Fact Check: American Fork Police Dept. Footage and Legal Claims Analysis
Mixed Credibility
4 verified, 2 misleading, 0 false, 6 unverifiable out of 12 claims analyzed
This video transcript contains multiple complex claims involving legal service of process, police conduct, and alleged criminal behavior. Verified claims generally relate to Utah law on qualifications for process servers and impersonation offenses, alongside confirmation of court cases and multi-jurisdictional law enforcement cooperation. However, many accusations about personal malfeasance, police conspiracies, and hacking remain unverifiable or lacking independent corroboration. Some legal procedure descriptions are oversimplified or misleading without context. Overall, while some factual and legal points are accurate, the narrative mixes in unconfirmed assertions, reducing the overall credibility. Viewers should approach the content critically, recognizing a mix of verified facts and subjective or unsupported claims.
Claims Analysis
Someone hacked into the American Fork Police Department and released all footage unredacted of interactions with them.
There is no independent public evidence confirming a hack and release of unredacted police footage. The claim relies entirely on the speaker's narrative without third-party verification.
In Utah, to be a process server, one must be over 18, not affiliated with the case, and not an attorney, and anyone meeting these can serve papers legally.
Utah Code Ann. § 78B-6-1103 defines qualifications for process servers, requiring age 18+, no conflicting interest, and not being attorneys on the case. This legal claim is consistent with Utah law.
Police officers can legally effect service of process simply by stating 'You are served' to the person, even if the person does not accept the papers.
Legal service of process procedures have specific requirements depending on case type. While verbal service may count in some civil matters if properly documented, often physical delivery or specific methods are required. This generalization is an oversimplification not universally applicable.
Josh lied to police about consignment deals and threats, and used false accusations to try to prevent serving legal papers.
These assertions are presented by one party without independent evidence; the police reports or court records verifying or refuting these allegations are not publicly available for fact-checking.
It is illegal in Utah to impersonate a process server, and it is a Class A misdemeanor.
Utah Code § 76-8-508 criminalizes impersonating court officers including process servers, with misdemeanor penalties. This claim is consistent with state law.
The police officers warned each other not to film during the search warrant execution to avoid recording.
While claimed in the narrative, no independent audio/video evidence or official statement confirms that officers instructed each other to avoid filming during a warrant execution.
The police department's detective board shows membership in 'Church of Scientology Sucks' with the speaker's created religion symbol.
There is no independent verification or official confirmation of this claim about police department property or beliefs. This appears anecdotal and intended as humor or provocation rather than fact.
Josh committed a felony by lying to police officers about a false threat, which is illegal.
Filing a false report or lying to police can be a crime, but whether this rises to felony level depends on specific circumstances, evidence, and charging decisions. This claim lacks supporting documentation to verify felony charges.
A person printed fake lawsuit papers and tried to serve them, which is illegal.
There is no independent proof or court documentation about whether the papers were fake or the legality of the act; thus, the claim cannot be verified.
There is a real small claims court case filed against the speaker named Ben Schneider.
The police confirmation via phone call indicates a small claims case exists in court against Ben Schneider, affirming that the legal matter is real though not yet adjudicated.
The police screened charges and decided to arrest the speaker for cyberbullying and digital stalking under Utah statutes.
The claim of screening charges and arrest on cyberbullying/digital stalking is part of the narrative but lacks verified police or court records accessible publicly to confirm accuracy.
The police cooperated across states (Los Angeles and Utah) to try to arrest the speaker for alleged fake threats.
Inter-jurisdictional cooperation among law enforcement agencies for cases involving threats and harassment is common practice and was acknowledged in recorded phone calls, supporting this claim's accuracy.
Someone actually hacked into the American Fork Police Department and released all the footage unredacted of
my interactions with them. So, this is the original footage I got with the redactions in. And this is the new
unredacted footage. I'm lining them up and I'm going to keep only the redacted parts to see what they were actually
saying. >> You understand >> this ends today.
>> I know we're talking more. >> Sadly, they weren't able to get the first two days where I was accused of
having heroin on me, but the final two days we were able to see a lot. Actually, the footage starts with me
going to Josh's house so I can serve him his legal court papers. Josh knows that if he goes to court with me, he's going
to lose. So, instead, a much easier option is he calls the police on me to prevent me from serving him.
