated statements.
Most viewed fact checks
Fact Check: April 2026 Regulus-Sphinx Alignment and Biblical Prophecy
This fact-check examines the claim that the star Regulus will align with the Sphinx's gaze at Easter 2026, signalling a significant spiritual or prophetic event as proposed by Chris Bledso. We evaluate the astronomical accuracy of the claimed alignment, the biblical connections, and warnings about deception in prophecy.
Fact Check: April 2026 Rapture Predictions and Related Claims
This video makes multiple prophetic and biblical claims prophesying an imminent rapture event around April 4th to 5th, 2026, linking various visions, interpretations, and speculative timelines. Our fact-check finds that these claims are unsupported by credible evidence or mainstream religious scholarship and involve unverifiable personal revelations and misinterpretations of historical and biblical texts.
Fact Check: Claims About Noah's Ark Discovery on Turkey's Highest Peak
This fact-check examines the sensational claims of an alleged Noah's Ark discovery on a Turkish mountain peak, analyzing the archaeological, scientific, and biblical assertions made. Our investigation finds no credible evidence supporting the extraordinary details presented, many of which contradict established science and historical knowledge.
Fact Check: Prophetic Claims and the Essene Calendar Explained
This video presents claims about the prophetic significance of the Essene calendar, its connection to biblical prophecy, and recent historical events. While some historical facts about the Dead Sea Scrolls and Jewish history are accurate, the prophetic interpretations and calendar correlations remain speculative and unverified by mainstream scholarship.
Fact Check: Zoink's Record Breaks and Impossible Levels in Geometry Dash
This fact check analyzes the claims about Geometry Dash player Zoink's achievements, including his record completions of notoriously difficult levels such as Booambama, Exasperation, and Silent Circles. While most accomplishments verify with community data and documented runs, some details on attempts and timelines require cautious interpretation.
Found this fact check useful?
Take it with you. One click puts it in your own LunaNotes library.
Save to LunaNotes