Fact Check: Trump's Claims on Iran, Military, Economy, and War Promises
Mixed Credibility
4 verified, 5 misleading, 1 false, 0 unverifiable out of 10 claims analyzed
This interview features multiple claims from former President Trump regarding his foreign policy decisions on Iran, military strength, and economic performance. While some statements reflect elements of truth, many are exaggerated or misleading, especially regarding the nature of the Iran nuclear deal, military actions such as alleged bombing of nuclear sites, and economic achievements without context. No evidence supports claims of direct U.S. bombings eliminating Iranian nuclear sites. Trump's criticism of the JCPOA aligns with common right-wing perspectives but neglects the deal’s verified constraints on Iran's program. His economic assertions omit pandemic-related context affecting jobs and growth. Overall, the video’s credibility is mixed with significant inaccuracies and unsubstantiated claims, warranting a credibility score of 55.
Claims Analysis
Trump promised 'no new wars' during his 2016 campaign and first term.
Multiple records show Trump and his campaign repeatedly promised to avoid new wars.
Trump built the strongest military in the world and inherited a terrible military with no equipment.
While military spending increased under Trump, the U.S. military was already highly capable. Describing it as 'terrible' with 'no equipment' exaggerates pre-Trump conditions.
Obama’s JCPOA was a 'horrible deal' allowing Iran to come close to nuclear weapons.
The JCPOA significantly limited Iran's nuclear capabilities and extended breakout time; however, critics argue it contained shortcomings. The consensus is the deal constrained Iran’s nuclear program rather than advancing it.
Trump sent B-2 bombers that 'obliterated' Iran’s nuclear site about 9-10 months ago.
No credible reports or evidence confirm that the U.S. conducted such a bombing strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities during Trump’s presidency or after.
Iran was developing nuclear weapons during the Obama administration despite the deal.
Iran was enriching uranium before and during the JCPOA negotiations but under IAEA oversight with no conclusive evidence they pursued weaponization during the deal’s effective period.
After withdrawing from the JCPOA, Iran escalated nuclear development and was closest to weapons-grade uranium.
Reports confirm Iran increased uranium enrichment levels and nuclear activities after the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA in 2018.
Trump claimed his first term had the 'greatest economy ever' and the following term is 'blowing it away'.
Economic indicators showed strong growth and low unemployment before the COVID-19 pandemic in Trump’s first term, but the pandemic caused a downturn. The claim omits context of economic disruptions and government stimulus.
Trump gave farmers $28 billion in aid during his first term due to trade disputes with China and Canada.
The Trump administration approved approximately $28 billion in aid for farmers affected by tariffs and trade disputes starting in 2018.
Gas prices were $1.85 to $1.91 per gallon in Iowa before attacks on Iran, and prices will soon drop like a rock.
Gas prices before the 2024 Iran-related military actions were higher than stated, and prices are influenced by many factors; predicting a sharp drop is speculative.
Trump opposes raising interest rates during good economic reports and prefers lowering rates to promote growth.
Trump publicly criticized the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes during his presidency, favoring lower rates to support economic growth.
>>> I'D LIKE TO TALK BIG PICTURE >>> I'D LIKE TO TALK BIG PICTURE NOW, MR. PRESIDENT. NOW, MR. PRESIDENT. ONE OF YOUR CONSISTENT CAMPAIGN
ONE OF YOUR CONSISTENT CAMPAIGN PROMISES WAS NO NEW WARS GOING PROMISES WAS NO NEW WARS GOING ALL OF THE WAY BACK TO 2015. ALL OF THE WAY BACK TO 2015. DID YOU BREAK THAT PROMISE TO
DID YOU BREAK THAT PROMISE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? >> N NO. >> NO. NO.
NO.. I HAD TO STOP A COUNTRY, VERY I HAD TO STOP A COUNTRY, VERY POWERFUL, VERY DANGEROUS COUNTRY POWERFUL, VERY DANGEROUS COUNTRY FROM HAVING A NUCLEAR WEAPON
FROM HAVING A NUCLEAR WEAPON BECAUSE THEY'D USE IT. BECAUSE THEY'D USE IT. THEY'D BLOW UP THE WORLD. THEY'D BLOW UP THE WORLD. THEY'D BLOW UP THE MIDDLE EAST
THEY'D BLOW UP THE MIDDLE EAST AND BLOW UP ISRAEL AND COME E HE AND BLOW UP ISRAEL AND COME HERE AND BLOW UP THE EARTH. AND BLOW UP THE EARTH. THEY'RE CRAZY PEOPLE.
THEY'RE CRAZY PEOPLE. I DEAL WITH THEM AND HIGH-STRUNG I DEAL WITH THEM AND HIGH-STRUNG PEOPLE. PEOPLE. VERY CRAZY.
VERYRY CRAZY. I GET ALONG WITH THEM. I GET ALONG WITH THEM. I LIKE THEM. I LIKE THEM. YOU DON'T WANT TO LET THEMEM HAE
YOU DON'T WANT TO LET THEM HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON, AND I'M DOINIG A NUCLEAR WEAPON, AND I'M DOING THE WORLD A SERVICE, BUT I'M THE WORLD A SERVICE, BUT I'M DOING OUR COUNTRY OUR SERVICE.
DOING OUR COUNTRY OUR SERVICE. IT'S AMERICA FIRST. IT'S AMERICA FIRST. I'M DOING OUR COUNTRY A SERVICE. I'M DOING OUR COUNTRY A SERVICE. NICE RAIN.
