Introduction: Personal Connection and Historical Context
The documentary recounts the story of Lieutenant Aubrey Hastings, killed during the 1914 Battle of Loos, embodying the personal tragedies experienced across Britain due to WWI. It frames a critical reconsideration of Britain's participation in the conflict, arguing the war was not futile but necessary.
Origins of the Conflict: The July Crisis and German Aggression
- The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand triggered Austria-Hungary’s aggressive stance against Serbia.
- Germany pledged unconditional support to Austria, warning France and Russia against intervention.
- Germany's militaristic leadership, including Kaiser Wilhelm II, Chancellor Bethmann Hollweg, and General Helmuth von Moltke, pursued war despite escalating risks.
- Germany issued a "blank check" backing Austria to attack Serbia rapidly, aiming to preempt Russian military growth.
- For a detailed exploration of these foundational tensions, see Understanding the Underlying Causes of World War One: A Comprehensive Lesson Plan for Social Studies Teachers.
Britain's Calculated Entry into War
- Britain was reluctant but alarmed by Germany’s naval buildup and ambitions threatening European balance and British global dominance.
- Secret assurances to France and concern over Belgium's neutrality influenced Britain's decision.
- The German invasion of neutral Belgium violated international law and justified Britain's declaration of war in August 1914.
Brutality of the German Invasion
- German troops committed systematic atrocities in Belgium and France, including massacres of civilians and destruction of historic sites like Louvain's university library.
- These actions shattered any hopes of a limited conflict and galvanized Allied resolve.
- The critical importance of Belgium's neutrality and its violation is underscored throughout this analysis.
Key Battles and the Shift to Trench Warfare
- The Battle of the Marne: Shifting the Tide of World War I halted German advances near Paris, preventing a swift German victory.
- The First Battle of Ypres exemplified brutal fighting and the deadly stalemate that led to trench warfare.
- British forces adapted from professional soldiers to mass conscripted armies.
Postwar Consequences and the Treaty of Versailles
- The 1919 peace conference sought to reshape Europe and prevent future wars but faced enormous challenges.
- The Treaty imposed reparations and territorial losses on Germany but has been criticized as both overly harsh and insufficiently enforced.
- Economic hardships and political instability in Germany contributed to the eventual rise of Nazism.
- Explore the long-term impact in The Aftermath of World War I: Pathways to Conflict and the Rise of Totalitarianism.
Legacy and Historical Perspectives
- Public opinion shifted postwar, with many veterans and historians viewing the war as tragic and futile.
- The distinction between the 'good war' of WWII and the 'bad war' of WWI is addressed critically.
- The documentary emphasizes recognizing the necessities and sacrifices of WWI to understand its enduring impact.
- To understand nationalist influences, see The Dark Side of Nationalism in World War One Explained.
Conclusion: The Importance of Remembering WWI
The detailed historical account challenges simplistic narratives about WWI’s futility, highlighting the complex causes, Britain’s reluctant yet necessary involvement, and the crucial consequences of a potential German victory. It calls for honoring the sacrifices made and understanding the war's true significance in European and global history.
[Music] on the 5th of October 195 my great uncle leftenant auy Hastings of the sth East s
regiment was killed in France blown to pieces in his trench during the Battle of
loose I grew up with his story reading the unhappy letters that he wrote amid the poppies of the battlefield along
with those of a grandfather and another great uncle who survived but this is the first time I've
visited the cemetery at fuka lathun where aubre is buried one of some 900,000 British Empire dead of the first
world war almost everyone in this country shares such links with that catastrophe
for our forefathers and for Europe it's a funny business looking down at the last resting place of one of
my own family whom I never met who died in a struggle that I've spent decades reading about it horror is not in doubt
but where I part company from what we might call the black add take on history is to believe that it was all so futile
that it didn't matter which side won in the 21st century the British people are deeply wedded to the idea
that the second world war was our good War the first or bad won but what if we stayed out what if Germany had
won in my opinion the deaths of Aubrey Hastings and hundreds of thousands of his comrades were assuredly a great
tragedy but they were not for nothing many British people honor the men who fought and died with a mixture
of sorrow and a sense of waste a belief that no cause could have Justified so horrendous a
sacrifice but 100 years after the outbreak it seems time to revisit the reasons we went to war in
1914 I want to argue that far from Britain having plunged into a blood bath we could have stayed out of our part in
the First World War was tragically necessary [Music]
any exploration of why Britain had to go to war in 1914 must start on the continent of
Europe the spark was ignited in the Balkans on the 28th of June when gabrillo prip a Bosnian Serb shot dead
Arch Duke France Ferdinand a to the Austrian Throne the Empire's rulers immediately
determined to exploit the outrage to justify invading neighboring Serbia where the murder weapons had come
from but the Russians were Serbia's close allies and they made it plain they would fight to protect their fellow
slaves through July 1914 the great Continental powers waded ever deeper into
crisis but from the outset the key player was [Music]
Germany on the 6th of July its rulers pledged the austrians their unconditional support to smash Serbia
promising to deal with Russia and its own Ally France if they intervened day by day it became plainer
that none of the big players would back down and thus began the countdown to the first world
[Music] war some historians have argued that once it became clear that Austria and
Germany were going to war with France and Russia we the British should simply have left them to get on n with it
stayed out that all that would have come out of a German victory was a fast forwarded version of today's European
Union I don't buy that the people who are running Germany cared nothing for democracy or other people's freedoms
once the shooting started it became plain that their War aims were a little different from those of Hitler 35 years
later excepting only the Jewish genocide the causes of the war are hugely complicated with the death of the arch
dukee only setting in motion existing forces no one nation deserves all the blame but there's an over riding case
that German recklessness contributed more than anything else to make a conflict intended to settle a local
score escalate into a European war and once the fighting and dying St Ed it became cruy apparent that a German