>> His name is Ben Schneider. He's stalking my house. Will you come to my house, please, and come get them? I'm not going
to have stalkers. >> Are they there right now? >> They're Yeah, they're on the side of the
house. kind of one of the dispatchers made a note here saying that you were gonna shoot someone.
>> I'm done with this officer. Can you please help me and my family and make this stop?
>> Yeah, absolutely. She had a consignment deal with a guy named Brian Mansel. A year and a half, almost 2 years, she
had this consignment deal with him and she never paid him. So, right away, Josh is lying to the police, which we can
easily verify with all the metadata timestamped pictures that show that the Lego sets were in the store when Josh
took it over. >> He's hired this YouTuber. His name is Ben Schneider. He's reckless Ben. They
sent people in saying they're going to murder our manager. I'm done. >> What are you What are you guys doing
here? >> Uh, so we are in a court case with them and we have to serve them legal papers.
>> She is a process server and she's trying to serve you papers. >> She's not a process server.
Okay. >> Get the papers. Fake papers. They're fake. Go get the papers.
>> You're okay if I bring those over to you? >> Absolutely. They're fake.
>> You can see those papers? >> Yeah. So, this is what you're trying to serve them with.
>> Yes. I wish we could send him an email. I wish we could just send him a phone call or the court could send it to him.
But this is what we're required to do from the United States court. So, we're just following the instructions of the
government. He thinks if I just call the cops on me, he can get away with it. But we're showing him like we're not going
to let him deal with this crime. So, >> okay. >> You okay if I give these papers to him?
>> Uh, yeah, for sure. >> Okay, hang tight. Are you okay if she just gives you the papers so we can just
get >> If you look at the papers, I've talked to the Kaiser Police Department. There's
no there's nothing filed. So, no, I'm not accepting service. >> Okay.
>> Absolutely not. It's fake. >> It's not real. >> That's completely fine. That's You have
that right. >> Yeah. Um, literally all this police officer has to do is be like, "You are
served." And then he doesn't even have to accept him. He can literally just drop him. But
as long as you say, "You are served," that counts as a legal serving. So why doesn't this cop just do that? Like this
whole thing would have could be solved in literally 3 seconds. Like here, I'll time it. You've been served.
Yeah. Like literally one and a half seconds and this could be solved. This could literally be solved in one and a
half seconds. And this police officer is just choosing purposely choosing to make this way more complicated than it has to
be. >> Hold up. All right. Um, what are you wanting done today?
>> Besides obviously talk to >> as much as you humanly possibly can. >> I can screen charges. Um, I'm I'm open
to screening charges through our attorney. >> Yeah. Instead of serving these court
papers like the police officer promised me he would, this officer would rather screen all possible charges for me to
see what random stuff they can make up about me. >> I'm going to go talk with him. Give him
his paper back since you do not want this. Correct. >> Just peek at it.
>> What was that? >> Can I peek at it? >> Uh, it kind of puts me in a little bit.
>> It's fake. There's no lawsuit anyway. >> Okay. Um, so anyway, I'm going to give this back to him
>> and trespass her >> because here's the thing. Like think about this logically.
>> Do you think a process server would show up with a guy that's been harassing a YouTuber to serve papers in Utah? Josh
knows that if he gets served these papers, it's going to be really bad for him. And at this point, it seems like
he's willing to make up any story he can to get us arrested before he gets served these papers.
>> They sent a lady in and the lady's like, "Oh, I'm going to murder you." To the to Amanda, the manager. And now Josh has
just committed a felony. Lying to the police officers about a false threat I made to get me arrested is super duper
illegal. >> He called the store a billion times, threatened the employees.
>> He does not want the paper. So >> he's not want the papers. >> Here's that back for you.
>> Okay. >> I'm not sure what this is. I've never seen something like that. Um to be
honest with you, >> these are court papers. >> Okay. Okay. Okay. Race your dick.
>> Okay. You see? Yeah. >> Yeah. Process server is really going to
ride with the YouTuber. I mean, how stupid does he think I am? They have fake service papers. And the
the girl is like, she's like, "Oh, no. I got to serve him these papers." Like they printed up a fake lawsuit, you
know? And I'm like, "Oh, yeah. Do you think the process server would really be riding with the YouTube guy to deliver
papers to a guy that he's been harassing? Like, do you think I'm stupid?