NICE RAIN. >> IT T IS RAINING HARD. >> IT IS RAINING HARD. >> BUT THE ANSWER IS -- WE'LL >> BUT THE ANSWER IS -- WE'LL JUST KEEP GOING.
JUST KEEP GOING. LET'S POWER THROUGH IT, RIGHT? LET'S POWER THROUGH IT, RIGHT? >> HERE WE PAUSED NEARLY FIVE >> HERE WE PAUSED NEARLY FIVE MINUTES FOR THE RAIN TO PASS AND
MINUTES FOR THE RAIN TO PASS AND THEN PICKED UP OURUR CONVERSATI. THEN PICKED UP OUR CONVERSATION. SO YOU'RE SAYING YOU DIDN'T SO YOU'RE SAYING YOU DIDN'T BREAK YOUR PROMISE, AND YET, MR.
BREAK YOUR PROMISE, AND YET, MR. PRESIDENT, IN YOUR FIRST TERM PRESIDENT, IN YOUR FIRST TERM YOU HELD TO THAT P PROMISE, ANDT YOU HELD TO THAT PROMISE, AND IT WAS SO FUNDAMENTAL TO WHO YOU
WAS SO FUNDAMENTAL TO WHO YOU WERE AS A CANDIDATE, TO A WERE AS A CANDIDATE, TO A FIRST-TERM PRESIDENT. FIRST-TERM PRESIDENT. WHWHAT CHANGED BECAUSE YOU
WHAT CHANGED BECAUSE YOU INSISTED NO NEW WARS? INSISTED NO NEW WARS? >> I DIDN'T GUARANTEE NO WAR. >> I DIDN'T GUARANTEE NO WAR. WHY WOULD I HAVE BUILT THE
WHY WOULD I HAVE BUILT THE TRONGEST MILITARY IN THE WORLD? TRONGEST MILITARY IN THE WORLD?? I BUILT OUR MILITARY. I BUILT OUR MILITARY. I INHERITED A TERRIBLE MILITARY.
I INHERITED A TERRIBLE MILITARY. WE HAD NO EQUIPMENT. WE HAD NO EQUIPMENT. BIDEN GAVE A LOT OF IT AWAWAY, T BIDEN GAVE A LOT OF IT AWAY, BUT IT'S STILL A RELATIVELY SMALL
IT'S STILL A RELATIVELY SMALL PORTION COMPARED TO WHAT I PORTION COMPARED TO WHAT I BUILT. BUILT.T. >> YOU SAID IT OVER AND OVER
AGAIN. >> WHY WOULD I BUILD A MILILITA? >> WHY WOULD I BUILD A MILITARY? I DIDN'T WANT TO USE THIS, BUT I DIDN'T WANT TO USE THIS, BUT I'M DOING YOU AND EVERYBODY ELSE
I'M DOING YOU AND EVERYBODY ELSE A BIG FAVOR. A BIG FAVOR. IN THE MIDST OF THE GREATEST IN THE MIDST OF THE GREATEST STOCK MARKET IN HISTORY, IN THE
STOCK MARKET IN HISTORY, IN THE MIDST OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL MIDST OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL COUNTRY, AS YOU KNOW, WE WERE A COUNTRY, AS YOU KNOW, WE WERE A DEAD COUNTRY, KRISTEN.
DEAD COUNTRY, KRISTEN. I KNOW YOU'RE A BIG LIBERAL, A I KNOW YOU'RE A BIG LIBERAL, A BIG PROGRESSIVE. BIG PROGRESSIVE. >> I'M JUST A JOURNALIST.
>> I'M JUST A JOURNALIST. >> WE WERE A DEAD COUNTRY. >> WE WERE A DEAD COUNTRY. A COUPLE OF YEARS AGAGO, WE WERA A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, WE WERE A DEAD COUNTRY AND YOU IN WE HAVE
DEAD COUNTRY AND YOU IN WE HAVE THE HOTTEST COUNTRY ANYWHERE IN THE HOTTEST COUNTRY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD AND AT AN ALL-TIME -- THE WORLD AND AT AN ALL-TIME -- BELIEVE IT OR NOT, WE JUST HAD
BELIEVE IT OR NOT, WE JUST HAD BRAND NEW STOCK MARKET RECORDS BRAND NEW STOCK MARKET RECORDS TODAY. TODAY.Y. IN THE HISTORY OF THE COUNTRY, I
IN THE HISTORY OF THE COUNTRY, I TOOK SCOTT, HOWARD, PETE AND TOOK SCOTT, HOWARD, PETE AND INTO A ROOM AND SAID I HAVE TO INTO A ROOM AND SAID I HAVE TO DO THIS COUNTRY, THIS WORLD, THE
DO THIS COUNTRY, THIS WORLD, THE MIDDLE EAST, ISRAEL, EVERYBODY A MIDDLE EAST, ISRAEL, EVERYBODY A FAVOR. FAVOR. YOYOU HAVE IRAN.
YOU HAVE IRAN. THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A NUCLEAR THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. WEAPON. BARARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA SIGNED TE
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA SIGNED THE JCPOA, IT WAS A HORRIBLE DEAL, JCPOA, IT WAS A HORRIBLE DEAL, HORRIBLE DEAL. HORRIBLE DEAL. LISTEN T TO ME, IT WAS A HORRIBE
LISTEN TO ME, IT WAS A HORRIBLE DEAL. DEALAL. IT WAS A PATH TO THEM GETTING A IT WAS A PATH TO THEM GETTING A NUCLEAR WEAPON.