Victory would be a disaster for [Music] Europe in 1914 Germany was by far the
most powerful State on the continent the most advanced Society in [Music]
Europe industrially it was racing ahead of its rivals in every field from Pharmaceuticals to automob
design socially it pioneered a welfare state by creating unemployment insurance and old AG
pensions German culture was revered across the world but it became Europe's historic
tragedy that the German system of government lag Generations behind everything else in the
country the Empire's elected par had the largest Socialist Party in Europe but while the rag dominated
domestic affairs it was the Kaiser the so-called all highest vilhelm II who still made every key appointment on
controlled decisions about War and Peace philh Helm was a weak man who was sought to masquerade as a strong one
chronically unstable and prone to Violent mood swings he wasn't at heart a warmonger as of course Hitler was but he
loved to play at soldiers he offered threats and blandishments to other powers which he always got in the wrong
order professor John R has spent a lifetime studying and writing about the Kaiser how personally influential was
Kaiser willhelm in the decision for War uh kazer wilham took over the Reigns from uh his father in 1888 and inherited
bism Mark's immense power himself when he threw bismar out but not content with that he then went back to an almost 18th
century notion of monarchy in other words he insisted on ruling personally uh with the result he appointed all
ministers all the chancellors all the generals all the Admirals himself personally according to his likes and
dislikes he was an extremely assertive bully well it was just extraordinary situation that you had a socialist
majority violently anti-militarist majority in the r duck and yet exercising no influence at all really
over um this regime and foreign policy yeah uh one of the reasons I believe uh behind the German General's decision to
go to war around about 1914 was the rising tide of democracy at home the the thinking was well if we leave it too
long we will not be able to get our way and do what we really need to do to make Germany great so we to go uh before that
time comes the most powerful institution in vilhelms Empire and indeed in all
Continental Europe was the German [Music] Army the Kaiser was also eager to extend
his power across the seas and personally promoted the creation of a big gun Navy this thoroughly alarmed the BR
British who feared Germany's Fleet as a threat to their global trade routs and Empire as Queen Victoria's grandson
vilhelm retained some respect for her people but he was determined that neither he nor his Empire should defer
to them it's almost as if he feels obliged to be more military and more masculine
than any other Monarch perhaps because there's always the whiff of englishness about him his mother being English he
was always very keen to say no no I'm not English I'm Prussian I'm I'm extremely Prussian so there's this
autocratic uh side to him there's extreme militarism but some of it does come from
England for example the love of the Navy the idea that he has a mission to become the superpower in Europe in place of
Britain he feels he has a right as leader of this new energized Germany after unification
fear of Germany's might and of its aspirations to dominate Europe prompted Russia and France to forge a close
military Alliance although Britain's government made no firm written commitment it
posted an option on supporting them in the event of War many British people recoiled from
the idea of joining an alliance with Zar Nicholas II whose people had been Britain's enemies through the 19th
century but the fears of Europe's rulers that a general War would result from their
rivalries caused Every Nation to huddle close to its friends the Germans to the austrians the
Russians to the French with the British as cous Mayes Germany's Warlords were haunted by
fears of Russia's growing might some of them were convinced that challenging the Zars armies sooner rather than later
offered Germany the best chance of Victory this is one of many German memorials to prussia's 19th century
military triumphs instead of perceiving big Wars as we do today as universal tragedies
the Kaiser generals and sometimes vilhelm himself believed that trial by battle was an acceptable instrument of
[Music] policy all Germany's leaders were in cure even paranoid about threats at home
from the Socialists abroad from Russia and France probably backed in a showdown by Britain in those days not many people
thought seriously about economics the Kaiser and his generals counted soldiers they failed to realize that their
country was achieving dominance of Europe without firing a shot through its industrial
Power by 1914 so many Germans had come to believe that a European clash in arms was inevitable that their fatalism
contributed mightily to bringing this about the Kaiser who was almost certainly clinically unstable was one of
three men in Germany who took the key decisions which resulted in war to this day historians argue fiercely about
which pulled the levers to precipitate disaster the others were the chancellor Theobald Von bethman holg appointed by
vilhelm and general helmet Von Mula head of the army the Kaiser and the chancellor were
the ones who on the 6th of July promised Austria Germany's support against Serbia bethman halve knowing that Russia
was committed to protect the serbs pressed the austrians to hurry their Invasion to preempt the
Zar this has become known as Berlin's blank check Keystone of the argument that Germany
was most blameworthy for the horrors that followed Professor Sirus stra has been
studying and chronicling the war for over 30 years he agrees that Berlin took a huge
gamble the Germans actively encouraged the austrians not merely to invade Serbia but to get on and do it even more
quickly than they were ready to do it yes partly because I think if they do it quickly you'll get away with it you'll
be able to crush Serbia there'll be a Balkan war that is over so quick that nobody will have time to intervene so
the the presumption here is speed and what Berlin is doing is constantly taking best case advice you know will
Russia stay out of this war because they're worried there'll be a Revolution in Russia the best answer is that yes
they will because there has been a Revolution in Russia in 1905 and there might be again so they work with that
assumption where it's in fact of course the Zar is going to be put under tremendous pressure to back Z slaves in
Serbia but throughout July the one nation surely that had the power to stop this process if the Germans had
said to the austrians stop do not invade Serbia there would have not been a general European War would there that's
right I think they have the power to say no I mean after all the blank check is Central and and the blank check is
issued by Germany and Germany then seems to show remarkable insuance as to how that check will be used you know austri
Hungary still has to cash it it's Austria Hungary that has to initiate War but absolutely the balance then shifts
to Berlin and if any power has the capacity to stop it its Berlin particularly at the very end of the