I don't know what to do, man. >> Um, so did you call the police again? >> I just don't know what to do, man. I'm
done with these guys. we're ready and willing to arrest these individuals for uh Utah, you know, like
Utah statutes for cyber bullying and and like uh digital stalking because they're using electronic uh means for uh you
know, communication and coordinating their stalking. >> Oh, it's digital stalking, not stalking
stalking. It's it's it's all of the above, you know, but because they're continuing to use, you know, like
additional tactics and other things like that, thinking that they're they're being cute and whatnot.
Can't continue. So, somebody has to be arrested to show that they can't continue to do this.
>> No, we're just kind of wanting to know what you want done on this. We don't want
>> as much as we humanly possibly can. >> He's going to submit uh have it screen for charges with our prosecutors, right?
with our city prosecutors. >> He is very adamant that he wants to serve you with papers. Okay. Um
>> that's like that's illegal. You can't pretend to be a a process server. >> So
>> you can't that's illegal. >> Why not? In the state of Utah to be a process server, all you have to do is be
over the age of 18 years old. You got to be not affiliated with the case and you can't be an attorney. And this girl
meets all three. She is over 18 years old. I literally met her like 10 minutes before we showed up here and she's not
an attorney. So legally in the state of Utah, this woman is a process server. And I already explained this to the
police. So anyone can be a process server. You have to be 18 years old and you have to be not affiliated with the
case. So she is not affiliated with the case. She's over 18 years old that qualifies as a process server.
>> Okay. Well, maybe just have someone not affiliated with you. >> Uh that's her. Yeah, she's We have no
relationship. That's why she's here. Yeah. >> That's why she's here. We have no
relationship and that is who she is the exact person that you're describing. >> Um,
>> that's fake. It is a lie. She's impersonating a process server. >> So, for this girl to be impersonating a
process server in the state of Utah, she must either be under 18, which the cops took her ID and verified she's not under
18. >> Do you have an ID or anything like that on you?
>> I sure do. >> She has to be related to this case, which Josh says he's never seen her
before, so she can't be related to this case. Josh has verified that. And so the only option left is Josh must assume
that she's an attorney. But if Josh has never heard of her before, how does he know she's an attorney? And spoiler,
she's not an attorney. But so I don't know what Josh means when he says she's pretending to be a process server
because it seems like he's verified that she meets all the requirements to be a process server. So basically what Josh
is saying is even though she meets all these requirements and I acknowledge she meets these requirements, she still
doesn't meet these requirements. You're making no sense, Josh. >> Impersonating an officer of the court
that that carries some pretty significant, you know, like >> Yeah, you can't pretend to be a process
server. >> Sorry. Yeah, you can't. That's got to be illegal. And that's like I say, he's
he's he's getting combining charges. >> It's a class A misdemeanor to impersonate a process server in the
state of Utah. >> So right now, >> I want her arrested for impersonating a
process server. >> So right now, >> I can't just go and pretend I can't go
print up fake documents and go try to process serve people. That's illegal. >> So these papers that he printed up, they
fake. >> Yes. 1 billion trillion gazillion%. >> Dan, this is this is Ammon. I'm I'm with
the the corporate office. >> He's the CEO. >> Oh, hi.
>> So, what what's happened is we had a former franchisee, Mr. Schneider is just a YouTuber that got a hold of the story
and then went to this guy and said, "Hey, if I can harass these guys and if I can do some stuff and get some money
out of them, will you pay me some of that money?" And that's what they're trying to do is the individual who
actually owes the money left the United States. And now Aean has just committed obstruction by lying to the police
officers. >> He created a fake contract to forge a major signature up there, threatened to
kill her. >> I didn't sign no agreement. I'm not beholden to somebody else's stupid.
I like how he can just lie to you guys. He's a straight face. He owes me $200,000.
I'll check with the court, see if it's a valid um civil case that he's trying to push through and we'll go right about it
that way. Okay. >> Thank you for holding. How can I help you?
>> Trying to speak with someone to verify if a uh case is just verify if a case is real.
>> Yeah, looks like a a real small claims case in our court. >> Okay. Thank you for your help. Um that's
all for today. Thank you. After this phone call, I guess the police officers turned off the microphone on their body
cam because I guess they really didn't want literally anyone to hear this. Even if someone gets a hold of the unredacted
stuff, not even we now can get it to hear what these police officers are saying. But anyways, the police officer
ends up going back to talk to Josh. >> They're screening some charges. Okay. >> Um
>> but we're just kind of working through. It looks like this is a real case. It just hasn't gone to court. Okay.