NUCLEAR WEAPON. THEY WERE VERY CLOSE TO HAVING A THEY WERE VERY CLOSE TO HAVING A NUNUCLEAR WEAPON, AND I TERMINAD NUCLEAR WEAPON, AND I TERMINATED THE DEALAL.
THE DEAL. WAIT. WAITIT. THEN I SENT THE B-2 BOMBERS IN THEN I SENT THE B-2 BOMBERS IN ABOUT NINE, TEN MONTHS AGO AND
ABOUT NINE, TEN MONTHS AGO AND THEY OBLITERATED, TOTALLY THEY OBLITERATED, TOTALLY OBLITERATED THIS SITE, AND I OBLITERATED THIS SITE, AND I SAVED IT.
SAVED IT. WE HAD A CHOICE. WE HAD A CHOICE. WE COULD LET THEM HAVE A NUCLEAR WE COULD LET THEM HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON OR WE COULD GO ALONG AND
WEAPON OR WE COULD GO ALONG AND HAVE SOME BEAUTIFUL DAYS, BUT HAVE SOME BEAUTIFUL DAYS, BUT THEY WOULD HAVE -- IT'S A THEY WOULD HAVE -- IT'S A JUDGEMENT.
JUDGEMENT.T. THEY WOULD HAVE USED A NUCLEAR THEY WOULD HAVE USED A NUCLEAR WEAPON, AND YOU KNOW WHAT? WEAPON, AND YOU KNOW WHAT? WHEN PEOPLE HEAR THAT WHOLE
WHEN PEOPLE HEAR THAT WHOLE SCENARIO, WHEN THEY HEAR ME SAY SCENARIO, WHEN THEY HEAR ME SAY IRAN WAS GOING HAVE A NUCLEAR IRAN WAS GOING HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON AND THEY'RE CRAZY, THEY
WEAPON AND THEY'RE CRAZY, THEY SAY YOU'RE DOING THE RIGHT SAY YOU'RE DOING THE RIGHT THING. THING.G. I DON'T THINK IT'S AN -- YOU'LL
I DON'T THINK IT'S AN -- YOU'LL DO POLLS BECAUSE YOU'RE ALL FAKE DO POLLS BECAUSE YOU'RE ALL FAKE POLLS ANYWAY, ESPECIALLY YOURS, POLLS ANYWAY, ESPECIALLY YOURS, BUT YOU DO POLLS.
BUT YOU DO POLLS. I JUST WON A BIG ELECTION, AND I JUST WON A BIG ELECTION, AND THE REASON I WON THE ELECTION IS THE REASON I WON THE ELECTION IS PEOPLE HAVE COME TO HAVE GOOD
PEOPLE HAVE COME TO HAVE GOOD JUDGMENT. JUDGMENTNT. I HAD TO MAKE A JUDGEMENT. I HAD TO MAKE A JUDGEMENT. DO I WANT TO GO ALONG AND HAVE A
DO I WANT TO GO ALONG AND HAVE A COUNTRY DOING WELL AND SOMEONE COUNTRY DOING WELL AND SOMEONE WOULD KILL US OR DO I WANT TO WOULD KILL US OR DO I WANT TO PUT OUT THAT HORRIBLE THREAT AND
PUT OUT THAT HORRIBLE THREAT AND I DID. I DID. I PUT IT OUTUT. I PUT IT OUT. I PUT IT OUTUT FOR MANY, MANY
I PUT IT OUT FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. YEARARS. NOW I'M GOING TO PUT IT OUT NOW I'M GOING TO PUT IT OUT PERMANENTLY.
PERMANENTLY. I'M GOING TO DO IT EITHER I'M GOING TO DO IT EITHER THROUGH A A NEGOTIATION WHERE THROUGH A NEGOTIATION WHERE WE'RE VERY CLOSE TO A A DEAL OR
WE'RE VERY CLOSE TO A DEAL OR I'M GOING TO BLOW THE HELL OUT I'M GOING TO BLOW THE HELL OUT OF THEM, TO BE HONEST WITH YOU, OF THEM, TO BE HONEST WITH YOU, AND IT'S GOING TO BE VERY EASY.
AND IT'S GOING TO BE VERY EASY. THAT'S THE EASIER PATH. THAT'S THE EASIER PATH. SO WHEN YOU SAY I PROMISE ON EYE SO WHEN YOU SAY I PROMISE ON EYE DIDN'T PROMISE ANYTHING.
DIDN'T PROMISE ANYTHING. I DON'T LIKE THESE ENDLESS WARS. I DON'T LIKE THESE ENDLESS WARS. THIS IS NOT AN ENDLESS WAR. THIS IS NOT AN ENDLESS WAR. WE'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR THREE
WE'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR THREE MONTHS. MONTHS. MUCH OF ITIT HAS BEEN UNDER THE MUCH OF IT HAS BEEN UNDER THE GOOD FORM OF CEASEFIRE.
GOOD FORM OF CEASEFIRE. THE BLOCKADE HAS BEEN AMAZING. THE BLOCKADE HAS BEEN AMAZING. OUOUR NAVY IS AMAZING AND OUR OUR NAVY IS AMAZING AND OUR MILITARY IS THE E BEST IN THE
MILITARY IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD. WORLD.D. HEY, WE TOOK OVER A VERY HEY, WE TOOK OVER A VERY POWERFULUL COUNTRY.
POWERFUL COUNTRY. VENEZUELA, A LOT OF SOLDIERS, VENEZUELA, A LOT OF SOLDIERS, BIG, STRONG MILITARY. BIG, STRONG MILITARY. WE TOOK OVER VENEZUELA IN A
WE TOOK OVER VENEZUELA IN A MATTER OF MINUTES. MATTER OF MINUTES. WE DESTROYED THE CAPABILITY OF WE DESTROYED THE CAPABILITY OF IRAN IN A MATTER OF DAYS.