crisis Army Chief of Staff helmet Bon Mula who answered only to the Kaiser also played a pivotal
role on the 28th of July vilhelm and bethman HG experienced a brief panic attack the looming War now looked far
bigger and Graver than they' bargained [Music] for but mka on his own initiative
telegraphed the austrians and urged them to hasten their attack the chief of staff had long
argued that if Germany must face a European Showdown it was better to have it before the Russians big armaments
expansion program was complete at an imperial council meeting in December 1912 he's reliably reported
as saying War and the sooner the better anakah mow is a German scholar
who has written a biography of the chief of staff which emphasizes his role in the July
crisis where did mka fit into the decision for war well muli very much Advocates War he thinks that war is
inevitable in the long run uh he thinks that eventually Russia will become too strong too militarily powerful for
Germany to defeat her and therefore he uh creates an atmosphere in which war seems a good solution out of a perceived
problems one thing that seemed extraordinary to us about how dysfunctional the German government was
in July 1914 is that here you've got mker who's supposed to be just the head of the army and at a critical moment
July the 28th he sends a telegram to Vienna to the austrians telling them to get on with invading Serbia and it does
an extraordinary reflection of both how Reckless MCO could be and of how powerful he wash MH well you're right he
he does send that Telegram and in Vienna they end up saying well who actually who rules in Berlin who rules in Berlin Mal
got a bitman or was it in fact the kaer um so yes you're completely right he exceeds his authority if you like by
sending this telegram Germany's leadership in July 1914 was extraordinarily reckless in
accepting the risk that by promoting a small Balkan War they would trigger a huge European
one when it became plain that the Russians would fight rather than see Serbia go under the Germans refused to
take the one step that could have prevented a general European catastrophe telling the austrians to pull back
instead they themselves prepared to mobilize against Russia and that's why I believe they deserve most blame for all
that follow on the 28th of July Austria declared war on Serbia and 2 Days Later
the Zar ordered his army to mobilize Germany then issued two ultimatums one to Russia and another to
France its Ally neither was expected to accept and few of the Kaiser's generals wished them to Berlin then set in motion
its hugely ambitious War plan designed to crush France before turning on [Music]
Russia created almost a decade earlier by mka's predecessor count Alfred Von schen the plan required an invasion of
France by way of its back door through neutral Belgium it was the German commitment to
overrun Belgium which suddenly propelled Britain hitherto a spectator of the Continental drama to the Forefront of
the stage under a treaty signed in 1839 this country was among the
guarantors of Belgian neutrality I'm one of those who still wonder whether Britain really would have
come in if it hadn't been for the invasion of Belgium Mala got this dead wrong he did he did he was in an
impossible situation militarily speaking or strategically speaking because Germany is in a sense in circle
by France in the west and Russia in the East and the only way he thinks he can win this war is by implementing the
so-call schen plan and that plan can only work if France is defeated quickly and that means invading Belgium but
interestingly in France the chief of staff similarly thinks our best chance would be to advance through Belgium but
the politicians that the the diplomats tell him we can't do that because of Britain the British told France on no
account exactly exactly and so had Germany also respected Belgian neutrality there would
have been all sorts of possibilities right at the end of July and early in August perhaps to come to a different
[Music] outcome thus in the first days of August 1914 Germany prepared to invade and
Crush France in a campaign of 40 days before turning on Russia Europe had a War but must the British be in it would
they [Music] fight basking in the barmy summer of
1914 and preoccupied by industrial turmoil and threatened Irish Civil War the British people had scant appetite
for a continental conflict but liberal PR Minister Herbert aswith and several key cabinet
colleagues were appalled by the prospect of Germany achieving dominance of Europe they doubted that Britain could merely
remain a bystander while this happened one such was the foreign secretary sir Edward gray who played a
critical [Music] role sir Edward gray is tradition ially
seen as a reticent English gentleman whose Grand passions were fly fishing and bird watching both of which he wrote
good books above but more recently he's become a focus of fierce controversy some historians claim that
gray made rash secret commitments to the French which dragged us unnecessarily into
war for centuries it had been a British Article of Faith that a balance of power which denied absolute dominance to any
one nation must be maintained on the continent between 1908 and 1914 when gray was not casting a fly on bright
Waters he held secret talks with the French about British support in the event of a German
attack the foreign secretary was less clever and less of a Statesman than his admirers
thought but the claim that he should be damned for dragging Britain into an unnecessary War doesn't stand
up I suggest that gray was a realist about the difficulty indeed impossibility Britain simply standing by
doing nothing while Germany conquered Europe if the French and Russians had been beaten as they almost certainly
would have been if Britain hadn't come in who can imagine a Victorious Germany allowing Britain to continue ruling the
waves and the world Financial system any more than Hitler would have done if Churchill had tried to strike a deal
with him in 1940 nothing gray said beforehand could have deterred the Germans because they
had weighed Britain's military power and discounted it the little British Army seemed incapable of influencing a huge
Clash of Continental [Music] hosts the Royal Navy was thought
irrelevant because in the Kaiser scor ful words dread norts have no wheels the foreign secretary secret and
Unwritten assurances to France seem to me to have reflected not warmongering but prudent and essential
precaution in July 1914 by proposing an immediate European conference gray did all that he could to avert
War s Michael Howard is 's most distinguished living historian he and I have spent many hours
discussing the vast puzzle of 1914 and crucially whether Britain could have done more to avert disaster Gray's
proposal which they rejected out of hand to address the confrontation between austr Hungary and Serbia by having a
peace conference it wasn't a contemptible proposal was it if they wanted a I mean it was absolutely
typical typical gray thing to do a typical sort of liberal solution ution uh and uh the Germans rejected it flatly
the Germans rejected it flatly because this would have meant letting down the austrians and they were not going to let