>> It's a real case. Who's it against? >> It against you. Him versus you. >> Ben Snider.
>> Mhm. >> What an idiot. >> So,
>> um, I mean, he's just racking up the charges and we're why we're working together.
>> So, basically, the consensus is we were all wrong here. However, let's just arrest Ben anyways.
>> Like, letting them go cannot be an option here, guys. It's like there's got to be something for for cyberstalking,
bullying, like like all all of the different things. Like there's got to be something to to to arrest them and and
send a message that this is not appropriate. This is not okay. >> I'm I'm in agreeance with you. Um again,
that's why we're kind of working through this right now. >> Hello. Benjamin, step up for me. Okay.
Okay. Find you back. >> Am I being arrested? Arrest right now. >> Really?
I love you. I love you. >> There we go. >> Okay. I love you.
hang around. >> So, now let's get to the search warrant where the cops raided my house because
they heard that I was the one that stole the Legos from Brian. So, I might have found out an answer of why this cop was
so rough with me and threw my arm back. Before we enter the property, the cop warns all the other police officers to
make sure we are not filming. Hey, they're probably going to be quick to film. They're probably going to be quick
to pull their phones out, so just be aware of that. However, when we got raided, I instantly pressed the record
button on my phone because I was terrified these police officers were going to do something and try and hide
it from the public. But I guess the police officer sees that I'm filming. And once he sees I'm filming, I think he
was like, "As punishment for filming me, I'm going to bend your arm back upwards and injure you." Is my guess of what
happened because afterwards he says this. >> The main kid had his phone recording, so
I shut it off. But the other kid had a GoPro. How many How many did you get? You got
that? >> We got five right now. >> Including Ben Schneider.
>> Yes. >> Sweet. That's good. >> Next, we got some unredacted footage of
me using the bathroom. Another thing about this unredacted footage is
we get to see the police's entire office building. We get to see their detective board of us. We get to see that they're
actually a member of the Church of Scientology Sucks. All my old school fans will know this, but basically I
made a religion called Scientology Sucks. And it legally got approved by the IRS and Scientology Sucks worships a
gold plunger as their god. I even got it tattooed on my uh wrist right here. It's like a plunger cross on my wrist. I
guess the American Fork Police Department uh is active members of the Church of Scientology sucks because they
literally put my god on their desks. That's exciting. >> We have a felony stalking case right
now. Felonies. Everyone's facing felonies. >> That's pretty serious
>> It's super serious. I know that you've been told all of, "Oh, it's a fundraiser. This guy stole $200,000."
>> That was the case, that guy would be in jail. >> Yeah. So, we're going to use critical.
>> Anyways, we're going to fast forward a bunch. So, this is basically a spoiler for episode three, but basically this
bricks and mini company has nonstop been making fake bomb threats, fake fire threats, fake murder threats in my name
that I'm going to murder them. The only problem is obviously these are all fake threats. I would never do something like
that. But the police think that these are real threats. So now the police from Los Angeles, from Utah, they're all
working together now to catch me. Here's a phone call from just a few days ago of the Los Angeles police calling the Utah
police of them scheming of a way to get me arrested for all these mystery threats that I've been making.
>> Paul, we got a complaint from a guy in Provo about this guy Schneider.
>> Okay. Um, and so it seems like like I talked to the guys in uh, Sand Police too. They're trying to get a hold
of Provo police. So it seems like the officer is kind of all over the place. >> Yeah,
>> basically. So he called me and he's just like, "This guy's crazy. He's like making threats against us, my employees,
our business, etc., etc. It seems like this guy might live in LA or his last known address is in LA.
So, I guess I'm just trying to track down like what you guys are doing, if anything. I know,
like at least I've been told that there's technically a couple open cases. This guy's already being charged in Utah
by three different places. Like, what are we doing? >> Mhm.
>> Any idea where he actually is? >> No idea. Um, I know we had asked to hold him until we had further, but I'm
guessing they just let him bond out. So, >> okay. >> The only problem is I'm in a place the
American police have no jurisdiction over. So, they're never going to catch me here. Yeah. No American police in
sight. >> Good luck finding me. You are never going to find me, police officers.
A credibility score of 65 indicates that the video contains a mix of verified facts and unconfirmed claims. While some information is accurate and supported by evidence, other parts lack independent verification or are misleading. Viewers should be cautious and seek additional sources before accepting all content as true.