IRAN IN A MATTER OF DAYS. NOBODY'S EVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE NOBODY'S EVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE IT, NOW I'M GOING TO FINISH IT, IT, NOW I'M GOING TO FINISH IT, BUT REMEMBER, YOU WERE IN
BUT REMEMBER, YOU WERE IN VIETNAM 19 YEARS BECAUSE STUPID VIETNAM 19 YEARS BECAUSE STUPID PEOPLE -- YOU WERE IN SO MANY PEOPLE -- YOU WERE IN SO MANY DIFFERENT COUNTRIES.
DIFFERENT COUNTRIES. EVERY WAR YOU'RE IN FOR YEARS. EVERY WAR YOU'RE IN FOR YEARS. LOOK AT -- LOOK AT IRAQ. LOOK AT -- LOOK AT IRAQ. LOOK WHERE YOU WERE.
LOOK WHERE YOU WERE. YOU WERE THERE FOR YEARS.. YOU WERE THERE FOR YEARS. LISTEN -- WE WERE THERE FOR A LISTEN -- WE WERE THERE FOR A FEW MONTHS AND THEHE THREAT IS
FEW MONTHS AND THE THREAT IS LARGELY OVER. LARGELY OVER. SOON IT WIWILL BE OVER, BUT YOU SOON IT WILL BE OVER, BUT YOU CANNOT LET IRAN HAVE A NUCLEAR
CANNOT LET IRAN HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON OR THEY WILL BLOW YOU UP. WEAPON OR THEY WILL BLOW YOU UP. THERE WILL BE NO, KRISTEN, THERE THERE WILL BE NO, KRISTEN, THERE WILL BE NO NBC.
WILL BE NO NBC. THERE WILL BE NO "MEET THE THERE WILL BE NO "MEET THE PRESS." PRESS." YOU WILL END THE "MEET THE
YOU WILL END THE "MEET THE PRESS" STRING. PRESS" STRING.G. >> LET ME ASK YOU, THOUGH, >> LET ME ASK YOU, THOUGH, DURING YOUR 2016 CAMPAIGN YOU
DURING YOUR 2016 CAMPAIGN YOU CALLED THE MIDDLE EAST A CALLED THE MIDDLE EAST A QUAGMIRE. >> IT IS. >> WHAT MAKES YOU SOSO SURE THIS
>> WHAT MAKES YOU SO SURE THIS WON'T BE A QUAGMIRE. WON'T BE A QUAGMIRE. >> WE WON'T BE THERE. >> WE WON'T BE THERE. >> YOU'RE CONVINCED THIS WON'T
>> YOU'RE CONVINCED THIS WON'T BE A QUAGMIRE. BE A QUAGMIRE. >> WE WIPED THE COUNTRY OF A >> WE WIPED THE COUNTRY OF A VERY DANGEROUS COUNTRY.
VERY DANGEROUS COUNTRY. IF WE LEFT TOMORROW, AND WE SAID IF WE LEFT TOMORROW, AND WE SAID LET'S GET OUT. LET'S GET OUT. IT WOULD TAKE THEM 15 OR 2 20
IT WOULD TAKE THEM 15 OR 20 YEARS TOY REBUILD BACK, BUT I'M YEARS TOY REBUILD BACK, BUT I'M NOT GOING GIVE THEM EVEN THAT NOT GOING GIVE THEM EVEN THAT CHANCE.
CHANCECE. I'M NOT GOING TO GIVE THEM THAT I'M NOT GOING TO GIVE THEM THAT CHANCE. CHANCE.. THEY CANNOT HAVE A NUCLEAR
THEY CANNOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON, AND IF THERE WAS E EVENA WEAPON, AND IF THERE WAS EVEN A 1% CHANCE TO HAVE IT I WOULDN'T 1% CHANCE TO HAVE IT I WOULDN'T LEAVE.
LEAVE.E. WE'RE ALMOST FINISHED. WE'RE ALMOST FINISHED. WE WILL HAHAVE A STRONG DEAL, A WE WILL HAVE A STRONG DEAL, A MEANINGFUL DEAL AND NOT LIKE THE
MEANINGFUL DEAL AND NOT LIKE THE OBAMA THING. OBAMA THING. OBAMA WAS S A PATH TO A NUCLEAR OBAMA WAS A PATH TO A NUCLEAR WEAPON AND MINE IS THE EXACT
WEAPON AND MINE IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE. OPPOSITETE. MINE IS A WALL. MINE IS A WALL. MINE IS A WALL JUST LIKE I B BUT
MINE IS A WALL JUST LIKE I BUILT A THOUSAND MILES OF WALL ON THE A THOUSAND MILES OF WALL ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER, AND BY THE WAY, SOUTHERN BORORDER, AND BY THE W, I TOOK THE WORST BORDER IN
I TOOK THE WORST B BORDER IN HISTORY, AND I MADE IT THE BEST HISTORY, AND I MADE IT THE BEST BORDER IN HISTORY Y IN A MATTERF BORDER IN HISTORY IN A MATTER OF WEEKS.
WEEKS.S. >> AND YET, MR. PRESIDENT, IRAN >> AND YET, MR. PRESIDENT, IRAN WAS THE CLOSEST TO DEVELOPOPING WAS THE CLOSEST TO DEVELOPING WEAPONS-GRADE URANIUM AFTER YOU
WEAPONS-GRADE URANIUM AFTER YOU RIPPED UP THE NUCLEAR DEAL RIPPED UP THE NUCLEAR DEAL BECAUSE THERE WERE NO BECAUSE THERE WERE NO GUARDRAILS.