down the austrians there was this sense throughout all classes in Austria it is time to finish with the serbs if we
don't finish with the serbs they will nibble us to death this is the moment of strike the Germans knowing knowing this
was a case were not going to bring in the austrians to debate about what their future was going to be uh So to that
extent also would say that the the Germans were responsible for not not letting their be a peaceful
settlement on the 2nd of August the Germans issued an ultimatum to King Albert of Belgium demanding passage for
their armies he flatly refused and appealed to Britain as a guarantor of his country's
neutrality thus it fell to Sir Edward Gray to convince a still reluctant British Parliament of the necessity for
Britain to join the war on the continent on the afternoon of the 3rd of August gray delivered the most important
speech of his life to the House of Commons by now most of the cabinet believed that Britain must fight in the
name of Belgium's rights could this country gray demanded Stand By and Watch the darest crime that ever stained human
history and thus become participators in the Sin he added we should I believe sacrifice our
respect and good name before the world and should not escape the most serious and Grave
consequences this was one of those extraordinary parliamentary occasions That Changed History it persuaded much
of the Liberal Party hither to bitterly hostile to intervention now to support it as to conservative opposition already
did thus on the 4th of August 1914 after Berlin rejected an ultimatum demanding its withdrawal from Belgium Britain
declared war on Germany was Belgium the real reason that Britain went to war in 1914 or as some
historians nowadays try to argue oh it was just a pretext that the British government really wanted to fight anyway
yeah well I would tend to say it's both and it's it there there are two there are
two arguments here one is the security of Belgium and the absence of a dominant power on the mainland of Europe is seen
as Central to Britain's strategic position they can't be the equivalent of Napoleon facing Britain across the
channel and dominating Britain's roots to the rest of the world the second issue is does it matter that Germany
disregards its International obligations enters Belgium which is a neutral State um and fails to reflect both
international law and the rights of of of of small Nations and the answer is it does matter and it it matters because
for Britain international law and what we might now see as morality also matters but it's more fundamental than
that because Britain is is an economic uh Power a trading power a power that depends on its shipping actually
international law is more than just a sense of of of of legal and moral obligation it's also a matter of
economic necessity you need to respect international law to make sure that Britain can continue to exercise the
degree of Leverage it does as a neutral itself well some people say no oh it was incredibly silly for Britain to get
involved in this horrific experience the first world war just because the German Army marched into Belgium but actually
it seems to me it was a pretty good reason for going to war it was an excellent reason going war and it did
something which at the beginning of the July crisis seemed unimaginable to many United the British people United the
British people he United the cabinet and he United the people as Britain mobilized its little
Army in that first week of August Germany's vast host was already surging into Belgium
within days the first reports appeared in the world's newspapers describing the extraordinarily brutal conduct of German
troops towards the Belgian people they were not merely carelessly destroying homes and Villages all
invading armies do that they were seizing and killing civilian hostages in scores and
hundreds even before 1914 the Kaiser's Army had earned a reputation for exceptional
brutality between 1904 and 7 when the Herrero and Nama tribes rebelled against German colonial rule in Southwest Africa
the Kaiser soldiers killed or deliberately starved to death almost 100,000 native
people vilhelm applauded and decorated the officer responsible even by the Imperial
standards of the day this action was worse than any British [Music]
excess but the Herrero genocide had been far away in Africa in August 1914 World opinion was stunned by German savagery
towards fellow Europeans in Flanders the destruction of the medieval University Town of loua
today rebuilt from Ash became a symbol of the excesses of the Kaiser soldiers endorsed by
Berlin professor John Horn has exhaustively researched and cataloged the German Army's actions in Berlin and
France during [Music] 1914 John we're here in the University
Library at louvar what happened here well on the 25th of um August there was the sound of fighting German soldiers
shooting at what they claimed was a civilian Insurrection round about 11:00 in the evening this beautiful University
liary was broken into by the German soldiers and deliberately set fire one young Jesuit father dupio uh had written
in his notebook that he thought the Germans in burning down the library had done something as barbaric as the
destruction of the Library of Alexandria in Antiquity this was seized by German soldiers and he was summarily executed
and by the the 29th or the 30th you have to imagine loua um as an almost empty town the population that hadn't been
deported gradually straggled back in to find between 1500 and 2,000 buildings destroyed and well over 240 of their own
Town's people had been killed all armies in all wars can behave very badly what seems different about what happened in
Belgium in 1914 was that it wasn't just a question of of the odd soldiers um brutally murdering a few civilians they
were systematically shooting them in scores and sometimes in hundreds as hostages you're quite right but what
we've just described in lva was a terrible incident and it immediately grabbed the international headlines but
it was typical of something that happened across the whole Invasion front in Belgium and also in eastern France
and it wasn't the worst case in terms of the death rate din was destroyed as a town and 674 of its inhabitants executed
two days before In Cold Blood in C in In Cold Blood [Music]
in the first weeks of the war nearly 6 and a half thousand civilians were executed by German troops in Belgium and
France Berlin claimed that they were merely exacting legitimate reprisals for resistance by civilians so-called
FR but John Horn rejects this you found no evidence at all of frer activity did you have guilla activity against the J
no it was uh apart from the odd very isolated incident but nothing which Justified the German accusations which
was that there had been what they called a folks Creek a people's War a mass Uprising and the Kaiser already by the
9th of um August only a week into the war is accusing the king of the belgians of fermenting such an uprising it it it
didn't happen was the institutional response of the German generals and right up to the Kaiser that seem
striking and it does seem to say something about the character of the regime that's right because um very