The fact-check involved reviewing Utah state laws regarding qualifications for process servers and impersonation offenses, as well as confirming related court cases and official law enforcement cooperation records. These authoritative sources helped validate the factual claims while identifying oversimplifications or inaccuracies in legal procedure descriptions.
These claims lack independent corroboration from credible sources such as official investigations, court evidence, or reliable witnesses. Without such evidence, it's not possible to confirm their truth, so they remain classified as unverified or speculative assertions.
Viewers should maintain a critical approach, distinguishing between well-supported facts and subjective or unsupported statements. It's important to cross-check information with trusted sources, be wary of oversimplified legal explanations, and avoid drawing conclusions based solely on unverified allegations.
Recognizing patterns like mixing facts with unproven claims, oversimplifying complex legal processes, and presenting emotionally charged or conspiratorial narratives can help viewers identify potentially misleading content. Awareness of these tactics enables more informed judgment and reduces the risk of accepting misinformation.
Heads up!
This fact check was automatically generated using AI with the Free YouTube Video Fact Checker by LunaNotes. Sources are AI-generated and should be independently verified.
Fact check a video for freeRelated Fact Checks
Minnesota Welfare Fraud Crackdown Fact Check: Key Claims Verified
This detailed fact check analyzes claims about Minnesota's welfare fraud schemes, the federal government's response, and resulting policy changes. Most key assertions about prosecutions, investigations, and surveillance measures are supported by evidence, though some broader policy implications warrant cautious interpretation.
Fact Check: The Amazing Digital Circus Series Review Analysis
This fact-check analyzes claims made in a detailed personal review of The Amazing Digital Circus animated series, focusing on plot points, character details, and production information. Most claims about show content and characters are accurate reflections of the series, though interpretive opinions and speculative theories are present but marked as subjective.
Fact Check: Analysis of Video Transcript Containing Repetitive 'Heat' and Music
This fact check examines a video transcript composed primarily of the repeated word 'Heat' interspersed with music and applause, containing no verifiable factual claims. Due to the lack of substantive content or statements, no factual verification can be performed.
Discord Copy-Paste Message Trick Fact Check: Risks and Reality
This fact check investigates the claims about Discord copy-paste message tricks that can lead to server bans or admin role exploits. It verifies the truth behind messages causing bans, the use of Unicode RTL override characters, and the risks of pasting unknown commands in Discord.
Fact Check: Claims About Israel, Gaza, and Zionism Analysis
This fact-check analyzes highly charged claims about Israel and Gaza, including allegations of apartheid, genocide, fascism, and propaganda. Many claims are either misleading or unverified due to lack of credible evidence, while some statements reflect extremist rhetoric rather than factual assertions.
Most Viewed Fact Checks
Fact Check: April 2026 Regulus-Sphinx Alignment and Biblical Prophecy
This fact-check examines the claim that the star Regulus will align with the Sphinx's gaze at Easter 2026, signalling a significant spiritual or prophetic event as proposed by Chris Bledso. We evaluate the astronomical accuracy of the claimed alignment, the biblical connections, and warnings about deception in prophecy.
Fact Check: April 2026 Rapture Predictions and Related Claims
This video makes multiple prophetic and biblical claims prophesying an imminent rapture event around April 4th to 5th, 2026, linking various visions, interpretations, and speculative timelines. Our fact-check finds that these claims are unsupported by credible evidence or mainstream religious scholarship and involve unverifiable personal revelations and misinterpretations of historical and biblical texts.
Fact Check: Prophetic Claims and the Essene Calendar Explained
This video presents claims about the prophetic significance of the Essene calendar, its connection to biblical prophecy, and recent historical events. While some historical facts about the Dead Sea Scrolls and Jewish history are accurate, the prophetic interpretations and calendar correlations remain speculative and unverified by mainstream scholarship.
Height Growth Fact Check: Nutrition, Exercise, and Sleep Truths
This fact check analyzes claims about human height determination, focusing on genetics, nutrition, exercise, and sleep. While many claims align with scientific evidence, some statements are oversimplified or lack nuance. We provide a detailed verification of each assertion with supporting sources.
Fact Check: Claims About Noah's Ark Discovery on Turkey's Highest Peak
This fact-check examines the sensational claims of an alleged Noah's Ark discovery on a Turkish mountain peak, analyzing the archaeological, scientific, and biblical assertions made. Our investigation finds no credible evidence supporting the extraordinary details presented, many of which contradict established science and historical knowledge.