GUARDRAILS. >> EXCUSE ME. NG THEY WERE DEVELOPING IT DURING THE NUCLEAR DEAL.
THE NUCLEAR DEAL. YOU DODON'T KNOW THAT? YOU DON'T KNOW THAT? IRAN, WHEN OBAMA SIGNED THAT IRAN, WHEN OBAMA SIGNED THAT STUPID DEAL WHERE HE PAID THEM
STUPID DEAL WHERE HE PAID THEM BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF -- HE BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF -- HE THOUGHT HE COULD BRIBE THEM. THOUGHT HE COULD BRIBE THEM. LISTEN TO ME, THEY WERE
LISTEN TO ME, THEY WERE DEVELOPING A NUCLEAR WEAPON. DEVELOPING A NUCLEAR WEAPON. THAT'S HOW THEY GOT THERE. THAT'S HOW THEY GOT THERE. THEY GOT ALL OF THIS URANIUM
THEY GOT ALL OF THIS URANIUM DURING OBAMA. DURING OBAMA.. YOU KNOW THAT, DON'T YOU? YOU KNOW THAT, DON'T YOU? WELL -- DON'T SAY THIS.
WELL -- DON'T SAY THIS. THEY GOT THERE. THEY GOT THERE. THEY DEVELOPED IT DURING THE THEY DEVELOPED IT DURING THE OBAMA -- BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.
OBAMA -- BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. >> AND THEY ESCALATED THEIR >> AND THEY ESCALATED THEIR DEVELOPMENT AFTER THE DEAL -- DEVELOPMENT AFTER THE DEAL -- LET'S TALK ABOUT THE ECONOMY.
LET'S TALK ABOUT THE ECONOMY. >> LET ME JUST TELL YOU >> LET ME JUST TELL YOU SOMETHING. SOMETHING. >> LET'S TALK ABOUT THE ECONOMY.
>> LET'S T TALK ABOUT THE ECONO. >> IF I DIDN'T GO IN THERE WITH >> IF I DIDN'T GO IN THERE WITH A B-2 BOMBER THEY WOULD RIGHT A B-2 BOMBER THEY WOULD RIGHT NOW HAVE A NUCLELEAR WEAPON, AND
NOW HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON, AND IT WOULD BE HALF THE WORLD WOULD IT WOULD BE HALF THE WORLD WOULD BE ERADICATED. BE ERADICATED. >> YOU HAVE --
>> YOU HAVE -- >> NOT STRONG. >> NOT STRONG. VERY STRONG. VERY STRONG. >> BEAT EXPECTATION.
>> BEAT EXEXPECTATION. >> BY HOW MUCH? >> BY HOW MUCHCH? >> TRIPLE. >> TRIPLE. 117,000 JOBS CREATED.
117,000 JOBS CREATED. >> GOOD. >> GOOD. >> AND YET GAS IS UP, DIESEL IS >> AND YET GAS IS UP, DIESEL IS UP.
UP. >> IT'S ALL COMING DOWN AS SOON AS THE WAR'S OVER. >> 70% O OF FARMER SAY THEY CANT >> 70% OF FARMER SAY THEY CAN'T A FORT FERTILIZER.
A FORT FERTILIZER. >> THE FARMERS ARE DOING VERY >> THE FARMERS ARE DOING VERY WELL. WELL. . >> WHAT IS YOUR MESSAGE TO
>> WHAT IS YOUR MESSAGE TO FAFARMERS, MANY WHO SUPPORT YOU. FARMERS, MANY WHO SUPPORT YOU. >> ALL OF THIS EM SUPPORT ME. >> ALL OF THIS EM SUPPORT ME. >> YOU KNOW I GAVE FARMERS $28
>> YOU KNOW I GAVE FARMERS $28 BILLION BECAUSE CHINA TOOK BILLION BECAUSE CHINA TOOK ADVANTAGE AND OTHER PEOPLE A AND ADVANTAGE AND OTHER PEOPLE AND YOU KNOW WHO PAID FOFOR IT?
YOU KNOW WHO PAID FOR IT? CHINA. CHININA. I HAD A GREAT FIRST TERM. I HAD A GREAT FIRST TERM. I HAD THE E GREATEST ECONOMY EVR
I HAD THE GREATEST ECONOMY EVER AND YOU KNOW WHAT? AND YOU KNOW WHAT? THIS ONE'S BLOLOWING IT AWAY. THIS ONE'S BLOWING IT AWAY. >> WHAT'S YOUR MESSAGE TO
>> WHAT'S YOUR MESSAGE TO ♪ FARMERS, THOUGH, MR. PRESIDENT, ON. >> ARE YOU READY?
>> ARE YOU READY? AM I ALLOWED TO TALKLK? AM I ALLOWED TO TALK? YOU KEEP ASKING QUESTIONS AND YOU KEEP ASKING QUESTIONS AND YOU DON'T LET ME GIVE ANSWERS.
YOU DON'T LET ME GIVE ANSWERS. >> I LOVE THTHE FARMERS. >> I LOVE THE FARMERS. THE FARMERS TRUST ME. THE FARMERS TRUST ME. CHINA AND OTHERS WERE -- AND
CHINA AND OTHERS WERE -- AND CANADA, IT WAS BRUTAL. CANADA, IT WAS BRUTAL. THEY WERE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THEY WERE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE E FARMERS.