quickly um what starts out as as as panics and localized responses by German soldiers is immediately um endorsed by
the whole German command structure and then what swings into play is a series of very brutal reprisals which are
justified in terms of German military Doctrine as to what you do when you're faced with civilian
Uprising for years apologists for Germany claimed that the Belgian atrocity were figments of Allied
propaganda some of the stories that made headlines in 1914 for instance claims that thousands of babies were maimed by
German soldiers were indeed Fabrications but a big truth persists the German Army behaved with systemic
barbarity during its Advance across Belgium and France its actions persuaded many
hitherto doubting British people that they had chosen the right side in the ghastly conflict that was
unfolding some historians today claim that the British government's decision to go to war in defense of Belgium's
neutrality was simply a fig Leaf a pretense when really it was all simply about supporting the French against the
Germans i' put it a bit differently yes it's true that some key ministers wanted to fight anyway but Belgium provided a
Tipping Point all sorts of British people who cared nothing for Serbia or Russia could easily get their minds
around the notion that it was outrageous that the most powerful Army in Europe proposed to crush beneath its boots a
small state simply to serve the convenience of the schen plan and wasn't that indeed a decent and
honorable reason for Britain to go to war had Germany been Victorious on the continent Britain would have found
itself in a desperate and lonely predicament the Germans had won and now I
hypothesize there would have been an Anglo German war within a matter of years the fear in Britain was that a
power which unified the continent would then be in a position to challenge Britain's command of the sea if she
commanded challenged and successfully overturned Britain's command of the sea Not only would we no longer have an
Empire we will be at the mercy of whoever commanded the whole of Europe that was what the British feared that
was what they were right to fear it and they were right to fear it because there was a substantial element in Germany led
by the Kaiser whose one objective was to challenge Britain as a world power to build a great Navy which could then
defeat the British and Germany would then become a world power at the expense of the British so if the Germans had won
the war I see no way in which they would not have used their dominance of Europe to bring the British down so we would
not have avoided a war we would only have postponed one by early September the German Army
had swept through Belgium and into France with Berlin believing that its victory was imminent Chancellor bethan
HG Drew up a list of his country's demands at the peace talks they included seizing large suedes
of land from both France and Russia annexing Lux Berg making Belgium and Holland vassel
States the September plan as it became known was designed to secure Germany's absolute political and economic control
of Europe but in the second week of September the French army achieved a
historic victory in the battle of the man driving back the Germans from the gates of
Paris What followed in the Autumn of 1914 finally wrecked Germany's dream of Swift
Victory it also witnessed the first big and seriously bloody Battle of the war for the
British in October the British expeditionary Force marched towards the old Belgian cloth town of e wipers as
millions of British soldiers came to know it they arrived there just in time to CL
flash head on with a massive enemy offensive the last great German effort to win the war by
Christmas what took place in the five weeks of battle around e set the pattern for the vision of the first world war
which has been etched into our national culture ever [Music]
since former Soldier Clive Harris today guides visitors to the battlefields of the first first world war and especially
those around e but you can see sh he's brought me to polygon wood one of the most famous or notorious landmarks of
the desperate struggle in 1914 it's right at the edge of the men road which runs back towards e which is
about five six kmers behind us now it sits right at the center of the battlefield as well so from the moment
the Germans attack us on the 18th of October right through to the last knockins of first Eeps on the 11th of
November this this wood here and the two Woods just to the rear of us were key as part of the battle this is where the
Germans made their last huge push of 1914 to try and win the war Before Christmas they did yeah they now
realized that they needed to knock us out of the war and by doing so they needed to capture the channel ports and
therefore they moved away from the V life and plan to degree and the capture of Eeps this is the last thing other
side of Eeps there is no defenses it was our last chance there is nothing behind us but the channel ports and there were
battles all over the shop small battles all over the wood here they were yeah we tend to think that the British line
would be a continual line when in fact it was more a series of outposts and quite often units found themselves
isolated and having to make small unit charges into Germans as opposed to a larger cohesive
defense here in Western Belgium the war of maneuver ranging across thousands of square miles that have been waged
through the late summer of 1914 gave way to a stalemate Across the Western Front [Music]
the technology of defense and destruction artillery and machine guns had achieved a dominance which
confounded the generals of both [Music] sides at e cavalrymen saw their horses
almost for the last time before being obliged to join a death grapple on foot well we're here this is the uh site
of the horse guards Memorial and it marks um an area where the horse guards fight his infantry pretty much on this
spot we're just on the so they came charging up dismounted yeah initially by this actual spot is where one of the
machine gun positions because it a great Arc of Fire over advancing enemy but what seems important here Clive it
wasn't just that the British threw back the German Army it was also that the whole character of the war changed for
all the armies that here was where they first came to terms with what everybody now understands was the full horror of
the Great War wasn't it y trench warfare and this is the end of that war of movement that starts in the August all
the way down to the man all the way back again and it's here that we start to dig dig dig so yeah we're on the spot where
it changes and when it started to rain yeah they weren't in the earth they were in the mud yeah then you have to learn
uh to cope with things such as trench F and how to get around that and reinforce your trenches to withstand bombardments
we're no longer going to see artillery now in front of the Infantry firing as field guns they're going to be behind
the lines or certainly in in sunken lanes and that sort of thing and nobody dares show his head above the parit no
this is we go Subterranean from now on that's right um any Movement by day would have been suicidal