THE FARMERS. THEY DON'T T TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEY DON'T TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEM ANYMORE. THEM ANYMORE. I GAVE THEM $28 BILLION SPLIT
I GAVE THEM $28 BILLION SPLIT UP. UPUP. THEY NEVER HAD A PAY DAY LIKE THEY NEVER HAD A PAY DAY LIKE THAT, AND THE FARMERS LOVE ME
THAT, AND THE FARMERS LOVE ME AND THEY CAME BACK AND THEY AND THEY CAME BACK AND THEY Y VOTED FOR ME IN RECORD NUMBERS. VOTED FOR ME IN RECORD NUMBERS. YOU KNOW THAT.
YOU KNOWOW THAT. NOBODY'S EVER EVEN COME CLOSE. NOBODY'S EVER EVEN COME CLOSE. NOW BECACAUSE OF THE FACT THAT E NOW BECAUSE OF THE FACT THTHAT HAD A CHOICE.
HAD A CHOICE. I HAD A CHOICE TO MAKE, I BEING KEEP IT GOING. THE FARMERS WERE DOING GREAT. THE FARMERS WERE DOING GREAT. FERTILIZER WAS VERY CHEAP.
FERTILIZER WAS VERY CHEAP. EVERYTHING WAS CHEAP, GASOLINE EVERYTHING WAS CHEAP, GASOLINE WAS VERY LOW. WAS VERY LOW. I COULD HAVE KEPT IT THAT WAY,
I COULD HAVE KEPT IT THAT WAY, AND I HAVE TO GIVE A RETURN, AND AND I HAVE TO GIVE A RETURN, AND THE FARMERS WILL UNDERSTAND IT THE FARMERS WILL UNDERSTAND IT BETTER THAN ANYBODY.
BETTER THAN ANYBODY. WE'LL HAVE HIGHER GASOLILINE AND WE'LL HAVE HIGHER GASOLINE AND HIGHER FERTILIZER, ET CETERA, ET HIGHER FERTILIZER, ET CETERA, ET CETERA, BUT I'LL GET RID OF A
CETERA, BUT I'LL GET RID OF A NUCLEAR WEAPON IN THE HANDS OF NUCLEAR WEAPON IN THE HANDS OF VERY DANGEROUS PEOPLE. VERY DANGEROUS PEOPLE. EXCUSE ME, WAIT.
EXCUSE ME, WAIT. IT SHOULULD HAVE BEEN DONE FOR 7 IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE FOR 47 YEARS. YEARS. NO PRESIDENT HAD THE GUTS TO DO
IT. I DID IT, AND I'VE DONONE IT. I DID IT, AND I'VE DONE IT. IT'S ALMOST COMPLETE. IT'S ALMOST COMPLETE. AS SOON AS THAT'S COMPLETE
AS SOON AS THAT'S COMPLETE GASOLINE PRICES ARE GOING TO GASOLINE PRICES ARE GOING TO DROP LIKE A ROCK. DROP LIKE A ROCK. YOU KNOW, I WAS IN IOWA SPEAKING
YOU KNOW, I WAS IN IOWA SPEAKING ABOUT FARMS, AND IT WAS BEFORE ABOUT FARMS, AND IT WAS BEFORE WE ATTACKED IRAN, AND I WAS IN WE ATTACKED IRAN, AND I WAS IN IOWA AND THE PRICES WERE $1.85 A
IOWA AND THE PRICES WERE $1.85 A GALLON. GALLON. $1.91 CENTS A GALLON -- $1.91 CENTS A GALLON -- >> WHAT?
>> WHAT? >> THIS TIME I IT WASN'T THE RA, >> THIS TIME IT WASN'T THE RAIN, BUT AN AUDIO ISSUE THAT FORCED BUT AN AUDIO ISSUE THAT FORCED US TO PAUSE THE INTERVIEW AGAIN.
US TO PAUSE THE INTERVIEW AGAIN. >> ARE GAS PRICES GOING HIGHER >> ARE GAS PRICES GOING HIGHER OR HAVE THEY PEAKED? OR HAVE THEY PEAKED? >> THEY'LL COME LOW.
>> THEY'LL COME LOW. VERY LOW, LOWER THAN THEY WERE VERY LOW, LOWER THAN THEY WERE BEFORE. >> HAVE THEY PEAKED? >> IT DEPENDS.
>> IT DEPENDS. IT DEPENDS WHERE THE WAR GOES. IT DEPENDS WHERE THE WAR GOES. IT COULD BE AFTER I GIVE THEM A IT COULD BE AFTER I GIVE THEM A SHOT, AND IT COULD BE IF WE SIGN
SHOT, AND IT COULD BE IF WE SIGN AN AGREEMENT IT WILL GO DOWN NOW AN AGREEMENT IT WILL GO DOWN NOW OTHERWISE IT WILL GO DOWN AFTER OTHERWISE IT WILL GO DOWN AFTER WE FINISH.