yeah but the British paid a devastating price for their narrow victory at e 56,000 British soldiers were killed or
wounded in a month the old professional British Army was largely
destroyed thereafter it would be civilian volunteers and later conscripts who accounted for the overwhelming
majority of the 6 million British soldiers who eventually served but however terrible the
sacrifice it seems mistaken to imagine the that there was ever an easy means by which the war could have been
ended gentlemen our long wait is nearly at an end tomorrow morning General Insanity mchit invites you to a Mass
Slaughter we're going over the top well h on har the hugely successful black add series epitomizes the enduring popular
view of the first world war but the British army fell victim to idiot commanders devoid of brains or courage
well best of luck to you all sorry I can't be with you but obviously there's no place at the front for an old General
with a Dicky heart and a wooden bladder well chu chu then see you all in Berlin for coffee and
cake most of the war's commanders really were pretty unlovable and unimaginative men but once the most powerful
industrial States in Europe were locked in Strife it seems wrong to imagine that even a Wellington or Napoleon could have
found an easy road to Victory George orell wrote a generation later that the only way to end a war quickly is to lose
it he was right the trench stalemate on the Western Front posed intractable problems
which no Commander proved able to solve generals needed to be able to control their forces by telephone and
could only do so from behind the front rather than at the head of their troops as on history's
battlefields but the price of longdistance command was to create a divide between the top brass in their
shadows and their men C deep in mud which has made an enduring and bitter impact on posterity's view of the
war in the summer of 1918 Allied Forces finally broke the stalemate on the Western Front and pushed east across
France with the British army taking more prisoners than all their Allied Partners put
together the Germans exhausted and demoralized fell back in growing disarray until an Armistice was signed
on the 11th of [Music] November around 10 million combatants
900,000 of them from the British Empire had lost their lives two months after the shooting
stopped the Victorious allies convened a peace conference at the palace of versailes outside
Paris their task was enormous their purposes the most ambitious in history the Versa Summit has often since been
branded a failure which condemned Europe to a further generation of strife prime minister Lloyd George
French Premier George clono and American President woodro Wilson led the negotiations involving delegations from
many other interested Nations which lasted for 6 months between January and June 1919
their intention was to produce a treaty that would not only reshape Europe but also ensure that there could never again
be a great War by disarming the Germans and making them pay the costs of the conflict historian Margaret McMillan is
the author of the most compelling and Vivid modern Narrative of what happened at
versailes what was at stake for the Allied powers at Versailles I think they had two things
they had to think about they were deeply concerned about the state of Europe and indeed their own countries included
there was real fear of Revolution and they were worried that the situation might deteriorate what was also at stake
of course is they were democracies and they had to think of their publics and the public had been led to believe and
had been kept going in the war by the promise that it was going to make a much better world and so what they had to try
and do is create a better world to incredbly ambitious objectives it was it very ambitious but then of course the
first world war is so unusual compared to earlier Wars because it was so exhausting that you couldn't just say at
the end of it well that's it done we'll make a few border changes and we'll go back to normal you couldn't go back to
normal I seem to remember that the Germans eventually paid less than they had made the French pay after they beat
the French in 1871 what the Allies couldn't say to their own people was look there's no way Germany can pay what
really we need to rebuild because they their own people had suffered so much and so they had to put a bill in but
what they did was they fudged it they divided the total reparations Bill up so the Germans only paid a fraction
once they paid the fraction they'd pay the rest which of course the Germans never wanted to do the Allies really
failed afterwards to convince their own peoples that their cause have been just didn't they well I suppose the problem
with the first world war is that the expectations are so high the promises are so great and all sorts of promises
as we know made during the war to try and keep people in the war but there's no way that all those promises can be
cashed in after the war is over abuse fell upon the Versa treaty almost before ink was dry on the
signatures the economist John Maynard KES one of the British treasury delegation published a scathing
broadside entitled The Economic Consequences of the Peace a strong German sympathizer KES
made a case that the terms imposed upon Germany were both morally unjust and economically
foolish how influential was Maynard K's and his book The Economic Consequences of the Peace which absolutely damned
Versa it was very influential I mean he wrote it very quickly it became a bestseller immediately it's been in
print ever since and it's a brilliant pmic it's not fair he paints this picture of these greedy selfish
hard-hearted cynical men dividing up Europe punishing Germany and they're just making a complete mess of it I
think there also he represents a whole generation of younger people who had supported the war believing that the
world was going to be a better place place and when they saw it wasn't going to be they reacted and blamed the people
who were trying to make peace for everything I thought one of the huge unfairnesses of kan's book is that he
never set it in the context of saying all right even if the Allies have made a fumbled bungle piece if the Germans had
won and if the Germans had been making the peace it would have been a vastly cruler and worse one for Europe well I
think there's plenty of evidence that what the German High command and they were basically in control of Germany by
this point by 1918 you had a military dictatorship in Germany and what they were planning were pretty extensive
annexations of other people's lands in the west and in the East they were planning to extend their influence they
in the Treaty of BR Lov they had forced the Bolsheviks who were desperate to give over whatever gold they had left
they'd set up an independent Ukraine I mean the evidence is unless they'd had a complete change of heart it would have
been a very harsh piece today an awful lot of people have come to feel a real guilt about the Treaty of Versa oh it
was an unfair treaty to Germany that it contributed to the rise of Hitler got it wrong was it the harsh vindictive treaty
they claim the trouble with the treaty I think is that it appeared to be harsher than it actually was and of course it
was all about implementation and in the end most of those Clauses which limited German power and forced Germany to pay
reparations were were not really implemented fully and so I think there's there's a perception of the treaty is
very harsh my question always is is what would you have done otherwise how would you have treated Germany if you felt it
had caused the War and caused this catastrophe for Europe what would you have done wouldn't you have tried to
limit its power because Vera failed to deliver a lasting peace it has become unjustly
blamed for the fact that a second world war had to be fought in truth so many violent forces
and crises shook Europe between 1919 and 1939 that it seems absurd to blame the peacemakers for having failed in their
grand purposes in the decade following Versa all Europe groaned under the burden of paying the
bills for the past conflict Britain was almost bankrupt on the moral and political regeneration
which prime minister Lloyd George had repeatedly promised failed to happen many men came back from the Army
to find their old jobs taken by civilians often women whereas in 1945 veterans returned
to a country run by a labor government committed to creating a welfare state after 1918 the old gang remained in
charge of an unreformed British Society those who had fought felt that they had been sold a false bill of
goods my own grandfather a writer who won a military cross as a gunner officer in France became one of those who within
a few years of the Armistice asked himself what it had all been for here's an essay my grandfather wrote
for a literary magazine in 1923 after meeting a group of fellow veterans who' served with him in France
they now felt he said that they had gone not as Heroes but on a Fool's errand to fight in a war that was not worth
fighting they'd endured the unsightly dirty life of the battlefields with a cheery and modest sense of Merit with a
belief that they were making some contribution to a good cause but now it
transpired this had been a stupid Article of Faith which was exploded my grandfather and His Kind
felt themselves Strangers In a Strange Land divided by the horrendous trench experience from those at home who knew
almost nothing about [Music] it the Poets of the Western Front such
men as Wilfred Owen Robert grave SE fre suon vividly described its Horrors on the sense of military futility in a
fashion that later generations have found [Music]
irresistible here was the world's worst wound and here with pride then name liveth forever more the Gateway
claims was ever an imulation so bellied as these intolerably nameless names well might the Dead who struggled
in the Slime rise and deride this Seiler of [Music]
crime but suon and His Kind never addressed the huge question of how on Earth Britain could have escaped from
the war except by conceding defeat it's a weird British thing that while we're hugely proud that our
forefathers fought Hitler we seem almost ashamed that they fought the Kaiser how has the overwhelming
perception developed in Britain over the last 100 years that there was nothing worth fighting about in the first world
war well well the interesting point is not so much that after the war opinion changed or opinion there to the point
when you said that was a bad War it was badly conducted it was a waste of time a waste of blood and it should never have
happened nobody thought that in 1918 I think nobody thought that for another 10 years until about 1928 The
Poets did The Poets did the interesting thing is whether people would have been interested and affected by what the
poets wrote they became expressive of a public opinion in 1928 they went expressive in in 1918 by the end of the
1920s there's this worldwide slump total catastrophic unemployment everywhere especially in Germany the
situation seemed to be far worse in 1928 than it had been in 19 194 and by 1933 or so it has become generally accepted
that the war was an unnecessary war that had have been bungled etc etc so I think that what was very very important was
not so much the fact that the war had been terribly expensive and bloody and the losses were awful it was that
nothing seemed to have come out of it of any good Europe's descent into the turmoil
and privations of the the 1930s caused many people to view the Great War as bungled the peace
shambolic some perversely blamed the victors for the rise of Hitler and [Music]
Nazism while many people today still think of the first world war as a bad War the second has come to be seen by
contrast as a virtuous Crusade against the Nazi architects of [Music]
genocide nobody went to war in 1939 to stop the Germans massacring the Jews I mean sad that maybe you say that partly
because of course the serious massacres hadn't yet begun uh but principally because Germany might be doing awful
things Nazi Germany domestically but in those days nobody saw that uh as an obligation to go to war in the way in
which we would today um so in some respects both Wars break out for similar reasons great power rivalries and the
concerns of of the balance of power within Europe and what is happening within Eastern Europe they're remarkably
similar in their causation and it is perverse that we have closed the second world war is the good War and the first
world war is the bad War uh and and of course we have not remained sufficiently I'm talking we as British now have not
remained sufficiently independent-minded or sufficiently historically aware uh to put these things in in our own and a
proper context [Music] no sane person believes that Britain
wanted a war in 1914 all the great Powers bear some responsibility for the Carnage but the
Germans seem to deserve most because they refused to use their almost indisputable ability to prevent
it they failed to see that nothing they HED to get out of the war could justify its horrendous prospective risk on
actual cost Britain emerged from the first world war with little to show save a few worthless
colonies and a host of public memorials but the right questions to ask about the conflict and the nation's
sacrifice today are whether we could justly or sensibly have stayed out of it and what would have befallen Europe
if the Kaisers Germany had won I'm imagining what whiteall as it was on the 4th of August jam with
expectant people about to be swept away by the most Dreadful cataclysm in European
history nobody in their right mind would suggest making the stiner of 1914 an occasion for
celebration but we should have the courage to tell our children and grandchildren that the wartime
generation did not fight and die for nothing that if their enemies had prevailed Europe would have paid an even
more terrible forfeit to explore further the story of how the world went to war in 1914 go to
bbc.co.uk WW1
Britain entered WWI primarily due to concerns over Germany's naval expansion threatening European balance and British global dominance. The violation of Belgium's neutrality by Germany provided a legal and moral justification, combined with prior secret commitments to defend France. These factors made Britain's entry necessary to counter German aggression and uphold international law.