WE FINISH. >> KEVIN WARSH, HIS FIRST ROLE >> KEVIN WARSH, HIS FIRST ROLE IS LATER THIS MONTH. IS LATER THIS MONTH. ECONOMISTS NOW SAY IT'S POPOSSIE
ECONOMISTS NOW SAY IT'S POSSIBLE THE FED MAY HAVEVE TO RAISE RAT. THE FED MAY HAVE TO RAISE RATES. DO YOU THINK THAT'S POSSIBLE AND DO YOU THINK THAT'S POSSIBLE AND WHAT WOULD YOUR REACTION BE,
WHAT WOULD YOUR REACTION BE, SIR? SIR?R? >> SO I'M OF A DIFFERENT -- I >> SO I'M OF A DIFFERENT -- I THINK KEVIN IS FANTASTIC, AND I
THINK KEVIN IS FANTASTIC, AND I WANT TO DO WHATEVER HE WANTS AND WANT TO DO WHATEVER HE WANTS AND I DON'T WANT TO HAVE A BIG I DON'T WANT TO HAVE A BIG INFLUENCE ON HIM, BUT WE HAD A
INFLUENCE ON HIM, BUT WE HAD A GREAT REPORT. GREAT REPORT. WE'RE DOING GREAT, AND IT'S WE'RE DOING GREAT, AND IT'S UNFAIR THAT WHENEVER YOU DO
UNFAIR THAT WHENEVER YOU DO GREAT THEY WANT TO RAISE GREAT THEY WANT TO RAISE INTEREST RATES. INTEREST RATESES. IT SHOULD BE THE OPPOSITE WAY.
IT SHOULD BE THE OPPOSITE WAY. IF YOU GO BACK 15, 20 YEARARS TE IF YOU GO BACK 15, 20 YEARS THE MARKET GOES UP. MARKET GOES UP. THE MARKET GOES DOWN BECAUSE
THE MARKET GOES DOWN BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY'LL RAISE THEY THINK THEY'LL RAISE INTEREST RATES. INTEREST RATES. THERE'E'S NO REASON TO RAISE
THERE'S NO REASON TO RAISE INTEREREST RATES. INTEREST RATES. THE COUNTRY BECOMES GREAT. THE COUNTRY BECOMES GREAT. WE BUILTLT THE COUNTRY BY DOING
WE BUILT THE COUNTRY BY DOING GREAT AND HAVING RATES LOW. GREAT AND HAVING RATES LOW. WHAT THEY DO IS WHEN THEY RAISE WHAT THEY DO IS WHEN THEY RAISE INTEREST RATES, THEY TRY AND
INTEREST RATES, THEY TRY AND KILL SUCCESS. KILL SUCCESS. I DODON'T WANT TO KILL SUCCESS. I DON'T WANT TO KILL SUCCESS.. WE SHOULD ACTUALLY LOWER
WE SHOULD ACTUALLY LOWER INTEREST RATES. INTEREST RATES. NONOW IF INFLATION COMES, AND YU NOW IF INFLATION COMES, AND YOU KNOW PEOPLE LIVE WITH INFLATION,
KNOW PEOPLE LIVE WITH INFLATION, BUT IF INFLATION COMES WHAT BUT IF INFLATION COMES WHAT HAPPPPENS IS YOU STAMP IT OUT, T HAPPENS IS YOU STAMP IT OUT, BUT SUCCESS CAN KILL INFLATION JUST
SUCCESS CAN KILL INFLATION JUST LIKE HIGHER INTEREST RATES. LIKE HIGHER INTEREST RATES. WHAT THEY DO NOW IS LIKE WE HAD WHAT THEY DO NOW IS LIKE WE HAD GREAT JOB NUMBERS, YOU AGREE,
GREAT JOB NUMBERS, YOU AGREE, RIGHT? RIGHT?T? >> THEY BEAT EXPECTATIONS. >> THEY BEAT EXPECTATIONS. >> THREE TIMES.
>> THREE TIMESES. ARE YOU READY? ARE YOU READY? WHAT DO THEY DO? WHAT DO THEY DO? THEY SAY OH, LET'S RAISE
THEY SAY OH, LET'S RAISE INTEREST RATES. INTEREST RATES. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE RATES GET I WOULD LIKE TO SEE RATES GET LOWER BECAUSE WE CAN BUILD THIS
LOWER BECAUSE WE CAN BUILD THIS GREATEST MACHINE THAT THE WORLD GREATEST MACHINE THAT THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN. HAS EVER SEEN. YOU CAN'T DO THAT WHENEN THEY
YOU CAN'T DO THAT WHEN THEY IMMEDIATELY RAISE INTEREST IMMEDIATELY RAISE INTEREST RATES. WE'RE DOING GREAT. WE ARE BUILDING MOMORE FACTORIES
WE ARE BUILDING MORE FACTORIES AND HAVE MORE MONEY COMING INTO AND HAVE MORE MONEY COMING INTO OUR COUNTRY FROM OTHER COUNTRIES OUR COUNTRY FROM OTHER COUNTRIES THAN EVER BEFORE.
THAN EVER BEFORE. WAIT A MINUTE. WAIT A MINUTE. WHAT HAPPENS? WHATAT HAPPENS? I DON'T WANT TO JUST KILL IT
I DON'T WANT TO JUST KILL IT WITH HIGH INTEREST RATES. WITH HIGH INTEREST RATES. GROWTH IS THE GRGREATEST THING U GROWTH IS THE GREATEST THING YOU CAN HAVE AND GROWTH DOES NOT
CAN HAVE AND GROWTH DOES NOT CAUSE INFLATION. CAUSE INFLATION. >> WOUOULD YOU BE UPSET IF THEY >> WOULD YOU BE UPSET IF THEY RAISED RATES?