Germany's leaders, including Kaiser Wilhelm II, Chancellor Bethmann Hollweg, and General Helmuth von Moltke, aggressively pursued war, supporting Austria-Hungary with an unconditional 'blank check' to attack Serbia. Their militaristic ambitions aimed to preempt Russia's military growth and expand German power, disregarding escalating risks and diplomatic solutions, thus playing a central role in igniting the war.
The German invasion of neutral Belgium violated international law and involved systematic atrocities, including massacres and destruction of cultural sites like Louvain's university library. This brutal aggression shattered hopes for a limited conflict, outraged global opinion, and galvanized Allied resolve, directly influencing Britain’s decision to declare war and shaping the war's moral narrative.
The Battle of the Marne in 1914 halted the rapid German advance toward Paris, preventing a swift victory. Subsequently, the First Battle of Ypres exemplified brutal fighting that resulted in a deadly stalemate. These battles led to the establishment of entrenched defensive positions, marking the beginning of protracted trench warfare and a shift from maneuver-based campaigns to attritional warfare.
Postwar, the Treaty of Versailles imposed harsh reparations and territorial losses on Germany, causing severe economic hardship and political instability. These conditions undermined the Weimar Republic and contributed to social unrest, creating fertile ground for extremist movements like Nazism to rise, ultimately destabilizing the interwar period and leading to further conflict.
The documentary argues that Britain's participation was necessary to counter German militarism and preserve international order. Despite the war's tragic losses, preventing a German-dominated Europe was crucial for maintaining balance and peace. Recognizing the complexity of causes and sacrifices challenges simplistic views of WWI as futile and highlights its enduring historical significance.
After WWI, many veterans and historians came to view the war as tragic and futile, contrasting it with the 'good war' narrative of WWII. However, this documentary challenges that perspective by emphasizing the necessary nature of Britain's involvement and the lasting impact of the conflict. It calls for a balanced understanding that honors sacrifices while learning from the war's complex legacy.
Heads up!
This summary and transcript were automatically generated using AI with the Free YouTube Transcript Summary Tool by LunaNotes.
Generate a summary for freeRelated Summaries
The Aftermath of World War I: Pathways to Conflict and the Rise of Totalitarianism
Explore the events post-World War I that led to the onset of World War II, from the Treaty of Versailles to the rise of fascism.
The Battle of the Marne: Shifting the Tide of World War I
Explore the pivotal Battle of the Marne, which marked the start of a stalemate in World War I.
The Dark Side of Nationalism in World War One Explained
Explore how nationalism fueled World War One, driving millions to fight and die for abstract ideals and national identity. This summary reveals the role of nationalism in sparking conflict, shaping alliances, and influencing post-war nation-building.
Understanding the Underlying Causes of World War One: A Comprehensive Lesson Plan for Social Studies Teachers
Explore the main causes of World War One and effective teaching strategies for Social Studies.
The Battle of Cambrai: A Turning Point in World War I
The Battle of Cambrai in November 1917 marked a significant shift in warfare with the first large-scale use of tanks, leading to a breakthrough in trench warfare. Despite initial success, the battle highlighted the challenges of combined arms tactics and the evolving nature of military strategy, setting the stage for future conflicts.
Most Viewed Summaries
Kolonyalismo at Imperyalismo: Ang Kasaysayan ng Pagsakop sa Pilipinas
Tuklasin ang kasaysayan ng kolonyalismo at imperyalismo sa Pilipinas sa pamamagitan ni Ferdinand Magellan.
A Comprehensive Guide to Using Stable Diffusion Forge UI
Explore the Stable Diffusion Forge UI, customizable settings, models, and more to enhance your image generation experience.
Mastering Inpainting with Stable Diffusion: Fix Mistakes and Enhance Your Images
Learn to fix mistakes and enhance images with Stable Diffusion's inpainting features effectively.
Pamamaraan at Patakarang Kolonyal ng mga Espanyol sa Pilipinas
Tuklasin ang mga pamamaraan at patakaran ng mga Espanyol sa Pilipinas, at ang epekto nito sa mga Pilipino.
How to Install and Configure Forge: A New Stable Diffusion Web UI
Learn to install and configure the new Forge web UI for Stable Diffusion, with tips on models and settings.