RAISED RATES? WHAT IS S YOUR MESSAGE TO THEM WHAT IS YOUR MESSAGE TO THEM ABOUT THAT? ABOUT THAT? >> LIVING WITH KEVIN, I HAVE A
>> LIVING WITH KEVIN, I HAVE A LOT OF RESPECT FOR HIM, BUT MY LOT OF RESPECT FOR HIM, BUT MY FEELING IS THAT WHEN A COUNTRY FEELING IS THAT WHEN A COUNTRY IS DOING WELL THEY SHOULDN'T BE
IS DOING WELL THEY SHOULDN'T BE PENALIZED BY IMMEDIATELY RAISING PENALIZED BY IMMEDIATELY RAISING INTEREST RATES. INTEREST RATES.. THEY SHOULD ACTUALLY BE
THEY SHOULD ACTUALLY BE INCENTIVIZED. INCENTIVIZED.. WE HAVE DEBT AND OTHER THING, WE WE HAVE DEBT AND OTHER THING, WE HAVEVE THINGS WE WANT TO TAKE CE
HAVE THINGS WE WANT TO TAKE CARE OF. OFOF. I WANT TO GO BIGGER ON THE I WANT TO GO BIGGER ON THE MILITARYRY.
MIMILITARY. I REALLY DO. I REALLY DO. IF WE DO WHAT I'M SAYINGNG THIS
A credibility score of 55 indicates that while some information in the video is accurate, there are significant inaccuracies and misleading claims present. Users should approach the content with caution and verify claims independently before accepting them as true.
Fact-checkers reviewed official reports and statements from credible international agencies and found no evidence supporting the claim that the U.S. conducted bombings to eliminate Iranian nuclear sites. Verification relies on multiple sources including government disclosures and independent inspections.
Economic data can be influenced by various factors such as the global pandemic. Trump's statements omit such context, which is critical to understanding the full picture of job growth and economic performance during his tenure.
The video includes exaggerations, misleading framing of facts, and omitting relevant context, which are typical tactics in political misinformation. It also reflects partial truths presented in a way that supports a specific agenda without balanced analysis.
No. The video contains unsubstantiated claims about U.S. bombings and military operations that lack credible evidence. It's important to consult official military and intelligence sources for accurate information on such matters.
The fact-check clearly identifies which claims are supported, which are misleading, and provides context for each assessment. By presenting a detailed explanation alongside the credibility score, users gain insight into the verification process and the reliability of information.
Heads up!
This fact check was automatically generated using AI with the Free YouTube Video Fact Checker by LunaNotes. Sources are AI-generated and should be independently verified.
Fact check a video for freeRelated Fact Checks
Fact Check: Claims in 'Operation Epic Fury' Speech on Iran and Venezuela
This analysis fact-checks the major assertions in the speech about the US military campaign against Iran, the situation in Venezuela, and claims about energy independence under the Trump administration. Many military and geopolitical claims are unsubstantiated or false. Economic and historic statements mix truth with exaggeration.
Fact Check: Iran Ceasefire, Missile Parade, and Public Protests Analysis
This fact check examines claims about Iran's internal situation during a ceasefire period extended by Donald Trump, focusing on missile displays, public protests, and conflicting narratives between the US and Iran. While many points align with known information, some depictions lack clear evidence or context, highlighting the complexity of the ongoing conflict.
Fact Check: US Middle East Policy and Presidential Actions Overview
This video provides a broad historical overview of US presidential actions and Middle East policies from 2000 through the Trump administration, touching on elections, wars, and diplomatic events. The fact-check finds many claims accurate, though some simplifications and minor context omissions are present, with an overall credible narrative.
Fact Check: Obama’s Views on Iran War and Nuclear Deal Assessed
This fact check examines former President Barack Obama’s statements regarding the Iran nuclear deal and the ongoing conflict with Iran. We verify the accuracy of his claims about the original deal’s effectiveness, U.S. withdrawal consequences, and the diplomatic approach versus military action.
Fact Check: Fox News Claims on Iran Deal Progress and Military Impact
This fact check examines Fox News' report on the purported Iran nuclear deal nearing completion, U.S. military operations against Iran, and related geopolitical developments. Several claims lack independent verification or appear exaggerated, resulting in a mixed credibility assessment.
Most Viewed Fact Checks
Fact Check: April 2026 Regulus-Sphinx Alignment and Biblical Prophecy
This fact-check examines the claim that the star Regulus will align with the Sphinx's gaze at Easter 2026, signalling a significant spiritual or prophetic event as proposed by Chris Bledso. We evaluate the astronomical accuracy of the claimed alignment, the biblical connections, and warnings about deception in prophecy.
Fact Check: April 2026 Rapture Predictions and Related Claims
This video makes multiple prophetic and biblical claims prophesying an imminent rapture event around April 4th to 5th, 2026, linking various visions, interpretations, and speculative timelines. Our fact-check finds that these claims are unsupported by credible evidence or mainstream religious scholarship and involve unverifiable personal revelations and misinterpretations of historical and biblical texts.
Fact Check: Prophetic Claims and the Essene Calendar Explained
This video presents claims about the prophetic significance of the Essene calendar, its connection to biblical prophecy, and recent historical events. While some historical facts about the Dead Sea Scrolls and Jewish history are accurate, the prophetic interpretations and calendar correlations remain speculative and unverified by mainstream scholarship.
Fact Check: Claims About Noah's Ark Discovery on Turkey's Highest Peak
This fact-check examines the sensational claims of an alleged Noah's Ark discovery on a Turkish mountain peak, analyzing the archaeological, scientific, and biblical assertions made. Our investigation finds no credible evidence supporting the extraordinary details presented, many of which contradict established science and historical knowledge.
Height Growth Fact Check: Nutrition, Exercise, and Sleep Truths
This fact check analyzes claims about human height determination, focusing on genetics, nutrition, exercise, and sleep. While many claims align with scientific evidence, some statements are oversimplified or lack nuance. We provide a detailed verification of each assertion with supporting sources.
If you found this fact check useful, consider buying us a coffee. It would help us a lot!